📚 Megathread British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) - All initial BCHRT related material goes here, including updates on current hearings.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Thumb Butler said:
He could sell his apartment and move in with mom (or become the Canadian Vodka Gnome).
Click to expand...
He's not going to pay apparently. Good luck jonny.

1574046496574.png

 
Gustav Schuchardt said:
It's pretty much a standard thing for lolsuits though isn't it? It's almost like narcissists have no way to separate 'X pissed me off' from 'X broke the law' in their minds.
Click to expand...

They also assume that if they're super ass mad it must mean whatever they're mad about is super illegal. Hence lolsuits over absolute nonsense like Maddox's suit or this one. A normal person would not assume they have the right to force strangers to fondle their genitals.
 
Ha ha. He can boast that he's not paying all he wants, but that's not likely to impress the government when they garnish his wages and place a lien on his property. (Admittedly I'm assuming that the laws work roughly the same in Canada as they do here in Freedomland.)
 
Norman B. Normal said:
Ha ha. He can boast that he's not paying all he wants, but that's not likely to impress the government when they garnish his wages and place a lien on his property. (Admittedly I'm assuming that the laws work roughly the same in Canada as they do here in Freedomland.)
Click to expand...
I believe it's the same as a civil judgement in the States. Like small claims & paying those can be milked for years UNLESS the party owed takes legal action. I don't think they would for 2 grand each. :(
I'm waitin to see how he comes out with his broken bed?
 
Kiwi Lime Pie said:
Yaniv claiming Member Cousineau was somehow biased against him was rich. If anything, the latter seemed to be more partial to Yaniv in some respects based on their ex parte communications.
Click to expand...
This is pretty common when a judge thinks they're going to rule against someone. Be really polite and lenient toward them so it's harder for them to find something wrong with your ruling and you won't have to get it remanded back to you for making some minor procedural error or not giving them the opportunity to communicate their position.
 
He is going ballsdeep on twitter right now. Personally I don’t believe he has a case.

Given his history, and now his penchant for violence by way of cane, mace or taser, any establishment has the right to deny service if they believe the patron in question could be a threat to their employees. Basically it isn’t discrimination. It’s self preservation and protection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom