Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I go back and forth on Brianna/John's pronouns simply because I know it would drive him absolutely batshit.

The whole "YOU CAN'T DEADNAME SOMEONE REEEEE" gives one a perverse pleasure in doing exactly that.
 
LMAO Wu deserves no fucking respect wtf is wrong with you?

If everybody calls her John and uses he she can instantly dismiss this website as transphobic and refuse to answer the hundreds of facts that disqualify her as suitable to hold power or be held as an expert.

I don't have any issue with Brianna being trans. My issues with Brianna are that she's a lying worthless scammer and a ridiculous spastic.

I don't have any problem with Kiwis using he and JWF. We know it drives these cunts crazy and I'm all for that. But personally I'm not going to do it.
 
1996-2006

No Degree

:biggrin:;):lol::P8)

John is a joke. I don't even know how you spend ten years utterly failing to get one of the dumbest, easiest degrees to get. Most colleges would throw a degree at even an utter moron just to get rid of him, but somehow, John couldn't even manage that in ten years.

You know how dumb a journalism major is? Well, they can graduate in journalism.
 
Here's the thing about John and his pronouns:

Does it really matter?

And the answer to that is no, not really. Brianna's trans status doesn't make her a lolcow. Brianna being an idiotic, homophobic, sexist, attention whoring scammer who fails at everything is what does it. Except when he's pretending like his surgically inverted penis makes him more qualified to be a woman than women, it plays no part in him being a massive cow.

Plus, it's not like constantly pointing out she's a he is going to make him hate this site more. His "deadname" is everywhere. We've gone through considerable effort to detail his life and point out every little lie in between. We regularly point out that he's a fucking moron and a nobody. Not using his preferred pronouns isn't really going to make him tard rage more; he's not one of those trannies. Just the fact that we exist to tell the truth about Brianna and not call him the greatest, smartest, sexiest woman ever is enough.
 
If everybody calls her John and uses he she can instantly dismiss this website as transphobic and refuse to answer the hundreds of facts that disqualify her as suitable to hold power or be held as an expert.

If you think the Farms are going to be dismissed on the basis of what pronouns are used to refer to Brianna Wu, you may want to check out some other forums here.
 
If everybody calls her John and uses he she can instantly dismiss this website as transphobic and refuse to answer the hundreds of facts that disqualify her as suitable to hold power or be held as an expert.
TBF, if he didn't have that excuse, he'd find others.

I understand the rest of your post. I don't agree, but I respect your position.
 
I go back and forth on Brianna/John's pronouns simply because I know it would drive him absolutely batshit.

The whole "YOU CAN'T DEADNAME SOMEONE REEEEE" gives one a perverse pleasure in doing exactly that.
If everybody calls her John and uses he she can instantly dismiss this website as transphobic and refuse to answer the hundreds of facts that disqualify her as suitable to hold power or be held as an expert.

I don't have any issue with Brianna being trans. My issues with Brianna are that she's a lying worthless scammer and a ridiculous spastic.

I don't have any problem with Kiwis using he and JWF. We know it drives these cunts crazy and I'm all for that. But personally I'm not going to do it.

This is where I am. I don't want to mess up in real life too. But I'm not going to complain about anyone else doing it here.

I didn't come here for introspection.

Moving on, speaking of the NYT, this quote about how they find experts to quote made me think of this thread:

For instance, Twitter is a valuable tool for finding research and researchers. But while it is open to both genders, women often face higher costs for using it, in the form of harassment, particularly sexual threats. Because men can use the platform more freely, their voices and work get a relative boost, making it even harder for women to break through.​

They basically admit that they just trawl Twitter for their "experts."

Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/insider/interpreter-gender-bias-women-experts.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If everybody calls her John and uses he she can instantly dismiss this website as transphobic and refuse to answer the hundreds of facts that disqualify her as suitable to hold power or be held as an expert.

The kind of morons who believe John's lies are going to do that anyway. It doesn't even matter. Even something as routine and basic in terms of investigation as just verifying that he has no degree is portrayed by him as some kind of "identity theft" even though this is the first thing any even marginally competent journalist would do if writing a story about this man.

Not a single person in the fake news media has even gone so far as to do that. You just say you're a troon and they mindlessly repeat your bullshit.
 
For instance, Twitter is a valuable tool for finding research and researchers. But while it is open to both genders, women often face higher costs for using it, in the form of harassment, particularly sexual threats. Because men can use the platform more freely, their voices and work get a relative boost, making it even harder for women to break through.
Depth of a puddle, these people. They should think about why trolls have often used female names and avatars since the internet was dailup.

Greater attention > greater harassment

Tits and pussy != greater harassment
 
Unpack your fucking shit and holy Christ groom that dog or put a bullet in its skull.

shit.png


shit1.jpg

shit2.jpg

shit3.jpg
 
Unpack your fucking shit and holy Christ groom that dog or put a bullet in its skull.

So is John going to murder that dog like his previous one?

Also this piece of shit keeps his dog caged in a filthy basement? What the fuck is wrong with this dude?
 
1. That pen is way too small for that dog of course it got out dummy
2. Who keeps their dogs in an unfinished basement
3. Judging by the pee pads on the floor Wu also plans to leave this dog in the basement for some time (or it's not housebroken)
 
All I can think of is "... whoa, the dog is still alive. A shame it won't live for too long, given how horrible its owner is".
 
Also this piece of shit keeps his dog caged in a filthy basement? What the fuck is wrong with this dude?

That's not even the half of it. John keeps the dog down there with all the other shit that he doesn't fucking care about. Its squalid life has less meaning than an anime statuette.
 
It takes Brianna's level of stupid to show off one's mess of a basement and borderline pet abuse.

John should be barred from owning pets for life. Also fuck Frank for letting this go on, too. They're both scumbags.

Welcome to the 1500th page of ignominious shame, bullshit and lies from John.
 
Back
Top Bottom