Next we need the Senate to be an actual body of law and not just a place to rich politicians to get rewarded with for being proper little members of their respective parties. Right now it serves zero function and sucks up way too much money. We need Senate elections and all the current appointee's need to be removed for the useless party animals they are.
This part is fundamentally flawed, but the rest of your post is pretty decent. The part about the Nates was a banger.
The Senate is NOT just a place for rich politicians to get rewarded for loyalty. The MAJORITY of Senators are appointed by the Crown from a wide field of disciplines, including Science, the Arts, the Professions, accomplished winners seasoned in their fields, so that the Chamber of SOBER SECOND THOUGHT has both a breadth and a depth of experience to check the whims and caprices of the elected House of Commoners. In fact, right now, many of the "Independent Caucus of Senators" (i.e. what used to be called the Liberal Caucus, i.e. appointments suggested to the Crown by a Liberal Prime Minister) are crossing the floor and joining the Conservative Caucus, that's how NOT a political loyalty scheme it is.
Right now it serves the function calming the tits of the ambulance chasing politicians. Whereas a politician like Poilievre might support COVID Lockdowns today and be against them tomorrow, depending on which way the political winds are blowing, Senators are there because they earned the privilege to be there by their outstanding achievement and can afford to make unpopular but correct decisions.
The last thing you need is Senate Elections. What's the point of having two Houses of Commoners swinging back and forth in the wind just like the States. Politicians are the worst for that job. SOBER SECOND THOUGHT, not ¿HoW mAnY dEmOgRaPhIcs Do I NeEd tO bUy tO eAkE oUt a WiN nExT eLeCtiOn?.
Democracy degenerates into demagoguery. That's what the Senate is supposed to check. Senates degenerate into Oligarchies. That's what the Crown is supposed to check.
SHIFT INTO SECOND GEAR NOW
Okay, here we're at the crux of the issue. The Crown. The Crown is supposed to be a based Christian Monarch willing to march on the front lines to Crusade against degens, even if his own aristocrats.
But what we have, instead, and I'm sorry to say is, is essentially just another another tribal chieftan manipulated by Liberal Global Architects of UNDRIP. Why do I say that? Well, we can gather this by comparing the notion of ABORIGINAL LAND TITLE and how that plays out in Canada versus how that plays out in England.
The monocultural global liberals who drafted UNDRIP figure that the chiefs are naïve and that they can weaponise Aboriginal Title to stripmine Canada. We see the results in Richmond right now, right? What's the logical conclusion of "I recognise that I live on the UNCEEDED TERRITORIES of the INSERT TRIBE HERE"? The logical conclusion is: here's the keys. The King of Canada even made one of these LaNd AcKnOwLedGeMeNtS himself at His Majesty's last Throne Speech. The whole idea behind UNDRIP and Aboriginal Title is a racist idea that underestimates the Natives as easier to manipulate than the Pale Faces.
But how does UNDRIP play out in England? Do the aboriginals have land title? Or is it Anglostan now?
At first this seems contradictory. But it isn't if you recognise that the King of England himself is just one of these tribal chieftans manipulated by the Liberal World Order who drafted UNDRIP. The king owns everything, right? Your all his subjects. What you own is At His Majesty's Leisure. So if Global Liberalism owns him, then they own the whole thing. And Global Liberalism has owned the King of England since 1945 at the very latest.
And bugger us all, who's the King of England? Why he's the very same King of Canada who made his Land Concession Speech from the Throne.
So there's the problem. The fish rots from the head. So what's the solution. The solution might be interesting and might bring those Natives into the fold that you mention at the very beginning of your post.
How about a Metis King? Someone to unite the bloodlines: English, French, and Indian. Someone with our accent, who lives with us and appoints his own Senators. Someone willing to fight and die for The Patrimony.
So who should be King? The Crown should be wrought in battle. The leader of the armies who crusades for Canada's liberation from Totalitarian Global Monoculturalism.
I hope that's not treason to suggest. Disclaimer: it's just an idea, not an incitement. Consider it, argue against it, adapt it, improve it, whatever. If you accept it, then it's yours - I didn't incite you, I merely uttered an idea.
