UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You just have to worry about syphillis, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, herpes, HIV and Monkeypox instead.
And having to spend all that money on clothes too.

Some women are terrible, but you find a good one and your life is amazing.

I think he just wants to suck a dick though.
 
Am I the only poster in this thread who isn't friends with pakis and refuses to associate with foreigners at all? I feel right left out being the only one not invited to the gang rape dinner parties.
I got along with them well enough in primary school and in the early years of high school but at a certain point they start being unashamedly "themselves". I think for many people and the Muslims themselves this makes interaction outside the classroom a non-starter, especially nowadays. The only people friends with Pakis in the UK are all people old enough to remember when there weren't as many of them in the country. Without a ton of them around, they're unable to self-segregate and so they're forced to assimilate, or at least sand down their cultural/religious identities.

This is why people thought civic nationalism was viable, because there was a time when a lone Muslim/Paki family would have to more or less melt into their surroundings in order to fit in and not be ostracised. Now that there's nothing preventing them from shunning their host nation entirely, they'll just remain unashamedly Muslim and thanks to the current zeitgeist, they're celebrated for it.

That's not to say assimilation means they become 1:1 British/English, just non-white, but the result is better turned out than the current way of things. The non-British youth are more or less just foreigners with no humouring of their host nation, whereas the older ones (ones here from the pre-90s) are at least a bit more meek. The fewer there is of a minority in proportion to the dominant race/culture, the less of an identity they're able to assert and will just join the fold best they can.

But frankly it's not an option now despite my apologia for them. There's far too many of them here to consider them anything other than outsiders. I think if they were incentive (or forced) to leave, many would do it, even if they'd whinge and moan all the while. The only ethnic group that's harder to do anything about would be blacks given a number of them arrived here pre-90s, but they're arguably less of a nuisance in the long-term than Pakis, Indians, and other assorted Muslims – I would like to eradicate the grime & grime rap music genre off the face of the earth though, even if it ultimately does nothing.

In the future, after a decade or two of it being zero, immigration ought to max out at 4 figures, and it's purpose is to fulfil only the most vital roles, such as maintaining infrastructure or engineering. If the only thing stopping a nuclear power plant from being operational is that there isn't a single person in the country capable of operating it, then that's the sole use-case scenario for bringing in an immigrant. Otherwise, we need to be far more self-reliant and not follow the corporate philosophy of infinite growth. Stagnation is preferable to ruination.
I find it genuinely depressing to read stuff like this constantly. I’m just trying to get through my life being a vaguely competent worker/mother/human. I’m sure I have may faults, I’m sure there’s a million things I could do better, so could most of us, but to think that half of humanity looks at me and sees either ‘hole’ or ‘retarded’ just makes me feel bleak as.
It's just generally easier to be all-encompassing with a viewpoint of others rather than break it down into the more accurate yet rhetorically weaker truth of, "some women are shit, some are great, many just do their thing" - a statement which can similarly apply to men and just about every group you can think of.

The reason why a lot of men do think that of women, and often have lots of examples to back it up, and it's in part down to how certain personality traits manifest in women compared to men. There's a crap ton of psychology mumbo jumbo involved, and I'm not sure whether half of it is just utter bullshit or not, but there is one prime difference: Men are more likely to be their own source of validation, women are less likely to be their own source of validation.

This can lead to women seeking out a popular consensus on an issue more often than a man would. That's not to say a man wouldn't seek others approval and women necessarily would, but it's just a tendency that's observable between the sexes. It's why it's harder to get a man to stop being a tranny than a woman, because the man has already well-decided that he is a "woman" (even if the suggestion was made by others) whereas the woman can feel invalidated (even if she was the one who made the choice herself) if there's enough external friction on the subject and thus desist. Men are more likely to be quieter on an issue they've decided on, whereas a woman is more likely to gauge its popularity and approval in contrast to men.

Preferably you want to avoid the extremes of either. The key is balance: Don't rely too much on seeking the approval of others, don't rely too much on your own personal assessment over the opinions of others i.e. Don't democratise your worldview, but don't be a complete tyrant over it either.

Being your own validator isn't necessarily a masculine trait despite its prevalence in men. But women who don't require consensus on their own feelings towards an issue tend to be better turned out. The internet in conjunction with consensus-taking, is what has lead to such a huge political gap between men and women, because the number of people involved in that consensus has grown exponentially. Rather than just family and friends, the consensus is now more or less the entire world, which isn't very good.
 


So uncivilised............
Always them, always entitled, always the victim when simply made to play by the rules of society.
This goes beyond fatigue.....action is required.
 
But it's okay - you can just be gay. You don't need to justify it with women.
You can tell very easily which are which though. Men who 'became' gay because they hate women act ironically kinda like how retards describe women. I have no doubt that you can slowly coom yourself into fucking with your sexuality but if you aren't actually gay and instead just think it's the easy way out then you're going to be stuck in a relationship that will never work. No one wants to date someone that they are not attracted to. And if you think gay guys are any less of a cunt than women are then it's just delusion. They will be as much of a cunt as any woman just in slightly different ways, or just the same ways half the time. Dating men isn't just haha yea lol we play video games and then suck each other off lol. There's a reason why the stereotype of a bitchy catty faggot exists.
And having to spend all that money on clothes too.
I have to buy her fucking thousands in clothes every week and all I ever see is the dumb bitch fucking taking them off? Next time I'm just dunking her in a bucket of black paint up to her neck and calling it a day.
But she's hard work.
All relationships are. You will never have a good relationship that's easy except with close family and even then it's pretty hit and miss. If it's easy then it's because you're not fully emotionally invested in each other. It should be hard and it shouldn't be problem free, if the relationship is never tested then you'll never truly know if she's the one to marry.
On one hand yea stabbing someone in broad daylight is pretty niggardly but if it's someone she knew? I'd say 50/50 chance it was a random attack or both of them are the same race. Can't find anything on it other than what's in that article though.
So uncivilised............
That's just indian behaviour. If there wasn't a member of staff next to the gate he would have jumped it. Beating a dead horse but doing this type of shit isn't considered trashy like it would be for a white person, he thinks he is 'winning' by beating the system. That being said it would have been funnier if he let him come through and then stopped him so the staff member could have had him arrested.
 
I have to buy her fucking thousands in clothes every week and all I ever see is the dumb bitch fucking taking them off? Next time I'm just dunking her in a bucket of black paint up to her neck and calling it a day.
My point was if you are being a homosexualist and having to be fashionable at all times.

Why do women need clothes when they shouldn't leave the kitchen?
 

Reform UK has "turned down genuinely good people" because of social media posts they made in the past, according to one of its councillors.

Follow the rabbit hole of previous stories linked in the article and you get, to no surprise, this:


"We want to make it crystal clear that while we defend our candidates' right to freedom of speech vigorously, we act fast when we find that individuals' statements fall beneath our standards.
"Labour and Conservatives also have candidates that make statements that fall below acceptable standards, but we move faster than others in acting decisively."
So much for the anti-muslim party that is supposedly going to mass deport browns and blacks.

:story:
 
We_ve_had_enough..mp4

So uncivilised............
Always them, always entitled, always the victim when simply made to play by the rules of society.
This goes beyond fatigue.....action is required.
So which paki posted that since it says "Englishman" like he's something abnormal?

Englishman is clearly having a bad day. Paki tried his luck and got put in his place while the Englishman let off some steam. We've all been there and it's 'wrong' but it's also part of being human. In any normal situation no one would have given a shit but wrong time, wrong place.

I agree with the shouty man though. Don't fucking steal. And don't try to rush past stop gates. Just wait your damn turn. I always feel weird when someone else has bought the tickets so I have to go without scanning anything. I've been paid for and I have a ticket but it feels like I'm doing something naughty.
 
That's just indian behaviour. If there wasn't a member of staff next to the gate he would have jumped it. Beating a dead horse but doing this type of shit isn't considered trashy like it would be for a white person, he thinks he is 'winning' by beating the system. That being said it would have been funnier if he let him come through and then stopped him so the staff member could have had him arrested.
Failed to assimilate - immediate deportation.
 
So much for the anti-muslim party that is supposedly going to mass deport browns and blacks.
Sargon is off somewhere fucking crying right now. 'not even reform would take you' is looking to be the worst political insult of the decade. Wonder what would happen if you dug up some comments any of the muslims have made about how much they fucking hate women having rights and freedoms? Of course the comments aren't listed so you know that it will be something objectively factual.
 
For anyone who hasn't seen it, or isn't aware, there's a thing called British Values which is being pushed. I don't know how old it is, but since December I've had it rammed down my throat.
They are, as follows:
Fundamental British values, as defined by the UK Department for Education and promoted in schools and early years settings, consist of four key principles: democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance for those with different faiths and beliefs. These values underpin modern British society and are designed to prevent radicalization.

  • Democracy
    :

    A culture built upon freedom, equality, and the right to vote or influence decisions, including participating in democratic processes
    .
    • Rule of Law: The understanding that rules matter, laws protect citizens, and everyone is accountable, ensuring a safe and fair society.
    • Individual Liberty: The freedom to make personal choices, hold personal beliefs, and exercise freedom of speech within the law.
    • Mutual Respect and Tolerance: Treating others with respect, regardless of differences, and accepting that people may have different faiths, beliefs, or lifestyles.
These values are mandatory in schools to prepare students for life in a diverse, modern Britain.
Stolen from google, not my highlight.

The bit that pisses me off is the bolded part. That is aimed at white brits, telling them to be tolerant of others' faiths, beliefs and lifestyles. Funny how it isn't a reciprocal statement though.
We have to tolerate them but because they're not british they don't have to tolerate us? Or be lawful, or respectful....

Bonus lulz: (found on google, taken from a primary school website)


1769973545638.png
Very British hand.
 
News o'clock. Remember the thread that got posted here a bit back about a board game around the Irish famine and people going, "well, maybe if done right it could be acceptable." How about one around the Troubles?
Crass or historical? A potential board game, which puts the spotlight on Northern Ireland's Troubles, has received pushback from some victims' groups.
More than 3,500 people died and thousands more were injured during the 30 years of violence.
But now, events from the decades-long conflict have been reimagined into a "card-driven simulation" game, allowing players to take on the roles of unionist or nationalist politicians, the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) or even paramilitaries.
The game is not complete or available for purchase, and developers say it could be years before it's available to the public.

BBC News NI has been taking a look at the proposed game, and what is being said by victims' groups and the people behind it.


What is The Troubles game?​

The Troubles: Shadow War in Northern Ireland 1964-1998 is a one to six player game, mainly using cards to retell significant events throughout the conflict, such as the Sunningdale Agreement, Hunger Strikes and the deadliest period of the Troubles between 1970 and 1974.
It was created by Scottish secondary school teacher Hugh O'Donnell and is being produced by Connecticuit-based games production company, Compass Games, who specialise in historical games.
O'Donnell declined an interview bid by BBC News NI, adding the game is part of a PhD project and wanted to be mindful of the "academic process and, more importantly, the sensitivities of those affected by the Troubles".
However in an email, he said the project is "intentionally interdisciplinary" and aims to understand how historical board games can potentially foster "empathy and engagement with contested narratives".
Players take on different "faction" roles, including nationalist and unionist politicians, the RUC, the Ulster Defence Regiment (UDR) or paramilitary groups like the Irish Republican Army (IRA) or the Loyalist Paramilitaries (LOY).
During gameplay, which is estimated to take about six hours per scenario, players use dice, some 260 cards and tokens, with some labelled as "bombing", "The Nutting Squad", "dawn raid", "sniper" and "car bomb".

What have victims' groups said?​


The proposed game has been criticised by some victims' groups - with some labelling it as "crass" or accused it of minimising what people endured during the deadly conflict.
Kenny Donaldson, from the South East Fermanagh Foundation (Seff), said while he has not seen or engaged with the game, there could be a "very suspect portrayal of what exactly the narrative of this place is".
"I feel educate is a stretch... it actually is a minimisation of what this was and we have to be very, very straight that the Troubles are not past tense," he told BBC Radio Ulster's The Nolan Show.
"The Troubles continue to be lived day in, daily, in Northern Ireland," he said.
He added a "common thread" between victims and survivors is that the game is in "bad taste", or described it as "exploitative".

'Risks being in very poor taste'​


Dr Paul Gallagher, from the victims' group Wave, said while he understands the game comes from a historical perspective: "For some people, it's daily life."
In 1994, Gallagher was left wheelchair-bound at the age of 21 after loyalist gunmen burst into a west Belfast home and shot him six times.
"I'm someone who's a victim of the things on these cards... I'm into history, but there's better ways of doing it," he told BBC News NI.
He added the content of some of the cards in the game "doesn't sit right" with people within Wave and colleagues who often work with clients who have been victims of attacks.
"It's a massive part of the population that's affected," he said.
"It might be alright breaking this out at a kitchen table in Surrey or New York, but for so many other people, their kitchen table has an empty chair there."
A statement from the Commission of Victims and Survivors in Northern Ireland said as the game is still being developed, it is "difficult to comment fully on its content".
"However, the use of a dice and cards format to represent a period marked by violence, loss and deep trauma risks being in very poor taste," it added.
"Such an approach may fail to recognise the ongoing and complex issues faced by victims, survivors, and their families, many of whom continue to live with trauma, including intergenerational trauma, as a direct consequence of our past."

What do the developers say?​

Speaking to BBC News NI, the president of Compass Games Bill Thomas said he understood the sensitivities around The Troubles in Northern Ireland.
"I think what people went through at that time is horrible," he added.
However, he believed there is an educational merit in "interacting" with history through board games.
He expressed that many of the games his company produces are all historically based, and that it was likely only a "niche" group of people who are interested in that specific period of history would potentially order the game.
Thomas also questioned why some groups would take issue with board games, and not television shows, movies or even books which focused on the Troubles.
The game has been in development for a number of years, Thomas added, and while potential players can register their interest, they will only be charged after the game is released, if at all.
There has also been an uptick in interest in the past week from across the world since issues were first highlighted.
"We have lots of people from the UK and Ireland looking to buy it," he explained.
He said that it is "just a different form" to educate people, and added: "the people that are yapping and yipping have probably never played an historical board game before."

Millionaire evicting people to make room for asylum seekers. Of course is also behind a charity
More than 100 people were threatened with eviction from their homes to make way for asylum seekers after companies linked to a prominent GP started running migrant hotels.
Firms connected to Dr Faisal Maassarani became landlords of Serco hotels in 2022 when asylum applications were almost at a 20-year high.
But soon after a hotel in Seel Street in Liverpool owned by one of the firms was found to be unsuitable, people in one of their Liverpool housing complexes were told they had to move out over "urgent" fire safety issues, unaware that 116 asylum seekers had seemingly been lined up to replace them almost immediately.
Maassarani, whose involvement with one of the firms was hidden behind a complex structure of companies and trusts registered in the Isle of Man, said he had no part in the day-to-day running of the buildings and did not authorise any communication with tenants.

Maassarani operates several GP surgeries in Knowsley and Sefton and in 2009 set up the social isolation charity Care Merseyside.
Between 2021 and 2022, a company he had founded, Schloss Roxburghe Holdings, acquired about £5m of freeholds on buildings that were originally owned by property developer Elliot Lawless before his companies went into administration.
In August 2022, when some of Maassarani's business associates bought the Waverley Hotel in Whitehaven in Cumbria, Serco moved asylum seekers into it within a week.
In November, one of Maassarani's companies then spent £3.5m buying the King's Gap hotel in Hoylake, which had been running as asylum seeker accommodation since 2020.


Protests have been held over the Hoylake King's Gap hotel being used as asylum accommodation
At the same time, asylum seekers were moved into the Seel Street hotel as the firms' relationships with Serco and the Home Office expanded.
And the BBC's investigations suggest it was the use of that hotel that directly led to dozens of people almost losing their homes in an alleged illegal eviction attempt.
A tenant of Parliament Place in Liverpool told the BBC he came home from work in March 2023 to find a letter from Schloss Roxburghe Holdings (SRH).
Andrew Lewis said he was left in "disbelief" at what the letter said.


Andrew Lewis was told he had to move out of his flat, unaware of plans to move asylum seekers in
The letter told tenants they needed to move out because the building required urgent fire safety works.
Lewis, 47, said: "People were afraid, panicking… and didn't want to be evicted."
The IT worker added: "They put it vague enough to make us assume we could come back in again. It wasn't until someone emailed the management company and said what happens after this four-week period that they said they were going to terminate our leases.
"And that's when we thought, we're not standing for this."
The tenants did not know about plans to move asylum seekers into their homes, nor that the plan had been under discussion for up to three months.
Those the BBC has spoken to also said they did not know that the buy-to-let landlords who owned the flats they lived in had been directly approached by an "agent" of SRH promoting the asylum deal to them.


Plans were being made to move asylum seekers into Parliament Place
In February 2023, an email was sent to some of the private landlords of flats in the building telling them a deal with "the United Kingdom Home Office" would give them a guaranteed £435 a month per flat, potentially for up to seven years.
The email said the Home Office had "undertaken a full survey of the building" in December 2022, and had then issued a "heads of terms" for a contract to use it from March 1.
The BBC understands the unsigned and undated "heads of terms" was actually a draft proposal, and that no agreement had been made.
But at the time, the Home Office and Serco were facing pressure from Liverpool City Council about the use of the SRH-owned Seel Street hotel as asylum accommodation because its location in the middle of the city centre's nightlife district made it unsuitable.


The Seel Street Hotel - now known as the Ropewalks Hotel - housed asylum seekers briefly in 2022
The timing suggests it was likely it was these asylum seekers that were destined to move into Parliament Place.
Liverpool City Council said it had visited the building "informally" in February 2023 "to check room sizes for intended occupancy" and whether the fire alarm system was suitable.
It is understood that not all of the building's private landlords were told about the plan, and that when some were, they objected to it.
The tenants were then contacted directly by letter by SRH and told they had to move out for fire safety works to take place.

Liverpool City Council said it had never suggested anyone needed to move out of the building.
Lewis, whose own landlord was not aware of the move, said he "100% believed" that the fire safety claims were a ruse to clear the building.
SRH shelved the asylum seeker plan, and was reported in the Liverpool Echo at the time to have withdrawn from the plan when it became clear the "upheaval to tenants was too great".
The tenants did not have to leave, and, to their knowledge, the fire safety works never took place.

Family ties​

Maassarani set up SRH in 2018 in the Isle of Man. Its directors were all professionals from other Isle of Man or British Virgin Islands-based firms. And because the shares in the company are owned by a foundation, there is no publicly available information linking Maassarani to it.
The GP said the revelation of his involvement in the company was not in the public interest, that he derived no financial income from it, and that while he had been told about plans to move asylum seekers into Parliament Place, he was not involved in the day-to-day running of the company.

Dr Maassarani, seen here taking part in a BBC health documentary in 2018, says he makes no financial benefit from Schloss Roxburghe Holdings

The trust which owns SRH was founded to pay for education and training for his family, and Maassarani has a personal business history with people believed to have been involved in both running SRH and managing his interests in asylum seeker accommodation.
The agent who wrote to Parliament Place landlords promoting the asylum seeker deal signed off the correspondence as 'Mike Murphy'. The BBC understands this to be Michael Murphy, at the time a partner at major Liverpool law firm and Everton stadium sponsor Hill Dickinson.
The BBC have asked Murphy about his alleged involvement, and he said he could not respond because of client confidentiality.

Tenants were not told their buy-to-let landlords had been told about an alleged deal with the Home Office

The BBC has found that as well as having acted as a solicitor for both Maassarani and Lawless, Murphy had personal business links to both men in relation to property deals worth nearly £2m.
He is also the son-in-law of one of the directors of the firm that managed the Waverley asylum seeker hotel in Cumbria, 76-year-old former building firm boss David Lloyd.
Lloyd is now the sole director of SRH, which in recent months has faced fresh illegal evictions allegations in relation to another of its Liverpool buildings, Queensland Place.

Schloss Roxburghe Holdings has also faced allegations of illegal eviction attempts at Queensland Place in Liverpool

In November, leaseholders there secured an injunction against the firm to stop it changing the locks on some tenants' rooms as part of a row over ground rent payments, with the company warned its assets could be seized and its director jailed if it was breached.
Maassarani and Lloyd are both currently directors of a firm called Optimus Hotel Management, which has recently taken a loan out against the £3.5m Wirral King's Gap asylum seeker hotel. Solicitor Murphy acted as a witness to the application.

'Not good enough'​

The Wirral hotel remains asylum seeker accommodation, but the Cumbria hotel was closed in December 2023, owing more than £170,000 to unpaid staff and His Majesty's Revenue and Customs.
It had been operated through a company that did not have its own bank account, and its liquidation fees were paid by another firm of which Maassarani is a director.


Murphy – who resigned from Hill Dickinson last April - declined to respond to any of the BBC's questions, citing "client confidentiality". Hill Dickinson said it could not comment on "the matters of any individual organisation or the private interests of existing or former partners".
Lloyd has not responded to the BBC's enquiries.
In a statement to the BBC, a spokesman for Dr Maassarani said he was "a local GP with over 20 years of NHS service to thousands of patients and their families across the Merseyside area" and "holds senior leadership positions within the NHS".
The statement added: "He is not in any way involved in the running or management of Schloss Roxburghe Holdings, neither does he benefit financially from it.
"As such he had no knowledge of, and was not involved in or responsible for, any communications with tenants at Parliament Place or Queensland Place."
It added he "is neither a party, defendant or respondent" in the injunction proceedings relating to Queensland Place.


Liverpool Riverside's Labour MP Kim Johnson said the incident at Parliament Place raised questions about how asylum accommodation deals were done, and rejected Maassarani's suggestion there was no public interest in knowledge of his link to SRH.
She added: "It's not good enough. I think there needs to be more investigation and scrutiny of how contracts are awarded and the whole procurement process. More due diligence is definitely required."
The Home Office – which the BBC understands has to approve all accommodation looking to be used by Serco - has declined to comment on its providers' commercial relationships.

Teacher's union saying they should get time off for Glastonbury. Technically for other events but that was the example used.
Teachers should be able to get time off to go to the Glastonbury music festival, a union boss has said.
Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union, said schools must “inject greater flexibility” into teaching, making it easier for them to get time off during term time.
He said that when he was a primary school teacher, he complained about not being able to go to Glastonbury and he wanted term time freedom for teachers to become the “norm”.
His comments have been criticised by Tory chairman Kevin Hollinrake, who said teachers should not be able to “skip class and go partying”.

Term time festivals​

Schools in England and Wales break-up for 13 weeks of the year but the famous Somerset music festival does not fall during holiday time.
Speaking to The House Magazine, Mr Kebede said: “We do need to find ways to inject greater flexibility into teaching. Not being able to go to Glastonbury, actually, was something I always complained about as a teacher.

“You do have some schools that will come to some accommodation around some of these things. We want to see that become the norm much more.”

Tory chairman Mr Hollinrake said: “It’s preposterous to suggest teachers should have time off to go to Glastonbury.
“Greater flexibility around maternity leave and time off for ill health are one thing, but giving teachers the green light to skip class and go partying is quite another.
“The National Education Union’s focus should be on helping teachers deliver the best possible education for our children. It should not be pushing for staff to be able to attend term time festivals.”
Mr Kebede’s comments come weeks before the NEU opens a ballot to ask members whether they would be prepared to strike over pay, funding and workload.
In the interview, he called on the Government to have a stronger focus on workload and flexibility to improve teacher retention.
“Graduates entering the world of work have so much more flexibility than teachers, and we’re just going to have to be very innovative about it,” he said.

Mr Kebede, who taught at a primary school in the north east, was elected as head of the NEU in 2023. In 2021 he was filmed at a pro-Palestine rally, where he called to “globalise the intifada” – an anti-Semitic chant. He has since distanced himself from these remarks.

Earlier this month, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson announced a review into anti-Semitism in schools. She said she had “genuine concerns” about the ability of schools to deal with “hatred and prejudice”. The investigation was launched after it emerged a Jewish MP’s visit to a school in his Bristol constituency was cancelled after a pro-Palestine campaign.
Writing for the Telegraph at the time, she said the treatment of Damien Egan, Labour MP for Bristol North East, was “completely unacceptable”.
During his interview, Mr Kebede also claimed schools were on the front line in the battle against Reform UK.
“Schools have become a bit of a battleground for Reform in terms of the narrative that they’re pushing,” he said.
He warned that Labour’s increasingly hard line on immigration could “embolden” Nigel Farage’s party.

“I was hoping for a more progressive direction of travel from Government on this, more painting the positive vision for future Britain, telling the positive stories of migration,” he said.

“That seems to be largely absent at the moment, and I think that emboldens Reform, rather than really defeats them and their ideas.”
Council asking parents not to record conversations with teachers while conspicuously not mentioning what was recorded

Aberdeenshire Council has asked parents not to secretly record conversations with their children's teachers after incidents of the activity left staff "distressed".
In a letter to parents and carers, education chief Laurence Findlay said "a few individuals" were involved and he thanked the overwhelming majority for their constructive and courteous communications with staff.
Teaching union the EIS said some staff had taken time off work due to stress caused, and it described some of the incidents as "threatening".
One parent told BBC Scotland News he had uploaded conversations to social media out of "frustration" after making previous complaints about his child's education.

Posting such recordings might amount to a breach of general data protection regulation (GDPR).


Aberdeenshire Council has not provided information on how many parents were involved, only saying it was a "small minority" and that the behaviour had a "significant impact" on staff wellbeing.
In the letter, Findlay said incidents included "inappropriate or disrespectful communication" and interactions that caused "distress or disruption" to staff.
The education director said: "Our staff are dedicated professionals who work hard to support your children, and they must be able to carry out their duties free from intimidation, aggression, or inappropriate behaviour.
"They do not come to work to be threatened or placed in fearful situations."
He said employees would be encouraged to report aggressive or intimidating behaviour to Police Scotland.
One parent, who spoke to BBC Scotland News anonymously, said he posted multiple audio recordings of conversations with school staff after making complaints regarding his child's education.
He added: "Parents are bound to get frustrated when they are doing that and they either get ignored, they do not get responded to, or when they do get responded to, the response is full of lies.
"I would do it again because I think it is extremely important to let other parents know you are not alone in this."


Findlay's letter to parents was raised at a meeting of Aberdeenshire Council's education committee by chairman David Keating.
He told the meeting: "It is good to remind everyone of the risk of tipping over to unreasonable behaviour when you are passionate and concerned for child.
"But the teachers deserve respect and parents have to be aware of our zero tolerance policy.
"In my experience, teachers work hard to address any issues that are raised by parents."
The EIS' Aberdeenshire branch said it welcomed the letter's plea to parents.
Local association secretary David Smith said: "We think it is supportive to our members, many of whom have come to me with issues around the sort of complaints and concerns the letter highlights.
"The conduct that is highlighted in the letter does not happen often but you would not deal with someone in the community that way so why would you do it with someone in their professional environment.
"We have members who have been off work with stress because of this, we have members who have considered resigning because of this."
Another Labour MP complaining about housing shortages while occupying a council flat and making 94k a year
A Labour MP who decried the lack of affordable homes in her constituency is living in a council flat, The Telegraph can reveal.
Apsana Begum, who earns a salary of £94,000 as the MP for Poplar and Limehouse, in east London, has spoken out about the “housing crisis across London” and rising rates of homelessness.
But The Telegraph can reveal that she continues to live in a council flat, despite admitting almost five years ago that she “probably” did not need it any more.
On Saturday, the Tories said Ms Begum’s “hypocrisy is staggering”.
Last April, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority set the basic annual salary of MPs at £93,904, up from £91,346. MPs also receive expenses to cover the costs of running an office, employing staff, renting a second home and travelling between Parliament and their constituency.

Ms Begum’s council flat is in the borough of Tower Hamlets, which stipulates that any single person or couple earning over £90,000 are not eligible to apply for council housing. However, officials said that once a council flat had been allocated, they did not continue to monitor the occupant’s salary.
Ms Begum is not breaking any rules by continuing to live in a council flat.
However, Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative Party chairman, said: “Apsana Begum’s hypocrisy is staggering. She has been speaking out about the need for more council housing while occupying a council flat herself, despite pocketing an MP’s salary worth more than three times the average wage.
“While thousands queue up for the chance to get a council home in Tower Hamlets, Begum is entrenched in a pad that even she admits she doesn’t need.
“As ever, it’s one rule for Labour and another for everyone else. Council homes should be for those who really need them.”

In an interview with The Guardian newspaper in August 2021, Ms Begum said: “I am probably in a much better position now than I was when I first contacted the council for support.

“And so it is something that I am thinking about: is it something that I need? And it’s probably not something that I need. It’s something that I should maybe consider or think about moving on from.”
She gave the interview after she had been cleared by Snaresbrook Crown Court of housing fraud.
She had been accused of three charges of making dishonest applications for council homes to Tower Hamlets council between 2013 and 2016.
After she was found not guilty by a jury, she said that “vexatious” claims about her living arrangements had led to 18 months of sexist and racist online abuse.
Tower Hamlets Council, which brought the prosecution, said it had a “duty” to investigate the allegations.

During a debate about house building in the Commons last November, Ms Begum said: “Londoners and my constituents have been priced out, with increasing gentrification and affordable homes that are not only in shortage but all too often just not affordable.
“That is the legacy of the previous Tory Government and their previous Tory Mayor of London, Boris Johnson.”
She went on to highlight the “housing crisis across London, with rising rates of homelessness, insufficient social housing, soaring rents and associated poor-quality housing”.

Ms Begum concluded her speech by saying: “Housing is a right, and we must all have safe, affordable and secure housing. We need investment and empowerment in our communities, and to resolve the housing crisis we need a mass building programme of social and particularly council housing.”

Tower Hamlets is London’s most densely populated borough and has one of the most acute housing needs in England, according to the think tank Centre for London.
The think tank notes that the borough’s density and disparity of housing need is reflected in its waiting times for social housing. A one-bedroom property has a 2,008 day wait, the second highest in London.

‘Acute’ housing crisis​

Tower Hamlets says the housing crisis is “acute” in the borough, with 19,000 people currently on the waiting list.
It notes that renting property in the private sector is “beyond the reach of families on low income, around three times as much as rents for similar council (or housing association) homes and often cannot be covered by the local Housing Benefit allowance”.

The borough says that there is a “large demand” for social housing in the borough and cautions that “most people who join the housing register will never be offered a social housing tenancy”.
Ms Begum, who is on the Left of the party, was elected in 2019. She was suspended from Labour in 2024 for voting against the Government in support of ending the two-child benefit cap. She was re-admitted to the party last September.
Recommended
https://archive.ph/o/4kyI0/https://...er-pressure-after-slump-in-londons-new-homes/
A Tower Hamlets Council spokesman said: “Our Allocations Scheme restricts applicants with a sole or joint income of £90,000 or more from joining the Housing Register. Once a person is housed through the Register it is not our policy to review their salary.”
Dr Charlotte Proudman, barrister and founder of Proudmans Law Firm, said: “Apsana Begum MP was acquitted after a vexatious trial in 2021 with the matter being closed and no wrongdoing on her part.
“We consider this harassment of her to be an abuse of power which highlights the unjust treatment she continues to have to endure as a survivor of ongoing domestic abuse and the first hijab-wearing MP.”
 
They are, as follows:
Yes we live in a 'democracy'. Remember that one poll that said something like 90% of actual English people think mass immigration has not worked? Or that whole monarch thing where technically nothing we do actually matters and he can just simply veto any democratic vote we have?

'rules matter' unless you're brown, a paedophile, or a well just brown.
'Individual Liberty: The freedom to make personal choices, hold personal beliefs, and exercise freedom of speech within the law.' Ahh yes the freedom to do things unless the government says no. We are free to do anything that the government allows us to. Now that's true freedom. Freedom is when the government restricts what you can say and do chud.

British values are whatever the fuck I do. Whatever I do is a British value. I am 100% from the British Isles, that's double what the government is so I have a bigger right to say what that means than the government. British values are industrious and dominant. Not importing faggots to do our work or outsourcing and being some pussies that let the fucking french push us around. British values is a fry up with sausage and black pudding washed down with a pint. You cannot learn the values of Britain. You are either born and raised with them or not. The paki raising the kid in an overwhelmingly foreigner infested area will never have British values. If you have to try and 'teach' those things then it is an admission that these fucking faggots will never integrate and that immigration is a fucking joke.
 
Glastonbury is fine to watch on the telly but the idea of actually going there sounds like a form of torture. You'll be packed like sardines next to a bunch of gaza girlies who haven't washed since 3 days before the festival began and there'll be some retard on an acoustic guitar playing kumbaya while you're trying to sleep in your tent while it pisses down.

Plus all of the bands you want to see (which I could probably name on one hand) only get a 45 minute setlist so you're better off watching them at a standalone gig.
 
How about one around the Troubles?
Allowed to make games shooting at the muslim terrorists or the nazis but don't you dare do the same for the ruc. They're different because uhhhhh people died you know? How can you make a game where people died you fucking horrible people.
The Troubles continue to be lived day in, daily, in Northern Ireland
And the people in RoI don't? The people that were shot or killed fighting a colonial invader don't also live with the fallout of the troubles? Think about the poor Irish people and their fee no you fucking chud not those Irish people.
However, the use of a dice and cards format to represent a period marked by violence, loss and deep trauma risks being in very poor taste
The most popular board game is fucking monopoly. You know that board game that uses dice and cards to depict the monopolisation of housing by the individuals and banks and forcing the average person into usury or homelessness and increasing the cost of living. You know. That thing that we are currently experiencing in this very moment. There's countless board games about wwii and no one gives a shit about that despite that being an objectively much worse period in time that still has living victims. Pretending that people are going to fucking start shaking and shit themselves and literally fucking die because someone made a card game. It's the same shit when suicide comes up in media and everything has to be banned to not offend the poor weak willed sensitive people struggling with mental health, they're one suicide joke off of killing themselves don't you know? That thinking is more offensive than any media has ever been. That's the real problem, not the fact that Ulster is still occupied by a hostile foreign power.
 
Back
Top Bottom