Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Rev 60 was much superior to your time-wasting games. Johnny designed Rev 60 so you could play through it in a couple of hours, max. Even better, he designed it so poorly that no one bothered buying it and playing it at all.
 
Karl der Grosse said:
Rev 60 was much superior to your time-wasting games. Johnny designed Rev 60 so you could play through it in a couple of hours, max. Even better, he designed it so poorly that no one bothered buying it and playing it at all.
Click to expand...
I think her name's Brianna. With your admin being a fat gender kook who gets off to drawings of little boys in tights one would think you'd be a bit more respectful of peoples' identities.
 
Autism that collapses the space-time continuum.

wal.jpg
 
fuckidunno said:
The first clause in the second amendment has kind of been ground for contention..a big question is it functional or preambulatory

The SCOTUS tends not to over specify on tha one

SCalia had a neat take (even if it was a side step , it was a brillinat one) in IIRC Heller that the clause informed but didn't restrict
(the preamble has been used to try to say it's a collective right)
Click to expand...
Much of the reasoning in Heller was lifted directly from The Commonplace Second Amendment by Eugene Volokh. In fact, they directly cite this work for the specific distinction between purposive and functional language (and there are other citations to other Volokh works). This isn't unique or particularly novel reasoning. For instance, the preamble of the Constitution itself is generally not citable as itself granting rights. For instance, one can't sue demanding "the Blessings of Liberty." However, the rest of the text of the Constitution is read in light of the purpose of establishing such things.

It is well worth reading if you are interested in the background of legal scholarship that led to the Heller decision, which came as a shock to many, although it shouldn't have.
 
AnOminous said:
For instance, the preamble of the Constitution itself is generally not citable as itself granting rights. For instance, one can't sue demanding "the Blessings of Liberty." However, the rest of the text of the Constitution is read in light of the purpose of establishing such things.
Click to expand...
yeah,, I mean it's right there in the title ...the preamble (to walk forward) and that's why the non-functional is classically describes as... preambulatory
 
eww. I was doing a bunch of dishes so I listened to the

"Brianna rewires an entire Porsche" part of the rocket podcast

NOTE : I didn't realize the person building John's PC is his little podcast co-host buddy.

but it brought up some really interesting points...about John


at abt 45:00 john starts talking about his new entertainment system being a safety feature because if his phone is anywhere near him he feels "instinctual need" to check "twitter or whatever" on it. Wrong word John, the word he's looking for is addictively he's a twitter addict.
He, by his own admission would check his phone while driving if he didnt have the carplay system.
OTOH that ALSO means John is still checking messages while driving...just hands free
1) not a very pure Fahrvergnügen experience there ole Johnnie
2) it's still taking attention away from driving (distracted driving)
www.cnet.com

Apple CarPlay, Android Auto distract drivers more than pot, alcohol, says study

A new study says driver reaction times using this tech were worse than motorists with alcohol or cannabis in their system.
www.cnet.com www.cnet.com

John goes on with 46:15 "because I only drive cars that are manuals, it keeps your hands off your phone" -- hands on the phone, manual or not is illegal in MA already

"keeps you engaged the whole time" -- nope, you aren't engaged the whole time John. You said it yourself that you just have to check...that's not being engaged in the driving. the above article ain't the onlyone out there Admit it Johnnie you are a junkie you just switched drugs
 
Last edited:
AnOminous said:
The "militia" as contemplated in the Amendment would have been every able-bodied male.
Click to expand...
US code still defines the militia as every able bodied male between 17 and 45, and female members of the National Guard. Which is why grabbers ranting about "herp derp, but youre not in a militia" is hilarious.
Peace and Harmony said:
41 year old unemployed man really bringing the intellectual heft needed to resolve the "kiddie game" debate.

View attachment 1940722
Click to expand...
*43-year-old
 
Sonichu-choo trainwreck said:
"keeps you engaged the whole time"
Click to expand...

Jezzus bri bri, why don't you just get a clapped out yugo - they are light you can get a stick and trying to keep the damn thing from stalling will keep you 'engaged'

or...and I'm jus spitballin' here...you could concentrate on driving instead of worrying if you got enough ass pats or if you have to cover up one of your twitter fakelife lies
 
Particle Bored said:
US code still defines the militia as every able bodied male between 17 and 45, and female members of the National Guard. Which is why grabbers ranting about "herp derp, but youre not in a militia" is hilarious.

*43-year-old
Click to expand...
I'm not sure about the full history of it, but the current statute indicates it was passed in 1956.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14, § 311; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656; renumbered § 246, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)
Click to expand...

I believe the last substantive change was adding females who are members of the National Guard, with most of the changes subsequent being renumberings and formatting changes.
 
AirdropShitposts said:
Right from that website:
View attachment 1939879
The thing about the main gun isn't even necessary if you buy a license for it. Which would probably be trivial for most tank purchasers.

I think the main legal restrictions you'd run into with a tank is its street legality, you can't really drive it anywhere except on private property in most localities. I'm sure as a member of the local militia you can get some kind of waiver if your piece gets called up.

edit: It's not just "red" states like Texas either, there's huge amounts of tanks in private hands in a hard blue state like California. Just looking up if there were any state restrictions I found at least three separate estate auctions selling 100+ tanks in the last decade for California. Here's a dude who has a Wikipedia page because he owned 220 military vehicles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Littlefield

Not to mention how many TV shows and movies are getting their stuff by renting it from private owners.

Yikes, 85 of that guys tanks are within striking distance of the Wu household!
Click to expand...
Even in a tank, John will somehow manage to ram into a bollard with it and make it inoperable.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
41 year old unemployed man really bringing the intellectual heft needed to resolve the "kiddie game" debate.

View attachment 1940722
Click to expand...
"I have pretty thick skin" says the tranny who calls for sites that say mean words on the internet to have government action taken against them. The tranny who said trolls making jokes on the internet were "violent" to him. Yeah...thick skin.
Peace and Harmony said:
Autism that collapses the space-time continuum.

View attachment 1940833
Click to expand...
I would genuinely love to see him get something like that only to have the people bring up his deleted tweets and bullshit instead of his survival of the gamergate death squads.
Peace and Harmony said:
Uh oh, someone's making fun of Investment Bro John Flynt's trading decisions! His hot-blooded manliness won't allow this to pass!!

View attachment 1941811
View attachment 1941812
Click to expand...
John really is a self righteous cunt. "You didn't agree with me instantly? Well, too bad for you. Muted." The only thick skin john has is on his hunch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom