- Joined
- Oct 9, 2016
Nothing says fierce like a PowerPoint that would garner a High School student a D grade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"How to add value:
Such a FIERCE vibe that you're on the Twatter the entire time.
View attachment 268796
That's right, John: I, too, believe that all non-white people think exactly alike. In fact, those shitskins are more or less identical.
View attachment 268809
Totally agreed John, it must be sexism. The other day I walked into a bank and slammed my erect cock right on the dude's desk and I raised $12 million just for being dude. Everyone knows that people invest in ideas based purely on identity politics and not because they think something will make money.
Totally agreed John, it must be sexism. The other day I walked into a bank and slammed my erect cock right on the dude's desk and I raised $12 million just for being dude. Everyone knows that people invest in ideas based purely on identity politics and not because they think something will make money.
View attachment 268670
New Yorker said:Head of Development at Giant Spacekat
James Bond is, by definition, toxic masculinity, and that is actually the point of the character.
This is why I actually like the idea of an Idris Elba Bond. There's not much about Bond that demands being white.
But it certainly does demand being an incredibly aggressive and sexually demanding male. He also needs to bang blondes just to really piss off the wizards of the alt-right.
He's meant to be an extension of the empire (built by whites), fucking up the plans of Johnny Foreigner. That's why I'm against a non-white Bond. That and I know exactly how appeasing the shriekers will go (REEEEEEEEEE! BLACK MAN BEING PORTRAYED AS AN ALCOHOLIC, WOMANISING, SOCIOPATH! REEEEEEEEEE!)
Elba's too old and too well known anyway.
#2 on Google Image Search for "Brianna Wu Congress." Nice job, fellas.
So Atomic Blonde?The idea of a Jane Bond was occasionally brought up. I, for one, would support this, even if just because it would be pretty difficult to write. The way human behavior is wired -- we'll leave the discussion "culture vs. biology" to others --, we're inclined to see a womanizing man as a rather swell guy, a manizing woman as a whore. It's a dumb double standard, but a double standard which exists, nonetheless. The writers of a "Jane Bond" would have to find a way around this dilemma. Maybe they could build on the real-life lady spy Mata Hari (who was also a sex worker)? Of course, SJWs would have to be kept away from this movie project at all costs. But I kinda can see a Jane Bond... At least, IMO, it would be infinitely better than the Craig iteration of Bond.
EDIT.
Hire Tarantino and Rodriguez to write and direct it!
Totally agreed John, it must be sexism. The other day I walked into a bank and slammed my erect cock right on the dude's desk and I raised $12 million just for being dude. Everyone knows that people invest in ideas based purely on identity politics and not because they think something will make money.
View attachment 268670
Um, possibly the simple fact that it usually takes more than a year's worth of effort to get a big project off the ground? Not that this work-shy troon whose entire life has basically been a pay-to-win game would know anything about putting hard work into something.Brianna Wu/John Walker Flynt said:But she's been working at it since I met her in Ireland in 2016. It's beyond ludicrous, and I don't know what else it could be but sexism.
It's considered cool when a man gets a woman to sleep with him, and when a woman gets a rich man to marry her. So maybe Jane Bond's thing is to secure lifetime commitments from a series of rich dupes.The idea of a Jane Bond was occasionally brought up. I, for one, would support this, even if just because it would be pretty difficult to write. The way human behavior is wired -- we'll leave the discussion "culture vs. biology" to others --, we're inclined to see a womanizing man as a rather swell guy, a manizing woman as a whore. It's a dumb double standard, but a double standard which exists, nonetheless. The writers of a "Jane Bond" would have to find a way around this dilemma. Maybe they could build on the real-life lady spy Mata Hari (who was also a sex worker)? Of course, SJWs would have to be kept away from this movie project at all costs. But I kinda can see a Jane Bond... At least, IMO, it would be infinitely better than the Craig iteration of Bond.
EDIT.
Hire Tarantino and Rodriguez to write and direct it!