Actually, we document everything first, judge second. Literally every tweet and public detail we can scavenge. The thing is.... she's not nice. She's completely self-serving in every regard possible, and lies/appropriates every tragedy she reads about. It's literally a formula now:
- Bad thing happens
- Wu mentions it (for exposure) but makes it all about her. "This person killed themselves, vote for me!"
- Wu invents a several-year long escapade "working" for that cause (be it a suicide hotline worker, an investigative journalist, "As a software engineer....." etc. It doesn't matter because it's all demonstrably false, but there are two sides: People who already know about her and avoid her (or document for others not to be fooled), or those who don't want to see the truth but want to ride her coattails or otherwise be associated with her stamp of approval
- Forget about it until it becomes relevant again, and then appropriate suffering more.
So if she ever was nice, if she ever did anything to serve anybody or anything outside herself, it would be documented here. It's not like we exclude anything here to fit a narrative, which I'm sure you must believe to keep up the illusion. It's just the fact is John is a really really bad person and will throw anyone on the barbed wire so she can cross the fence over their bloodied corpse.