Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Peace and Harmony said:
Let me take a rough guess as to exactly how much you've listened to from those figures and others, John.

View attachment 444537
Click to expand...

Pavel: Captain! there's some singularity forming in the north eastern section of the continent.
Spock: Yes, I see it too, the sensors are reading a massive explosion of hypocracy, with levels off the charts!
Kirk: Spock, try to contain it.
Spock: I am trying captain, but it seems every question-pulse I send in is immediately blocked.
Kirk: Somebody better come up with ideas soon...
Pavel: Captain! There's a block-ray coming straight from the center of the singularity in MA-8! It's headed right for us!
Kirk: Fire photon torpedos and warp 9, get us out of here!
 
Lol "liquid computing" I guess that is what we need to deal with the imminent threat of moon rocks.
 
AnOminous said:
Lol "liquid computing" I guess that is what we need to deal with the imminent threat of moon rocks.
Click to expand...
It's actually a really neat idea. Basically the thought is that you could start doing a task on one device, go to another, and seamlessly continue the exact same task. Kinda like how when your listening to Spotify on desktop, and then you leave the house and fire it up on your phone, and it starts up at the exact place the song was at on desktop.
I know there's some company that's been really hitting this concept lately, but I can't seem to recall which, lemme hit up the Wikipedia page real quick and-

upload_2018-5-8_10-54-24.png


Ahhh ok, well, that solves that mystery.

Literally the first thing mentioned on the page for "liquid computing".
 
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
It's actually a really neat idea. Basically the thought is that you could start doing a task on one device, go to another, and seamlessly continue the exact same task.
Click to expand...

This works really well for the dumb tasks we normally do, like play me a song or show me a video.

There are obvious reasons a shrieking Frankentroon can't solve the real issues, like, how do we fold a protein so that it cures a particular form of cancer.
 
ZKWNordman said:
What is that discoloration at Brianna’s hairline? Dandruff? Glue? Flesh eating bacteria?
Click to expand...
That's a scar from a forehead reduction procedure. No punchline, that is exactly what it is.
Peace and Harmony said:
The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters.

View attachment 444459
Click to expand...
Nearly 30 years after the fall of the Soviet Union, Wu still tries to keep Soviet Potato Bag Fashion alive.
 
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
It's actually a really neat idea. Basically the thought is that you could start doing a task on one device, go to another, and seamlessly continue the exact same task. Kinda like how when your listening to Spotify on desktop, and then you leave the house and fire it up on your phone, and it starts up at the exact place the song was at on desktop.
I know there's some company that's been really hitting this concept lately, but I can't seem to recall which, lemme hit up the Wikipedia page real quick and-

View attachment 444594

Ahhh ok, well, that solves that mystery.

Literally the first thing mentioned on the page for "liquid computing".
Click to expand...

It's also the next step in consolidating all of your shit into their "cloud" or "ecosystem", collecting even more personal data and further driving "computing as a service" or whatever it's called.

There's already tons of remote viewing applications that runs on every device imaginable and VPNs used properly extends that functionality significantly. Liquid computing sounds like a vajazzled version of something that already exists and works well.
 
Smaug's Smokey Hole said:
It's also the next step in consolidating all of your shit into their "cloud" or "ecosystem", collecting even more personal data and further driving "computing as a service" or whatever it's called.
Click to expand...
Undeniably true. This is the driver for a lot of innovations lately. Think of them as attractive front ends for surveiling you and you won't be far wrong.

Smaug's Smokey Hole said:
There's already tons of remote viewing applications that runs on every device imaginable and VPNs used properly extends that functionality significantly. Liquid computing sounds like a vajazzled version of something that already exists and works well.
Click to expand...
I don't quite agree with this. Seamless transition of a user workflow between devices is neither feasible for many users nor readily provided by remote viewing apps or VPNs. If I'm in the middle of writing a white paper and don't want to lug my laptop to lunch, it might be nice to pick up writing it on my cell phone without a tedious procedure to transfer the data.
 
AprilRains said:
I don't quite agree with this. Seamless transition of a user workflow between devices is neither feasible for many users nor readily provided by remote viewing apps or VPNs. If I'm in the middle of writing a white paper and don't want to lug my laptop to lunch, it might be nice to pick up writing it on my cell phone without a tedious procedure to transfer the data.
Click to expand...

The workflow just can't be the same between a computer and a phone, they're largely incompatible from a usability perspective, and that's probably the strongest point for "liquid computing" if it can entirely change the workspace when something moves between devices. If you just want to use Word or play Heroes of Might and Magic 2 on your laptop at home via a phone from a mountaintop in Mongolia, or transfer files between them, that's solved. :autistic: I know.
 
Went to see if there was anything out there no on John’s scamraiser. Someone posted a note on a fb group...two likes.

88C39C33-BB66-4365-86CA-97DE45650520.jpeg
 
A fetishization of women is LITERALLY the only reason anyone could say that T3 is better than T2. It was objectively inferior in every single way, except it has a female Terminator so...

That offends me as much as anything else she's said.

Edit: Hell, now that I think about it, even if you're fetishizing the idea of a strong woman, Linda Hamilton is infinitely better than either Claire Danes or Kristina Loken.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom