Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
lol
DU_XKd3UQAAMfBi.jpg
 
RandomNobody said:
Wu btfo
DU_CP83UQAAGBw0.jpg

DU_CQXXVMAUlcm-.jpg
Click to expand...

Such a shame to see internalized patriarchy like this.

"Internalized Patriarchy" is now the term for a penis that has been surgically inverted in a sad attempt to try to recreate a vagina.
"Some troons have an internalized patriarchy that he must dilate or it will heal closed."
"Ricky Jones is saving up for an internalized patriarchy."
"An internalized patriarchy is unable to produce any male tears."
"John Wu has sand in his internalized patriarchy."
 
Last edited:
ZKWNordman said:
This probably doesn’t need repeating, but for anyone just tuning in: Brianna doesn’t give a shit about the scampaign. She only cares about raising her profile and amassing an army of fans.
Click to expand...

John doesn't give a shit about the people, but he certainly cares about the campaign.

Everything that John does is in his best interests, one way or another. This campaign is the ultimate temper tantrum, sparked off by the fact Hillary never became president because that's what John wanted.

Every single promise John has said will benefit him, either directly or indirectly.

I have yet to see any promise John has made that doesn't affect him, but affects the people in the district he is running for.

It's like the ultimate temper tantrum.
 
captn_kettle said:
John doesn't give a shit about the people, but he certainly cares about the campaign.
Click to expand...

While John cares about the campaign, John doesn't care about winning the campaign. It's pretty clear to everyone, including him, that he is not going to win or even make it on a ballot. To him it's just a vanity play. You can bet he is hoping this GDC picks up some traction. He needs something like gamergate that he can milk for a bit, and likely jack his grotesque, now inverted, mucousy, likely filthy, genitals off to.
 
She cared about the campaign when it got her attention and adoration and people wanted to meet her and tell her how perfect she was for it. Nobody is doing that anymore except a few obvious losers on twitter. She doesn't care about the campaign anymore.

Please somebody ask her if she's pulled papers yet and where you can sign them.

And I like Loni's take. Weird when people don't lock down their Facebook, but hers is wide open. Looks like she's a Democrat in Massachusetts. Sorry Brianna, another potential voter lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kroster said:
She cared about the campaign when it got her attention and adoration and people wanted to meet her and tell her how perfect she was for it. Nobody is doing that anymore except a few obvious losers on twitter. She doesn't care about the campaign anymore.
Click to expand...

Her whole life is moving from one endorphin rush to the next. Then she gets bored and abandons it.

She didn't bother fixing her website for a month. And when she did it's basically a blank page that offers no information on the campaign. Now she's violating FEC violations. I'm wondering if she'll even bother filing anymore or just hope the amounts are low enough that the FEC doesn't come calling.

The whole thing will be funny when she doesn't even get on the ballot.
 
I'm guessing that if she never pulls papers then she's not really running, so her FCC filings can just quietly stop. Up until now her running has been theoretical. She's not a real candidate until her 2000 signatures are filed. I know that won't happen, you know that won't happen, and maybe she knows that won't happen.

The question is if she'll just quietly fade away, or if she'll announce that she's not running (probably because of a personal health issue, because it would negate her identity if she made up an excuse about the trolls pushing her out). How do her other ventures usually end?

ETA: I am wrong. I don't know much about the FEC. They will care.
 
Last edited:
Kroster said:
I'm guessing that if she never pulls papers then she's not really running, so her FCC filings can just quietly stop. Up until now her running has been theoretical. She's not a real candidate until her 2000 signatures are filed. I know that won't happen, you know that won't happen, and maybe she knows that won't happen.

The question is if she'll just quietly fade away, or if she'll announce that she's not running (probably because of a personal health issue, because it would negate her identity if she made up an excuse about the trolls pushing her out). How do her other ventures usually end?
Click to expand...
If she's collecting money from people under the guise of it being used for a campaign, I'm pretty sure she needs to legally report it.

I mean they're both con artists so who the fuck knows what they'll do.
 
Kroster said:
I'm guessing that if she never pulls papers then she's not really running, so her FCC filings can just quietly stop.
Click to expand...

Nope, there’s a specific process you have to follow with the FEC. You can’t just stop filing quarterly reports because you change your mind. You have to file paperwork with them to let them know that you’re pulling the plug.

The FEC doesn’t nitpick expenditures like we do, but they do know that you haven’t filed your paperwork. They will send you a strongly worded letter and make it public in your filings so that the world knows. This will now be the second letter that the campaign draws from the FEC, which means that Wu will get more scrutiny going forward. That said, in my experience, you generally get a grace period of a few days after the filing before they start mailing you threatening enforcement letters.

If Wu files say, tomorrow or Monday, the FEC probably won’t care as long as filings happen on time in the future. If it goes on too long it starts to become an issue. I honestly don’t know how long you have to let it go before they seek fees and penalties, though. I’ve seen a lot of campaigns, but never come across a case personally where someone is stupid enough to just blow off the FEC.

EDIT - Just so everyone is aware, there are three people you have to file with at a minimum - the state (or state party), the FEC, and financial disclosures with the House of Representatives. If you want to drop out, you have to notify both the state and the FEC. No idea how Mass works since I believe ballot access is by petition. Presumably failure to file petitions would be adequate. The FEC doesn’t give a shit about your petitions or lack of petitions - they want your filings. Period.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom