Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Calling it now: Wu's next hustle is being the guy who brings his cosplay car to regional sci-fi conventions in order to impress people with the amount of :autism: it requires to faithfully recreate a vehicle featured in two issues of a relatively unknown comic series. He may even win a hugo for best car cosplay.
This would have the potential for much humor and horror at the same time, since you know he would want to do the cosplay costume for himself in order to complete the set. And we know from past photos what he looks like in cosplay...
 
Well, don't be so harsh on Brianna. I think there are at least two characters he can successfully cosplay. On the top of my head this one:

max-schreck.jpg

And with some effort this one:

pennywise-the-clown-taylan-soyturk.jpg

He doesn't need to change is teeth much.
 
This would have the potential for much humor and horror at the same time, since you know he would want to do the cosplay costume for himself in order to complete the set. And we know from past photos what he looks like in cosplay...
Judging by how recent Brianna repairs are done, he'd just dress Frank in drag or hire a cosplayer.
 
I think they already did that, when they gave Frank Wu his four Hugos for Best Fan Art. The Hugos, they ain't what they usedta be.
In this particular case it's the exact opposite, the Hugos are too much what they used to be. All those "fan ____" Hugos are holdovers from an earlier age when sci-fi was more of a niche hobby, and fan activity really did hold the community together.
 
Trying to look up more inspirational quotes to steal and appropriate?

quote.png


Dk0sINlV4AAVT22.jpg


I actually really like this quote. I don't see how it's wrong in any way, it's basically saying "treat people shitty, expect to be treated shitty. Treat people well, and they will treat you well back."
 
Last edited:
I actually really like this quote. I don't see how it's wrong in any way, it's basically saying "treat people shitty, expect to be treated shitty. Treat people well, and they will treat you well back."
I think the implication here is that it's referring specifically to relationships and sex, and the meaning is closer to "If you're sick of being pumped and dumped by Chad, stop acting like such a slut". And you can't just come out and say that! Going down my SJW Bingo card:
* Assuming relationships are heterosexual and monogamous
* Reinforcing patriarchal stereotypes of what it means to be "a lady" (no points if you include a similar complaint for "gentlemen", because fuck men)
* F-REEEEEE space
* Implying that women are responsible for men's behavior, meaning it's their fault when they get literally raped and murdered
* Not teaching men not to rape, because toxic masculinity is the actual source of all problems between men and women

What do I win?
 
I actually really like this quote. I don't see how it's wrong in any way, it's basically saying "treat people shitty, expect to be treated shitty. Treat people well, and they will treat you well back."

I don't know, it reads more like "don't be a bitch and make him smack you around again."
 
I thought we were beyond just assuming that "lady" means biologically female and "gentlemen" only refers to biological males. Why be so stereotypical about who can be a lady and who can be a gentleman?

As the late, great David Bowie sayeth, "I'm a mama-papa coming for you."

Gender is a spectrum, dammit, just like the 'tism! SMH
 
I think the implication here is that it's referring specifically to relationships and sex, and the meaning is closer to "If you're sick of being pumped and dumped by Chad, stop acting like such a slut". And you can't just come out and say that! Going down my SJW Bingo card:
* Assuming relationships are heterosexual and monogamous
* Reinforcing patriarchal stereotypes of what it means to be "a lady" (no points if you include a similar complaint for "gentlemen", because fuck men)
* F-REEEEEE space
* Implying that women are responsible for men's behavior, meaning it's their fault when they get literally raped and murdered
* Not teaching men not to rape, because toxic masculinity is the actual source of all problems between men and women

What do I win?

Ha, I'm glad someone else gets it.

Women don't like being held to any standard or responsibility. This is probably why troonship appeals to Brianna so much.
Just still blows my mind how many blue-pilled men fool themselves into believing this could be an assault on women and they need to white knight them.

It's "taboo" thought (which is a logical fallacy) that because it's "sexist" you can't accept it. The mental gymnastics some people go through to not see something so transparent...
 
Ha, I'm glad someone else gets it.

Women don't like being held to any standard or responsibility. This is probably why troonship appeals to Brianna so much.
Just still blows my mind how many blue-pilled men fool themselves into believing this could be an assault on women and they need to white knight them.

It's "taboo" thought (which is a logical fallacy) that because it's "sexist" you can't accept it. The mental gymnastics some people go through to not see something so transparent...

I would qualify your statement starting with "women" as "certain women". I know plenty of women who accept or even demand being held to standards. Let's be more precise: "SJW women" or "female SJWs" if you like.
 
Calling it now: Wu's next hustle is being the guy who brings his cosplay car to regional sci-fi conventions in order to impress people with the amount of :autism: it requires to faithfully recreate a vehicle featured in two issues of a relatively unknown comic series. He may even win a hugo for best car cosplay.
She'll get bored of the car thing and move on. Remember how she was big into VR a couple years ago?
 
I agree. I just didn't want anyone to be mistaken in thinking that I believe in NAWALT.
But we're fucking not.

I acknowledge that the glass floor is more real than the glass ceiling, but I want to be held accountable for what I accomplish. If I succeed, I deserve the credit. If I fail, I deserve the blame. I'm not a Faberge fucking egg and I hate being treated like one.

Male feminists who pull that shit make me angrier than outright chauvinists. At least the chauvinists are honest.
 
Now she has a legal gofundme... but, oh, what's this?

View attachment 520403

Oh, she's shady as fuck. I can see why Wu likes her.
Seems like I vaguely recall the incident this dude is talking about. I found this thing on google explaining more about the fucked up things this pair have been up to.

Not saying the whole thing is made up, but it's a possibility.

Brianna Wu shilling for a con artist. What a shock!

http://techgeek.com.au/2014/10/21/real-tk-tech-news-fraud/
 
But we're fucking not.

I acknowledge that the glass floor is more real than the glass ceiling, but I want to be held accountable for what I accomplish. If I succeed, I deserve the credit. If I fail, I deserve the blame. I'm not a Faberge fucking egg and I hate being treated like one.

Male feminists who pull that shit make me angrier than outright chauvinists. At least the chauvinists are honest.

Third wave feminism isn't about equality. Hell, first-wave feminism wasn't (they wanted the right to vote without having to register for selective service like males). It's about being put on a pedestal and worshipped for nothing more than having a vagina. 80% of men in divorce get NO CUSTODY.
When a teacher fucks a kid it's "Had relations with" even though it's RAPE. And they get off with a slap on the wrist and get to keep their jobs.

Equal reward for equal effort. But that's not what feminism is. It's just man-hating.
 
Back
Top Bottom