Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
John could probably get a good divorce lawyer to take it on contingency.

The issue is more that Frank is likely to be extremely vindictive in divorce, as he was last time. He would do shit like consult every divorce lawyer in town just to keep John from being able to hire one, and dish all the dirt on him if he gets mad enough. Probably bully him into a lowball settlement, since John would probably end up with something.

The thing is, despite Frank's income, there probably just isn't much of a marital estate to split up. You have a few wrecked shitbox cars and other abandoned John projects, and they rent, so no home, a worthless corporation that owns nothing but the rights to one of the worst selling games in all of history, and otherwise, there's just Frank's income.

If Frank did ever get sick of John, he'd take a bit of a haircut, but John's standard of living would be immediately in the toilet. No more "classic sports cars" to turn into garbage by pretending to be a mechanic. No more trips to empty rooms to pretend to be important. No more fake political campaigns.
It would be back to the truck stop for old Johnny boy.

As a former sex worker, I...
 
Well I was on the fence before but hot damn I sure as hell know who I'm voting for now :tyceknife:

murder.png
 
John’s melting down even more lately over Lynch ignoring him.

Edit: which is good because he’s going to continue to say and do incredibly stupid things.
 
Last edited:
Well I was on the fence before but hot damn I sure as hell know who I'm voting for now :tyceknife:

View attachment 317299
Still not @StephenLynch I see. You fucking coward, Brianna.

Also, murder is murder no matter what that person's orientation or gender is. You can't say "they were trans" and expect to walk away free. That's just never going to happen so stop making it seem like it's a reality.
 
The thing is, despite Frank's income, there probably just isn't much of a marital estate to split up. You have a few wrecked shitbox cars and other abandoned John projects, and they rent, so no home, a worthless corporation that owns nothing but the rights to one of the worst selling games in all of history, and otherwise, there's just Frank's income.

There's more, but I think it would all go to Flu in that situation given Frank would just be washing his hands of the matter. You've got a 12-core computer (that's probably on its last legs given Flu somehow keeps pushing it to run 100% capacity 100% of the time), the entire suite of game consoles both new and vintage, the dusty shelves of video game statues and pony toys, that gaudy-as-fuck bike we haven't seen in months, and the dogs - three unkempt, probably not housebroken poochies and the ashen remains of Crash.

It would all go to Flu...but then the question must be raised as to where. Flu would be effectively homeless and they certainly can't go running back to mommy and daddy anymore.

The only crap Frank would maybe keep is all the nerf shit.
 
John could probably get a good divorce lawyer to take it on contingency.

The issue is more that Frank is likely to be extremely vindictive in divorce, as he was last time. He would do shit like consult every divorce lawyer in town just to keep John from being able to hire one, and dish all the dirt on him if he gets mad enough. Probably bully him into a lowball settlement, since John would probably end up with something.

The thing is, despite Frank's income, there probably just isn't much of a marital estate to split up. You have a few wrecked shitbox cars and other abandoned John projects, and they rent, so no home, a worthless corporation that owns nothing but the rights to one of the worst selling games in all of history, and otherwise, there's just Frank's income.

If Frank did ever get sick of John, he'd take a bit of a haircut, but John's standard of living would be immediately in the toilet. No more "classic sports cars" to turn into garbage by pretending to be a mechanic. No more trips to empty rooms to pretend to be important. No more fake political campaigns.

Speaking of the embarrassing failure that is Rev60 I just checked steamspy and the game continues to fail, somehow losing 50% of its owners in the last month.
https://steamspy.com/app/350200
(I know steamspy isn't exact and has problems when trying to estimate small numbers, still found it funny though)


three unkempt, probably not housebroken poochies and the ashen remains of Crash.
Maybe it's just one dog, two dried dog skeletons fused together in an improvised IKEA dog prison, and a shoe box filled with ash. He only talks about Rocket and when the other dogs are seen in pictures they seem to be recycled from old tweets(if I'm remembering that right).
They might have been given away or put in a "no kill" shelter of course, not that Wu would ever admit to something like that unless the new Twitter trend became bravely talking about how hard it is to give up children for adoption.
 
Last edited:
This whole campaign is attention seeking, and he can't even get attention from his campaign rival.

Lynch never will.
It isn't worth his time to address this rambling idiot.



However, his supporters might and John won't be able to forever say they are Gamergate trolls.
And he knows it's in his best interest not to have people digging into who Brianna really is.

That is the reason for....
Still not @StephenLynch I see. You fucking coward, Brianna
 
It's not the people buying some custom gear they're after...What they want are the ones that literally buy everything. One of those is worth like 10000 regular users, 5 high investors, or 200 periodics.

Wu is their target market.

CWC counts in this mentality as well. Simpson's: Tapped Out spending tallies ring a bell?

I'd hit my sixth letter of the alphabet key here to pay respects to the Audi TT, but that thing wasn't shit in its prime, so I'm not going to wear on my keyboard over it.
 
So here's the thing, and we've been over it before but it might be useful for the people new to WuWorld.

I just don't get Frank.

The theory is he's a control freak who, having been walked out on by two true and honest women so far in his life, now want someone who is wholly dependant on him.

Thing is, I don't see a control freak putting up with the way John publicly humiliates him.
I'm not a narcissist or a control freak (honest, I have problems in other directions) but the "LOL so patient, look at my stupid husband" shit would have me getting drunk and murdering John in his sleep.

I don't know how Frank does it , he's either so laid back he's catatonic, unlikely given his past relationships, or he's repressing some major rage issues that could end badly.
 
So here's the thing, and we've been over it before but it might be useful for the people new to WuWorld.

I just don't get Frank.

The theory is he's a control freak who, having been walked out on by two true and honest women so far in his life, now want someone who is wholly dependant on him.

Thing is, I don't see a control freak putting up with the way John publicly humiliates him.
I'm not a narcissist or a control freak (honest, I have problems in other directions) but the "LOL so patient, look at my stupid husband" shit would have me getting drunk and murdering John in his sleep.

I don't know how Frank does it , he's either so laid back he's catatonic, unlikely given his past relationships, or he's repressing some major rage issues that could end badly.
He’s @Null ’s secret benefactor that keeps Kiwi Farms funded enough to exist.

Don’t tell anybody.
 
So here's the thing, and we've been over it before but it might be useful for the people new to WuWorld.

I just don't get Frank.

The theory is he's a control freak who, having been walked out on by two true and honest women so far in his life, now want someone who is wholly dependant on him.

Don't forget he publicly slandered his two ex-wives (at least one of them I know this happened), while both wives say he was an asshole to put it mildly.

Thing is, I don't see a control freak putting up with the way John publicly humiliates him.
I'm not a narcissist or a control freak (honest, I have problems in other directions) but the "LOL so patient, look at my stupid husband" shit would have me getting drunk and murdering John in his sleep.

I don't know how Frank does it , he's either so laid back he's catatonic, unlikely given his past relationships, or he's repressing some major rage issues that could end badly.

At one point or another it was implied that Frank had a part in Wu's "oh woe is me" shtick during Gamergate to garner attention, though how much and to what means ultimately is not known.
 
Why won't journalists confront you about your failed game and hollow shell of a studio?

lgbt.png


I'm not a narcissist or a control freak (honest, I have problems in other directions) but the "LOL so patient, look at my stupid husband" shit would have me getting drunk and murdering John in his sleep.

Frank allows it. The number of things that John berates him for is very limited: he sucks at video games, he doesn't know how to clean the house, etc. John would never make fun of him for his shit writing, or for his educational qualifications, let's say.
 
That’s not what “trans panic” means, and it’s worked maybe once or twice in court. You fucking froot loop.

He elides the fact that "trans panic" is an affirmative defense, which usually means the defendant has to prove to the fact finder that he acted reasonably in the circumstances that led to the victim's death. Such a defense certainly didn't help Matthew Shepard's killers, because no reasonable person can be allowed to fucking crucify someone in an empty field because they got hit on by a gay man. The defenses that Brianna Wu is all up in arms about are ones that are generally contemplated to be employed in situations where someone unknowingly winds up in an otherwise consensual sexual encounter with a partner who turns out to have deceived them as to what sort of genitals they've got under their clothes. Which, really, is fairly reasonably interpreted as a form of rape.

You know. Like John Flynt claimed he did on several occasions.

So here's the thing, and we've been over it before but it might be useful for the people new to WuWorld.

I just don't get Frank.

The theory is he's a control freak who, having been walked out on by two true and honest women so far in his life, now want someone who is wholly dependant on him.

Thing is, I don't see a control freak putting up with the way John publicly humiliates him.
I'm not a narcissist or a control freak (honest, I have problems in other directions) but the "LOL so patient, look at my stupid husband" shit would have me getting drunk and murdering John in his sleep.

I don't know how Frank does it , he's either so laid back he's catatonic, unlikely given his past relationships, or he's repressing some major rage issues that could end badly.

I've said it before, but I'm convinced something about John gives Frank a weird sexual thrill. Whether it's his economic helplessness, his bizarre appearance, or just the fact he's a post op transsexual I have no idea. Frankly, I don't want to know.
 
Whether it's his economic helplessness

I certainly think this is part of it.
While he was a POS to his ex-wife, she finally said enough.
She has enough education and skills to take care of herself.

John has absolutely nothing without someone elses money, no skills or even the most basic College degree and he has burned every bridge possible.
Frank knows this.
 
He elides the fact that "trans panic" is an affirmative defense, which usually means the defendant has to prove to the fact finder that he acted reasonably in the circumstances that led to the victim's death. Such a defense certainly didn't help Matthew Shepard's killers, because no reasonable person can be allowed to fucking crucify someone in an empty field because they got hit on by a gay man. The defenses that Brianna Wu is all up in arms about are ones that are generally contemplated to be employed in situations where someone unknowingly winds up in an otherwise consensual sexual encounter with a partner who turns out to have deceived them as to what sort of genitals they've got under their clothes. Which, really, is fairly reasonably interpreted as a form of rape.

If you're charged with first degree murder, which requires premeditation, the fact that you were reacting in a panic entirely defeats the premeditation requirement and means it is not first degree murder. You can't constitutionally prohibit someone from raising a defense that clearly and factually means you were guilty of some lesser offense, like second degree.
 
If you're charged with first degree murder, which requires premeditation, the fact that you were reacting in a panic entirely defeats the premeditation requirement and means it is not first degree murder. You can't constitutionally prohibit someone from raising a defense that clearly and factually means you were guilty of some lesser offense, like second degree.

There are a lot of nuances and problems with even simple affirmative defenses. I don't really expect even a halfway honest politician to address them all when campaigning on either side of them, but making the leap from "This defense shouldn't be permitted" to "THIS IS LEGALIZING TRANS MURDERS REEEE" makes my head hurt.
 
Back
Top Bottom