Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sperging incorrectly about bitcoin always attracts tons of alt-right mansplainers who want to harass a proud, tough Godzilla in tech.

Super optimistic but Brianna knows you can’t store porn on bitcoin and this is bait to make up for getting btfo’d the other day about women in esports.
 

Does anyone else find it odd that a software engineer can only defend his position on a software issue by citing clickbait in The Guardian as if it were a peer-reviewed journal published by IEEE? Wouldn't a real software engineer do something like explain why it is possible to embed porn in bitcoin code? It's almost as if cybersecurity expert Flynt/Wu doesn't know dick about programming.

How long before John realizes all of this and these tweets are deleted? Optimistic?
 
Too bad @uber, I guess you don't get to participate in District 8's gay communist tech utopia.

View attachment 406256
View attachment 406257
View attachment 406258
Wu, honey, a treadmill can be considered "lethal technology." No piece of tech can ever be 100% safe and the fact that this is the only major incident involving one when they've been on the streets for a respectable amount of time is actually pretty impressive. I understand some red flags should be raised about this and it's tragic that this happened to an innocent woman just trying to go about her day, but it's not like it went haywire and started plowing through a crowd of civilians. Wu just wants to use this tragedy as a soapbox while she desperately screams for attention, like she always does.
 
40 year old dude who failed out of college took a course one time, he must be an EXPERT

res.png


Super optimistic but Brianna knows

No, he doesn't.
 
Frank: Brianna, I promised the internet we would go to the Quincy Democrats tonight. Can you save the Twitter arguing for later?
Brianna: [incomprehensible snaps and snarls]
Frank: Yes dear.
 
40 year old dude who failed out of college took a course one time, he must be an EXPERT

View attachment 407408



No, he doesn't.

Looks like Flynt/Wu did as well on the bar exam as he did on the written exam for the motorcycle license. If someone posts a child porn image on a page hosted by Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg isn't guilty of a felony. Failure to report the post and failure to remove it are other issues entirely.
 
40 year old dude who failed out of college took a course one time, he must be an EXPERT

View attachment 407408



No, he doesn't.

I swear there's a keyword there which John forgot, one which completely dismisses his whole rhetoric. And that word is "knowingly".

I'm not 100% sure on this, but I'm pretty sure you're only in the shit if you KNOWINGLY download and/or share these pictures.
 
Why would a software engineering/journalism major take a telecommunications law class? That's a specialized course not typically taken in undergrad. He doesn't even try to make his lies remotely plausible anymore.
 
I swear there's a keyword there which John forgot, one which completely dismisses his whole rhetoric. And that word is "knowingly".

I'm not 100% sure on this, but I'm pretty sure you're only in the shit if you KNOWINGLY download and/or share these pictures.

Bingo.

If you happen to be cruising a legal porn site, click a link thumbnailing something legal, and some sick fuck used that as a bait and switch for a child porn vid, you obviously were not looking for CP, so if you back the fuck out and ideally report it, not on you.

Another possible exception is getting a redirect to CP when going to something else entirely, a quick examination of your IP history will clearly show you were not going there on purpose.

You have no defense if your browsing history shows you regularly patronizing a place known for actual CP and keep going back, it's assumed then you had clear intent.


And on the cryptocurrency =/= CP thing, say wut?

It is possible to convert images to encrypted code and vice versa, but from what I know of blockchain technology, that would be implausible at best and impossible to even try without someone figuring it out really quick.
 
Why would a software engineering/journalism major take a telecommunications law class? That's a specialized course not typically take
n in undergrad. He doesn't even try to make his lies remotely plausible anymore.

I must respectfully disagree on this. A course titled something like Mass Communications Law is almost always required in undergraduate journalism programs. That said, those courses focus almost exclusively on how to avoid getting yourself and/or your employer sued for libel or plagiarism -- both of which Flynt/Wu is guilty of on multiple occasions, so I guess that was another course he failed. College journalism classes typically spend zero time instructing students on how to avoid prosecution for hosting online kiddie porn.

Just another pack of lies from John the Expert on Everything.
 
Okay so i suffered the cancer that is the guardian and came away with some interesting results.

Firstly, lets look at this quote:

Researchers from the RWTH Aachen University, Germany found that around 1,600 files were currently stored in bitcoin’s blockchain. Of the files least eight were of sexual content, including one thought to be an image of child abuse and two that contain 274 links to child abuse content, 142 of which link to dark web services.

So the bitcoin blockchain contains 3 files that solicit CP, 1 picture and 2 text files. That amounts to about 8mb, providing the picture is a high-res copy. But how big is the blockchain currently? Well the blockchain is (https://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size) 141.76GB in size. So 141GB of naughtiness and you get 1 picture and 2 txt files. We really have a pandemic on our hands.

When sending transactions over blockchain you have an option to send messages attached to your transaction. These use up barely any data, and its a lot like how you can attach funny messages to your payments through your bank. Its likely someone has split a hex copy of these malicious files and pasting code in the messages, something achievable with any other online payment method too.

This is why The Guardian keeps referencing to downloading the full blockchain. Not only do you need to download 141GB of data in order to access it, but you need to know how to defragment the files which are being broadcast over random transactions.

The reason why John is chimping the fuck out, is that he has NO IDEA how cryptocurrency works. Once it clicks, i'm sure John will be asking for crypto donations to fund his failed journey to the white house.
 
The reason why John is chimping the fuck out, is that he has NO IDEA how cryptocurrency works. Once it clicks, i'm sure John will be asking for crypto donations to fund his failed journey to the white house.
It'll be a classic John vs. John moment, like with Nintendo NOT ONE MORE DIME and Uber.

Bitcoin is evil, will use up more than 100% of earth's energy, distribute child pornography and allow Elon Musk to throw twice as many moon rocks.

Please donate bitcoin to my campaign.
 
bitdox.png

@Dynastia is Satoshi Nakamoto, confirmed.

For everyone's edification, here's what the researchers found in regards to CP:
bitcp.png

So one could argue that maybe John/The Guardian was right in that there's a single CP image (maybe) on the blockchain, but the Guardian headline is obviously stretching definitions and assumptions for sensationalism.

So the bitcoin blockchain contains 3 files that solicit CP, 1 picture and 2 text files. That amounts to about 8mb, providing the picture is a high-res copy.
Note also that the totality of non-financial data they found was 16MB, so it's pretty unlikely it was very high res at all. Apparently the main tool for inserting images is something called Apertus, and that only accounted for ~3MB. My impression from the way they worded it in the study is that it's possibly a topless teenager, given that it's referred to as "mild nudity of a young woman." They couldn't even tell if she was underage and had to go by the claims of a third-party forum.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be surprised if John thinks that Bitcoin is literally child porn as currency.

"I'll give you 30 photos of ten year old girls in bondage for that HDTV"

"No dice. It's worth at least 50 photos of two year olds getting peed on!"
 
Back
Top Bottom