UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's gotta suck to be 80 years old and watch your home, from the time you are a young man to now in old age, get absolutely infected with globohomo politics and shitskins everywhere.
Welcome to Metropolis USA. Seeing cities become untamable ghettos over a period of only 2 or 3 decades is heartbreaking. Those cities are gone forever. There's no coming back from that without liquidating their populations.

It is depressing to think that by comparison London is going to make Chicago or Detroit seem like desirable places to live. They long ago hit the tipping point, the English are in a hopeless freefall.

What you end up in all of those situations is a socialist utopia; the triumph of the eternal welfare state writ large. Serfs up, lords down!

Blazing saddles, friendo. It keeps coming up, but that movie will be the reason for Mel Brooks eventual unpersoning.
He is fantasticly, visibly Jewish: anyone who touches him will have to fend off the label of antisemitism, which trumps most all other identitarian sects.

Last Whites of the East End
Knowing the BBC, it's probably been memory-holed to some extent.
The hour-long programme, aired last night, focused on the disappearing traditional Cockney culture in the London borough of Newham.

Some who tuned in were so offended by the opinions expressed that they compared it to white supremacy propaganda.

"Hitler documentary in the afternoon, #KKK documentary just finished and now #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd? F**king British TV at its racist best," fumed one viewer on Twitter.

Now I really have to see it. I used to watch all the BBC docs back in 2016, so I'm surprised I missed that one. So far torrents for it are giving me no love.

Another more reasonable perspective:
The Last Whites Of The East End



"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see." Enoch Powell.

This week the BBC broke with all protocol and historical precedent by airing a documentary which was somewhat sympathetic toward the White British who've been ethnically cleansed by the British establishment.

There was some element of the usual BBC trickery, for example, one of the most prominent of the 'White British' fleeing Newham, the East London Borough where this was filmed, was mixed race, half Black/White who was married to a Romanian woman, they had a young daughter, another young man was half Indian and one of the people most sympathetic toward the fleeing Whites was a Bangladeshi. But nevertheless, the BBC broadcast a documentary in which White British people who're being ethnically cleansed had an opportunity to look straight into the camera and say ''We're being ethnically cleansed!''. Usually, when the BBC report on 'sensitive issues' they neuter the content by overlaying a moronic slapstick-lite soundtrack to make it all seem a bit of lark, Last Whites of the East End was mercifully spared it.

The demographic transformation of the old Cockney East End has been brutal, the 2011 census reported that White British were down to 16% of the population, and that was taken 6 years ago, it is now estimated to be 12%. Within that, wards such as Green Street East and Green Street West are now 4,8% White British(!). It cannot be stated enough, there was no democratic mandate whatsoever for any of this, there was no public debate, nobody voted for it, indeed, as we shall see, the British establishment did everything they could to stop the East End Cockneys voting their way out of it via the BNP. If any other ethnic or racial group had been treat in this manner by their own political class it would be considered a crime against humanity.

The general tone of the documentary can be summed up as one of loss and loneliness, the passing of an age. The Oakham family have always been in the East End, their ancestors were the 'salt of the earth' Cockneys Charles Dickens wrote about. The matriarch of the family, Debbie, is preparing herself for the flight of her one of her daughters, the daughter has two children and, like so many others, has decided they should not be brought up as a White minority. Debbie understands but nevertheless, it's just another bond being severed, another little strand of East End history being cut.

Muslims don't drink so all the pubs went under, all that remains is a dilapidated working men's club held aloft on the pensions of those too old and too poor to leave Newham. The landlord of the club describes the club as an ''oasis'' where the Whites can ''mix with their own''. The grizzled old Cockneys spend their time in the club drinking lager and engaging in nostalgia, remember the year that...what about the time Charlie....oh he was one alright!. The imbecilic Leftist on Twitter might quip ''They came here because you went there'' and the club certainly gives an impression of actually being a long forgotten colonial outpost, lager, darts and old women ballroom dancing as the Black and Brown Islamic masses shuffle passed just yards away outside.

Mixed race Tony laments the passing of an age ''It's all gone'' in times gone by Tony was made to feel uncomfortable because he was too dark, now he's a minority again because he's too White, and with a young daughter he too is now fleeing to the White Flight safe haven of Essex. Because as Tony explains, nobody, absolutely nobody, wants to bring up a little girl in an area dominated by Muslim men.

The BBC's soap-opera "Eastenders" which is set in London's East End is often criticized for it's non White quota, in reality, as a reflection of the East End, Whites are hugely over-represented, making up around 70-80% of the cast. If the soap was to accurately portray London's East End it would be radically different. There would be subtitles throughout most of the show, non Whites would make up 88% of the actors and the story lines would centre on the interactions between Somalians, Nigerians, Jamaicans, Pakistanis etc. The Queen Victoria pub would have closed down years ago and turned into Mosque or government funded African out-reach centre. Nobody would watch the show because nobody could possibly identify with such a ''community'' they would switch off, just like the real life East Enders ran off.

During the course of the documentary various people ask how this could happen, the Bangladeshi interviewed scorns the Whites for simply ''throwing in the towel'' and leaving without a fight. Tony tells an anecdote, a young White woman he knew was physically and verbally attacked by a Somalian girl, she was called a ''White slag''. Tony asked the White girl why she didn't fight back, why put up with it? she replied that she couldn't, she was White and if she tried to do anything she'd be accused of racism and her life would be destroyed, safer and easier to just be insulted, and the non-Whites know it. Others in the documentary have other, similar, stories to tell. So in a sense they've answered their question. Whites could never fight back, the game was rigged against them from the start, anything they did would be called racist, and indeed, when they tried to mount a defence by voting for the BNP that is exactly what happened.


There's a recurring theme in British politics, Whites will happily vote for Labour or Conservative, they'll carry on voting for them as their areas begin to change racially, but then, at last, when it's obviously an attempt to socially engineer them out of existence, they desperately ''lurch to the Right'' but it's always too little too late, it's the last scream before the fall of the axe. This trend was seen in areas of Yorkshire and London during the 2000's with the BNP. As The Guardian reported at the time:

The far right British National party is to field a candidate in the race to become executive mayor of the east London borough of Newham.
The news comes on the same day that the home secretary, David Blunkett, attacked the BNP's "vile racism" and called on politicians of all parties to fight against the far right's influence in next month's local elections.
Newham has traditionally been Labour-dominated and if the BNP is to win it has to defeat Sir Robin Wales, the council's current leader and clear favourite for the mayoral job.
The party's platform includes plans to cut back all local spending on projects that promote multiculturalism, halting any expenditure on asylum seekers and giving "local British people" priority on housing waiting lists.

By 2005 so many of the White British in London boroughs were panicking that the BNP looked to set to make serious electoral gains. So much so that the entire political and metropolitan establishment, with the BBC playing a central role, united in a concerted effort to destroy the BNP.
The Guardian ''Parties unite to try to drive BNP off London council''

Little has distinguished Warren Northover from any other backroom activist during his five years in the Labour Party. He has attended meetings, stuck down envelopes, handed out leaflets and canvassed for two MPs. But today the silver-haired taxi driver becomes the key figure in a cross-party effort to resist the drive into London of the racist British National Party and to stop it gaining a foothold in the south-east.
In today's byelection in the Goresbrook ward of Barking and Dagenham, Mr Northover, 70, will try to wrest back the BNP's only council seat in the capital.
It was relinquished when Daniel Kelley, who won the ward last September, stood down citing ill health. But the extremists see the retention of Goresbrook as key to a wider plan to capture a block of seats at next year's council elections. They have the springboard of having secured 16.9% per cent of the vote in Barking at the general election and the knowledge that 10 council seats could fall with just a 5% swing.
But other parties are determined to stop them. Both the Liberal Democrats and the Greens have withdrawn their candidates to give Mr Northover a better chance, and the Tories have fought a vigorous campaign. The seat will also be contested by UKIP, which could drain votes away from the far right.
In recognition of the importance being accorded to the contest, the Home Office minister Hazel Blears visited the ward on Monday. The campaign has been assisted by a coalition of anti-racist activists, church groups and trades unions.
Many dispute the motivations of the BNP, claiming that Nick Griffin was a stooge and the whole party a setup, but the point here is that the British establishment was absolutely determined to destroy the ethnic and cultural composition of Cockney, White working class London, and that short of some IRA style terror campaign there was nothing the Whites could do about it. And so they fled, to stay and do nothing meant to live in what amounted to Pakistan, Somalia or Bangladesh, to protest left you open to attack by the entire governing and media class, as well as violent attacks at the hands of their UAF thug gangs. Escape was the only option.

An entire culture and ethnic group, the heart of historical London, now scattered across White Flight zones dotted around South England. And it still isn't enough...

The hour-long programme, aired last night, focused on the disappearing traditional Cockney culture in the London borough of Newham.
Some who tuned in were so offended by the opinions expressed that they compared it to white supremacy propaganda.
"Hitler documentary in the afternoon, #KKK documentary just finished and now #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd? F**king British TV at its racist best," fumed one viewer on Twitter.

The reaction of the Liberal Left to the documentary was tediously predictable, in The Mirror reported:
The hour-long programme, aired last night, focused on the disappearing traditional Cockney culture in the London borough of Newham.
Some who tuned in were so offended by the opinions expressed that they compared it to white supremacy propaganda.
"Hitler documentary in the afternoon, #KKK documentary just finished and now #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd? F**king British TV at its racist best," fumed one viewer on Twitter.
Another then posted: "Just caught up with #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd on iplayer. A documentary on life in Newham, where I was born & bred. What a load of racist tosh."
The White British were called racist when they objected to the first immigrants, they were called racist again when they said they were worried about becoming outnumbered and then, finally, they were called racist one last time when they simply left the area. The rodents of the Left are not magnanimous in victory, their hatred is boundless.

It's quite possible that one of the reasons the Liberal Left loathed this documentary wasn't just their ideals being exposed as a sham at best and genocidal at worst, it was because many of the vacating Whites were answering questions which preempted Left Liberal thinking. Debbie's daughter, Amy, explained straight out that she ''preferred her own (White) kind'' and then added ''nobody minds when the Asians do the same''. The standard response to White Flight by the Liberals has been to cite ''fluctuating house prices'' it's just people being upwardly mobile, and they're saying this in response to the documentary, despite the White British looking directly into the camera and saying ''I'm leaving because it feels like a foreign land''.

The Last Whites of the East End left me feeling surprisingly optimistic. One of the most terrifying words a Nationalist can come across is ''integration'' and what this documentary made clear was that integration isn't happening on the scale our enemies expected, our people are segregating themselves. It was the story of a battle lost, but not by any means the end of the war.

That same site also has an article more directly topical on Cleese:


Pretty good reads!

Prior to the documentary's broadcast, Robert Hardman wrote a review in the Daily Mail, praising the programme as "a beautifully made film which neither patronises nor sensationalises its subjects. And it does not mince its words — which may explain why the BBC has put it in a late-night slot at 10.45pm and given it minimal pre-publicity". He highlighted the views of Cunningham and Hussain to argue that multiculturalism has been "handled abysmally". Hardman opined that the documentary would "make extremely uncomfortable viewing for all the main political parties" and would be preceded with health warnings for easily offended viewers.
"CAUTION: May contain unapologetic white people who exhibit minimally amounts of white guilt."

Annotation 2019-05-31 140634.jpg


"No, you cannot watch it, and no, we aren't going to ever air it again."
 
Last edited:
if they really want to block porn they are going to have to ban pretty much everything that's not news articles, they can't pick or choose what they wan't to block on a site, no more 4chan, reddit, twitter, or facebook for them.
 
I think it's because MindGeek, who owns Pornhub, Brazzers, Digital Playground, Redtube, Twistys, YouPorn, Reality Kings, Elegant Angel, and so forth, also just happens to have developed the AgeID age verification technology. In fact, I heard somewhere it was someone at MindGeek who pitched AgeID to the Government as a way of implementing the porn loicense provisions in the DEA in the first place.
That would not surprise me in the fucking least.
 
In fact, I heard somewhere it was someone at MindGeek who pitched AgeID to the Government as a way of implementing the porn loicense provisions in the DEA in the first place.
That's interesting, but if thats true then what is MindGeeks end goal of doing this? Since you need to dox yourself to the website to use it maybe they are trying to do some data collection? Or are try trying to milk some money of the UK government by selling them the technology?
 
That's interesting, but if thats true then what is MindGeeks end goal of doing this? Since you need to dox yourself to the website to use it maybe they are trying to do some data collection? Or are try trying to tard cum some money of the UK government by selling them the technology?
The government said they would block any porn site that didn't implement age verification. So if Pornhub owns the age verification system they have the power to block competitors.

E: Also you don't dox yourself to the porn website. You dox yourself to the guy at the counter of your cornershop who gives you what is supposed to be an anonymous token to use online. But they can still tie that token to your browsing habits and maybe you'll accidentally dox yourself along the way but that'd be a breach of at least GDPR.
 
Last edited:
if they really want to block porn they are going to have to ban pretty much everything that's not news articles, they can't pick or choose what they wan't to block on a site, no more 4chan, reddit, twitter, or facebook for them.

I dunno about FB, but Jack Dorsey has said that porn is allowed in the platform. Unless the government tries to make a registration of every single porn account, good luck.


I think it's because MindGeek, who owns Pornhub, Brazzers, Digital Playground, Redtube, Twistys, YouPorn, Reality Kings, Elegant Angel, and so forth, also just happens to have developed the AgeID age verification technology. In fact, I heard somewhere it was someone at MindGeek who pitched AgeID to the Government as a way of implementing the porn loicense provisions in the DEA in the first place.

Corporations using countries as guinea pigs with the help of their governments? Well, imagine my shock.
 
It’s estimated it could affect a whopping 35 million people, forcing them to get “age verified” by handing over their details or using a passport, bank card, or “porn pass” from the shops.
Hello mate, could I get one of those porn passes please?

This country is actually a joke. The government wants to sell porn passes? Why wouldn't I just buy a VPN subscription instead? Absolutely out of touch.
 
I was quite keen on seeing at least part of the population get blocked off porn access just because I'm curious to see what would happen since I'm one of those people that believes in the claim that less porn access means more sex crimes.

It's still better if they finally scrapped this idiotic idea altogether, but sometimes you just want to burn stuff to see how it collapses.
 
It would be worth it to see this implemented just to see the Rube Goldberg style work arounds that will pop up. Do it parliament, you obviously can't get it up over Brexit so this is your last chance to perform in front of a crowd.
 
Also you don't dox yourself to the porn website. You dox yourself to the guy at the counter of your cornershop who gives you what is supposed to be an anonymous token to use online. But they can still tie that token to your browsing habits and maybe you'll accidentally dox yourself along the way but that'd be a breach of at least GDPR.
Most sources about this say you can use other forms to identify yourself by giving the website info about yourself like SMS, credit card, passport or driving licence even this article itself kinda says so
“apprehensive about giving personal information as verification online, for fear of how the data would be used”.
It’s estimated it could affect a whopping 35 million people, forcing them to get “age verified” by handing over their details or using a passport, bank card, or “porn pass” from the shops.
I'm pretty sure buying the token is just one opinion out of many
 
You know the ironic thing, when I was younger I was kind of uncomfortable with how much the word "nigger" was thrown around in that film, I thought it was crass and I didn't get the point of it. But it was the pc socjus outrage crowd that convinced me to take a closer look at stuff like that and now I realize the context and the valuable purpose of boundary-pushing stuff like that for its own sake, and I appreciate things that make the censors and moral police uncomfortable a lot more now than I did a decade ago. We need them to be bothered all the time because if we're not doing it deliberately, they're going to find excuses to be bothered anyway, and they'll push that maginot line a lot further if we play nice and let them because contrary to their public mission statement they are never looking for a compromise that makes everyone happy, or even any compromise at all.
Same. Back then I barely even noticed race - MLK and his spiritual descendants had basically achieved their dream.

After constant harassment of whites by race baiters, I'm even more racially minded than my parents.
 
Most sources about this say you can use other forms to identify yourself by giving the website info about yourself like SMS, credit card, passport or driving licence even this article itself kinda says so


I'm pretty sure buying the token is just one opinion out of many
Credit card, premium SMS, etc has always been available. Probably everyone over 40 has always expected to pay for porn so they don't care about those things. The cornershop token is the only new thing.

In the 90s/00s most sites had censored previews and required you to "verify your age" which just so happened to require like a $1 charge to your card. Piracy killed off that model but the porn industry tried its hardest to prevent it so it's no surprise that they're happy to go back to it.

I tried to remember some of the old services and found AVSecure. They claim to be some blockchain crap founded in 2017 but the Wayback Machine reveals they're one of those old "age verification" services from at least 2003.

AgeID is another one I vaguely remember. They claim to be a new startup from 2015 but Wayback goes back to 1999.

They may have little relation to the original companies but it's strange how at least two have reused old names...
 
Last edited:
The government said they would block any porn site that didn't implement age verification. So if Pornhub owns the age verification system they have the power to block competitors.

E: Also you don't dox yourself to the porn website. You dox yourself to the guy at the counter of your cornershop who gives you what is supposed to be an anonymous token to use online. But they can still tie that token to your browsing habits and maybe you'll accidentally dox yourself along the way but that'd be a breach of at least GDPR.
This. Regulation helps the biggest players in any given market because they can force the little guys into a no-win situation with costs making it impossible to join the market.
 
The hilarious thing about these internet-filtering laws is that most people that know what a computer is can just circumvent this with a VPN or a browser like Tor.
 
BBC did a good doc on London's white flight called "Last Whites of the East End" a couple of years ago, about all the cockneys fleeing to the home counties like Essex to get away from the niggers and Muslims. Can't find a video link for the doc though.
Knowing the BBC, it's probably been memory-holed to some extent.


Now I really have to see it. I used to watch all the BBC docs back in 2016, so I'm surprised I missed that one. So far torrents for it are giving me no love.



"CAUTION: May contain unapologetic white people who exhibit minimally amounts of white guilt."

View attachment 779522

"No, you cannot watch it, and no, we aren't going to ever air it again."

Just checked my UK torrent sites and got it on tvchaos and uploaded to YT.

Last Whites of the East End. (just hope it doesn't get flagged as BBC copyright)





Edit didnt work.... upload too long or someshit...

Anyway you can get it on TV Chaos.. https://www.tvchaosuk.com if signups are open..
 
Last edited:
Only BLACKED will be allowed in the absolute worst European country.
I know it's a meme but I rarely or never see black people in porn. The front page on Pornhub is tailored to your region and in the UK it's 99% white people.

So I think the blacked stuff probably only shows up if you live somewhere with lots of black people lusting over whites and/or it's like the Youtube algorithm where the system recommends more of what you've already watched (i.e. the pollacks complaining about cuck porn are the ones watching it).
 
Same. Back then I barely even noticed race - MLK and his spiritual descendants had basically achieved their dream.

After constant harassment of whites by race baiters, I'm even more racially minded than my parents.
The same thing has happened to me and I really don't want to be that way. I can't help it. It's just a knee jerk reaction to their rhetoric. They'd have done a lot better for racial harmony if they'd just shut up and let things take their natural course.
 
I know it's a meme but I rarely or never see black people in porn. The front page on Pornhub is tailored to your region and in the UK it's 99% white people.

So I think the blacked stuff probably only shows up if you live somewhere with lots of black people lusting over whites and/or it's like the Youtube algorithm where the system recommends more of what you've already watched (i.e. the pollacks complaining about cuck porn are the ones watching it).
Why do you Brits have so many blacks on your telies
 
Back
Top Bottom