Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
He may be on to something. malegenitals = 12 characters, femalegenitals = 14 thus he's more secure.
 
Unsurprisingly, John is wrong. There were all kinds of silly (to us) forms of evidence used in the Salem witch trials, but "testimony from Satan speaking to them from the demon world" was not one of them.

And even if they did, how does that invalidate Giuliani's point? The right to know and confront your accuser is one of the most bedrock-deep principles in American jurisprudence. You know who loves anonymous and unchallengeable accusations? Dictatorships and corrupt shitholes. And the Democrats in the House, apparently.
Also, why would the puritans, a devoutly religous sect accept testimony from Satan, the Father of Lies? This doesn't hold up to even a moment's idle thought, let alone serious scrutiny.
 
I truly don't know which is more appalling: John's historical illiteracy, John's complete theological ignorance, or John's handwaving away of inconvenient doctrines of jurisprudence.
 
Also, why would the puritans, a devoutly religous sect accept testimony from Satan, the Father of Lies? This doesn't hold up to even a moment's idle thought, let alone serious scrutiny.

I wonder if, in his garbled, synthetic hormone-and-Ambien-ravaged brain, he's thinking of the Devil's Advocate, the person who argues against the canonization of a candidate for Catholic sainthood.
 
It's the trannies, John. No one wants to hire trannies because they are insane.

View attachment 964357

"In Congress I'll fight to ensure our rights can't be taken away."​

...says the Democrat who demands the Supreme Court override Congress every time the Republicans pass a bill.

There's 100+ years of scholarly thought on whether the Courts should override the legislature, how they should do it, and when they should be constrained. But there is less than 5 seconds' worth of thought in John's brain about how the branches should interact.
 
"I'm smarter than Andrew Yang was a #YangGang member before he was even born"

yang.png


But does Yang have an official public policy on Final Fantasy like John Walker Flynt does ?

ff.png
 
Crazy Kelly Ellis is trying to police twatter, she’s lost her mind lately but nice to see her go after the Wutard who clearly can’t keep his lies straight or keep a consistent message.

Also, FF15 was good. I enjoyed it as I did 12.
 
"I'm smarter than Andrew Yang was a #YangGang member before he was even born"

View attachment 966413

But does Yang have an official public policy on Final Fantasy like John Walker Flynt does ?

View attachment 966414
Interesting language for a candidate. I'm not particularly offended myself, but I can imagine some people might find it offputting. Generally, you try to avoid things like this while you are running for public office. Especially in a tweet about gaming which a great deal of your constituency won't really care about anyway. Of course, when you know you can't win -- I guess it doesn't really matter. But a serious candidate wouldn't do this, John.
 
"In Congress I'll fight to ensure our rights can't be taken away."​

By "our rights" he means the rights of wealthy white male troons like him, which include the right not to be criticized by anyone, ever. He will protect "our rights" by sending out jackbooted thugs to kick in the doors of anyone who thinks he's a joke.
 
I wonder if, in his garbled, synthetic hormone-and-Ambien-ravaged brain, he's thinking of the Devil's Advocate, the person who argues against the canonization of a candidate for Catholic sainthood.

You could hold a gun to John's head and demand that he explain the role of the advocatus diaboli in the old canonization process. He would stare at you and drool until the trigger was pulled, after which he would shamble away, muttering about his brain being his least vulnerable organ.
 
Last edited:
You could hold a gun to John's head and demand that he explain the role of the advocatus diaboli in the old canonization process. He would state at you and drool until the trigger was pulled, after which he would shamble away, muttering about his brain being his least vulnerable organ.

Now understand, I'm not suggesting John knows more about the canonization process, or any legal procedure, really, than your average flatworm. I'm just saying maybe he heard the phrase once or twice and that it had an actual, legal significance, and dreamed up this loonytoons version of what it means.
 
Now understand, I'm not suggesting John knows more about the canonization process, or any legal procedure, really, than your average flatworm. I'm just saying maybe he heard the phrase once or twice and that it had an actual, legal significance, and dreamed up this loonytoons version of what it means.

I don't disagree with you. I just like the image of John being forced to answer real questions, preferably by a grizzled and deranged VC (the Victor Charlie kind, not a venture capitalist) waving a gun and screaming "Didi mao!"

As to where John came up with his ruhtarded, bullshit history, I figure it was an imbecilic mashup of The Devil and Daniel Webster, an old Vincent Price movie and three episodes of Bewitched.
 
I don't disagree with you. I just like the image of John being forced to answer real questions, preferably by a grizzled and deranged VC (the Victor Charlie kind, not a venture capitalist) waving a gun and screaming "Didi mao!"

As to where John came up with his ruhtarded, bullshit history, I figure it was an imbecilic mashup of The Devil and Daniel Webster, an old Vincent Price movie and three episodes of Bewitched.

I don't think he even took it from anywhere consciously. He's just used to making shit up and spewing stream of consciousness nonsense without being called on it, or just immediately getting anyone banned from Twitter who points out that he's wrong.
 
I don't think he even took it from anywhere consciously. He's just used to making shit up and spewing stream of consciousness nonsense without being called on it, or just immediately getting anyone banned from Twitter who points out that he's wrong.

This is, of course, true. But I like my story about old episodes of Bewitched better.
 
"When I was a crime reporter" are you fucking kidding me

View attachment 966747

Nah John if you're working adult then paying for insulin should be very reasonable.

View attachment 966748

If John had ever actually worked at a newspaper, he would know that crime reporters very rarely see and almost never talk to criminals. He would also know that they are not called "crime reporters"; they work the police beat and are usually called "cops reporters" or "police reporters."

But the eejits who follow John lap this bullshit up and ask for seconds.
 
Back
Top Bottom