🐱 Can Marvel Come Back from Queer Character Erasure? - Get woke or go broke

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


Can Marvel Come Back from Queer Character Erasure?
After years of will-they-or-won’t-they, Marvel finally released The New Mutants. It quickly joined the list of lackluster X-Men films destined for obscurity. However, all wasn’t lost with Fox Marvel’s conclusion to its X-Men dynasty. Dani Moonstar and Rahne Sinclair’s on-screen relationship was a win for queer representation in the superhero genre. They presented a positive portrayal of a queer, interracial relationship. With The New Mutants under the Disney umbrella, the Marvel Cinematic Universe now has access to a film that did queer representation right. But the looming question is: will they follow this film’s lead? Marvel’s movie history doesn’t inspire confidence on this front. However, as a queer Marvel fan, I still have hope for LGBTQIA+ representation.
The MCU is known for pulling heroes from around the galaxy to thwart superpowered villains, demons, and cosmic entities, but it still lags behind its comic universe inspiration when it comes to LGBTQIA+ representation. Marvel jumpstarted its foray into queer depictions of different superpowered beings with the coming out of Alpha Flight’s Northstar as a gay mutant in Alpha Flightissue #106. From there, Marvel really hit its major LGBTQIA+ stride. They released page after page of superheroic stories that allowed Marvel’s comics fans to find their favorite do-gooders living as queer heroes.
20th Century Studios
Various Runaways, Avengers, Wakandans, and Mutants (already an allegory for LGBTQIA+ folks) have been queer across multiple comic book series. This representation brought us gay weddings (Northstar making history again), distinguished bisexual and pansexual characters devoid of stereotypes (like New Mutant’s Prodigy and Deadpool), LGBTQIA+ friendships (Young X-Men’s Graymalkin and Anole), transgender/cisgender relationships (like Angela: Asgard’s Assassin’s Sera and Angela), and superheroes wrestling with their sexuality (like X-Men’s Iceman). All of this resonated with queer fans across different Marvel comic properties.
MCU films introduced some of these LGBTQIA+ card-carrying members. Granted, these were characters with layered development throughout, but those layers didn’t include their queerness. These characters either didn’t have their queerness present or were coded as queer after their film appearances. In anticipation of Marvel’s Phase Three behemoth Avengers: Endgame, Marvel stated that an openly gay character would appear. That statement heightened anticipation for the blockbuster film. Many fans assumed said character would be a superhero. So you can imagine the disappointment when the openly gay character in the film didn’t have super powers and appeared in a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it scene.
This history, unfortunately, doesn’t instill any faith within the MCU from its vast LGBTQIA+ fanbase. With Marvel’s LGBTQIA+ representation not transferring from print to screen, it tells an all-too-familiar tale to queer audiences that who they are does not translate to film. The MCU contains some amazing plots; the same writing that constructed an entire superhero universe can tell stories that are true to queer experiences as well. Having a queer superhero or villain does not detract from character development. If anything it only embellishes detailed narratives that make characters feel relatable. That relatability translates to queer audiences feeling represented, even in a fictional universe with a straight default setting. Why can’t Marvel Universe gods, Dora Milaje, and X-Men engage in superheroics and be a part of the LGBTQIA+ community?
Marvel
Hopefully Marvel’s Phase Four will answer that question. Between rumors and announcements, Phase Four will include more LGBTQIA+ representation than any Fox Marvel or MCU movies have provided within the past two decades. For instance, Disney+’s Loki will reportedly show the character’s bisexuality and gender fluidity on screen. Rumors also point to the show introducing the MCU’s first transgender character. Additionally, we have Tessa Thompson appearing as Valkyrie again in Thor: Love and Thunder. This film will finally introduce the character’s bisexuality as the leader of Asgard looks for someone to rule alongside her. Marvel’s Eternals will feature a gay married couple. Alongside other rumored stories in development, such as the X-Men reboot and the eventual introduction of the Young Avengers, Marvel has multiple opportunities to represent queer folks. They have even more chances to tell queer stories that engage current LGBTQIA+ fans and acquire new ones.
With all of these new appearances, Marvel could be on a journey towards creating proper LGBTQIA+ representation. My hope is that the studio can stick to this path. As the MCU embarks on new territory, audiences around the world will be patiently waiting to see what will unfold. Hopefully, it will lay down the groundwork for a more inclusive MCU.
 
How many fucking letters are you going to add to this fucking retarded shit. And absolutely, yes. People are tired of LGBTQ garbage.
 
How many fucking letters are you going to add to this fucking retarded shit. And absolutely, yes. People are tired of LGBTQ garbage.
They only needed homosexual and queer(strange/different).
Good thing they didn't go with 'HQ', that would be a really dumb abbreviation that nobody would use for anything.

Edit:
Yes, I know it's an initialism.
 
Good luck hoping for BBQ-recognition in mainstream Disney movies while they aim for the chinese market.

Also, maybe people would be less antagonistic towards this LGBT-pandering, if any goddamned comic, videogame, book, tv show or movie in the past decade had done it in a way that's not grating as fuck. Being gay is not a personality. Hell, it's not even a personality trait. Reducing an entire character down to how he likes to get his freak on is stupid and in a story about spandex-wearing weirdos trying to beat up some extra-terrestrial warlord is just uncalled for.
Making characters gay or trans or whatever is always a political statement that is hamfistedly forced into the story, distracts from it and leads to boring one-note characters. It's the 2010s take on the 1990s tokenism, instead of being side characters, they are now main characters (functionally, at least, while they remain just as bland and stereotypical as their 90s counterparts). They usually lack any kind of negative traits, are about as interesting as stale bread and everything about them always revolves around that one defining trait: Their perception of their genitals. Riveting.

But, then again, that's the impression I get with many irl BBQ-people as well. They stick a label on themselves such as "genderqueer" and then that somehow becomes their sole defining character trait - down to stereotypical behaviour that I get the feeling they deliberately picked up to fit the simplistic description of their self-chosen label.
 
What the article doesn't say is all those gay comics sold like shit.
That X-men movie with the faggots did horrible, almost no one watched it and it got generally bad reviews.

Comic fans are tired of funny books being used by troons to push their retarded political agenda. No one wants to read about a non-binary Muslim troon in a love affair with a gay black wrestler with purple hair in an iron man book.
 
How many fucking letters are you going to add to this fucking retarded shit. And absolutely, yes. People are tired of LGBTQ garbage.
I've been seeing one that adds an O and a C in there lately. I think O stands for omnisexual shit. Not even sure what the fuck the C is about.
 
How many fucking letters are you going to add to this fucking retarded shit. And absolutely, yes. People are tired of LGBTQ garbage.
In other words, let's cater to a small demographic in the laziest, generalized way possible. Forget about character development and just shove it in their faces.

Which makes the tokenism look insincere and generic.
 
his history, unfortunately, doesn’t instill any faith within the MCU from its vast LGBTQIA+ fanbase
You aren't vast. About 10% of the population is queer and less than that actually gives a shit about Marvel. You aren't a target demographic. Shut up.
 
As a faggot and middling comics fan, let me tell you what draws me to comics. It isn't 'seeing myself represented' by token, shallow caricatures of what hack writers think I am like. I wouldn't even want accurate representation of myself, because I'm not a fucking mutant or superhero. The mundanity of day to day life I can get by walking out my door.

Let me tell you what I and other people want; adventure, danger, suspense, larger than life events with larger than life heroes and villains. They want men and women of virtue and beauty struggling greatly, even slipping on their own all too human weaknesses but ultimately triumphing over evil both nakedly brutal and subtly sinister. In short, they want good storytelling.

No amount of tokenism will ever substitute for quality narrative.
 
Last edited:
Good luck hoping for BBQ-recognition in mainstream Disney movies while they aim for the chinese market.
Which they did not mention ONCE in the article. Movies with overt homosexuality will not get government approval for release.

Disney may as well fag out Star Wars at this point, since China hates it and the majority of the audience they're trying to cater to consists of white people over 30 with no children. Who would lap it up, presumably.

As a faggot and middling comics fan, let me tell you what draws me to comics. It isn't 'seeing myself represented' by token, shallow caricatures of what hack writers think I am like. I wouldn't even want accurate representation of myself, because I'm not a fucking mutant or superhero. The mundanity of day to day life I can get by walking out my door.

Liar. Marvel solemnly assures me what you want is for Ice Man to be Kitty's shopping and go out for dirty martinis with buddy.
 
The author states that Marvel is 'lagging behind' when it comes to Depressed Phone Zombie representation, but that's a comparative statement. Lagging behind, compared to what? It's already at least as gay as DC, and it is, in fact, gayer than real life.
 
Back
Top Bottom