Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I seriously doubt that car can be damaged any further.

It still looks like a car. We're talking about a mongoloid who completely butchered an Audi TT right down to the exterior paint job looking like a 5 year old found their daddy's spray paints and spent five seconds trying to decorate it before getting bored.
 
It's actually nice to see that we're all united in our hatred of the Failing New York Times, really.

View attachment 1472724

Do we all remember when John was bragging about looking for a second home on the water at a nice lake in New England? Yes, we do.

John probably hates the people in that image because their dog is groomed. He would have five houses -- and ten Porsches -- if his paypig could afford it.
 
"We're in second gear!" the screaming, gay, Asian midget lisps through his completely unnecessary mask. The snarling, 6'+ tall ghoul crammed in the car next to him reminds him (and the viewers) that he has a PhD, which basically means that, since the ghoul owns him, the ghoul has a PhD.
 
Even knowing who they are, I don't know how I'd react if I saw a screaming elderly homosexual (poorly gagged with a dust mask) and a twitching wendigo brandishing a cameraphone drive past me in a barely working open top porsche. How must the average Joe feel?
 
For curiosity's sake, here's the Twitter account for the people doing the research, and here's the questionnaire itself.
Yeah, as you pointed out it's quite a biased little set of questions. I would have no problems playing Custer's Revenge, not because I want to rape a Native American but because I know exactly how bad the graphics are. It's laughable. Their choices of games and scenarios for sexual assault in a game are suspect - in large part because it's not something nearly any games include. They should have had a question about The Last of Us Part 2 and its unavoidable sex scene if they wanted to talk non-consensual sex in games, because I'm pretty sure no player consented to have that happen to them.

Their research seems muddled even as the bias is evident, especially considering which questions they let you explain and which ones they don't. But they clearly want people to think about how games negatively impact players when they're asked to do bad things. It doesn't feel like they were allowing for 'I don't want to do that in a game so I'll just play something else, rather than insist the game shouldn't exist'.

Also it's funny that they changed the question Jake got upset about. I'm guessing a few queers got upset that it was even an option for people to commit such wrongthink...
 
Last edited:
We no longer have low-information voters - we have negative information voters.

portland.png
 
John what kind of fucked up hoodrat neighbourhood do you live in and why haven't they killed you yet

View attachment 1475596

Why is John endangering the investigation by letting the criminals know how it's progressing and what information the investigators have? Why is he not doing what a responsible citizen would do and just giving them the video, assuming it exists?
 
John what kind of fucked up hoodrat neighbourhood do you live in and why haven't they killed you yet

View attachment 1475596
Interesting. I'm skeptical about the cameras; I doubt John has the aptitude to set them up on his own, and even if he had pros install them he would have sperged on Twitter about how he did it himself. One might think he had a moment of awareness and chose not to broadcast his security measures, but that's what he's doing right now. Also, eight cameras is excessive for their little house.

Yet he tagged the DPD claiming to have footage.

Interesting.
 
Yet he tagged the DPD claiming to have footage.

Best case scenario is he doesn't have shit and the cops call him out on it, and on top of that, the perp sees it and comes to his house to kick his ass for being a snitch.
 
Why is John endangering the investigation by letting the criminals know how it's progressing and what information the investigators have? Why is he not doing what a responsible citizen would do and just giving them the video, assuming it exists?
How would he get internet asspats that way?
 
I'm sure you'll have strong words for Detective Einstein, John.

View attachment 1475768
Ok so wtf. The previous tweet implied that John had watched the footage and saw something that might be of use to the police. Now he says he was 12 hours off. So wtf was supposed to be so interesting to the PD? I doubt the cops would find footage of Frank screamfacing at the size of Kerblop's morning evacuation to be 'very compelling.'
 
I AM JOHN FLYNT, KING OF KINGS, LOOK UPON MY WORKS YE MIGHTY IN DESPAIR
take your fucking meds, John.

rogan.png


Is there any non-retarded way to interpret this

mass.png
 
Last edited:
John what kind of fucked up hoodrat neighbourhood do you live in and why haven't they killed you yet

View attachment 1475596

John says the incident occurred "next to" his house. The police say they spent "several days" canvassing the neighborhood. How did they miss talking to the nextdoor neighbor? The nextdoor neighbor with eight security cameras, something cops are trained to look for in a case like this.

What the hell is John up to?
 
Back
Top Bottom