UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

soulless guarantee · Nov 30, 2025

Wonderland foster child said:
The Free Palestine numpties are all suddenly deeply concerned about Congo and Sudan. In fact they couldn't give a toss about either, or locate them on a map. It's just deniability because when the only world conflict you care about is the one that concerns the world's only Jewish state, you can't scream anti-Semitism-isn't-the-same-as-anti-Zionism forever and be believed.

Yes, that was exactly it! I skipped over noting her saying free Congo and Sudan because I thought Kashmir was a funnier option as it's pretty likely that their solution to Kashmir is to hand it over to Pakistan because they are Muslim, whereas I have no idea of what is going on in Congo and Sudan beyond them being countries that have been fucked for decades, so it's very telling that they are only starting to "care" about these other conflicts because some of them have started to get an inkling of optics about only caring about dead Muslims when it's Israel killing them, and completely ignoring intra-ethnic conflicts that have also resulted in the death and displacement of thousands.

AntiSchwuletteAktion said:
They're taking a stance in India v. Pakistan?? Is it just, 'India needs to give all of Kashmir to Pakistan because muslims are innocent oppressed babies'?

I would imagine that is precisely it, although they probably haven't realised that China also has a border dispute there as well.

FedPostalService · Nov 30, 2025

AntiSchwuletteAktion said:
They're taking a stance in India v. Pakistan?? Is it just, 'India needs to give all of Kashmir to Pakistan because muslims are innocent oppressed babies'?

Years ago it was just Kashmir that “British” Muslims would sperg about. The PLO were all a bunch of commies so they ignored Palestine (which is why the left are obsessed with it.)

It was only when Hasmas took control of the Gaza Strip that they started caring. You’ll notice they don’t sperg about the PLO/Fatah controlled West Bank.

teriyakiburns · Nov 30, 2025

SIMIΔN said:
As an aside, I seem to remember the British Parliament officially declared Great Britain has no indigenous/native people, but I can't seem to find it.

the closest I can find is this.

It is primarily the media and "science" coordinating to create a new narrative of there being no native Britons, though. Politicians follow along. Their argument is that, because of the Roman, Saxon, and Norman invasions, there's no such thing as a "native Briton", despite the fact that the Normans in particular left essentially no genetic footprint (outside the aristocracy), which leaves approximately 1500 years for a coherent ethnicity to form. Ethnic groups far younger than that are declared native and worthy of protection.

SirCliveSinclairdabbing · Nov 30, 2025

Going back to your party. I was chatting with a bloke who boasted he was a fully qualified union rep and I managed to keep a straight face. He reckons your party will never be fully union supported and just used as leverage on the Labour Party. Which is great because the imam block is seeing Labour as not needed and without the union block your party will never get support. Total baldo victory!

FedPostalService · Nov 30, 2025

SirCliveSinclairdabbing said:
Going back to your party. I was chatting with a bloke who boasted he was a fully qualified union rep and I managed to keep a straight face. He reckons your party will never be fully union supported and just used as leverage on the Labour Party. Which is great because the imam block is seeing Labour as not needed and without the union block your party will never get support. Total baldo victory!

So what Reform was to the Tories before the Tories destroyed themselves and forced Reform into being an actual political party?

Morethanabitfoolish · Nov 30, 2025

News time.

Starting off with a society guaranteed to get more headlines due to harassment.

https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/cambridge-universitys-new-womens-society-32839694

The establishment of a new women's society at the historic University of Cambridge has ignited "hundreds of hateful comments" and sparked a petition to "fight back against transphobia."

The Cambridge University Society of Women (CUSW) was officially launched last week, positioning itself as "as the only openly and proudly single-sex society for women at the university."

However, the announcement swiftly attracted criticism from campus activists who labelled the founders "a disappointment to women."

Maeve Halligan, 22, the president and co-founder of CUSW alongside Serena Worley and Thea Sewell, stated that while the society wasn't conceived as a reactionary movement, her "frustration has given way."

The ancient waterway built by Romans that runs for miles throughout Cambridgeshire

The popular Cambridge street with a name people struggle to pronounce
Speaking to the Express, she said: "Free speech on UK campuses is somewhat under threat," reports the Express.

A key objective of the Society of Women, she elaborated, is to "champion free speech" and foster an environment where women can "discuss and disagree safely and civilly and freely."

Yet, within hours of its inaugural social media post, the CUSW was swamped with "hundreds and hundreds" of antagonistic comments accusing members of being "the opposite of progressive."

Among the messages were attacks such as "choke on your hatred, "how dare you call yourself feminist," and "you're a disappointment to women."

Ms Halligan revealed that many of the comments originated from "the women and non-binary officers" on campus, who "formerly just represented women".

Within 48 hours, an online petition demanding the society be banned emerged on Change.org, quickly gathering hundreds of signatures. The campaign, entitled Ban the New Cambridge University 'Women's Society', had accumulated 245 signatures at the time of writing, with the declared aim of "fighting back against transphobia."

The petition calls on the Student Union to refuse CUSW's registration, alleging the group "endangers the safety and rights of trans people at Cambridge."

Ms Halligan, a postgraduate student, said "acknowledging the facts of biological sex is now somehow a politicised belief," adding that some students may be put off from joining owing to the perception of its "single-sex nature as a political imposition.

"They're seeing the backlash. It's sadly still brave to join a society like this," she said.

"Ten years ago, a young woman starting a women's society would not be news. If anything, it's quite boring. But there have been genuine women's sex-based issues in this country."

Ms Halligan continued: "What bothers me the most is that we're talking about men and we're sort of purporting to be discussing a women's issue. We're talking about yet again a male threat to women. I've just got no patience for it anymore."

She said she had "reached breaking point" on the issue of free speech at Cambridge. "I recognised it as a toss-up between speaking freely and potentially having a bit of a crap time for it, or not speaking freely. And for a while, I chose the latter."

Cambridge University has garnered a "woke" reputation in recent years, according to Ms Halligan.

She cited instances in sport - where a biologically male transgender rower joined a women's team - and in colleges that have started accepting men who identify as women.

"It's as small as the kind of pronouns in every email signature that was enforced for a period of time," she added. "It's corrupt."

The society offers two types of membership: one for current female students and another for female alumni of Cambridge. If all applicants pass the vetting process, the society anticipates welcoming around 30 student members within its first fortnight, with over 100 alumnae already signed up.

Remember how Keir bragged about opening up our defence manufacturing to Europe to make rearmament easier? Turns out that was not enough and they want even more incentives like no fees for international students from the EU.

https://archive.ph/9wjHv

The EU is pushing the UK to lower university tuition fees for Europeans under a new under-30s visa that is key to the Brexit reset but is discussing a compromise to help prop up university finances.
The i Paper understands that Brussels could compromise on its demand for “equal treatment”, which would mean European students stop having to pay international fees that can go up to £38,000 a year and instead pay domestic fees which are capped at £9,535 – the situation pre-Brexit.
The UK Government has been resisting EU demands to lower fees as cash-strapped universities become increasingly reliant on international fees to stay afloat.

One compromise being discussed in the EU was a middle ground European-only fee set between domestic and international charges, that could for example be charged at the cost to the university of delivering a student place.
This would help encourage more EU students back to Britain by lowering what are seen as prohibitive costs while helping prop up higher education finances, which are once again under pressure after Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in the Budget this week that universities would have to pay a £925-per-student international student levy.
This could be coupled with concessions from the EU side on Britain’s demand for the overall number of visas issued under the mooted “youth experience” scheme to be capped.

It came as the UK was said to have made its own counter-proposal to try and break a deadlock in negotiations over Britain joining the EU’s 150bn euro (£130m) rearmament fund, ahead of Sunday’s deadline. They have stalled over Brussels’ demands for the UK to pay billions of pounds to “pay to play”.

The i Paper was told that Britain has submitted a counter offer that would instead mean that it pays-per-project funded under the scheme rather than the up front cost, which UK officials refused to deny.
The EU last week reportedly lowered its demands for the UK to pay up to 6.5bn euros in order to be able to bid for weapons contracts, to 2bn euros. The UK offered somewhere between 75m and 200m euros, and threatened to walk away from the talks.
But EU ambassadors were told on Wednesday that the two sides have yet to reach a deal.
The latest UK counter-proposal is to pay a proportion of the value of each weapons project funded under the EU scheme, rather than an up front cost, but there is scepticism that Brussels will agree to this.
The two sides are understood to be working on agreeing a methodology to work out a fee, after UK sources complained that the EU appeared to have picked a figure out of thin air last week.
David Henig, UK director at the European Centre for International Political Economy, said it appeared Britain was “trying to find angles that are domestically reasonable and may find traction in Brussels”.
The former UK trade official also blamed splits in the EU on how important it is for the UK to join SAFE for the impasse in negotiations, saying “lack of agreement between EU member states is never a good basis for agreement”.

UK Cabinet sources continue to balk at the EU’s cash demands and questioned why Canada was being allowed to join for a much lower fee, thought to be hundreds of millions of euros, and insisted Britain’s defence industry would continue to thrive outside the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) fund.
But failure to reach agreement would be a major blow after British participation was sold as a major gain of Sir Keir Starme’rs Brexit “reset”, and European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in May suggested membership could be agreed in “weeks”.
Government sources believe talks will “go down to the wire” ahead of the Sunday deadline for participating countries to submit bids for loans for rearmament projects under SAFE, with a meeting between the Prime Minister and von der Leyen at the G20 summit last week regarded as positive as it led to negotiations continuing.

Some in the EU are also attempting to pressure the UK to agree to rejoining the Erasmus student exchange programme by Sunday if it wants British students to be able to participate from January 2027.
It is believed that if negotiations are successful, the UK joining the two EU schemes could be announced at the same time, with Erasmus viewed as the easier of the two negotiations.
Senior officials on both sides are next week expected to meet to take stock of negotiations so far, with the aim to resume in January, with talks also taking place on a food and drink deal, and energy and emissions trading agreements.

National Trust being spitefully stupid again

https://archive.ph/zTZKG

The National Trust has been accused of anti-Christian discrimination after banning a Roman Catholic from filming at a religious site.
Christian Holden was blocked from filming at St Cuthbert’s Cave in Northumberland last year for a documentary about the 7th-century monk.
He was told by executives at the heritage charity that the “religious affiliation” of the film, which centred on the long-distance St Cuthbert’s Way footpath, meant it could not go ahead.
The trust has now been accused of religious discrimination by Voice for Justice UK, a Christian campaign group.

Mr Holden, 51, told The Telegraph: “To have someone say we can’t host you because of your religious affiliation, that’s really stunning.
“We’re trying to tell the story of St Cuthbert, that site is very specific to St Cuthbert, and it’s relevant because of St Cuthbert’s history with the place.

“To say: ‘You can’t tell the story of this Christian heritage site because you’re a Christian...’ I was really taken aback by it.
“For myself professionally, it’s almost like I’ve hit a brick wall just because of my religious background. I’m stunned that I can’t fulfil my role, my job, as best I can to tell that story.”
Mr Holden, from Tenby, Pembrokeshire, was commissioned to produce a documentary following Dr Jason Baxter, an American academic, and students at Benedictine College, a Roman Catholic private university in Kansas.
In August, the group walked St Cuthbert’s Way, a 62-mile route from Melrose, Roxburghshire, where Cuthbert was prior, to Lindisfarne, Northumberland, where he was bishop.
Mr Holden requested permission in June to film at St Cuthbert’s Cave, where the body of the monk is thought to have been hidden from Viking raids in the 9th century before later being taken to Durham, where it remains to this day.

“Their immediate response was that they don’t host filming of a religious or political nature,” he said.
Mr Holden said that he followed up with a phone call and subsequently received an email from a trust employee to say that the trust would maintain its initial decision not to allow the filming because of the religious affiliation.

“I was a bit stunned, to be honest, with that, not least because they host a site which is only of real significance because of its relation to St Cuthbert.”
Emails seen by The Telegraph show the employee telling Mr Holden that the refusal had been “mandated from the highest level of the NT”.
“Thank you for the email and clarification on the filming,” they wrote. “We will however be following through with our initial decision that we will not be able to host your filming due to its religious affiliation. I’m sorry I know this is disappointing, but this approach has been mandated from the highest level of the NT.”
Mr Holden said he asked for the decision to be reviewed – only to be told by a more senior employee that “they believe they have the right to refuse access to their site and they’re not bound by legislation”.
“He said that because they’re not receiving public money, they’re not beholden to some of these regulations, which again is bizarre,” he said.
The film went ahead without St Cuthbert’s Cave being featured.

Mr Holden, who runs St Anthony Communications, said he was granted permission in 2015 to make a religious film at St John’s Jerusalem, a Knights Hospitaller chapel in Kent maintained by the National Trust.

Voice for Justice UK claimed the charity had discriminated against Mr Holden contrary to the 2010 Equality Act, under which religion is a protected characteristic.
The Rev Lynda Rose, its chief executive, said: “The National Trust is tasked with protecting the nation’s historical sites and monuments. Christianity first came to our shores almost 2,000 years ago. For around 1,300 years we have been a Christian country. Our heritage is Christian.
“For the National Trust to turn down a request to film a documentary about the life of St Cuthbert on the ground of ‘religious affiliation’ is a rejection and betrayal of the heritage they ostensibly exist to protect.”
The National Trust was accused of sidelining Christianity in 2023 when it featured Diwali, Eid and Ramadan – but not Christmas or Easter – in an “inclusivity and wellbeing” calendar.
A National Trust spokesman told The Telegraph: “The National Trust has no mandate or policy about religious filming. Each request should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and we are looking into how this was handled to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

“We do host filming for religious programmes at National Trust places, for example Songs of Praise at Fountains Abbey in 2022. We are keen to work with Mr Holden to find a resolution to this issue.”

NHS doctor of unspecified religion suspended after deciding to post about the Jews on social media.

https://archive.ph/nZpRC

An NHS resident doctor has been suspended by a medical tribunal for 15 months after posting alleged antisemitic comments on social media.
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, a 31-year-old trainee trauma and orthopaedic surgeon, was also alleged to have expressed support for "violent action and terrorist organisations".
The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) said Dr Aladwan's posts "may impact on patient confidence" in both her and the profession, while patients could be "discouraged" from seeking treatment from her.
Dr Aladwan, who is British Palestinian, denies making racist or hate speech.
She is currently the subject of a fitness to practise investigation by the General Medical Council (GMC), an independent body that regulates doctors, physician associates and anaesthesia associates to protect patient safety.
The GMC began its investigation following complaints that Dr Aladwan had made antisemitic or offensive comments on posts that also appeared to support terrorism.
The tribunal heard that Dr Aladwan's alleged posts on X included antisemitic conspiracy theories as well as posts that "demonise, or express and encourage hatred towards Jews in general, their history and their way of life".
Her lawyer told the tribunal there was "no evidence" that her activities have had "any impact on patient safety or her ability to fulfil her duties as a doctor".
Dr Aladwan's suspension will take effect from today and will be reviewed within six months.
The hearing, which took place in Manchester, was an interim orders tribunal (IOT), deciding whether Dr Aladwan's practice should be restricted while the GMC's investigation takes place.
It does not rule on the allegations under investigation.
In the tribunal's ruling, it said it "notes that there is no information to suggest that any patient complaints have been raised or that any patients have come to harm".
Dr Aladwan was previously subject to an IOT in September, which determined that no restrictions should be imposed upon her.
On 3 October 2025, a decision was made to refer Dr Aladwan's case to an IOT hearing again after the GMC alleged an "escalation in the tone of Dr Aladwan's social media posts" following the September ruling and the Manchester synagogue attack in early October.
Responding to the tribunal's ruling on X, Dr Aladwan said: "Let this decision stand as the definitive proof that there is no independent British medical regulation. The 'Israeli' and Jewish lobby decide who can and cannot practise medicine in Britain."
She added: "This is not an end. It is the beginning of a far greater battle for the integrity of our institutions."
The GMC's social media guidance states that medical professionals have the right to "freedom of belief, privacy, and expression" but that using social media "has to be balanced with the possible impact on other people's rights and interests".

She's a particularly unsubtle individual.

Multiple Labour councillors parking their expensive vehicles in disabled spaces. Just to make it clear they're better than the peasants.

https://archive.ph/jsETg

A car belonging to a west London councillor has been spotted parked in a disabled bay without a blue badge – just days after a member of the same council apologised for the same act.
The car, which is understood to belong to Hounslow Labour Councillor and former Deputy Mayor, Hina Mir, was parked in a disabled parking bay on Tuesday while a full council meeting was taking place.
Alongside her role as councillor and Chair of the Housing and Environment Scrutiny Panel, Ms Mir is a solicitor.
Hounslow Labour told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) “The Labour Group is currently investigating the matter.”
It comes only days after her colleague, Cllr Farhaan Rehman, was forced to resign his committee chairmanship after it emerged he had parked a Lamborghini in a disabled bay on two occasions. Cllr Rehman remains a Labour councillor and a candidate for the 2026 elections.

While the parking spaces are owned and managed by Hounslow Council, the local authority previously said it was a matter for Hounslow Labour. However if a general member of the public was caught parking in a disabled bay in the borough without a blue badge, it would be a matter for the council and they could face a fixed penalty notice of £160.
The LDRS understands that the car park at Hounslow House civic centre is not used by the general public, with spaces used instead by council staff and politicians.
Disabled bays at the Hounslow Council building are marked with yellow paint, and standard parking spaces in white paint.
Cllr Jack Emsley, Conservative Councillor for Chiswick Homefields told the LDRS that the incident confirms a double standard in the borough. He said: “Labour councillors are taking residents for fools.
“It’s clear that a sense of entitlement runs rife through the Hounslow Labour Party, and this latest breaking of the rules will rightly be seen as them sticking two fingers up at residents who have faced the brunt of their heavy handed approach to enforcement for everyone other than themselves. This is yet further confirmation that under this current Labour council, it’s one rule for them and another for the rest of us.”

Cllr Rehman found himself to be the butt of jokes at the meeting of full council on Tuesday, with opposition councillors taking the opportunity to poke fun at his car parking incidents, first revealed by the LDRS.

Speaking about the council’s “Hounslow Vision” plans, Cllr Peter Thompson, Leader of Hounslow Conservatives, said: “The brochure is beautifully designed, it’s shiny, it’s got a glossy finish… the kind you usually see on, I don’t know, a high-end sports car… such as a Lamborghini.”
Cllr Rehman was due to propose a motion relating to gambling and licensing rules at the meeting on Tuesday. However, following his resignation as Chair of the Licensing Panel, his name was withdrawn.
The incidents have caused outcry among Hounslow residents who feel it sets a double standard for councillors and members of the public. Particularly at a time when Loretta Alvarez, 26, still faces a £1,000 fine from the council for “fly-tipping” an envelope next to overflowing communal bins.
Reacting to the latest incident, Loretta said: “I have no words. It annoys me because it’s like these are the people who should set an example. They set rules they want us to follow… but they act like they are above the rules.”
Cllr Mir was contacted directly for comment, but failed to respond by the time of publication.

Swerf'n'Terf · Nov 30, 2025

SIMIΔN said:
As an aside, I seem to remember the British Parliament officially declared Great Britain has no indigenous/native people, but I can't seem to find it. The closest I got was this Guardian idiocy.

IIRC this was a UN definition adopted by the British and other governments, possibly as a result of the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. I'm coming up short on the search engines, but I want to say in 2009 they agreed specific definitions of indigenous and the only group in Europe so defined was the Sami.

soulless guarantee · Nov 30, 2025

Morethanabitfoolish said:
Multiple Labour councillors parking their expensive vehicles in disabled spaces. Just to make it clear they're better than the peasants

I found myself wondering how on Earth a councillor could afford a Lamborghini, so did a small bit of digging on companies house. A Farhaan Rehman was director of 3 real estate companies in Hounslow, with him resigning from director positions in early 2025. Strangely, 2 of the companies seem to be lacking accounting details on the CH website, with those same 2 companies having received notice of compulsory strike-off, and in one instance this resulted in voluntary strike-off and the other instance of the strike-off being discontinued with the company confirming they intend to continue existing. The third company, which existed before Rehman joined as a director, and was co-directed by a different person compared to the other 2 companies, strangely only lists assets of £1 in all their annual accounts, dating back to 2020/21 financial year. Now admittedly, this is a lay person's observations of the facts, but to me it seems rather odd that a real estate company would only have £1 in assets every year, and that one of the directors would go on to own a Lamborghini while representing the Labour Party at councillor level...

Coolio55 · Nov 30, 2025

What laws racially determined a Briton in Rhodesia? We should probably adopt those.
...if they actually exist. I've been told time and time again that they had this fabulous system where they gave people more rights if they were British but as with all legends, the truth is probably more mundane.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole · Nov 30, 2025

Coolio55 said:
Rhodesia

Everything about Rhodesia is stunning because if it wasn't for the UN basically forcing everyone to not recognise it no matter what, it could have ended up being unironically one of the greatest food sources of Africa.

Plus the flag is kino

DreinMeinVein · Nov 30, 2025

UselessRubberKeyboard said:
Poor Corbyn must be right frustrated. No politics getting done with all that superfluous bullshit around.

In some little ways I feel a tiny bit sorry for Corbyn. Not a lot. His politics are not mine, but there's a tradition of lefties who represent "the working man".
Instead he's found himself with a loyal support base made up of absolute fucking nutters

He allowed this to happen. He was willing to court/be courted by Momentum, TWT and Novara Media. Corbyn himself is a Red Wall lefty, a Eurosceptic and an old fashioned socialist. We can all visualise the type of person to whom he'd like to appeal.

However, he was too happy to be branded as the Magic Grandpa. He became very popular with the kids who want everything given to them for free, as well as those who assumed they'd grow up so rich that mega-tax would be a drop in the ocean.
And so that's what he's got – the 6% of voters who are totally retarded. A party membership of bluehairs, troons and some other weirdos from the bottom part of the useless third.
1990's Corbyn probably never imagined it to go this way, yet he let it happen. He gets what he deserves.

The unions should learn a lesson from all this but they haven't.

Made In Wales · Nov 30, 2025

I wouldn't be surprised if Zarah Sultana of swing is actually a McSweeney plant trying to belittle Your Party in order to ensure that Communist Grandpa never takes on Starmer.

The last thing Starmer wants is a left-wing version of Reform UK, as that would end Labour.

Labour are in full panic mode, it's actually quite funny to see the hatred they're getting from all sides.

Some news (was going to post some yesterday but the site wouldn't load):

* Ex-BBC presenter Mark Mardell diagnosed with Parkinson's 'turned away from Turkish Airlines flight' for not having GP letter

* Victorian disease breaks out at school with headteacher forced to urgently shut down site - scabies is back!

* British Army forced to withdraw entire support lorry fleet over major safety flaw

* Oxford Union's would-be president now offers grovelling apology to Charlie Kirk's family

* Mother's horror as neighbour orders digger to plough '15ft trench' in her front garden

* Donald Trump's sharp clampdown on immigration policy CAN be done in Britain, ex-Border Force Director General says

* Woke UK theatre slaps beloved musical with trigger warning 'because it depicts the crucifixion'

* Royal Family set to fork out thousands of pounds by Chancellor Rachel Reeves' mansion tax

* Outrage as David Lammy 'rushed to ditch portrait of late Queen in Foreign Office for pan-African flags'

* Jeremy Corbyn breaks silence amid ongoing Your Party drama with co-leader Zarah Sultana

* Middle classes left 'bruised and demoralised' while distrust burdens voters post-Budget, GB News guest warns

* 'We've been let down for YEARS!' Reform newcomer lavishes in unexpected victory after Nigel Farage sends Labour spinning in red heartland of Hetton, Sunderland

* Judge tells non-binary therapist sueing NHS Trust over being ‘deadnamed’ to STOP being so offended

* Labour's biggest union donor piles pressure on Rachel Reeves in damning Budget verdict - Sharon Graham of Unite no longer trusts Labour

Heinrich Maneuver · Nov 30, 2025

uh oh

soulless guarantee · Nov 30, 2025

Allegedly the only black holes that Starmer cares about is the one that can be filled by pyromaniac Ukrainian male models.

Made In Wales · Nov 30, 2025

Heinrich Maneuver said:
uh oh
View attachment 8233626
View attachment 8233624

It's over.

Maybe not tomorrow, or this week, but there is no coming back from this.

The leaks will continue and I can see Starmer proroguing Parliament in a vain and desperate attempt to get his way - it won't work and he's facing either a leadership challenge or VONC early in 2026.

His options:

* Somehow win the support of the party.
* Go graciously (as if) and support the new PM (Burnham/Streeting/whoever else).
* Threaten the dissidents with removal of the whip (Jonathan Reynolds, Chief Whip, would quit).
* Look to do a deal with other parties to not vote him out if mass resignations/defections occur.
* If he is that petty about not losing his job, press the big red button with 'Go To The Palace' on it.

I am now informed that Starmer is planning to meet with Useless (Ursula), Zelensky and his NWO pals early next year in a plan to ensure Ukraine wins the war and that Trump is 'permanently sidelined' by the UK for daring to be seen to support Putin in any way.

Effectively, we are 'going to war' with the USA by blanking them - this means tariffs going back up in time for the new financial year. This will hurt more than the budget, believe it or not.

I just cannot see Starmer winning a fight against Trump - whatever we think of him, he's done more for his country and world peace than Starmer has and Harris could.

Heinrich Maneuver · Nov 30, 2025

Made In Wales said:
The leaks will continue

If the Downing Street leaks to GBNews are true, that Starmer knew Reeves was lying, there is no coming back at all, especially with big Labour donors now attacking the Budget for breaking promises. If donors start pulling out there is no chance other MPs will back this imho.
As much as I hate yanks blanking them is fucking retarded; he'll stop sending the yanks intelligence on drug boats because he's upset over killing cartel members but he'll let the RAF give the Israelis intelligence and keep up the war that keeps sending more 'refugees' our war? Stop focusing on international politics and either fix the domestic issues or quit and go buy another Uki rent boy.

A second transphobia allegation has hit the Your Party conference, from this distinguished.... uh. man with long hair?

Made In Wales · Nov 30, 2025

Heinrich Maneuver said:
If the Downing Street leaks to GBNews are true, that Starmer knew Reeves was lying, there is no coming back at all, especially with big Labour donors now attacking the Budget for breaking promises. If donors start pulling out there is no chance other MPs will back this imho.
As much as I hate yanks blanking them is fucking retarded; he'll stop sending the yanks intelligence on drug boats because he's upset over killing cartel members but he'll let the RAF give the Israelis intelligence and keep up the war that keeps sending more 'refugees' our war? Stop focusing on international politics and either fix the domestic issues or quit and go buy another Uki rent boy.
View attachment 8233697
A second transphobia allegation has hit the Your Party conference, from this distinguished.... uh. man with long hair?

I much preferred Neil from The Young Ones, in the 'long haired hippy' stakes:

FedPostalService · Nov 30, 2025

I was just at the gym (sorry to the idpol posters of the thread for going outside and not restricting exercise to gay orgies at Homeland camping trips) and there’s a guy whose sole job is to push a floor cleaning thing to keep the the floors dry and clean. I wouldn’t be surprised if the female changing rooms have a woman doing the same.

I have no doubt at all that there is a machine that does the same job, similar to robot vacuum cleaners. That machine will be getting cheaper every year and that guy more expensive.

We’re going to see most those menial jobs going in the next few years so I don’t understand why the government is still importing infinite third worlders to do them whilst having budgets that speed up the process of automating those jobs.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole · Nov 30, 2025

So an abridged version of the Your Party conference and/or the Green's economic policy basically boils down to:

"How dare selfish rich people leave the UK and take money with them out of the country. Do they really value greed over helping the common man? That should be going to the treasury so I don't have to pay any more tax"

FedPostalService · Nov 30, 2025

Tom Nook's Gloryhole said:
So an abridged version of the Your Party conference and/or the Green's economic policy basically boils down to:

"How dare selfish rich people leave the UK and take money with them out of the country. Do they really value greed over helping the common man? That should be going to the treasury so I don't have to pay any more tax"

A working class socialist is just a Tory who thinks only other people should pay taxes, so maybe they are the working man’s party?

UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

soulless guarantee

STOP BECAMING KHOLE KARDASHIAN

FedPostalService

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

teriyakiburns

If anyone tried stealing my pot, I'd wrestle them.

SirCliveSinclairdabbing

I'm on the ZX Spectrum.

FedPostalService

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

Morethanabitfoolish

Sick of politics, time to join the anime posters.

Swerf'n'Terf

soulless guarantee

STOP BECAMING KHOLE KARDASHIAN

Coolio55

Hateful big goat

Tom Nook's Gloryhole

DreinMeinVein

Made In Wales

Heinrich Maneuver

it's just you, me and this wire

soulless guarantee

STOP BECAMING KHOLE KARDASHIAN

Made In Wales

Heinrich Maneuver

it's just you, me and this wire

Made In Wales

FedPostalService

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

Tom Nook's Gloryhole

FedPostalService

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

STOP BECAMING KHOLE KARDASHIAN

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

If anyone tried stealing my pot, I'd wrestle them.

I'm on the ZX Spectrum.

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

Sick of politics, time to join the anime posters.

​

​

​

STOP BECAMING KHOLE KARDASHIAN

Hateful big goat

it's just you, me and this wire

STOP BECAMING KHOLE KARDASHIAN

it's just you, me and this wire

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock

Null yearns for Big Bulgarian Cock