Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Well, the Liberal caucus meeting ended not too long ago with the expected results: Trudeau is not resigning. If I had to guess on what happened, I agree with Northern Perspective and would say that the dissident MPs got to say their piece, but the dear leader responded with the typical condescending platitudes. Essentially this:

"Thank you for your input we're glad that you feel that you speak up and we're all one big happy family. We all need to stand together because it's Poilievre who's the existential threat to the country so let the cabinet handle this. Oh, and don't you lowly backbenchers dare talk to the media."

Cue the cabinet members coming out and repeating the party line while the backbenchers slink out with scowls on their faces. I imagine this isn't over because if Trudeau is going to ignore or patronize the back bench, they could abstain or vote against the government come the next confidence vote.
 
Jetpack Himmler said:
Cue the cabinet members coming out and repeating the party line while the backbenchers slink out with scowls on their faces. I imagine this isn't over because if Trudeau is going to ignore or patronize the back bench, they could abstain or vote against the government come the next confidence vote.
Click to expand...
Reminder to the BackBenchers them slinking away and doing nothing will get them on lists for the Day of the Rope too.
 
Lobster Cult High Priest said:
Reminder to the BackBenchers them slinking away and doing nothing will get them on lists for the Day of the Rope too.
Click to expand...
Liberal backbenchers are pretty much impotent because the party removed leadership reviews from its constitution in 2016 so there is no mechanism to oust Trudeau unless he leaves of his own volition. You see have how other parties in other Commonwealth nations like the UK and Australia can force an unpopular leader to resign (e.g. Boris Johnson) and the Conservatives here forced out Erin O'Toole after the convoy. The most the backbenchers can do is refuse to support the government by abstention or voting with the opposition on a confidence motion.
 
Fapcop said:
Ask any a typical Canadian boomer about what makes Canada special or what’s uniquely Canadian, and they’ll say something like: “We have socialized healthcare!” or “We’re diverse!”.
Click to expand...
People know Canada for things like maple syrup, mounties, poutine... oh and Canadians being nice. Never heard anyone say Canada is diverse. I don't think that impression exists outside of Canada. But I could be out of touch. It sounds to me like your boomers are repeating some propaganda they've been fed from TV.
The socialized healthcare thing is kind of true but other countries have that too so it's only really special when compared directly with the US. Which makes for a lame "feature" for the country.
I dunno, I always thought Canada was nice and unique, but not because of "diversity" or "healthcare"
 
Jetpack Himmler said:
The most the backbenchers can do is refuse to support the government by abstention or voting with the opposition on a confidence motion.
Click to expand...
Or leave the party or cross the floor. I wouldn't be surprised to see a few doing that soon, they are going to lose their jobs as soon as an election is called anyway might as well try a hail mary.
 
melty said:
People know Canada for things like maple syrup, mounties, poutine... oh and Canadians being nice. Never heard anyone say Canada is diverse. I don't think that impression exists outside of Canada. But I could be out of touch. It sounds to me like your boomers are repeating some propaganda they've been fed from TV.
The socialized healthcare thing is kind of true but other countries have that too so it's only really special when compared directly with the US. Which makes for a lame "feature" for the country.
I dunno, I always thought Canada was nice and unique, but not because of "diversity" or "healthcare"
Click to expand...
Up to the early and mid aughts Canada was actually "The Great White North"

How far it has fallen.
 
Totallyunknown said:
You really proved my point about the brain drain when I meant individual Canadians weren't willing to do what the "convoy heroes" did as they ruined their own reputation among their peers. Again Trudeau is a jackass that leads a country of mostly retards.
Click to expand...
Canada is where the smart have no power and idiots run everything. Trudeau being the most incompetent douche bag of all.
 
Kiwisee said:
Did you know that our own government has outsourced policy making to an American law firm known as the McKinsey institute?
Click to expand...
It’s actually sillier/worse than that.

McKinsey isn’t a law firm, it’s a business consulting firm.

You have been turned into an economic zone by Trudeau.


IMG_2192.jpeg

They used your country as a business case experiment. Clearly, it didn’t work.

If it makes you feel any better, they were also partially responsible for the US opioid crisis and the diversity epidemic here too.
 
Buttigieg2020 said:
It’s actually sillier/worse than that.

McKinsey isn’t a law firm, it’s a business consulting firm.

You have been turned into an economic zone by Trudeau.


View attachment 6555433

They used your country as a business case experiment. Clearly, it didn’t work.

If it makes you feel any better, they were also partially responsible for the US opioid crisis and the diversity epidemic here too.
Click to expand...
Best part of McKinsey Consultants is that they are all retarded 23 year olds with MBAs whose main piece of advice is “Increase revenues and decrease costs”
 
Buttigieg2020 said:
It’s actually sillier/worse than that.

McKinsey isn’t a law firm, it’s a business consulting firm.

You have been turned into an economic zone by Trudeau.


View attachment 6555433

They used your country as a business case experiment. Clearly, it didn’t work.

If it makes you feel any better, they were also partially responsible for the US opioid crisis and the diversity epidemic here too.
Click to expand...
This is actually a huge problem in soft science fields in academia such as sociology and economics. An experiment will be carried out and on paper, it follows the scientific method and gets peer reviewed and stuff, but subsequent experiments that follow the scientific method with the same set of inputs do not reach the same conclusion. You could draw your own conclusions from that. Personally, I think it shows many studies in the soft sciences are not incredibly useful unless the result is overwhelmingly in one direction or the other.
 
Last edited:
Never Scored said:
This is actually a huge problem in soft science fields in academia such as sociology and economics. An experiment will be carried out and on paper, it follows the scientific method and gets peer reviewed and stuff, but subsequent experiments that follow the scientific method with the same set of inputs do not reach the same conclusion. You could draw your own conclusions from that. Personally, I think it shows many studies in the soft sciences are not incredibly useful unless the results is overwhelmingly in one direction or the other.
Click to expand...
A common problem in academia, particularly in the harder to prove areas of study, is the researchers get very emotionally invested in their little theories to the point where they stop applying common sense to any of their reasoning around such theories. Often attempts they make to refute any such criticisms are based on some issue of semantics.

Like with UBI, anyone who thinks it would cause inflation will inevitably run into someone who says "Inflation means printing more money. Simply tax the rich instead."
This, of course, is retarded since it focuses on definitions of specific terms rather than the effects of inflation (i.e. more money in circulation, diluting the power of a dollar, increased demand for goods leading to price increases, etc.). Call it what you want: inflation, an economic buttfucking, bankers making an oopsie. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a fucking duck.

This is why researchers make terrible policy makers.
 
Last edited:
In the case of the McKinsey DEI conclusion it is obvious what the conclusion was if you were not a progressive DEI type yourself.

The most successful businesses (full of no nonsense white people) could afford to employ diversity with lower qualifications to "support equal opportunity" and not be too negatively impacted by it. Or imperceptible negative issues caused by it due to the scale of the organization. This was again simply a byproduct of the Pareto Principle. If 90% of the actual profit creating work is done by 10% of the workforce you can subvert a large amount of the workforce with DEI before the organization suffers from it.

However when you reorient your entire organization to diversity because you thought that the diversity itself was the cause of the high profits the result is a collectivist organization. Any communist/collectivist organization is more concerned with being in the in group than they are with anything else. This is in direct conflict with the idea that all actual ideas for change (in the context of making money) in the organization to make more profit will be ideas that rock the boat. Which is now no longer acceptable.

So you create an organization run by grifters for grifters that don't understand why they have run out of things to grift.
 
It's days like this where I think Trudy can actually see the writing on the wall - he's apparently cutting the Yearly Immigration Targets

OTTAWA - Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to announce a major drop in the number of new permanent residents Canada will accept in 2025.

As first reported by The National Post, the government's immigration levels are expected to drop to 395,000 in 2025, a huge decrease from the 500,000 that had previously been set as the target.

The information was provided by a government official with knowledge of the plan.

Trudeau and his immigration minister will also announce reduced targets for number of temporary residents for the first time.


The government's goal is to reduce the number of temporary residents to five per cent of the population over the next three years, down from 6.5 per cent in March.

The moves come after years of rapid increase to the number of new permanent residents in Canada and a ballooning number of people coming to Canada on a temporary basis, which federal ministers have conceded put pressure on housing and affordability.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has accused the Liberals of destroying the national consensus on immigration.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 24, 2024.

Do you feel that? It feels like Trudy's starting to panic, as reality sets in.

Unfortunately, everyone else who wants the job is also retarded.
 
Leaf Wage Slave Jr said:
immigration levels are expected to drop to 395,000 in 2025, a huge decrease from the 500,000 that had previously been set as the target.
Click to expand...
This >100,000 person decrease sounds good until you hear what the actual numbers are. It's certainly an improvement, hell even a decrease of 500 people would technically count, but it's an empty gesture at this point. 395k is a frightening number of undesirables.

How about none? I know they would never make it 0, but it defies all reason they keep letting so many of these fuckers in when there's already no damn room.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom