Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sissy Galvez said:
What if this Brian fag loaned them the money? He seems to have a creepy fetish for Brianna. If he’s as rich as @W person cow says he is, it might be him.
Click to expand...
He is not rich as such, more of a toy of his rich brother. He gets to live in modest luxury with the finest doctors, never to work again and to hang out at his brother's mansion sometimes and whatnot. But doesn't have his own money as such. I mean, way richer than me but not as rich as Frank.
 
So here's a story not related directly to Wu, but I think something we're all :optimistic: for.

https://theintercept.com/2018/08/30/julia-salazar-dsa-colombia-immigrant/

Some quotes.

The state Senate campaign of Julia Salazar, a prominent member of the New York City Democratic Socialists of America, was jolted last week when Tablet Magazine published a story casting doubt on several parts of the candidate’s biography — from self-describing as an immigrant to her claim of Jewish lineage.
Click to expand...

The article reviews Salazar’s turn as a former conservative activist, strident supporter of the Israeli government, and opponent of abortion rights, to a democratic socialist and critic of Israel. That broad journey had been reported before, but the real grenades were a pair of revelations that suggested she had concocted elements of her biography. First, the author interviewed Salazar’s brother, who said that her father never identified as Jewish, contradicting the candidate’s claim that she has Jewish lineage. This has led to criticism and examination in the Jewish press.
Click to expand...

The entire story fits both Becky and Wu.
 
Sissy Galvez said:
What if this Brian fag loaned them the money? He seems to have a creepy fetish for Brianna. If he’s as rich as @W person cow says he is, it might be him.
Click to expand...
Warren is also lucid for around 3 hours a day, exaggerates everything, and can't maintain a consistent line of thought to save his life.

Brian may indeed warrant a thread, but we need verifiable information that doesn't come from a patently unreliable and easily distracted wackjob. Going the "Warren route" is gonna be 15 days of manic, unrelated sperging about anything that flies through his head, secondhand gossip he heard from "a really nice guy who's a fellow berniecrat I met in Malden", and some stoner-ass Poli Sci 101 theories.

We've been down that road. It's like pulling teeth to keep him on topic, and it's impossible to prove any of what you do get, because everything he knows is "something he heard somewhere".

Peace and Harmony said:
Gross

View attachment 535809
Click to expand...
So while announcing how much she's learned and grown from this frankly embarrassing loss, she's spent the last few days being a smug piece of shit and laughing it up with her tech buddies while ignoring/belittling her potential voters for their concerns regarding her candidacy.

The more things change....
 
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
Warren is also lucid for around 3 hours a day, exaggerates everything, and can't maintain a consistent line of thought to save his life.

Brian may indeed warrant a thread, but we need verifiable information that doesn't come from a patently unreliable and easily distracted wackjob. Going the "Warren route" is gonna be 15 days of manic, unrelated sperging about anything that flies through his head, secondhand gossip he heard from "a really nice guy who's a fellow berniecrat I met in Malden", and some stoner-ass Poli Sci 101 theories.

We've been down that road. It's like pulling teeth to keep him on topic, and it's impossible to prove any of what you do get, because everything he knows is "something he heard somewhere".


So while announcing how much she's learned and grown from this frankly embarrassing loss, she's spent the last few days being a smug piece of shit and laughing it up with her tech buddies while ignoring/belittling her potential voters for their concerns regarding her candidacy.

The more things change....
Click to expand...

The main fascination with Brian is that he transcends the usual Brianna Wu asspatter who does his “slay queen slay uwu” on her “I’m so oppressed” tweets.

I have to dig through his tweets to find it but he REEEEEE’d at local commentators who correctly called out Brianna for being out of touch in that Boston Globe article. He actively finds people critical of Brianna (valid or otherwise) and harasses them and claims victory when blocked.

Based on the threads from Universal Hub, he is someone who is utterly incapable of not having the last word on a topic. He’d probably have a 100 page tweet war with someone who was running for dog catcher who said he didn’t vote for Brianna Wu.
 
For all her REEEing about sexist press coverage, BriBri better hope she doesn't get any. Much like another favourite of mine, Russ Greer, the only thing that's saving her is how far below the radar she actually is. You've seen what people outside the hugbox really think of her. I don't really think the softball media coverage is evidence of some media corruption like that. Those powder-puff feel-good interviews happen for every candidate because they're usually set up by the candidates themselves. It's telling that EVEN IN BLATANT PR EXERCISES you barely have to read between the lines to see how unlikable and incompetent Brianna is. If she starts getting less softball interviews and gets involved in a serious race? If her opponent actually thinks she's worth attacking? Hoo boy.

Fuck it, I hope she gets tons of donations from sad cucks. I hope she runs again. I hope she makes Lynch actually start to feel threatened. A limitless fountain of tard cum awaits.
 
Yes John, it's not as if the routine suppression and demonetisation etc of any non-progressive viewpoint has not been thoroughly documented for at least two years, if not more.

murder.png
 
Send someone as dumb as you your way? Start by looking at your donor list maybe.

fast.png


Autists who never interact with anyone discover multi-party prisoner's dilemma for the first time.

hyp.png


Hit a little too close to home, John?

kills.png
 
I don't know if this has been posted before and I apologise if it has, but look what I found thumbing through an old magazine at an appointment.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180907_100226.jpg
    IMG_20180907_100226.jpg
    973.4 KB · Views: 155
Android raptor said:
I don't know if this has been posted before and I apologise if it has, but look what I found thumbing through an old magazine at an appointment.
Click to expand...

Brianna Wu having any kind of celebrity or influence is proof we have failed as a civilization. Let the nukes fly, gentleman, judgement is upon us.
 
Francis York Morgan said:
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that Brianna has more empathy for a totaled sports car than every voter in the district they campaigned in.
Click to expand...

More empathy for an Audi, no less. At least the one in that picture did its job in protecting the driver. Wu totaled theirs from the inside out by trying to trick it out, lost interest, and then ruined its exterior with fucking spray paint.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
Send someone as dumb as you your way? Start by looking at your donor list maybe.

View attachment 536088

Autists who never interact with anyone discover multi-party prisoner's dilemma for the first time.

View attachment 536089
Click to expand...

"Urban, walkable."

This sure sounds like code for lots of Whole Foods and Trader Joe's and fancy little boutiques and as few black people as possible. Keep those antifa protesters away please, though, we're liberals here!

Peace and Harmony said:
Shaddup you fucking nerd

View attachment 536144
Click to expand...

John, a man who has bought at least 4 cars that make him look like the biggest asshole in the world, and who looked like an asshole driving a Porsche to do two or three door knocks in working class Boston, has no position at all talking about how to buy a car that doesn't make you look like an asshole.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
John how exactly can you be a legal expert on a term that does not exist in the legal literature

View attachment 536227
Click to expand...
Hate speech is a term which has been defined in numerous state laws and by the American Bar Association.
Not by the Supreme Court yet, but in other places yes, hundreds of times.
We had two politicians in Malden who tried to make this claim, that hate speech has "no definition", even after having the definition read to them.
They were laughed off the stage. One of them resigned, and the other one was voted out of office :)
 
W person cow said:
Hate speech is a term which has been defined in numerous state laws and by the American Bar Association.
Not by the Supreme Court yet, but in other places yes, hundreds of times.
We had two politicians in Malden who tried to make this claim, that hate speech has "no definition", even after having the definition read to them.
They were laughed off the stage. One of them resigned, and the other one was voted out of office :)
Click to expand...
And the Supreme Court reaffirmed as recently as 2017 that there's no "hate speech" exception to the 1st amendment, so all those state laws and the ABAs dumbfuckery are worth about as much as Brianna's campaign promises.
 
W person cow said:
Hate speech is a term which has been defined in numerous state laws and by the American Bar Association.
Not by the Supreme Court yet, but in other places yes, hundreds of times.
Click to expand...

It has been partially defined by the Supreme Court on multiple occasions.

As legally protected speech.

Most recently in 2017, unanimously.

Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.” United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U. S. 644, 655 (1929) (Holmes, J., dissenting).
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom