UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aight goin a lil bit too far here, thought you were meming.
I do not support the violence that occurred on any side during the war. The stalin purges and german genocides were despicable, disgusting, dark days of humanity. Chamberlain should have been given more of a chance to secure peace but i'll leave it to the historians to argue that one.

As for National Socialism (As I understand it) It's about making a strong, unifying country that uses the strength to help the poorest and worst off in society. Everyone pays their fair share and there's real love for the nation. Those who want to go on the dole or are in prison, pay back their debt my helping the country be a better place; building roads, cleaning streets, erecting trees in parks etc. That national pride pushes innovation for humanity far more than any other ideology.

Rowntree, of the Fruit Pastels fame, introduced the 5 day working week and allowed his workers the weekend off, much to the ire of his compatriots. He did so, because he believed in a healthy work/life balance. Saltaire, the mill owning magnate built an entire town (which still exists today) with hospitals, schools, shops and parks, out of his own pocket, for the love of the work, the people and the country.
 
Plod out in force in cov today. Wonder what that's about. 6 foot roamers near the centre, two cars and one civvie car. Didn't know we even had that many officers employed total.
I’m the olden days, when they use to do their job, it wasn’t uncommon to see police.
 
Notice how the fat drag queens and troons at things like the Olympics only attack Christianity but not Islam or Judaism? How do you think Muslims would respond, and what does that say about Christian responses to being attacked?
The organisers would face a high chance of being beheaded on the streets of Paris for pulling that stunt. I don't think smashing mosque windows quite has the same effect and I don't want Christians beheading innocent people either?
Oh yeah, because siting back idly and watching their government import Sub-Saharan niggers and Muslim rapists by the boatload, while persecuting the native population has worked wonders for the people of Britain so far... 🙄 Something that you cucked and emasculated little bitches need to get through your heads is thet sometimes violence is the  ONLY solution to a problem, optics and perception be damned.
You're just LARPing on the internet though. In the real world trying to organise anything with poor optics isn't going to pan out well.
 
You're just LARPing on the internet though. In the real world trying to organise anything with poor optics isn't going to pan out well.

Exactly this!
Theirs a time and a place for violence but it's never going to achieve fuck all until enough people are behind your cause.

The only natives frustrated enough right now are the ones right at the bottom of the social and economic scale living in shitholes like London, Birmingham, leeds etc where the white English are starting to become the minority, the rest of the country gets to think it's just a big city problem and their not gonna upset their lives over it.

Anyone thinks otherwise go burn a few mosques and see what it changes other than your life in a prison cell.
Real change needs to start with the media that are complicit in hiding so much from most of the population, as until the truth starts getting told the government has nothing to fear.
 
Public execution is too good for him imo.
Just take him behind the station and blow his head off with a shotgun, doing anything more than that is a waste of effort.
Chamberlain should have been given more of a chance to secure peace but i'll leave it to the historians to argue that one.
Chamberlain gets unfairly maligned by people who don't understand the actual history of the situation, he was the one who got the British military into decent shape prior to the war but he gets portrayed as a cowardly appeaser because of the fact that he didn't want millions of people to die in another retarded brother war.
I’m the olden days, when they use to do their job, it wasn’t uncommon to see police.
I live pretty much next door to my town's police station yet I never see any plod around save for the occasional car.
 
Huw Edwards pleads guilty to child porn. He had Category A images of children - that's sexual penetration, sex with animals or sadism. It wasn't just the coke-addicted 17 year old he was messaging either that the nonce apologists were handwringing over ("nooo the age of consent is 16, it should be legal to have pictures of 17 year olds"), that was bad enough: these were of kids age 7 to 14.
How the BBC kept this quiet so long, I do not know.
They knew he was arrested for serious offence in November, however they didn't know until today what they were, if you take them at their word. But he still made £475,000-£479,999 between April 2023 and April 2024 from the BBC

also
A BBC source said the corporation "did not believe there was any legal recourse to recoup any previous pay or future pension money" from Edwards.

Hope judge throws max 10 years at him, but expecting him to get off with therapy or some bullshit.
 
Appeasement for us was a way to stall Hitler long enough until our military was ready. Chamberlain knew that war was inevitable but he also knew that if we jumped in right away we'd get blown away, even after years of appeasement we were still not ready so imagine how bad it would've been if he just declared war right after the Anschluss.
 
Can some Farmers please explain the difference between this video of Tommy justifying rioting.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=uJLmwdd_8VA
Compared to this fucking shit

https://youtube.com/watch?v=tY0M1mna_j4

The difference is that George Floyd deserved what he got, just like almost every nigger who gets killed by cops in our country. White English men are justified in attacking those who are attacking them. I wouldn't even call it "rioting."

A fair comparison would be between BLM rioters and pro-Hamas rioters in England. Compare the riot in Leeds on the part of niggerskin Muslims and gyps to BLM rioters. Neither are righteous.

Thanks for sharing that rant from Tommy. I hadn't seen it yet, and I agree with him 100%.

PS According to Mayar Tousi you've had 17 stabbing attacks from shitskins in the last 48 hours.
 
The organisers would face a high chance of being beheaded on the streets of Paris for pulling that stunt. I don't think smashing mosque windows quite has the same effect and I don't want Christians beheading innocent people either?
Me either, but surely you see the problem here, right? It's like the recent concern among Principled Conservatives about getting insane Leftists (who'd happily see you rot in poverty or jail) fired from their menial jobs for expressing their bloodthirst over Trump.

"They're only attacking us Christians because we unilaterally disarmed in ways the other religions will not, but I don't want to use the means that have worked for those groups."

If the rule you followed brought you to this...maybe that rule is a luxury you can have when you're in charge and society is functional and high-trust, but until that's the case, there's no "principle" in polite civilizational suicide.
 
kicking off in london. i swear that beardy cunt's a yid. black and white unite ffs





 
This is just laughably untrue, by such a huge margin it's silly to deny it. Do I need to find the table showing the *poorest quintile* of White majority districts (literal post-industrial Appalachian poverty towns) have lower violent crime rates than the *richest quintile* of black majority ones (DC-VA-MD suburbs of 6-fig DEI jobs)?


Notice how the fat drag queens and troons at things like the Olympics only attack Christianity but not Islam or Judaism? How do you think Muslims would respond, and what does that say about Christian responses to being attacked?
Oh sweet summer child. While you will find an exception, you won’t break the rule and everyone who lives near a poor suburb will defeat you and your lovely exception.
 
Appeasement for us was a way to stall Hitler long enough until our military was ready. Chamberlain knew that war was inevitable but he also knew that if we jumped in right away we'd get blown away, even after years of appeasement we were still not ready so imagine how bad it would've been if he just declared war right after the Anschluss.
Inevitable, not as in "Germans were on a warpath", but inevitable as in "the UK was in bed with the jews, their anti-european revenge project and zionism, so pursuing peace, partnership or an alliance was a nonstarter".
Just like little girls getting stabbed in the UK is "inevitable" - not because "that's just how muslamics be, mayne", but because you're complicit in the destruction wrought by the Greater Israel project and you've accepted to bear the social costs of Israeli expansion and their project of depriving their target nations of manpower by means of resettling the problem demographics to Europe and the Americas. If the reaction is managed, as jews have managed it, it's then efficiently steered by hijacking populist anti-immigration sentiments to further bolster government support for Israel by selling it to dumb reactionaries as a "fellow bulwark against Islam" while doing nothing about immigration.

Every mooslem in your land is there because a jew put them there. Ignorance of the fact is the space jews rely on to operate.
 
Oh sweet summer child. While you will find an exception, you won’t break the rule and everyone who lives near a poor suburb will defeat you and your lovely exception.
Haven't found the district level one, but here's an older/simpler one.

How deeply buried in a multi-million dollar gated neighborhood of Prince George's County would you have to be for your family to be as safe as in Nowhereville, Appalachia?

FfRpN47WAAIHnbs.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • FfRpN47WAAIHnbs.jpeg
    FfRpN47WAAIHnbs.jpeg
    50.2 KB · Views: 5
Inevitable, not as in "Germans were on a warpath", but inevitable as in "the UK was in bed with the jews, their anti-european revenge project and zionism, so pursuing peace, partnership or an alliance was a nonstarter".
Just like little girls getting stabbed in the UK is "inevitable" - not because "that's just how muslamics be, mayne", but because you're complicit in the destruction wrought by the Greater Israel project and you've accepted to bear the social costs of Israeli expansion and their project of depriving their target nations of manpower by means of resettling the problem demographics to Europe and the Americas. If the reaction is managed, as jews have managed it, it's then efficiently steered by hijacking populist anti-immigration sentiments to further bolster government support for Israel by selling it to dumb reactionaries as a "fellow bulwark against Islam" while doing nothing about immigration.

Every mooslem in your land is there because a jew put them there. Ignorance of the fact is the space jews rely on to operate.
Piss off schizo. The jew paranoia doesn't work on me.
 
The founding fathers of the US realized that the government's fear of it's population was paramount, and understood that very well, to the point that the very first parts of our constitution were specifically called out to allow the citizens to criticize the government, and to arm themselves against that very same government.
I agree with you in spirit, and I don't want to burst your bubble, but the Bill of Rights isn't the very first part of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights is literally a collection of amendments, literally afterthoughts.

IIRC, those who didn't think to include them assumed that the rights outlined in them didn't need to be explicitly declared. Lawmakers from states who had rights outlined in their constitutions pushed to have them included.

I take your meaning, however. I think those first two rights in the Bill of Rights are critical, even though not long ago (PL) I lost a government position in violation of that first right.
 
Just take him behind the station and blow his head off with a shotgun, doing anything more than that is a waste of effort.

Yep, bullet to the back of the head and put the little rat out of his misery.

But instead he'll run up the legal aid on some long ass trial and then all the money to keep him in prison for decades.
All in it'll be millions spent on some savage who should never even been allowed to be born in this country.


Hope judge throws max 10 years at him, but expecting him to get off with therapy or some bullshit.

We can only wish , bet he don't even get 12 months that's if he even gets custodial.

Uk justice in action, drugs = 7 years, noncing kids = 7 months!!
 
Been watching the reactions etc on this and the media, even the so called alternative media seem to desperately be trying to either shift pity onto the brown cunts or in the case of the Alts, assure you its got to be solved with talking more (and donating to edaddy of course!)
Idk, I sense fear, Its too early to say but this seems to have started something, nobody is swallowing their shit on this one.
Of course its just as likely that it burns out and everybody goes back to the new normal but im quietly optimistic here.
 
Remember that the police are in the middle of a recruitment crisis too.


Chief constables are to be given discretion to award the extra money to new constables’ starting salaries to help police forces compete with the private sector for new recruits.
The Government has accepted a recommendation by the police remuneration review body, which said police chiefs should be able to start new constables on £1,200 higher salary than normal. It comes on top of the 4.75 per cent increase in the basic salary of £33,324 a year agreed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves.
It is designed to help forces facing difficulties recruiting new officers at the same time as losing older policemen and women. The review body said it aimed to ensure the police service in England and Wales could maintain the uplift of 20,000 officers over the past three years by continuing to “recruit at volume.”

“It will assist those forces that are finding recruitment challenging and continue to boost the income of the lowest paid officers,” said the review body.
“We are conscious that over the last decade there has been a significant increase in the gap between private and public sector pay.
“This risks undermining the ability of the police service to recruit, retain and motivate high-calibre officers with the right attitudes to manage complexity, respond to vulnerability, de-escalate social tension, and build and sustain public trust and confidence.”
All 43 forces will be able to offer the extra pay to new recruits – which is made possible by allowing chief constables to put new constables on pay point 2, rather than pay point 1.
The Government has, however, rejected a recommendation by the review body for the Metropolitan Police to be able to offer a £4,000 “golden hello” by putting new recruits on pay point 3. Instead, the Government is proposing to raise the London allowance by £1,250.

It comes as the review body warned that the Met was short of 1,500 officers on its target of 35,415, which could put the safety of the public at risk, the pay review body has said.
“We are very aware of the operational and public safety risks of it not meeting its workforce,” said the review body. “We are very concerned about the immediate challenges the MPS faces in attracting officers of the right calibre with the right skills and attitudes and in the volume needed to address current shortfalls.
“We are alert to the operational risks and the implications for public safety that the MPS has told us may arise if the situation is not addressed.”
It said the MPS employed around a quarter of all the officers in England and Wales, accounted for a sixth of all crime, was the lead force for strategic threats such as terrorism and a third of county lines gang crime was linked to London.
The force is, however, still in special measures after inspectors uncovered a litany of systemic failings in fighting crime and serving victims.
The review body had recommended that Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, should be allowed to pay “golden hellos” of some £4,000 more than the normal starting salaries for new police constables in order to compete with the private sector.
However, it warned: “This measure could have implications for neighbouring forces and the constable pay scale as a whole. We therefore propose that this additional discretion be limited to two years with an initial review of the discretion after one year.”
The review body also warned that there had been an increase in the number of warranted police officers being placed in desk jobs normally carried out by police staff. This was because of the way funding for the 20,000 uplift had been geared towards recruiting front line officers.
Senior police chiefs have called for greater flexibility to allow them to recruit more police staff so they can switch officers into frontline roles.
 
Back
Top Bottom