- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
"there's no correct way to be queer" unless you're Caitlyn Jenner in which case execute yourself, what a fucking story John.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"The gay mayor doesn't want to pillage and burn Chik-Fil-A, so I won't vote for him." Is this really the sort of policy position that Democrat voters judge their candidates by these days? The party is well and truly dead."there's no correct way to be queer" unless you're Caitlyn Jenner in which case execute yourself, what a fucking story John.
View attachment 720183
"Does this girdle make me look fat?" - John
Well, he has to use something to cinch that equatorial bulge born of too many Potbelly sandwiches. Which makes me think the slim belt he wears with the One True Dress must have some sort of steel cable reinforcement embedded that enables it to hold together under the extreme tension. But if the buckle ever fails and the ends go flying, someone's gonna lose an eye.
I've posited that the slim belt is the cursed, tanned and leathery tail of ratman-John, Satan cut it off and tied it around John's waist as a constant reminder of what he came from, the reminder that he was never a (wo)man. Satan is real bastard and he finally found a good way to force humanity further away from god.
I wonder if this is just low hanging troll bait. She’s waiting to get large scale blowback from it and then screech that she’s being harassed.
Problem is, this kind of photo is something I could easily see this being mocked on plenty of liberal programs because it’s just that awful.
Edit to add: please let them decide this a great flyer option. Imagine all of district 8 covered in flyers with chiclet teeth Wuman demanding your money and votes.
I love this, it's like John said "You know how certain pairs of colors are complementary? Well what if three colors were complementary?"
She reminds me of dame Edna in that interviewHer HLN interview is up
Surprisingly no snarling, though she does even head bobbing to give you whiplash.
How fucking weak do you got to be as a parent to have to use consoles time limit tools to get your kids to stop playing videogames?Her HLN interview is up
Surprisingly no snarling, though she does even head bobbing to give you whiplash.
One step closer to the glorious day of legalised rape (archive)
View attachment 721094
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 9, 2019
Press Representative:
Paul Casali
(917) 714–4205
paul@briannawu2020.com
BRIANNA WU CONDEMNS TRUMP FOR ROLLING BACK PROTECTIONS FOR WOMEN WORKERS
DEDHAM, Massachusetts — Candidate for U.S. Congress Brianna Wu condemned President Trump for signing an executive order which rolls back hard-fought protections for women in the workplace put in place under President Obama.
“Here he goes again,” said Wu. “Any opportunity to reverse the progress made under President Obama, and any opportunity to treat women as subservient, Donald Trump will jump on it every time. This is another of a long line of examples, but this one affects women and their families all over the country, including in Massachusetts.”
On March 27th, with little fanfare, Trump revoked the 2014 Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces order that President Obama signed to ensure that companies with federal contracts comply with 14 labor and civil rights laws. President Trump’s Executive Order is titled “Presidential Executive Order on the Revocation of Federal Contracting Executive Orders.” The Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces order was put into place under President Obama after a Government Accountability Office report showed that companies with multiple violations were being awarded with multimillion dollar federal contracts. The order impacted women workers paycheck transparency and a included a ban on forced arbitration clauses for sexual harassment, sexual assault, or discrimination claims.
“With Trump’s track record of his treatment of women, is anyone really surprised?” said Wu. ‘This revocation returns women to the days of being forced to pay companies that discriminate against them through their tax dollars. What possible justification could Trump have to do this besides his penchant for reversing any real progress President Obama made and his obvious contempt for women?”
“With this revocation, women who work for companies with federal contracts will now have to negotiate their pay in the dark since Trump eliminated company transparency requirements to detail earnings, pay scales, salaries and other details. And, women who work for these companies who are the victims of sexual harassment, assault, or other forms of discrimination will be forced to go back into these forced arbitration sessions, in secret, where the rest of the company and other women may never find out about the claims. It’s Trump protecting the powerful and not the people yet again, and it’s disgusting. Elections have consequences, and the consequences of Trump’s election have been disastrous for women,” said Wu.
Wu also called into question the timing of Trump’s order and the respective lack of media coverage. “It isn’t lost on me that this order was signed while the Mueller Report discussion was headline news. If Trump was trying to bury the news, he failed, because I and others will call him on it.”