Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Newsflash: CBC.ca is garbage & and it makes me MATI

Screen Shot 2025-04-15 at 12.14.38 PM.webp
 

I love how the "experts" are worried now that it's a 'slippery slope' to make sure that mass murderers are kept in prison yet were silent about the truckers convoy being essentially labeled as terrorists and having bank accounts frozen. That smug condescension from the journo at the end as well about "which mass murderers are getting off on parole?" Is exactly why Canada is the joke of the first world.
 
https://youtu.be/i6S9wRsOvhQ?si=n1awB4W6YRUXpo6A
I love how the "experts" are worried now that it's a 'slippery slope' to make sure that mass murderers are kept in prison yet were silent about the truckers convoy being essentially labeled as terrorists and having bank accounts frozen.




Local archive to prevent more traffic to CTV's YT
 
You know it is bad when San Francisco is cleaning up its tent cities and the problem is getting worse in Toronto. One day maybe Toronto residents will also understand that the only reason the problem exists is because they let it and don't crack down on it.

1744749941064.webp

San Francisco Article
 
You know it is bad when San Francisco is cleaning up its tent cities and the problem is getting worse in Toronto. One day maybe Toronto residents will also understand that the only reason the problem exists is because they let it and don't crack down on it.

View attachment 7224482
San Francisco Article
Then the boomers would cry that we're using "american style" solutions to fix the problem and demand more communist gobbledygook
 
You know it is bad when San Francisco is cleaning up its tent cities and the problem is getting worse in Toronto. One day maybe Toronto residents will also understand that the only reason the problem exists is because they let it and don't crack down on it.

To be fair, San Francisco has 222 encampments despite being a city of around 800,000 people, which is a worse ratio than Toronto, a city with 283 encampments and 3 million people. And 222 was their lowest number.

That being said, it's likely that a crackdown on the encampments in Toronto will happen soon. Our current premier is Doug Ford, who has historically been known to push back against homelessness. In addition, Toronto Police has been doing a decent job at clearing encampments already, despite being somewhat overburdened with other operations, related to drug-related crime and combatting gang violence, which has plagued Toronto in almost the same way that it has Chicago.

reedinthestreet Toronto.webp


(I would highly suggest checking out @reedinthestreet and @torontocreature for updates on Toronto happenings. Would suggest archiving; another Toronto news Instagram has recently been taken down...)

At the end of the day, I am (carefully) optimistic that Toronto and the GTA can keep its sanity, so long as people remain informed and police continue their efforts.

But yeah, that's about it. Have a video of a TTC informed citizen playing with a lighter. High-level stuff...

 
Then the boomers would cry that we're using "american style" solutions to fix the problem and demand more communist gobbledygook
American-style solutions were fine when we were selling off our manufacturing to China and Mexico and sending our boys to die in the Middle East. Are American-style solutions fine when more jobs are created to lift people out of poverty and red tape is cut in order to make housing easier to build for instance (making it possible for younger people to have a place to start a family)? Not so much, it turns out!
 
Speaking of Indian drivers I was driving the 401 through Toronto Sunday night and every car going 100 (below the flow of traffic) in the left lane (middle lane when the far left is a HOV lane) was a Jeet driver when I looked over to pass them from the right lane.

It seems like Jeets driving passenger vehicles are the most beta of betas while Jeets driving semis are super reckless and unsafe.
One thing I have noticed with jeets is that they cannot unplug from their phones. They are all on their phones when driving even their semi truck drivers.

Haven't you seen clips of those diploma mills where they cheat endlessly, the teachers know about it but they just have to accept it so the uni gets their money. They'll just find a way to cheat more. The simplest option is to not waste resources on such a sad race.
I mean it's hilarious when now pajeets claim the racism against them is because of their success. If their people was so successful and bright, India would be best place on earth (over 1.4 billion of these geniuses there). Instead it's the biggest shit hole on earth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just being thunkful here, but I'm thinking of an angle Trump could take to soften Ottawa's control over the West and also gain a political advantage back at home. That is to say: make a one-time offer of US citizenship to Canadian citizens residing in Alberta and Saskatchewan, regardless of whether they have imminent plans to move to the USA. As in, "hey, you, Albertan, drive down to the border and we'll slap a fucking passport into your hands, you're welcome".

Sounds insane, right? Utter madness? On the face of it, perhaps. But consider the following. Those taking up the offer of citizenship in the current climate would overwhelmingly self-select for the right wing. Zero worries of suddenly getting a new batch of Democrats. Those who do relocate across the border would be a net plus for the Republican Party. And even if there isn't an exodus? The US now has a large number of dual-citizens living in AB and SK, further increasing soft political reach in those regions.

This would actually make more sense than trying to outright annex the two provinces, since the support simply isn't there. At least, not in the short term. Even among Alberta separatists, most are in favour of independence rather than statehood. And separatists of any stripe have, IMO, at best a rock hard ceiling of 40% support and would be extremely unlikely to win a referendum.

Anyway, thank you for reading my retarded blog.
 
This would actually make more sense than trying to outright annex the two provinces, since the support simply isn't there. At least, not in the short term. Even among Alberta separatists, most are in favour of independence rather than statehood. And separatists of any stripe have, IMO, at best a rock hard ceiling of 40% support and would be extremely unlikely to win a referendum.
As an Albertan, I would say it depends on how hard Ottawa wants to fuck us over. The Liberals made it obvious that they will repeat the same failed policy expecting different reason and how long can we take it until we say "fuck it"? The cucks in Edmonton will probably ask for more, but Calgary is the wildcard.
 
As an Albertan, I would say it depends on how hard Ottawa wants to fuck us over. The Liberals made it obvious that they will repeat the same failed policy expecting different reason and how long can we take it until we say "fuck it"? The cucks in Edmonton will probably ask for more, but Calgary is the wildcard.
Calgary is where all of the "Alberta is calling" Toronto fags moved. Separatism will not have much support in large urban areas.
 
Just being thunkful here, but I'm thinking of an angle Trump could take to soften Ottawa's control over the West and also gain a political advantage back at home. That is to say: make a one-time offer of US citizenship to Canadian citizens residing in Alberta and Saskatchewan, regardless of whether they have imminent plans to move to the USA. As in, "hey, you, Albertan, drive down to the border and we'll slap a fucking passport into your hands, you're welcome".

Sounds insane, right? Utter madness? On the face of it, perhaps. But consider the following. Those taking up the offer of citizenship in the current climate would overwhelmingly self-select for the right wing. Zero worries of suddenly getting a new batch of Democrats. Those who do relocate across the border would be a net plus for the Republican Party. And even if there isn't an exodus? The US now has a large number of dual-citizens living in AB and SK, further increasing soft political reach in those regions.

This would actually make more sense than trying to outright annex the two provinces, since the support simply isn't there. At least, not in the short term. Even among Alberta separatists, most are in favour of independence rather than statehood. And separatists of any stripe have, IMO, at best a rock hard ceiling of 40% support and would be extremely unlikely to win a referendum.

Anyway, thank you for reading my retarded blog.
The issue is that our government will tax the ever living shit out of you if you try to leave the country. One last hearty “fuck you” before leaving. It’s so severe a lot of people don’t think it’s worth even making an attempt to leave the country because of it.
 
The cucks in Edmonton will probably ask for more, but Calgary is the wildcard.
Calgary is as bad as Edmonton these days for this sort of thing. The southern suburbs are what balance out the usual progressive nonsense permeating downtown and the gentrified northwest, but even then it only makes for a wash overall. Albertan separatism will be a meme for a while yet.
 
Lot of Canadians leftists will hate that new article from American Thinker.

April 15, 2025

Canada’s Free Ride Is Finally Over​

By Charlton Allen

President Trump’s tariffs on Canadian imports triggered the usual response from Ottawa. First under Justin Trudeau and now under his successor, Mark Carney, Canada’s political class didn’t just protest—they retaliated, slapping on symbolic countermeasures and accusing the United States of economic aggression.

Outrage as policy—the Canadian default setting when Washington asserts leverage. But beneath the indignation lies a more straightforward truth: Canada had it coming.

Canada has basked in American economic and military protection for years while shirking its responsibilities.

Regarding trade, defense, energy, and foreign policy, successive Liberal governments have treated the U.S.-Canada relationship as a one-way arrangement—Washington provides the muscle, and Ottawa collects the perks. That indulgence is over.
 
Back
Top Bottom