ZKWNordman
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
”Top 10 ways AI is going to take yer jerb"
I think she wrote that piece.
http://efanzines.com/DrinkTank/DrinkTank162.pdf
Just kidding. #1 is a lament about how her computer won’t fuck her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
”Top 10 ways AI is going to take yer jerb"
Leaving aside the content of the ad: Who thought it was a good idea to make Frank the main character? Nobody knows who either of them are or what they're doing. And who ever heard of a candidate having a "co-host" on their own commercials?
It's also important to stress that even if she was running in a district with a booming tech sector that Brianna would still come off as an out of touch imbecile. I mean, she gave an answer of nanomachines to a question regarding environmental issues like it's something that can be coming out in the next two years.Tech is not even on the radar for people here and she sounds weird and out of touch every time she talks about it.
I think she wrote that piece.
http://efanzines.com/DrinkTank/DrinkTank162.pdf
Just kidding. #1 is a lament about how her computer won’t fuck her.
Leaving aside the content of the ad: Who thought it was a good idea to make Frank the main character? Nobody knows who either of them are or what they're doing. And who ever heard of a candidate having a "co-host" on their own commercials?
They should have skipped the whole campaign thing and gone right to being Youtubers. They probably could have used Frank's connections to promote it in the usual places.
Maybe it’s the mystery troon whose hand took the cookies in the last ad.Also, does anyone know whose voice that is at the end, "Paid for by Brianna Wu for Congress?" Is that the voice of Warren? Did they pay a voice actor $3,858 for one line of voice work and a blinky LED?
Frank is still that 12 year old boy who watched his sister drown or w/e.
Wait.... could it be..... Natalie?????Maybe it’s the mystery troon whose hand took the cookies in the last ad.
Wait.... could it be..... Natalie?????
I consider myself a layman on tech so perhaps I'm just dumb but I have absolutely no idea what this video is even about.
I initially thought something making publicly funded research freely accessible for the public but suddenly security comes up?
I mean I don't expect much from an ad like this. But good lord, it echoes like hell, the lighting is horrible, the mic is constantly in the red, Frank is mumbling all of his lines through his teeth, Brianna's glasses are so far down her nose, the top rim of is nearly covering her eyes... I could go on forever.I consider myself a layman on tech so perhaps I'm just dumb but I have absolutely no idea what this video is even about.
I initially thought something making publicly funded research freely accessible for the public but suddenly security comes up?
I like how John just pulls a number out of his ass to try to sound authoritative. It's telling that he said I bet it's a job you could do in four or five months, because he actually has no clue what is even involved never mind how long any part of it takes. He has no idea if he was wildly over, under, or even correct. In a way, I envy his devil-may-care attitude toward facts by just throwing a dart, quite obvious and publically, and then if anyone challenges his brazen fraud he'll double down. It's impressive in a perverse way.
Isn’t it illegal he has Corey doctorow writing puff pieces on him every month?DrFrankWu is playing defense in the Boing Boing comments. Have fun, boys.
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/congre...xplains-net-neutrality-with-cookies/119923/22
DrFrankWu is playing defense in the Boing Boing comments. Have fun, boys.
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/congre...xplains-net-neutrality-with-cookies/119923/22