- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
Buying much more expensive laptops for schools is pointless, cheap and replaceable is the way to go but Brianna "heh, they don't have the latest Pentium" Wu will never figure that out. Programming is also easier and more accessible than ever so I don't know what his point is, why even bring up some Apple shit? At this point in time learning programming is completely free, you don't have to spend a nickel if you have a computer of some kind.
Flu has always been of the opinion that you need to burn money for only THE best on the market as soon as something better comes along. Even back in the milsaps days, John wrote an editorial bashing the math department for not having THE cutting edge computers even though they'd just upgraded the previous year.
What Flu fails to grasp, which is a sure sign that they are not an expert when it comes to computers in the slightest, is that the desired performance of the computer has to min-max resources. If it needs an amount of resources like memory and processing power, then you give it that stuff, but you don't go in excess of those limits any more than necessary. The name of the game is efficiency, not dick-waving because you have the best shit before it's even been fully broken in and patched correctly. If you can get a job done with less expenses in both processing and cost, then why would you splurge on something that has higher processing at higher cost when you're never going to use it?