Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Peace and Harmony said:
Try not neglecting them until they die of frustration.

View attachment 1529293

I don't even know who John is supposed to be shilling for anymore.

View attachment 1529294

I dunno John, what are the odds of a teenager dying from coronavirus versus the odds of the same teenager getting shot by a nig?

View attachment 1529296
Click to expand...
Oak Grove High School is ranked 12th within Mississippi. Students have the opportunity to take Advanced Placement® coursework and exams. The AP® participation rate at Oak Grove High School is 22%. The total minority enrollment is 47%, and 46% of students are economically disadvantaged. Oak Grove High School is 1 of 3 high schools in the Lamar County School District.
Click to expand...

https://www.usnews.com/education/be...pation rate,the Lamar County School District.
 
Cringe till you die.

fall.png
 
Karl_der_Grosse said:
It's been a while since John busted out the Katrina larping. Katrina was terrible on the coast, yes, but Johnny was nowhere near the coast at any time after Katrina. He was in a nice college town watching Katrina coverage on cable. Probably tranced out on ambien at the time.
Click to expand...
He's really never been near the coast at all. Hattiesburg is an hour inland, and while it certainly felt effects from the storm, it simply can't be compared. By the time Katrina hit Oxford, it would have just been a pretty strong thunderstorm.

John only ever brings up Mississippi to shit on it, but he always does so in a somewhat concern-trolling fashion. "Pity the poor uneducated backward hicks of Mississippi, they live in a barren hellscape of racism, I wish it would improve...but man could you even imagine living there lmao glad I got out fuck that place"
 
Peace and Harmony said:
Try not neglecting them until they die of frustration.

View attachment 1529293
Click to expand...

wait..now bri bri is asking for advice!?!
I smell a mansplaining trap here - besides AFAIK bri bri is one of the top 20 dog trainers on Earth (the moon had some pretty good trainers, but their dogs all died b/c they were left outside in the microatmosphere and the trainers died in a terrible moon rock accident)
 
Cedric_Eff said:
I find it funny that William Shatner of all people mocks John’s statesment on the commercialization of space. A sci-fi icon breaking down bullshit sci fi pop culture nonsense.

John literally ripped off the launch rocks off moon idea from Metal Armor Dragonar when they fucking used a mass driver to hurl asteroids at earth.
Click to expand...
He ripped it from his favourite author "Hienlien"'s Moon Is A Harsh Mistress which had a similar setup. But because John is a moron who listens to audiobooks while playing freemium games, he didn't get the mass driver part and kept saying that rocks can be simply dropped from the moon and kept doubling down on that.
 
Karl Franz said:
He ripped it from his favourite author "Hienlien"'s Moon Is A Harsh Mistress which had a similar setup. But because John is a moron who listens to audiobooks while playing freemium games, he didn't get the mass driver part and kept saying that rocks can be simply dropped from the moon and kept doubling down on that.
Click to expand...

I did a full break down on just how dumb John is about Moon Rocks a while back.

Lets put on our interesting physical deformities, grab our signature pets, head to the moon and hold the world ransom with our space rocks.

The Chelyabinsk object was estimated to be 11,000 tons. This didn't impact, it exploded in mid-air, and rattled some windows. But it should make a sufficient warning shot that will make the leaders of the United States, Britain, and the USSR sit up and take notice (and give into our ransom demands for cargo containers of diamonds to be dropped into the ocean so they can be collected and brought to our under-water base.) So as our opener, we need to send 11,000 tons of material to earth. Given the gravity on the moon is 1/6th the earth's , this would be like moving around 2,000 TON projectile on earth.
To give you an idea of the scale, that's like shifting around 3 Christ The Redeemer statues, or about 10 blue whales or your mom. And this is all just to rattle some windows and put on one hell of a light show, mind you.

We'll assume the moon rock is just an unguided projectile. I'm not even going to address the computational horsepower you'd need to put your moon rock onto a target even as small as a city, and the exacting level of calibration you'd need to be able to hit a moving target from a moving target over 300,000km. Because it doesn't matter.

Everyone is welcome to check or correct my math as its been a long time since I've had to do space physics, but accelerating 11,000 tons of mass to the 2.3Km/s for lunar escape velocity would require 26,394 Terrajoules, or 7,332 megawatts of energy. That's over double capacity of the largest nuclear plant in the US. You could use a ~5-mega ton blast to propel your space rock as well - so about 4 nuclear missles worth of warheads - provided your space rock survives the blast intact and your launch area doesn't absorb any of the energy.

In short, people will notice. And unless you up that energy requirement even more, they're going to have a few days to do something about you and your little moon rock. (Like dispatch a suave MI-6 agent to infiltrate your moon base, seduce your chief scientist, and plant evidence that will turn you and your partners against each other. Or just use their own nukes to knock it off course/fragment it. Whatever feels right.)

Again, this is for a window rattler, not something that would actually impact on the surface.

Conclusion:
To weaponize space rocks, you're going to need nuclear energy. If you've got nukes, why wouldn't you just use those?

Yes, Mr. Bond. Why indeed? Ha. Ha ha. Muwahahahaha.
 
Ghostse said:
I did a full break down on just how dumb John is about Moon Rocks a while back.

Lets put on our interesting physical deformities, grab our signature pets, head to the moon and hold the world ransom with our space rocks.

The Chelyabinsk object was estimated to be 11,000 tons. This didn't impact, it exploded in mid-air, and rattled some windows. But it should make a sufficient warning shot that will make the leaders of the United States, Britain, and the USSR sit up and take notice (and give into our ransom demands for cargo containers of diamonds to be dropped into the ocean so they can be collected and brought to our under-water base.) So as our opener, we need to send 11,000 tons of material to earth. Given the gravity on the moon is 1/6th the earth's , this would be like moving around 2,000 TON projectile on earth.
To give you an idea of the scale, that's like shifting around 3 Christ The Redeemer statues, or about 10 blue whales or your mom. And this is all just to rattle some windows and put on one hell of a light show, mind you.

We'll assume the moon rock is just an unguided projectile. I'm not even going to address the computational horsepower you'd need to put your moon rock onto a target even as small as a city, and the exacting level of calibration you'd need to be able to hit a moving target from a moving target over 300,000km. Because it doesn't matter.

Everyone is welcome to check or correct my math as its been a long time since I've had to do space physics, but accelerating 11,000 tons of mass to the 2.3Km/s for lunar escape velocity would require 26,394 Terrajoules, or 7,332 megawatts of energy. That's over double capacity of the largest nuclear plant in the US. You could use a ~5-mega ton blast to propel your space rock as well - so about 4 nuclear missles worth of warheads - provided your space rock survives the blast intact and your launch area doesn't absorb any of the energy.

In short, people will notice. And unless you up that energy requirement even more, they're going to have a few days to do something about you and your little moon rock. (Like dispatch a suave MI-6 agent to infiltrate your moon base, seduce your chief scientist, and plant evidence that will turn you and your partners against each other. Or just use their own nukes to knock it off course/fragment it. Whatever feels right.)

Again, this is for a window rattler, not something that would actually impact on the surface.

Conclusion:
To weaponize space rocks, you're going to need nuclear energy. If you've got nukes, why wouldn't you just use those?

Yes, Mr. Bond. Why indeed? Ha. Ha ha. Muwahahahaha.
Click to expand...

yep, he doesn't account for boost phase or a really long transit time.

You can tell John never read (I don't think it's on audible...John doesn't read) pournelle's paper..that was all Low Earth Orbit that's a big part of it, no meaningful response time and it's essentially separating the boost phase (when you hang the weapon in the sky months or years earlier) from the ballistic phase
and the weapons "rods from god" have a decent enog ballistic coefficient and are bout the size of a telephone pole

*IF* someone were do drive a big enough mass in to be worth 1,000s of nukes - well that's not "tactical" anything. That's strategic level destruction, and given that humans are evolved forearth,it's mutually assured as you've just created a fuckton of ejecta problems and aced the very ecosystem that would have value to you
 
fuckidunno said:
yep, he doesn't account for boost phase or a really long transit time.

You can tell John never read (I don't think it's on audible...John doesn't read) pournelle's paper..that was all Low Earth Orbit that's a big part of it, no meaningful response time and it's essentially separating the boost phase (when you hang the weapon in the sky months or years earlier) from the ballistic phase
and the weapons "rods from god" have a decent enog ballistic coefficient and are bout the size of a telephone pole

*IF* someone were do drive a big enough mass in to be worth 1,000s of nukes - well that's not "tactical" anything. That's strategic level destruction, and given that humans are evolved forearth,it's mutually assured as you've just created a fuckton of ejecta problems and aced the very ecosystem that would have value to you
Click to expand...

The "Rods from God" need to be a pure, uniform, dense material (Tungsten was what they were discussing last I heard) and polished to near perfection as any flaws in materials or craftsmanship would make them fail catastrophically due to the forces involved.
You could probably manufacture something (instead of just hurling random matter) and move less material, but it'd still be ungodly massive and still require huge amounts of energy to lift from the moon.
 
Ghostse said:
The "Rods from God" need to be a pure, uniform, dense material (Tungsten was what they were discussing last I heard) and polished to near perfection as any flaws in materials or craftsmanship would make them fail catastrophically due to the forces involved.
You could probably manufacture something (instead of just hurling random matter) and move less material, but it'd still be ungodly massive and still require huge amounts of energy to lift from the moon.
Click to expand...

yep tungsten - the RfG (ie Thor weapons system) was all LEO something John conveniently missed with abt a 20ish:1 diameter to length -- machined, bolts from the blue not just some rock

[btw : nice work. you've done what wu fears most "show your work"]
 
Last edited:
Karl Franz said:
He ripped it from his favourite author "Hienlien"'s Moon Is A Harsh Mistress which had a similar setup. But because John is a moron who listens to audiobooks while playing freemium games, he didn't get the mass driver part and kept saying that rocks can be simply dropped from the moon and kept doubling down on that.
Click to expand...

WHA!?! bri bri using oversimplified long-stretch / sci-fantasy as opposed to technical whitepapers?

but her speculative fiction chops are run so deep her riffs are definitely NOT from a couple of the pop-est of pop movies

pf - Copy.png



(I bet she thinks Blade Runner is actually has much to do with Do Androids Dream of electric Sheep? Not dissing on the flick, but let's face facts, like most PKD movie treatments they borrow a basic concept and a bitchin title)
 
dy.png


maybe 3 years depending on how cold the winter are...

HEY! that explains John's "progressive" stance on global warming (as in to progress it) - kill winter and keep those mutts alive.
envx - Copy.png
 
AnOminous said:
Everyone who doesn't know they're not supposed to call him a tranny do it. Look at that French publication that outright called him a tranny. Also the Boston Globe outright called him a tranny, and then, passively-aggressively, when "corrected" by John, just changed it to say John "identifies as a woman," which is all but still just calling him a tranny.

So they know he's a dude, but they know they're supposed to pretend he isn't.
Click to expand...
IIRC, it was actually Dave Weigel with the Washington Post who wrote that Brianna is a tranny, then "corrected" it later (and simultaneously refused to lie about what Brianna is, hence "identifies as a woman"). The Boston Globe posted a picture (that Brianna himself originally posted) in an article that looked less professional than Lynch and the other guy running in 2018, causing Brianna to pitch a shitfit. It was kind of funny, because the "red hair streak gamergirl!" picture, as bad as it was, looked much better than any official Bri-bri camapaign photos.

Catgirl IRL said:
Coming out at this point would retroactively prove an alt right conspiracy theory was correct the entire time, and throw a lot of shit onto other claims John has made - the adoption, coming out as bisexual, supposedly being disowned, etc.

People know - and the media have even stepped around it - it's just nobody mainstream has the balls to tackle the issue.
Click to expand...
That's why I can't wait for Brianna to fly too close to the sun. It would give more oppression points, but at the cost of basically the entire public persona he's spent 15-ish years building up.

I really wish William Shatner or someone else with a blue checkmark that Brianna tries to mob would just post a pre-cockchop pic of Johnny as a response someday.

hell is other robots said:
I don't think it is a matter of testicular fortitude by the media for once. What's the point to calling out someone of Wu's stature? Being mostly insignificant is why the bullshit claims never get checked and why the mansplaining/gamergate deflections are effective. It's the same reason why Lynch never acknowledge Wu as a challenger for his seat, there just is no upside to airing that dirty laundry.
Click to expand...
That's true - he would have to do something to piss another blue checkmark off (moreso than usual), or he would have to do something insane/illegal.
 
Scam PAC released a new "advert."


Which is a direct rip off of someone else's advert.


Only produced by Wu, so it's much longer and much worse. Oh hey, Wu. 1994 called. They wanted their text rendering back.
 
Grand Fucktard said:
View attachment 1530098

maybe 3 years depending on how cold the winter are...

HEY! that explains John's "progressive" stance on global warming (as in to progress it) - kill winter and keep those mutts alive. View attachment 1530109
Click to expand...

This is too ludicrous for words. The idea that being a teenage gearhead is a path to a computer science career is laugh-out-loud retarded. Maybe John will one day explain how rebuilding an old carburetor gave him insight into coding alpha blades.
 
Oof. Wu got 2 comments on the latest video, and one of them was from Frank.

1597794979409.png


That has the definite air of someone praising a four year old for the finger painting they've just done.
I think there's some massive salt coming up soon. Wu's definitely heading towards being fired, she's so obviously incompetent to do the job assigned. Also, it seems like there's a good chance Robbie Goldstein might win the 8th district election while being a political neophyte running for the first time. I hope it happens because Wu's reaction will be priceless. It's probably misogyny or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom