UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shit like this is why I now view myself as an accelerationist now with regards to the state of the country.

I genuinely think the only thing we can do now is let shit get worse until eventually the entire country collapses, and then hope that whatever comes afterwards when the political and cultural systems fall through is better than what we have now. It's a big fucking gamble and there's every chance that what comes after would be the Islamic Caliphate of Britain, but the alternative is a painstaking process of decades of things being just barely not shit enough to collapse the system.
This outlook and your user name is very, very apt lmao
 
Shit like this is why I now view myself as an accelerationist now with regards to the state of the country.

I genuinely think the only thing we can do now is let shit get worse until eventually the entire country collapses, and then hope that whatever comes afterwards when the political and cultural systems fall through is better than what we have now. It's a big fucking gamble and there's every chance that what comes after would be the Islamic Caliphate of Britain, but the alternative is a painstaking process of decades of things being just barely not shit enough to collapse the system.
I have to disagree with this position, because it never makes things better. I've spent time in countries that are on the other side of this sort of total societal collapse. Regardless of what economic state they were in at the time, regardless of the precise details that brought about their social or economic collapse, they all had one thing in common: A complete and utter destruction of any sort of societal trust and order, leading to routine corruption at every level of society, graft and bribery, and all the same societal problems that led to the collapse in the first place, but now without the social structures left to even begin addressing them. Accelerationism and collapse does not create a ground for restoring society to a better state, but instead permanently cements in place all the very worst problems it is supposed to fix. It is a fantasy, crafted by people who don't have the patience to try and fix the problems they are facing; an ideological tantrum, smashing things up and tearing things down without care for what comes afterwards, in the belief that they will somehow magically survive the social apocalypse they're creating. It fixes nothing and leaves ruins, from which can only emerge an even more degraded, corrupt, and degenerate society.
 
I've seen his channel before, it's how he talks for some really weird reason. To be fair that is how Paul Joseph Watson also sounds to me
I would have bet my left nut that was AI speak. Imagine talking like that. It's like a more retarded chavved up Obsidian Ant.
 
I have to disagree with this position, because it never makes things better. I've spent time in countries that are on the other side of this sort of total societal collapse. Regardless of what economic state they were in at the time, regardless of the precise details that brought about their social or economic collapse, they all had one thing in common: A complete and utter destruction of any sort of societal trust and order, leading to routine corruption at every level of society, graft and bribery, and all the same societal problems that led to the collapse in the first place, but now without the social structures left to even begin addressing them. Accelerationism and collapse does not create a ground for restoring society to a better state, but instead permanently cements in place all the very worst problems it is supposed to fix. It is a fantasy, crafted by people who don't have the patience to try and fix the problems they are facing; an ideological tantrum, smashing things up and tearing things down without care for what comes afterwards, in the belief that they will somehow magically survive the social apocalypse they're creating. It fixes nothing and leaves ruins, from which can only emerge an even more degraded, corrupt, and degenerate society.
For every revolution that makes the lot of the common man better, there are 5 or 6 that make it worse. I can only think of the American and French revolutions, and the Eastern European revolutions that followed the fall of the USSR (Poland, Hungary, Romania etc.). Even then, things got so much worse in Russia under Yeltsin that Putin was an improvement. The Arab Spring has made every single country (except maybe Tunisia, even then it's marginal) a worse place, Syria is still in a state of Civil War 13 years later.

And that's when there is an uprising against a government, not a collapse of society. Look at what happened in places like Rwanda, Somalia, Yemen, Yugoslavia. Those places fell to anarchy and genocide and only Yugoslavia has recovered because it was on NATO's doorstep and they didn't want gangster states on their borders (but got Albania anyway). People who think accelerationism or revolution is the solution don't study history and think their bloodbath will be the good bloodbath that bucks the trend for no other reason than they believe in it.

So what's my suggestion, then? There isn't one. Leave if you can, fortify if you can't. Just because society collapsing would be bad doesn't mean it won't happen; it probably will. The UK has been the canary in the coalmine for the West, so if we do collapse the rest of the West isn't far away. I genuinely hope it won't happen in my lifetime or that of my children, because bad as things are here it will look like paradise compared to what happens if we go all Mad Max. Actually probably the best we can hope for is a military coup. The army are probably the least corrupted institution of state left, I'd rather have mustachioed Brigadiers running the place than politicians or feral rape gangs.
 
I genuinely hope it won't happen in my lifetime or that of my children, because bad as things are here it will look like paradise compared to what happens if we go all Mad Max.
As I keep pointing out to everyone I know who claims to have an attitude of anarchism to these things a collapsing society will fail the most vulnerable first. It's not going to be like the shitty tv shows where the cast are lovely and diverse, the people who will be most screwed are the ones most reliant on things functioning the way they are meant to. Old, young, disabled etc. are the ones who will suffer and it astounds me how many people there are who have those sort of people in their lives and still talk about wanting a collapse.

Speaking of our country being a train wreck...Christ I've racked up more than I want to post in one go. Will save some for the weekend.

Standard charity scam. That said I have a horrible suspicion I could do an article a day on Birmingham alone
A woman has been found guilty of stealing money from a charity she set up and then trying to cover it up with the help of her brother.
Police said Rajbinder Kaur, 55, from Birmingham, founded Sikh Youth UK in 2016 and took money from it to pay off personal debts, as well as sending money to others including family members.
She was convicted of six counts of theft and one of money laundering at Birmingham Crown Court.
Kaur was also found guilty of knowingly or recklessly providing false or misleading information to the Charity Commission, as was her brother Kaldip Singh Lehal, 43.
The trial heard how the pair applied to set up the charity, but the Charity Commission shut it down after failing to get enough information.
Despite this, West Midlands Police said Sikh Youth UK collected donations which were then siphoned off by Kaur, who was a former bank worker.
The force said she had more than 50 personal bank accounts in an attempt to make it as complicated as possible to follow the flow of stolen money.
Supt Annie Miller said Kaur, of Hamstead Road, had attempted to portray herself as being financially naive.
But she said: "In the simplest of terms Kaur was stealing large amounts of money that had been donated by local people for good causes."
Kaur and Lehal will be sentenced on 21 November.
(they started looking into them 5 years ago)

Looks like their social media might be rife with screaming about this.

Teacher being a creepy pervert example infinity
A former teacher has been permanently banned from the profession after arranging to meet a child alone while working as a scout leader.
Shawn Kendall, who once taught English at Norton Hill School in Somerset, was found by a misconduct panel to be guilty of "unacceptable professional conduct".
The Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) said Mr Kendall exchanged "over-familiar" texts with the child and acted "in an inappropriate manner" in his scout role.
The Scouts Association said Mr Kendall had "betrayed the trust" of the organisation.
The school's headteacher, Gordon Green, said the incidents happened within Mr Kendall's role as a scout leader and there is "no indication of any such behaviour during his time at our school".
Between July and August 2022 Mr Kendall was alone on his car with the child on more than one occasion, a TRA report , externalsaid.
Mr Kendall admitted he gave the child "lifts" home from their meeting point for the Scouts, and stated it was in the "full knowledge and understanding of the parents".
But the panel found Mr Kendall exchanged "over-personal" texts with the child, such as "probably have to wait until you are at uni, but game if you are" and "Lady and the Tramp is a bit like we would be".
At one point Mr Kendall messaged the child: "I am looking forward to a cuddle tho", and invited them to meet up at a weekend to watch films together.
Mr Kendall was excluded from The Scouts Association on 10 January 2023, six months after he told the school he had been suspended.
The school, in Midsomer Norton, held its own investigation and then suspended Mr Kendall on 6 March, 2023. He resigned the following month.


In a written submission to the panel, Mr Kendall described his "regret, guilt and self-loathing over his behaviour and the impact that it has had".
The report said "Mr Kendall submitted that his instinct was to help, and that he did not consider the 'slippery slope' he had embarked upon, although stated that he 'fully recognise how this contributed to later events, although this was not recognised at the time'.
"Mr Kendall submitted that he has now begun a new career, and that he poses no risk 'now or in the future'."
Mr Kendall described the experience as the 'worst…of [his] life'."
Despite the panel acknowledging his regret, it found he showed "little insight" to the potential effect of his actions on the child involved.

A spokesperson for The Scout Association said it "cooperated fully with the statutory authorities throughout the investigation".
"The safety of young people in our care is our number one priority, and there is no place in scouting for anyone who behaves in this way.
"Kendall has not been a member of the Scouts since 2022 and will never be able to volunteer with us again."
They added everyone who works at the Scouts abides by a "strict code of practice to put young people first", and "stringent vetting" is carried out on all adults who work with young people.
Mr Green said it was "clear his position as a teacher was untenable".
"The safeguarding and well being of our children is absolutely paramount," he said.
"We ensured that we followed all the statutory advice and made the referral to the TRA after Mr Kendall resigned so that they could investigate further to make a decision on whether he would be able to work in any role involving children going forwards."


Most enraging part about this one is the flouncing performers still got paid

A five-week run of A Midsummer Night's Dream at a major Manchester theatre was cancelled after the director bitterly feuded with theatre bosses over references to Palestine and trans rights.

The Royal Exchange Theatre, which sits in the heart of the city, was due to run a modern version of the Shakespeare classic set in contemporary Manchester with a drum and bass soundtrack. It was directed by Stef O'Driscoll, known for her work in London's Royal Court Theatre.

Theatre bosses cancelled the first few performances, which were due to start on September 6, citing a cast injury and a 'technical issue.'

But the real reason for the cancellation was that theatre bosses objected to a song in the production which referred to trans rights and the phrase 'Free Palestine', Manchester Evening News revealed.

The outlet reported that theatre management wanted the section to be removed, but O'Driscoll reportedly insisted it remain, an opinion that was supported by her cast.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...regnant-woman-flight.html?ico=related-replace
A source told MEN: 'They did the first preview, at which point the theatre said they are going to have to cut the reference to trans rights and free Palestine.

'The director said - no, this is my direction, it's what it's always been, we've had weeks and months and you are now trying to change it after the first preview. The company were very solid and unified.'

A meeting between the cast, director and upper management took place last Wednesday, where disagreements were supposed to be worked through.

But a source told the paper that the row could not be resolved.

'Wednesday was meant to be press night, by which point you would expect enthusiasm from people on social media - nothing at all. On Wednesday the cast were called in for a meeting at 11am to resolve it, they couldn't', they said.

'At the weekend they couldn't agree, the director had walked, so they cancelled it.'

A source close to the production added: 'This is a big deal for them. They've been through the wars financially, through Covid. I know people that are directly involved. They are really devastated about it.'

Ticketholders were told on Saturday that the entire run was cancelled, and that they would be refunded.

Stars who were due to perform in the five-week run have since taken to social media to express their grief at the cancellation.

BBC star Alicia Forde, who was set to play Lysander, said in an Instagram story: 'Much love for the messages about the cancellation of our show A Midsummer Night's Dream at the Royal Exchange.

'Not ignoring you I promise, just taking some time... big love to the cast and crew, it was a special one x.'

Manchester musician Salo, who was set to play the Moon in the production, said on Instagram: 'A Midsummer Night's Dream has been cancelled. Apologies to everyone that was so excited to see this theatre production.

'The work I put into this was huge and I'm f****** gutted for myself and everyone involved. Don't wanna talk about it too much as I'm emotionally drained but will answer any questions about it at a later date. Just need some time to process.'

Equity, the acting union, said that the cast and crew were still being paid for the full run.

A spokesperson told MEN: ' We are supporting members in dealing with the impact of this cancellation on their wellbeing and future relationships with the venue.

'Whilst we're pleased that the workforce will not be out of pocket, the issues that have led to the cancellation of the production require further discussion with Manchester Royal Exchange.

'Equity has today contacted the theatre requesting an urgent meeting to discuss the reasons for cancellation, the impact on our members and the steps being taken now. We remain very concerned about this situation and its impact on our members.'

MailOnline has contacted the Royal Exchange Theatre and representatives for Stef O'Driscoll for comment.

In case anyone had any doubts about if Italy was actually curbing their immigration issues
  • Prime Minister Keir Starmer praises Italy's "remarkable progress" on tackling illegal migration during a news conference, in Rome, alongside his Italian counterpart
  • Starmer says the pair used a meeting today to discuss global challenges and "meeting them together" - and thanks Giorgia Meloni, specifically, for her leadership in supporting Ukraine
  • For her part, the Italian prime minister says collaboration between UK and Italian authorities is needed "to get to the core of the problem" of human trafficking
  • She also describes allegations of human rights violations, made against Italy in its treatment of migrants, as "completely groundless"
  • Starmer earlier said he was "interested" in learning more about Italy's scheme to send those rescued at sea to Albania to process their asylum claim

While not as stupid as the headline might suggest I can already see what's going to happen

Teachers will be allowed to work from home to do marking and lesson planning under a Labour plan to boost recruitment to the profession.

Under reported plans, headteachers will be told to make it easier for teachers to work from home during free periods.

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson hopes the increased flexibility will stop women from leaving the profession when they have children, according to reports.

Schools would be encouraged to give teachers blocks of free periods for marking or other prep work at the beginning or end of the day. This would allow people to juggle work while looking after children or completing the school run.

A government source told The Telegraph: “Unlike its predecessor, this government is taking the recruitment and retention of teachers seriously, which is why we’re making common-sense changes that enable great teachers to say in our classrooms.

“These changes are part of a wider reset of the relationship between government and teaching staff to ensure we drive high and rising standards across our schools and deliver better life chances for our children.”

The plans come after Labour pledged to end “the culture of presenteeism” in Britain’s workplaces by giving employees the right to switch off after hours.

Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds said this week that giving employees the right to work from home or to ignore work emails or calls out of hours will make them more “motivated and resilient”.

He slammed former Conservative minister Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg for “declaring war on people working from home”.

Mr Reynolds told The Times: “Good employers understand that their workforce, to keep them motivated and resilient, they do need to judge people on outcomes and not a culture of presenteeism.”

The Labour government will publish an employment rights bill next month that would make flexible working a default right.

The Department for Education has been contacted for comment.

More than 30 pieces of silver.


Sir Keir Starmer’s chief of staff received a pay rise after the election which means she is now paid more than the prime minister.
The BBC has been told that Sue Gray asked for and was given a salary of £170,000 - £3,000 more than the PM and more than any cabinet minister – or her Conservative predecessor.
One source told the BBC: "It was suggested that she might want to go for a few thousand pounds less than the prime minister to avoid this very story. She declined."
A government source close to Ms Gray said this claim was "categorically untrue" and she had "had no involvement in any decision on her pay".
The decision has ignited a row within government over Ms Gray, whose report while a senior civil servant into parties in Downing Street during the pandemic contributed to the downfall of Boris Johnson.
She then went on to work as a Labour Party adviser.
Her wide-ranging role as the prime minister's chief of staff includes controlling access to the PM and helping to ensure the government's policies are put into action.
Her Conservative predecessor Liam, now Lord, Booth Smith, who did the job under Rishi Sunak, was paid at the upper end of the highest pay band for special advisers, between £140,000 and £145,000 a year, external.
The boost in Ms Gray’s pay comes after the prime minister signed off a rebanding of the salaries for special advisers shortly after taking office.
The government says the rebanding was done by officials, not by Ms Gray herself, and her salary is not at the top of the new highest band for special advisers.
News of Ms Gray’s pay rise, briefed to the BBC by a number of Whitehall sources, is the latest in a line of leaks about her which paint a picture of fractious relationships at the very top of government, just months into Labour’s tenure.
"It speaks to the dysfunctional way No10 is being run - no political judgement, an increasingly grand Sue who considers herself to be the deputy prime minister, hence the salary and no other voice for the prime minister to hear as everything gets run through Sue," one insider told the BBC.
The prime minister earns £166,786.
One angry government insider branded Ms Gray's pay "the highest ever special adviser salary in the history of special advisers".
Others in government speak passionately in Ms Gray’s defence and believe there is a misplaced and deeply personal campaign against her which is grossly unfair.
A government source said "any questions should be directed at the process and not an individual".
Asked about Ms Gray being paid more than the PM, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "We’re very lucky to have Sue."


Another cabinet minister, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the BBC: "Sue has done an enormous job preparing Labour for government, and is now showing her customary drive to get Whitehall to deliver on Labour’s priorities.
"She won’t be distracted, she will carry on doing what she always does, focus on delivering the change that the British people voted for."
Ms Gray’s salary has sparked such a row in government partly because other advisers believe they are being underpaid.
Every cabinet minister has at least two special advisers, many of whom also worked with them in opposition.
Then, they were paid by the Labour Party.
Most were expecting pay rises upon entering government only to discover they would in fact be paid less.
Many of the disappointed advisers blame Ms Gray specifically - although others insist that pay is a matter for civil servants.
The majority of those on the committee within Whitehall responsible for special advisers pay and conditions are civil servants, but Ms Gray is on it too.
"It’s bizarre," one furious adviser told the BBC. "I’m working harder than ever in a more important job and they want to pay me less than the Labour Party was paying me when it was broke."
These frustrations are not confined to junior advisers.
A source claimed that the prime minister’s director of communications, Matthew Doyle, was initially offered a salary of £110,000, significantly less than Ms Gray’s.
This was later raised to £140,000, a figure in line with several of his predecessors doing the same job.
There is no suggestion there was any anger internally over Doyle’s pay.
Many special advisers worked for weeks without being shown a proposed employment contract, meaning that by the time they discovered what their salary would be they had essentially no choice but to accept it.
Again, Ms Gray was widely blamed for the delay in formal contracts being circulated.

When Ms Gray was hired as Starmer’s chief of staff in 2023 she was tasked with working on Labour’s preparations for government.
Special advisers see the row over their salaries as a sign that the work was not carried out in enough detail.
"If you ever see any evidence of our preparations for government, please let me know," one adviser said.
When a new government is elected dozens of new special advisers arrive all at once.
To ensure people are paid immediately, they were each put on a holding salary, while the new pay bands were worked through.
Others questioned why the initial batch of ministerial appointments, which Ms Gray oversaw, took so long given the chief of staff had had months to plan.
A minister for the Middle East, Hamish Falconer, was not appointed until 18 July, two weeks after the general election.
Successive Conservative governments also explored increasing the pay of special advisers, before concluding "the politics is wild", as one Tory source put it, of giving advisers pay rises when millions of households were struggling with the cost of living.
Under both Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, proposals for increases were fully worked up, we are told, "but they were rejected because they were seen as indefensible".
Those in government now argue the pay of special advisers had become well out of step with others in Whitehall and needed to go up.
But others still think Ms Gray’s pay is excessive.
A Cabinet Office spokesman told the BBC: "It is false to suggest that political appointees have made any decisions on their own pay bands or determining their own pay.
"Any decision on special adviser pay is made by officials not political appointees. As set out publicly, special advisers cannot authorise expenditure of public funds or have responsibility for budgets."
The Conservatives said Labour had 10 questions to answer, including whether the prime minister personally signed off Ms Gray's new salary and the increase to the cap on the highest pay band.
They have also asked whether a special adviser remuneration committee still exists and if Ms Gray is a member, as well as what role she played in setting her own salary and changing pay bands.

For those who needed more reason to hate the junior doctors and the BMA. I also hate them an additional amount for specifically picking an American term because they all watch too much TV.
Junior doctors working across the NHS will now be called resident doctors instead - in a change intended to better reflect their expertise.
The doctors union, the British Medical Association (BMA), which called for the change, called the term junior "infantilising and demeaning".
"Resident doctor" will refer to more than 50,000 qualified doctors working in GP practices and hospitals - some recently out of medical school and others with a decade of experience.
Health ministers say they have accepted the new name as part of a drive to "reset the relationship" between NHS doctors and the government.
It comes just days after resident doctors in England accepted the government’s offer of a 22% pay rise over two years, ending an 18-month dispute.
The BMA says many of its members said the term "junior" was confusing and wrongly implied doctors were unqualified.
Politicians had also sometimes used the term to "undersell the role", it says.

"I'm 40, I have two kids, a cat and a mortgage," she says.
"When I say, 'junior doctor', my friends and family interpret that to mean I am still at medical school.
"It takes a lot of explaining to say I'm still in training to be a consultant but am not a student."
And while "resident" is not "entirely accurate" - because many resident doctors are not necessarily resident in the hospitals they work in - it is a much better term.
"It is more neutral," Dr Huang says.
"It doesn't have an inherent value judgement in it that 'junior' does and is a little more akin to what people are used to watching [TV drama] Grey's Anatomy."

How can anyone claim it's unfair that Labour MPs are interviewed by their husband? Just pretend this is what journalism should be!
ITV's chief executive has defended Ed Balls' interview with his wife, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, on Good Morning Britain - but said they would not do it again.
Dame Carolyn McCall was speaking after media regulator Ofcom announced it will not investigate more than 16,000 complaints about an episode of the ITV breakfast show on 5 August.
That morning, Balls and co-host Kate Garraway interviewed Cooper about the government's response to violent unrest in parts of the UK.
"It was a very, very tricky morning, there was a national emergency almost being called, and so we got very short notice that the home secretary was coming on the show," Dame Carolyn said.

"She was doing a whole round [of interviews], but it was unexpected, and we believe that it was fair and impartial," she told the Royal Television Society London Conference on Tuesday.
"And actually Ofcom just ruled, but amazingly no-one has picked up on the fact, that Ofcom are not pursuing these complaints, because they believe it's fair, balanced and impartial.
"So would we do it again? No. Was it impartial, fair and balanced? And did they behave professionally? Yes.
"I mean, he asked her a few questions, but I think Kate was leading on that wasn't she? And so I do think you've just got to say, if Ofcom have looked at it and they're not pursuing this any further because they thought it was fair balanced and impartial, you know, that's it."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2xky7g9jdo
Balls, a former Labour minister, is now a regular GMB presenter; Cooper, his wife, was appointed home secretary following the general election in July. They have been married since 1998.
Ofcom said it carefully considered the complaints of a conflict of interest.
But a spokesperson said: "Taking into account that their relationship was made clear twice, that a range of views about Labour's handling of the riots were included in the programme as a whole, and given the vast majority of the interview was conducted by co-presenter, Kate Garraway, we will not be pursuing further."
Ofcom added that it had issued guidance warning ITV to "take particular care over the compliance of such interviews in future to ensure due impartiality".
Some of the complaints about the episode related to how Balls and Garraway questioned Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana in a separate interview.
In response, Ofcom said: "In our view, Ms Sultana was given ample opportunity to express her views and respond to the questions put to her, while we consider the robust line of questioning would be consistent with regular viewers' expectations of interviews with political figures on this programme."
In the item, Sultana, who previously sat as a Labour MP before she had the whip suspended in July, said the government should describe the riots as Islamophobic as well as racist, and challenged Balls on an article he had previously written about immigration.
Writing afterwards on X, external, she said: "The sneering contempt of 'journalists' will never stop me from calling out racism and Islamophobic hate."

I do wish the word "excommunicated" was in this article
A priest has been given a suspended prison sentence for stealing money from his own church's donation plates.
Fortunato Pantisano, 44, was caught on CCTV taking about £200 at Our Lady of Perpetual Help Catholic Church in Fulham, west London, on 7 January.
The Italian national pleaded not guilty to a charge of theft by an employee in June but was convicted of the offence following a trial at Westminster Magistrates' Court.
The court heard Pantisano had been a priest at the church for 10 years and had previously been of good character.


Pantisano, of Harewood Avenue in Westminster, was sentenced to 20 weeks' imprisonment suspended for two years.
District Judge Daniel Sternberg also ordered him to pay £200 in compensation and costs of about £800.
Judge Sternberg said the offence was of "high culpability" due to the trust and responsibility placed in the defendant by the church.
The court heard that Pantisano was suspended from service at the time of the theft. He continued to deny having committed the offence, his pre-sentence report showed.
Judge Sternberg added it was likely Pantisano would not be able to practise as a priest again.
The judge said a suspended sentence was appropriate given the defendant had no previous convictions, presented no real risk to the public and had a "strong prospect" of rehabilitation.
 
Between this thread and Spunt's thread that name has to come to fill with me existential dread at its mere mentioning, for some horrors should simply not be allowed to exist.
I feel sorry for Birmingham, it has neglected to a near abusive degree since the recession of the 80s and despite 9 years of no overall party in charge it's a Labour stronghold in almost every way. The council declared bankruptcy last September which I think makes it the largest city to do so and is not a harbinger of anything getting better.
 
I feel sorry for Birmingham, it has neglected to a near abusive degree since the recession of the 80s and despite 9 years of no overall party in charge it's a Labour stronghold in almost every way. The council declared bankruptcy last September which I think makes it the largest city to do so and is not a harbinger of anything getting better.
At least it isn't Leeds or Bradford!

But that's like Cleveland claiming that at least they aren't Detroit in that its about as low of a bar as you can get without going subterranean.
 
At least it isn't Leeds or Bradford!

But that's like Cleveland claiming that at least they aren't Detroit in that its about as low of a bar as you can get without going subterranean.
Unfortunately the word that most people doing those comparisons forget to add on the end is, "yet."
 
Bold of you to assume Leeds and Bradford won't get even worse, thus keeping the comparison entirely valid.
I think once things get bad enough getting worse is a challenge, giving those lagging behind chance to catch up.
Leeds I believe needs a story about a rapist eating his victim on the streets as the next hurdle to clear on its slide into a circle of Hell made manifest on Earth.
 
Back
Top Bottom