Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
zzzten said:
more annoyed than angry. Unless you're an actual paid shill whos job it is to sew dissent, I don't understand how you're able to be consistently wrong, ignore the corrections made about your statement, and then claim yourself to be right. you know people can read this entire conversation and see that you've given absolutely 0 evidence to back up any of your claims.
Click to expand...
"SOURCE BRO. WHERE IS SOURCE BRO"


GROK: The narrative that Canadian banks were entirely unscathed doesn’t tell the whole story. A 2012 report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) argues that Canadian banks received significant government support—totaling $114 billion at its peak between October 2008 and July 2010. This support came from multiple sources: the Bank of Canada, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), and even the U.S. Federal Reserve. For context, $114 billion was about 7% of Canada’s GDP in 2009, or roughly $3,400 per Canadian. The CCPA report notes that at certain points, three major banks—CIBC, BMO, and Scotiabank—relied on government support that exceeded their market value, suggesting they were "completely underwater" without this aid. For example, CIBC received $21 billion, about 1.5 times its market value at the time. The CMHC also purchased $69 billion in mortgage-backed securities from banks to provide liquidity, a move that some argue shifted risk onto taxpayers.
 
HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
"SOURCE BRO. WHERE IS SOURCE BRO"


GROK: The narrative that Canadian banks were entirely unscathed doesn’t tell the whole story. A 2012 report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) argues that Canadian banks received significant government support—totaling $114 billion at its peak between October 2008 and July 2010. This support came from multiple sources: the Bank of Canada, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), and even the U.S. Federal Reserve. For context, $114 billion was about 7% of Canada’s GDP in 2009, or roughly $3,400 per Canadian. The CCPA report notes that at certain points, three major banks—CIBC, BMO, and Scotiabank—relied on government support that exceeded their market value, suggesting they were "completely underwater" without this aid. For example, CIBC received $21 billion, about 1.5 times its market value at the time. The CMHC also purchased $69 billion in mortgage-backed securities from banks to provide liquidity, a move that some argue shifted risk onto taxpayers.
Click to expand...
your source is an ai trained by info given by the united states government. are you retarded? That's rhetorical btw.

It's sad enough that you aren't able to ask critical questions and have to resort to citing an AI. but to do it so brazenly without a hint of why you might be in the wrong. now I just pity you
 
zzzten said:
more annoyed than angry. Unless you're an actual paid shill whos job it is to sew dissent, I don't understand how you're able to be consistently wrong, ignore the corrections made about your statement, and then claim yourself to be right. you know people can read this entire conversation and see that you've given absolutely 0 evidence to back up any of your claims.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, because they would pay someone to go on fucking kiwi farms, yep.

You've conceded most of your points. Talking about how Canada wasn't ruled by oligarchs then you backpedaled to say that we do have them and that you prefer canada's.

Is using a search engine beyond your comprehension?
 
Last edited:
HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
R U SERIOUS
Click to expand...
1000005821.webp
 
Brutality said:
Gypsies do originate from the subcontinent after all, so it makes sense why you'd see some here
Click to expand...
They're genetically 75%+ Indian so that's where their ancestors are from.

I voted today and it was a pretty short line.

Turns out BC is issuing retaliatory tarriffs on goods travelling to Alaska so that's going to go over well.
 
Brutality said:
Yeah, I was in and out in under half an hour. Was hesitant when I heard about long lines yesterday but I overheard the poll workers say that it was still a good turnout

Bring a pen, they only provide you with a pencil
Click to expand...
they always provide a pencil though? granted it's not a scanotron they use
 
HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
Saddest thing is that just because we have fucking universal health care, that somehow means govt didn't sell us out.

No, bitch, the government owns us.
Click to expand...

The rona also showed what a crock universal healthcare is.

They siphon your income for a system that doesn't provide timely access, choice or quality of care.

It's illegal for you to pay out-of-pocket for your own healthcare to get the government out of the exam room between you and your doctor.

But they can also ban you from accessing routine or emergency government medical care altogether for capricious reasons like you won't wear a face diaper or didn't inject the latest Pfizer experimental gene therapy.
 
Mordecai 3 Finger Brown said:
The rona also showed what a crock universal healthcare is.
Click to expand...
All the Kung-Flu did was expose just how fragile our healthcare system was, and honestly still is, in places where it hasn't gotten worse. Its a system that was already being stretched to its breaking point, and the one-two punch of Covid-Chan and the mass importation of Pajeets strained it well past that.
 
Brutality said:
They still count by hand for federal elections. Using pen avoids some plant election worker using an eraser to fact check* your ballot
Click to expand...
when would they have an opportunity to? the boxes are sealed against tampering and the count happens in the open. If we're at the point where they're erasing your pencil marks then we're at the point where they'll just burn your ballot and have fake ones prepared
 
harbringer883 said:
Also whats the point of "elbows up".
Click to expand...
CBC talking point about being not-really-combative-but-posturing-towards tariffs, intentionally made to be immediately co-opted as an anti "whatever party I don't like" slogan.

It comes from hockey where "elbows up" is a call to take a fighting stance, but not in the same way as in normal fighty sports because hockey players wear a lot of padding in weird places compared to other sports so a boxing stance becomes very exaggerated to compensate for extra weight/lost mobility
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom