Science Building a better forest tree with CRISPR gene editing - what could go wrong part 245

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Researchers at North Carolina State University used a CRISPR gene-editing system to breed poplar trees with reduced levels of lignin, the major barrier to sustainable production of wood fibers, while improving their wood properties. The findings—published in the journal Science—hold promise to make fiber production for everything from paper to diapers greener, cheaper and more efficient.

Led by NC State CRISPR pioneer Rodolphe Barrangou and tree geneticist Jack Wang, a team of researchers used predictive modeling to set goals of lowering lignin levels, increasing the carbohydrate to lignin (C/L) ratio, and increasing the ratio of two important lignin building blocks—syringyl to guaiacyl (S/G)—in poplar trees. These combined chemical characteristics represent a fiber production sweet spot, Barrangou and Wang say.

"We're using CRISPR to build a more sustainable forest," said Barrangou, the Todd R. Klaenhammer Distinguished Professor of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences at NC State and co-corresponding author of the paper. "CRISPR systems provide the flexibility to edit more than just single genes or gene families, allowing for greater improvement to wood properties."

The machine-learning model predicted and then sorted through almost 70,000 different gene-editing strategies targeting 21 important genes associated with lignin production—some changing multiple genes at a time—to arrive at 347 strategies; more than 99% of those strategies targeted at least three genes.

From there, the researchers selected the seven best strategies that modeling suggested would lead to trees that would attain the chemical sweet spot—35% less lignin than wild, or unmodified, trees; C/L ratios that were more than 200% higher than wild trees; S/G ratios that were also more than 200% higher than wild trees; and tree growth rates that were similar to wild trees. From these seven strategies, the researchers used CRISPR gene editing to produce 174 lines of poplar trees. After six months in an NC State greenhouse, an examination of those trees showed reduced lignin content of up to 50% in some varieties, as well as a 228% increase in the C-L ratio in others. Interestingly, the researchers say, more significant lignin reductions were shown in trees with four to six gene edits, although trees with three gene edits showed lignin reduction of up to 32%. Single-gene edits failed to reduce lignin content much at all, showing that using CRISPR to make multigene changes could confer advantages in fiber production.

The study also included sophisticated pulp production mill models that suggest reduced lignin content in trees could increase pulp yield and reduce so-called black liquor, the major byproduct of pulping, which could help mills produce up to 40% more sustainable fibers.

Finally, the efficiencies found in fiber production could reduce greenhouse gases associated with pulp production by up to 20% if reduced lignin and increased C/L and S/G ratios are achieved in trees at industrial scale.

Forest trees represent the largest biogenic carbon sink on earth and are paramount in efforts to curb climate change. They are pillars of our ecosystems and the bioeconomy. In North Carolina, forestry contributes over $35 billion to the local economy and supports approximately 140,000 jobs.

"Multiplex genome editing provides a remarkable opportunity to improve forest resilience, productivity, and utilization at a time when our natural resources are increasingly challenged by climate change and the need to produce more sustainable biomaterials using less land," said Wang, assistant professor and director of the Forest Biotechnology Group at NC State and co-corresponding author of the paper.

Next steps include continued greenhouse tests to see how the gene-edited trees perform compared to wild trees. Later, the team hopes to use field trials to gauge whether the gene-edited trees can handle the stresses provided by life outdoors, outside the controlled greenhouse environment.

The researchers stressed the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration that enabled this study, encompassing three NC State colleges, multiple departments, the N.C. Plant Sciences Initiative, NC State's Molecular Education, Technology and Research Innovation Center (METRIC), and partner universities.

"An interdisciplinary approach to tree breeding that combines genetics, computational biology, CRISPR tools, and bio-economics has profoundly expanded our knowledge of tree growth, development, and forest applications," said Daniel Sulis, a postdoctoral scholar at NC State and the first author of the paper. "This powerful approach has transformed our ability to unravel the complexity of tree genetics and deduce integrated solutions that could improve ecologically and economically important wood traits while reducing the carbon footprint of fiber production."

Building on the long-standing legacy of innovations in the fields of plant sciences and forestry at NC State, Barrangou and Wang created a startup company called TreeCo to advance the use of CRISPR technologies in forest trees. This collaborative effort led by NC State faculty members aims to combine tree genetic insights with the power of genome editing to breed a healthier and more sustainable future.

 
Imagine missing the opportunity to use CRISPR to create trees that produce stronger, more durable and consistent wood for engineering purposes and doing something this gay instead.
 
Where I live the two biggest industries are timber and chicken. Poplar trees are something that you cut down and burn so you can plant a pine or oak tree. I hope that their, probably government backed, research will yield results in commercial timber eventually, but I feel that they were probably more interested in the grants that they could get to research something that doesn't matter and is easier than making a actually better tree or a super cute tree girl.
 
If they really wanted to help the environment, they'd invent trees that hug us back.

*Weeps softly into tofu*
 
All I wanna know about CRISPR is when I finally get my big tiddy catgirl GF.
Some day, brother.
1689414421701.jpeg
 
Imagine missing the opportunity to use CRISPR to create trees that produce stronger, more durable and consistent wood for engineering purposes and doing something this gay instead.
while improving their wood properties.
Pretty sure they are, but we all know journalists would rather focus on the heckin greenhouse gases and not better wood. That said, more efficient industrial processes are always welcome. 20% more usable pulp from the same amount of wood inputs is a big fucking deal.
 
All I wanna know about CRISPR is when I finally get my big tiddy catgirl GF.
We literally have the technology to do that with CRISPR, but those pesky ethics...If they won't even let Jurassic Park chickens live, they ain't gonna give you a big tiddy goth catgirl

Maybe they should consider bamboo. One of the fastest growing plants, absorbs 5x the amount of carbon dioxide, releases 35% more oxygen than a stand of trees, and is great for paper.
 
...create trees that produce stronger, more durable and consistent wood...
That would mean allowing people to have jobs, allowing people to keep building homes; and we all know that they can't have that, not when 15 minutes cities is so close...

A billion cane toads...
And you should see how big some of those fuckers are now! I've seen photos of them easily the size of a average pet rabbit.
 
From there, the researchers selected the seven best strategies that modeling suggested would lead to trees that would attain the chemical sweet spot—35% less lignin than wild, or unmodified, trees; C/L ratios that were more than 200% higher than wild trees; S/G ratios that were also more than 200% higher than wild trees; and tree growth rates that were similar to wild trees.
Ah brilliant, "better" product that will still take a decade and a half to harvest, very good.
The study also included sophisticated pulp production mill models that suggest reduced lignin content in trees could increase pulp yield and reduce so-called black liquor, the major byproduct of pulping, which could help mills produce up to 40% more sustainable fibers.
They mean the black liquor that is frequently recovered in ways that also make useful byproducts. Key takeaway for non-chemistryfags:
The combination of reactions 1 through 4 form a closed cycle with respect to sodium, sulfur and calcium and is the main concept of the so-called recausticizing process where sodium carbonate is reacted to regenerate sodium hydroxide.

The recovery boiler also generates high pressure steam which is fed to turbogenerators, reducing the steam pressure for the mill use and generating electricity. A modern kraft pulp mill is more than self-sufficient in its electrical generation and normally will provide a net flow of energy which can be used by an associated paper mill or sold to neighboring industries or communities through to the local electrical grid.[14] Additionally, bark and wood residues are often burned in a separate power boiler to generate steam.
Nasties are in a closed-loop cycle, process water becomes steam (not discharged into waterways), and you end up being a net-generator of electricity. You get even more heat (electricity) from burning the unusable portions of the tree. Turpentine and Tall Oil are useful byproducts that mills either refine or sell. We're coming up on nearly a century of refining and perfecting this process. While it might seem complex to the layman, for what it accomplishes it is elegant in its simplicity.

Another important thing is almost nobody gets into tree farming for pulp production. It is the sale you make for early harvest or to prevent losses when trees are unsuitable for other uses. Paper is also probably the shortest carbon sequestering use. Timber/lumber can withstand decomposition for centuries. A very simple way to think of Carb/Lignin in trees is very similar to the fiber/resin ratios in composites. You cannot mess with those without fundamentally changing the physical characteristics. "Good" for pulp generally means dogshit for any other purposes.
 
There's enough shit going on, they want to bring Triffids into the mix?
Aaaaaaaand back come the nightmares. Thank you so much.

John Wyndham is one of the most overlooked sci-fi writers there is. The concept sounds implausibly silly - killer plants. But - along with another work of his The Kraken Wakes - it's a very well thought out story. I started watching the second BBC adaptation where they'd fucked with the plot details a bit but it was still good. I got to the bit where the main character finds that blind old lady in the hospital, she looks like she could be your mum. She's scared, she knows something terrible is happening but she can't see a thing and she's all alone. Watching the near-helpless viewpoint character tell her "I'll come back. I'll get help and come back" and run on because there's almost nothing else he can do, whilst she's waving her arms around and crying out for him not to leave her. I nearly noped out then and there. People suffering and being able to do nothing about it is nightmare fuel for me.

Fuck the Triffids! Please, nobody create triffids!
 
I know this is fueled by Green hysteria, but I find it funny that they conveniently forget that the Tree of Heaven exists. They're an invasive-ass species from China that is notorious for spreading like weeds, playing host to some nasty-ass insects and a very tenacious plant in general. If the main tree is threatened, it will try to spawn saplings like no tomorrow.

An absolute dream for woodcutters and the lumber industry. A nightmare for anyone trying to run a garden or lives in the suburbs.
 
If this doesn't lead to sentient Treants or Treant adjacent fantasy creatures for real life, I don't want to fucking hear about it. I don't trust anyone in a lab who wants to fuck around with genetics.

If I can't have talking tree buddies in my backyard it's a hard no for me too.

I know this is fueled by Green hysteria, but I find it funny that they conveniently forget that the Tree of Heaven exists. They're an invasive-ass species from China that is notorious for spreading like weeds, playing host to some nasty-ass insects and a very tenacious plant in general. If the main tree is threatened, it will try to spawn saplings like no tomorrow.

An absolute dream for woodcutters and the lumber industry. A nightmare for anyone trying to run a garden or lives in the suburbs.

Is that the weedy looking thing you often see sprout up alongside mimosa? Has a bit of an odd smell? Not bad. Just weird. The pic I saw looks similar in terms of leaves.

We had almost no rain in the spring. Then it rained like crazy in June and these things started sprouting everywhere. You see this stuff grow for years in abandoned lots and yards. I like mimosa for the sugary scented flowers. As long as it's like one tree. But if you have it then you have to mow and weed a lot to prevent a mimosa forest from sprouting.
 
Back
Top Bottom