Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ser Prize said:
I almost got into a fight with my boomer/gen X mom and pooner sister about this. They kept saying how great Canada is and how Americans envy us up here and how it's all worse down there and blah blah blah. And I'm just like 'have you not noticed how shitty things are here?'. But they just kept insisting everything is worse down in the US and how lucky we are to be canadian without singling out any actual reasons WHY.
Click to expand...
I only have to say 51st state to get my mother in a frenzied rage
 
Lobster Cult High Priest said:
The funniest thing is the utter scandal the mainstream media is trying to make over Christy Clark supposedly registering in the past as a Conservative to vote in their national leadership race.

I thought liberals and democrats loved to do that so they could pick the weakest candidate to run against (Red Tories like Erin “has two moms” O’Toole, Milk boy Andrew Scheer or Pajeeta neocon Nikki Haley for Americans)
Click to expand...
I think it’s because she panic-lied and said she never joined the CPC, then receipts were produced.

Had she just explained what she did honestly she would have been fine.
 
HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
These people are hilarious. Same people who say there is no Canadian identity and have spent last 20 years demonizing Canadian history and important political figures all of sudden want people to defend that said country.

l.o.l.
Click to expand...
The Canadian history I support is the 1837/1839 Upper and Lower Canadian Rebellions

The Family Compact has gotten much worse and needs to be dealt with

@HomoforLife yes there children dumb which is also why all Canadian politicians talk down to us like kindergarten teachers
 
Lunar Eclipse Paradox said:
I find sources making statements that Canada's crime rate is growing faster than America's. A consequence of mass unchecked immigration. The fact that I often hear warnings about serial killers on the loose in my area is terrifying. Walking in Mexico at night serves as a what I fear to be a precursor to what it would be like walking in Canada at night in the future. It's already terrifying to live only a few hundred meters from murder suspects. Canada has had that luxury Mexico had not for years. I would read about people in Culiacan having psychosis living in a gang war zone with little breathing room on going outside to carry out daily activities. Though a scenario like that in Canada is rather unlikely, the thought of it still gives me chills.
Click to expand...
The problem is boomers, just the other day my mother brought up rising crime rates, especially in certain cities. I pointed out that those cities all took in large amount of Indians, she got violently angry.
 
Great news everyone! Justin’s put together a dream team to take on mean old Trump!

Are you ready for the diplomatic and economic stylings of Jean Charest and Rachel Notley?

Checkmate, chuds.
IMG_9958.jpeg
IMG_9959.jpeg

Election? Why would you want an election? C’mon now.
 
>be a Canadian liberal
>Spend a decade saying "fuck Canada's founders, deyz all racist crackers and imperialists
>Import 8 million Indians into a population of 32 million
>Crime rises
>We are a post national nation, it's okay we have no history
>Canadian economy collapses
>People can't find jobs or afford to live
>ThisIsPerfectlyFine.jpg it's just a perception of economic problems, not reality
>America offers to make us the 51st state to save what's left
>REEEEEEEEEEEE DONT YOU KNOW, YOURE LETTING THE FOUNDERS (*cough, loblaws-sobeys monopoly) OF THIS NATION DOWN, cough cough, don't you have pride in SJAM and our founding national founders we spent a decade demonizing while trying to shove Indian and Chinese cock down your mouth Reeeeee

Like legit, these people are fucking morons and destroyed my country.
 
Flan Handler said:
Great news everyone! Justin’s put together a dream team to take on mean old Trump!

Are you ready for the diplomatic and economic stylings of Jean Charest and Rachel Notley?

Checkmate, chuds.
View attachment 6865458
View attachment 6865459

Election? Why would you want an election? C’mon now.
Click to expand...
Hilarious that Arlene is going up against Kevin O'Leary who is on Trump's side.

Both former hosts of Dragon's Den (The Canadian version of Shark Tank)
 
The best part of this, is that in their push to show they are doing something. They are laying out their entire plan, while the Trump admin says nothing. The Canadian Government keeps slamming its cards on the table.

"We won't sell you oil!"
"It's ok, we're turning on the fracking taps again."
"We won't sell you potash!"
"We'll relax rules on fertilizers and go elsewhere."

Eventually, the Government is going to have to realize they have nothing.
 
I often wonder how politicians who have a cognitive ability similar to that of a 5 year old keep getting into office. My theory suggests people keep falling for their false promises and there is no system in place to stop them from doing and saying things that contradict their points and ensure they'll do the things they promised to do.
 
Liberal & Conservative establishment unite to keep Mad Max out of the televised debates (again).
The People's Party of Canada - Press Release
Ottawa, ON, January 15, 2025 — The Leaders’ Debates Commission has once again changed its criteria so they can easily exclude the leader of the People’s Party on the basis of dubious polls, as they did in 2021.
In 2021, parties needed to meet one of three criteria to qualify: 1) have at least one MP; 2) have had at least 4% of the total vote in the previous election; or 3) have at least 4% on average in polls at the beginning of the campaign.
The PPC did not meet 1) and 2), and its leader was disqualified on 3) by using dubious polling results in which the PPC barely registered, which gave the party an average of only 3.27%, even though its support was clearly much higher and it ended up scoring 4.9% on election day.
Mr. Bernier would automatically qualify to take part in this year’s debates on the basis of criterion 2) if the Commission had kept the same criteria.
However, yesterday, the Commission announced a key change, dropping that criterion and requiring that parties must now meet not one, but two of these three criteria: 1) have at least one MP; 2) have at least 4% on average in the polls at the beginning of the campaign; or 3) run candidates in at least 90% of ridings.
Moreover, the Commission states in its document that when consulting the parties about the new rules last year, “The Commission received submissions from the Bloc Quebecois, the Conservative Party of Canada, the Green Party of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada, and the New Democratic Party of Canada.”
This is not true. A PPC staffer sent a submission to Michel Cormier, the Commission’s Executive Director, on July 3 2024, two days before the deadline, in which it was argued that the Commission should keep the same criteria as in 2021. Not only is the Commission trying to exclude Mr. Bernier from the debates, but it seems like it did not take the PPC submission into account. The PPC is still awaiting an explanation from the Commission as of Wednesday 1:00 pm.

Maxime Bernier commented:
“This change only has one obvious purpose, one that unites the whole political establishment in Ottawa: Making it easier to exclude the PPC. These new rules only affect me, the leader of the only new party to emerge forcefully on the federal political scene in decades, and none of the other leaders expected to participate. They want to deny a voice to 840,000 Canadian voters who supported the PPC in 2021.
It’s still possible for the PPC to qualify of course, but we are again at the mercy of dubious polls, some of which we know deliberately exclude the PPC from the list of potential responses, which inevitably understates our level of support.
Instead of using the hard data that are the results of the last election, which prove without doubt that the PPC is one of the major parties whose voice is essential in Canadian policy debates, and, the Commission has chosen to rely on fleeting data that can easily be manipulated and will be obsolete a few weeks later.
Why does the Commission need to change its criteria every electoral cycle? Isn’t it weird that a Commission is kept alive, and public funds are spent to carry consultations with experts and parties, only to come up every few years with new rules that make the participation of the PPC more difficult? Does it exist to facilitate democratic debates or to censor a populist voice?”

Contact: For more information, or to schedule an interview with Mr. Bernier, please write to: media@peoplespartyofcanada.ca.
Click to expand...
Source (A)
 
Lunar Eclipse Paradox said:
I often wonder how politicians who have a cognitive ability similar to that of a 5 year old keep getting into office. My theory suggests people keep falling for their false promises and there is no system in place to stop them from doing and saying things that contradict their points and ensure they'll do the things they promised to do.
Click to expand...
well you need a minimum of $300K to even run for the Liberal Party leadership. Likely a similar number for running for a seat as an MP or MPP. (let's say $100K). How many Canadians have access to those funds in liquid funds? 1% or less.
 
Lunar Eclipse Paradox said:
I often wonder how politicians who have a cognitive ability similar to that of a 5 year old keep getting into office. My theory suggests people keep falling for their false promises and there is no system in place to stop them from doing and saying things that contradict their points and ensure they'll do the things they promised to do.
Click to expand...
nepotism, financial greed, anbd a narccistic disorder strong enough top push through all the systems that discourage normal people from getting involved in politics.
 
Guys guys guys Ignatieff 2.0 is heeeere…

The Globalists’ Globalist, Central Banker to the Stars, Mark Carney rolled out his campaign in Edmonton today!

I am going to phonepost this gold sorry about no archives but who cares:

Here’s an eight minute clip, the hourlong speech is unbearable.
IMG_9961.jpeg
IMG_9962.jpeg
Look at all these “Albertans”. Not a whitey in sight:
IMG_9969.jpeg

Too cheap to spend $8 for a blue check
IMG_9964.jpeg
Some analysis:
IMG_9965.jpeg
IMG_9963.jpeg
And great job on the logo design. Best graphic artists money can buy:
IMG_1981.jpeg
IMG_9970.jpeg
 
Flan Handler said:
Guys guys guys Ignatieff 2.0 is heeeere…

The Globalists’ Globalist, Central Banker to the Stars, Mark Carney rolled out his campaign in Edmonton today!

I am going to phonepost this gold sorry about no archives but who cares:

Here’s an eight minute clip, the hourlong speech is unbearable.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=A9G8eXMIeWIView attachment 6866510
View attachment 6866512
Look at all these “Albertans”. Not a whitey in sight:
View attachment 6866532

Too cheap to spend $8 for a blue check
View attachment 6866513
Some analysis:
View attachment 6866517
View attachment 6866518
And great job on the logo design. Best graphic artists money can buy:
View attachment 6866520
Click to expand...
Who? Which party is he running as?
 
Lunar Eclipse Paradox said:
I often wonder how politicians who have a cognitive ability similar to that of a 5 year old keep getting into office. My theory suggests people keep falling for their false promises and there is no system in place to stop them from doing and saying things that contradict their points and ensure they'll do the things they promised to do.
Click to expand...
I’m of the opinion that there’s got to be something in the tap water in Ottawa, and it just makes everyone in Parliament retarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom