Disaster California Assembly Passes Reparations Bill - Endless oppression and endless gibs

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachel...ifornia-assembly-passes-reparations-bill/amp/
Archive: http://archive.is/kHms8

TOPLINE: A bill creating a task force to study how reparations could be implemented statewide passed the California Assembly this week as Black Lives Matter protests across the U.S. force leaders to reckon with the country’s history of racism.

KEY FACTS: The bill would establish an eight-member task force to study how reparations could be awarded and who would be eligible for them in an effort to address the wrongs of slavery in the U.S. The measure was passed 60-14 with bipartisan support. The bill still has to pass the State Senate and be signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom. If the bill becomes law, California would be the first state to create an official task force studying the issue.

CRUCIAL QUOTE: “The discriminatory practices of the past echo into the everyday lives of today’s Californians… We seem to recognize that justice requires that those who have been treated unjustly need the means to make themselves whole again,” said Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, the author of the bill, said.

KEY BACKGROUND: Since the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement in 2014, politicians have started taking the idea of reparations seriously. A federal bill establishing a commission to study the issue was introduced in 2019 and House Democrats hope Congress will vote on the legislation later this year, CNN reported. The city of Evanston, Illinois, which is outside Chicago, created a first-in-the-nation program last year that uses taxes on legal marijuana sales to fund reparations (the city hopes to start making payments later this year or early next). And Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said this week he supports studying the feasibility of reparations after being hesitant about them for years.

TANGENT: The U.S. in 1988 paid reparations to survivors of Japanese internment camps during World War II, giving each person $20,000.

==========
Well, California has all the diversity it needs to fall into the endless gibs cycle. Get the fuck out while you still can.
I've never seen a Forbes article with such shit formatting. I'm not on mobile, why the fuck does it have to look like this?
 
My ancestors and their kin in Ohio fought, sacrificed, and died during the Civil War so so that republicanism would survive and slavery would die. They starved and donated food for the war effort, and my great great grandfather lost a leg. They were never compensated for their sacrifice, and lost generations of work to support the cause of freedom. These simple Ohio farmers from Holmes County, who had never even seen a slave before (much less profit from slavery), fought and died so that people they had never met would have a chance at freedom. They believed in the rights of all men to not be owned by another person.
It's good to see their sacrifice is finally being recognized.

I'll be eagerly awaiting my check from the state of California.
 
Last edited:
This is just gonna line the pockets of people on the committee looking into reparations. Nothing will come out of this.
 
Last edited:
Tear open every old wound I guess.

'Member that war which cost more American lives than any other and ended with the abolition of slavery? 'Member '40 acres and a mule?' We demand more
 
Was slavery a big thing in California?

No, and while (if I'm remembering my history classes right) California never officially picked a side; they fought on the side of the Union by giving bodies and supplies... but that's also probably wrong. The USA is shit at teaching history.
 
This is just gonna line pockets for people on the committee looking into reparations. Nothing will come out of this.
Pretty much, especially since there's basically zero way to determine who would even be eligible for reparations. They'll putter about for a year tops, quietly come back with a "this is fucking retarded and impossible" verdict and it'll be forgotten about - and everyone involved will probably be a bit richer. Funny how that works.
 
Pretty much, especially since there's basically zero way to determine who would even be eligible for reparations. They'll putter about for a year tops, quietly come back with a "this is fucking retarded and impossible" verdict and it'll be forgotten about - and everyone involved will probably be a bit richer. Funny how that works.
Most likely plan will be "community investment" reparations that will be funneled to the usual DNC-affiliated black "community leaders" to disperse to their cronies.

If reparations do happen, the lawyers at the SPLC will see more dollars than LaShawna on the street.
 
My mothers' family came here in the very early 1900s.
My dads' family lived in the north, and had nothing to do with slavery.
Why do I have to pay reparations?
 
No, and while (if I'm remembering my history classes right) California never officially picked a side; they fought on the side of the Union by giving bodies and supplies... but that's also probably wrong. The USA is shit at teaching history.
They didn't have to officially "pick" a side because they remained a territory of the United States (i.e. the Union).

There were some confederate sympathizers in the southern part of the state who were quickly suppressed once the war started. They not only sent troops and supplies east but raised several regiments to help flush confederates out of the south-west.
 
Last edited:
Was slavery a big thing in California?
Could be that some southerners brought their slaves with them during the gold rush, IIRC, California was free state when joining the Union in 1850.
Far more important question could Mexican-Americans whose ancestors were slaves while California was still part of Mexico be also eligible for the same reparations and could they argue in court that California is the legal successor to the then Mexican Alta California?
I think California is opening Pandoras box with that stunt.
 
Could be that some southerners brought their slaves with them during the gold rush, IIRC, California was free state when joining the Union in 1850.
Far more important question could Mexican-Americans whose ancestors were slaves while California was still part of Mexico be also eligible for the same reparations and could they argue in court that California is the legal successor to the then Mexican Alta California?
I think California is opening Pandoras box with that stunt.

There's nothing California would love more than to placate its non-whites; and if they somehow find a way to give money to blacks, you better believe everyone with a hispanic sounding name will be lining up to get theirs. Because hey, we don't need ID to do anything, because only whites are devious, we'll use the honor system to decide who gets money.
 
There's nothing California would love more than to placate its non-whites; and if they somehow find a way to give money to blacks, you better believe everyone with a hispanic sounding name will be lining up to get theirs. Because hey, we don't need ID to do anything, because only whites are devious, we'll use the honor system to decide who gets money.

Yeah, sounds pretty much like the things to come.
Let's get some popcorn, dis gonna be gud.
 
California has fucked over Asians and Latinos more than its ever screwed over Black people and I don't think either demographic are going to be pleased knowing that a "fellow" minority that hates them is now getting more than they'll ever receive for nothing. Even if this committee passes out nothing, people will remember this. Preferential treatment to one minority will continue the derision between them all, which is probably the goal of the elite in the end.
 
Back
Top Bottom