UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Muslim MP Iqbal Mohamed (Member of Parliament for Dewsbury and Batley) ... says that cousin marriage is part of his culture and that banning it would be ‘Islamophobia’.
It's an outright lie to say that he said banning it is 'Islamophobia', unless this moment is clipped elsewhere. The guy is already dying on the most retarded hill possible and making a clown of himself, there is no need to make shit up.

Also, as to the merits of his argument, there is something to be said that these groups probably won't care if marriage between first cousins is banned or not, making a ban largely ineffective. They're likely to continue, especially considering they, by and large, couldn't give less of a shit about western values and institutions, meaning this legislation is a bandaid over a much larger issue — which polite society isn't allowed to comment on.

His alternative proposals seem absurd to the point of comedy, always towing that leftist line that any bad behaviour by minority groups amounts to a lack of information, and they, as the enlightened and virtuous leftist, should save them from themselves through education. As if a health seminar is a cure to this.

I won't even comment on the genetic testing point, as the necessity of Arab states to regularly conduct these tests, in trying to stem the flow of retard babies being born because of the sheer number of incestuous relationships, is hilarious in of itself.

However, to give the devil his due, it wasn't all that long ago that the European aristocracy was inbred to the point of making SCP-esque monstrosities, à la the Hapsburg dynasty.
 
It's an outright lie to say that he said banning it is 'Islamophobia', unless this moment is clipped elsewhere. The guy is already dying on the most retarded hill possible and making a clown of himself, there is no need to make shit up.

Also, as to the merits of his argument, there is something to be said that these groups probably won't care if marriage between first cousins is banned or not, making a ban largely ineffective. They're likely to continue, especially considering they, by and large, couldn't give less of a shit about western values and institutions, meaning this legislation is a bandaid over a much larger issue — which polite society isn't allowed to comment on.

His alternative proposals seem absurd to the point of comedy, always towing that leftist line that any bad behaviour by minority groups amounts to a lack of information, and they, as the enlightened and virtuous leftist, should save them from themselves through education. As if a health seminar is a cure to this.

I won't even comment on the genetic testing point, as the necessity of Arab states to regularly conduct these tests, in trying to stem the flow of retard babies being born because of the sheer number of incestuous relationships, is hilarious in of itself.

However, to give the devil his due, it wasn't all that long ago that the European aristocracy was inbred to the point of making SCP-esque monstrosities, à la the Hapsburg dynasty.
Muslim man screams in grievance, must be a Sunday...


Some news, if you'd like:


Keir Starmer hands peerage to former adviser who campaigned for paedophile as Tories demand investigation into PM's spin doctor




New Archbishop of Canterbury urged to scrap £100million slavery reparations plan




Former England star Andy Carroll 'faces five years in prison' after being charged with breaking 'non-molestation order'




Scandal-hit Wessex Water ex-boss was paid £170,000 bonus despite ban




French union BLOCKS efforts to stop small boats as UK sanctions nation failing to take back illegal migrants




Trans militants plotting ‘attacks on offices of senior politicians’, including Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting




GB News guests ridicule 'silly' West Side Story trigger warning as they slam 'woke agenda'




GoFundMe sees cost-of-living fundraisers increase by a fifth as British families struggle with rising bills




Ex-MI6 operative issues dire warning over 9/11 style attack in Britain with hundreds of terrorists hiding in the UK


 
Oh, huh, I wonder what all these terrorists have in common.
Exactly, I really can't think why allowing infinite stabby, rapey and bomby types here would be a bad thing... *Sarcasm Meter explodes*

Well, if ISIS and Al-Qaeda won't do anything (as if), then the ATA (Angry Tranny Alliance) will.

Death by Terrorist or Death by Tranny... oh dear me, Keir...
 
[Mahmood] "We expect countries to play by the rules. If one of their citizens has no right to be here, they must take them back. "I thank Angola and Namibia and welcome their co-operation. Now is the time for the Democratic Republic of Congo to do the right thing. Take your citizens back or lose the privilege of entering our country. "This is just the start of the measures I am taking to secure our border and ramp up the removal of those with no right to be here"
Can anyone explain what the fuck she's talking about when she says that a criminal illegal migrant's home country "must take them back"? Why is she ringing up Namibia and asking them if they'll kindly take back their child-raping citizen who's entered the UK illegally? Just put them on a fucking plane? Why do we need their permission?
 
Oh and the government (and Tories) are both in denial about that Egyptian guy who they let back in who was posting jew hate on twitter openly. They claim they had no idea his tweets existed........ right.
Because the rest of the news stories were too gutless to quote his posts directly I used the Mail article. It 100% was not just Jews.

Keir Starmer last night faced a storm of criticism for celebrating the arrival in the UK of an Egyptian activist who advocated the killing of ‘Zionists’ and the British police.
Tory and Reform UK politicians united to condemn the Prime Minister for welcoming Alaa Abd El-Fattah’s return to Britain, after serving more than a decade in Egyptian jails.
The Prime Minister said: ‘I’m delighted that Alaa Abd El-Fattah is back in the UK and has been reunited with his loved ones, who must be feeling profound relief.’
His arrival was also welcomed by Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper.
Robert Jenrick, the Tories’ justice spokesman, condemned Sir Keir’s remarks.
Writing in today’s Mail on Sunday, Mr Jenrick said: ‘At a time when anti-Semitic incidents are surging, when Jewish communities feel under threat and when policing is under intense pressure, the signal this sends is grotesque.’
He added: ‘The Prime Minister is no longer a private campaigner or a gun for hire. His words carry weight and represent us all.’
Reform leader Nigel Farage said: ‘This Government just gets worse. No mention of these violent tweets on the BBC News story either.’

Mr El-Fattah, 44, wrote most the tweets between 2010 and 2011, some of which appear to have been deleted. In one, he said: ‘I consider killing any colonialists and especially Zionists heroic, we need to kill more of them.’
In another, he wrote: ‘There was no genocide against Jews by the Nazis – after all, many Jews are left.’
Shortly after that, he tweeted: ‘Dear Zionists, please don’t ever talk to me, I’m a violent person who advocated the killing of all Zionists including civilians, so f*** off.’
He also said: ‘Police are not human, they don’t have rights, we should just kill them all.’
On August 8, 2011, as London was in the grip of riots, Mr El-Fattah wrote: ‘Go burn the city or Downing Street or hunt police you fools.’
He also said: ‘So the British dogs and monkeys really think terrorists will reveal their plans on Twitter?’
Mr El-Fattah, who was born and raised in Egypt, was granted British citizenship in 2022 as his mother Laila Soueif was born in the UK.
He became an internationally known freedom activist as the Arab Spring swept the country in 2011. He was arrested and jailed during the protests, but released months later.


In June 2014, Mr El-Fattah was arrested for his activism against Egyptian president Abdel Fattah El-Sisi’s regime, and sentenced to 15 years, but released in 2019.
He was jailed again for five years in December 2021 over claims he spread fake news about torture on social media.
The activist was granted a pardon in September and released, but was not allowed to leave the country until Boxing Day.
And last night, critics questioned how the PM and his ministers did not know about Mr El-Fattah’s previous tweets.
In a letter to Sir Keir, seen by the MoS, Mr Jenrick wrote: ‘Did you know about these statements before you issued your “delighted” message? Do you condemn them without qualification... will you correct the record by withdrawing the unalloyed endorsement?’
Mr El-Fattah was seen as a cause celebre in Britain and around the world, praised by celebrities such as Judi Dench.
A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: ‘Either the Government did not carry out a basic search, or they knew about this and considered it insufficiently important to warrant saying anything. We have no idea which of these it is, and struggle to decide which is more concerning.
‘In the wake of lethal terrorist attacks on Jews from Manchester to Bondi, the UK now has yet one more resident who wants to see “Zionists” murdered, unless of course the passage of time and a long spell in Egypt have led to a radical rethink by Alaa Abd El-Fattah.’ Mr El-Fattah could not be contacted for comment.


ROBERT JENRICK: Want to wipe out anti-Semitism, Sir Keir? Then stop welcoming its proponents with open arms
Only days ago, Keir Starmer promised to ‘eradicate anti-Semitism in the UK’. Then, this week, he did the opposite.
The Prime Minister went on X to say he was ‘delighted’ that Alaa Abd El-Fattah is back in Britain. He called the case a ‘top priority’ for his Government.
He even thanked Egyptian president Abdel Fattah El-Sisi for granting a pardon.
That is not discreet diplomacy. It is a very personal welcome from the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. And it is indefensible. Because this isn’t simply a story about a relieved family. It is also a story about who the Prime Minister chose to celebrate.
Mr El-Fattah’s public record includes statements that should make any responsible leader pause before putting the authority of government behind him.
In his own social media posts, he has endorsed killing ‘Zionists’ and urged more of it. He has also been reported as calling for Israelis to be killed in chilling terms. And he appeared to deny the Holocaust happened.
Nor is this confined to Israel. In July 2011, he wrote that ‘police are not human’, that they ‘don’t have rights’, and that ‘we should just kill them all’.
In August 2011, amid disorder on London’s streets, he urged people to ‘go burn the city or Downing Street or hunt police’. In fact, he said he hated white people and called us Brits ‘dogs’.

Read that again. A man being publicly welcomed by the Prime Minister has, in his own words, advocated violence against Jews and violence against police, has egged on attacks on the seat of government itself and has insulted the British people.
In today’s two-tier justice system, people have been arrested at the airport or had a knock on the door from the police for tweeting lesser things – indeed got 30 months inside for saying them.
At a time when anti-Semitic incidents are surging, when Jewish communities feel under threat and when policing is under intense pressure, the signal this sends is grotesque.
The Government should be standing four-square with the victims of hatred and violence. Instead, the Prime Minister is jubilant about bringing a man with a record of incitement into this country and presenting it as his personal triumph.
There can be only two explanations. Either Sir Keir did not know what he was amplifying – which would be staggering negligence at the top of government – or he did know, and decided to press ‘post’ anyway. That would be worse.
No one disputes that families want loved ones home. No one supports arbitrary detention abroad. But the Prime Minister is no longer a private campaigner or a gun for hire. His words carry weight and represent us all as a nation.
He should withdraw his unalloyed endorsement of this man, condemn these statements without equivocation and explain how on earth this became a ‘top priority’.
If Sir Keir is serious about eradicating anti-Semitism, he should start by not cheering it on and welcoming its proponents at the arrivals lounge with open arms.
 
Also a child brothel.
Nobody would be more surprised to find God exists than a Church of England vicar. I’m glad they’re keeping the architecture going but there’s a huge spiritual and moral vacuum there.
The tales I’ve heard from friends who went to religious boarding schools are bad
 
I’m glad they’re keeping the architecture going
Except for all the times they sell churches to property developers and Muslims. I'm starting to think the French had the right idea, seizing all the property from the church to hold in trust for the people.

That's twice I've had nice things to say about France today. I must be coming down with something...
 
Nobody would be more surprised to find God exists than a Church of England vicar. I’m glad they’re keeping the architecture going but there’s a huge spiritual and moral vacuum there.
The tales I’ve heard from friends who went to religious boarding schools are bad
Catholic bros keep winning. They may shag kids but at least they believe in god whilst they are doing it.
 
Catholic bros keep winning. They may shag kids but at least they believe in god whilst they are doing it.
I’m afraid the catholic boarding schools were just as bad. I met some horribly damaged boys at uni, who had been physically and sexually abused by the religious and lay staff. There’s been a few inquiries but mainly it’s stuffed under the rug and ignored
I believe in God, but I’m afraid I look at religious man made institutions with a very skeptical eye
 
I’m afraid the catholic boarding schools were just as bad. I met some horribly damaged boys at uni, who had been physically and sexually abused by the religious and lay staff. There’s been a few inquiries but mainly it’s stuffed under the rug and ignored
I believe in God, but I’m afraid I look at religious man made institutions with a very skeptical eye
I’m an euphoric atheist myself, but I believe we should reject modernity and embrace tradition when it comes to religiously sanctioned child abusers.
 
I’m a euphoric atheist myself, but I believe we should reject modernity and embrace tradition when it comes to religiously sanctioned child abusers.
Pressing them into a bog after strangulation, Bronze Age style? Has to be an improvement on the current slap on the wrist
 
Back
Top Bottom