Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It's funny, he should have ignored Milo to begin with and yet John repeatedly tweeted about writing an article on Milo that never appeared. Now he's telling his slobbering followers to ignore Milo after bringing him up again.

John, do you even understand what self awareness is?
 
Peace and Harmony said:
Drumpf is such a fucking re,tard for sperging on Twatter all day long, am I right John?

View attachment 241462
Click to expand...

Ironically if Wu ever became president (cue laughs and optimistic ratings), you know that John would tweet at least 5x more than Trump.

I thought you embraced tech John? I thought you understood tech John? I thought you were the techzilla John?

This tweet is fucking gay and definitely won't alienate potential voters.
 
"I'm super busy with my campaign but I decided to go a Disney theme park in Florida"

Just what the FUCK, the level of stupidity sinks ever lower every fucking day.

disney1.jpg

disney2.jpg
 
Warren *ahem* Lynch? Has to be a :epik: job? Especially that drag queen response . . .

I'm sure there were tons of district eight voters just flooding into an obsolete corporate surrender point 2000 miles away today on the eastern seaboard, must have banked at least 100 votes there!
 
Peace and Harmony said:
"I'm super busy with my campaign but I decided to go a Disney theme park in Florida"

Just what the FUCK, the level of stupidity sinks ever lower every fucking day.

View attachment 241970
View attachment 241971
Click to expand...
Just for curiosities' sake, let's check in on Stephen Lynch:
Lynchian.JPG


Stephen Lynch said:
June 30, 2017

Thank you for signing up for our e-newsletter, where I will be sharing updates on what Congress is considering on the House Floor, legislation I’ve introduced or cosponsored, as well as reports on issues and events of importance to the families of the 8th Congressional District.

This week, Senate Republican leadership delayed consideration of their version of Trumpcare due to strong opposition from Americans across the country. When the Senate draft proposal was released earlier this month, I expressed strong opposition to the measure. After reading the Senate proposal, I have serious concerns hard-working families in Massachusetts may lose access to healthcare coverage they depend on. The Senate bill shifts a greater share of the cost of healthcare onto state taxpayers, abandoning the longstanding 50-50 cost-sharing arrangement between the federal and state governments. The Senate proposal would significantly reduce future Medicaid spending; putting funding at risk that Massachusetts depends on. From ensuring young people are healthy enough to go to school each day to providing quality care to people with disabilities as well as offering treatment services for those struggling with opioid abuse, future cuts to Medicaid funding in Massachusetts would have wide-ranging, detrimental impacts on the benefits and services available for families in Massachusetts and across the country. The Senate bill also seeks to significantly raise costs for older Americans, allowing insurers to charge seniors five times as much as younger consumers, making it more expensive for seniors to get the healthcare they need. And the proposal makes it harder for women to access contraceptive services by defunding Planned Parenthood. Healthcare reform ought to make quality healthcare more accessible and affordable. Instead, Senate Republicans are asking everyday Americans to pay more for less coverage, while cutting taxes for wealthy Americans. This is yet another cost-shifting proposal that will shift costs from healthy people to sick people and from younger people to older people. We need to reduce the cost of health care in this country, rather than shift the cost to more vulnerable populations. The Senate delayed consideration until after the Fourth of July, so I will keep you updated as the process moves forward and potential changes to the legislation are released.

With international cyberattacks affecting computer systems around the world in recent days, it is critical that we examine cybersecurity infrastructure and consider ways to strengthen any potential vulnerabilities. Just last week, legislators in British Parliament lost access to e-mail accounts after a cyberattack occurred. With hacking tools becoming more sophisticated, and the potential for abuse by illicit actors including terrorist organizations, I have been working with the Oversight Subcommittee on National Security, the Financial Services Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance, as well as Task Force On Anti-Terrorism and Proliferation Financing, to conduct robust oversight of current procedures, ongoing investigations, and opportunities for improvement. On Tuesday, at my request, the Financial Services Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance held a briefing on North Korea and financial hacking. The briefing was a timely examination of financial crime, cybersecurity, as well as terrorism financing. I look forward to having additional hearings and briefings to determine what legislative action can be taken to improve cybersecurity for the United States government, as well as for companies and individuals in the U.S.

This week, the House considered H.R. 1215, the so-called Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017, which passed by a vote of 218-210. I voted against the measure because it prevents victims of medical malpractice and defective medical products from being fully compensated for their injuries. The legislation eliminates joint and several liability for claims for both economic and noneconomic damages, which will make it harder for plaintiffs to be fully compensated by all responsible defendants for their injuries. We should be helping Americans access safe and affordable healthcare rather than protecting wrongdoers.

The House also voted on H.R. 3004, Kate’s Law, which passed by a vote of 257-167. I voted in favor of Kate’s Law, which would increase penalties for undocumented immigrants with criminal histories who were deported from the U.S. and again reenter the U.S. illegally and commit a crime. This is a complicated issue, but I think this is a step towards protecting the public from repeat offenders. The House also voted on H.R. 3003, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, which would prohibit state, county, and local governments or officials from “restricting” the ability of local law enforcement or other entities to comply with federal immigration laws and help federal authorities in the enforcement of those laws. Most notably, the legislation blocks federal funding for state, county, and local governments who are determined to be in non-compliance. The legislation’s broad provision says that any grant administered by the Department of Justice or the Department of Homeland Security that is “substantially related to law enforcement, terrorism, national security, immigration, or naturalization” would be able to be blocked. Under the language of H.R. 3003, Suffolk, Norfolk, or Plymouth County would be ineligible for juvenile justice grants, Community Oriented Policing program funding, Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program funding, as well as funding under the DHS State Homeland Security Program, if any town or city within that county is found to have a policy that “restricts” the immigration enforcement process. I voted against H.R. 3003, which passed by a vote of 228-195, because it would cut federal grants for communities in Massachusetts, which are in compliance with federal law. We rely on this funding to support vital programs throughout the Commonwealth.

As we mark Independence Day on Tuesday, I wish all of the families in the 8th Congressional District as well as across the country a safe and happy Fourth of July holiday.

Thank you for keeping in touch with our office and for keeping me informed about the issues that are important to you and your family.

God bless you and God bless these United States of America.
Click to expand...
What's that? A tangible plan to deal with cybersecurity beyond empty platitudes? Pfft, lame.
 
lol DisneyQuest?

I just watched some video about it and that place had been a dump for years.

DisneyQuest was Disney's prototype indoor VR park that would be constructed in major cities, for an up-front price a fraction of trying to construct entire regional parks I.E. "Disney's America" to milk major cities. The one in Florida was the first and worked simply because it was already part of a high-traffic area on a Disney Resort.

The second was built in Chicago and only remained open for less than a decade, never attracting the desired crowds and effectively being the death of the project by proving it was simply not viable for the intended purpose.

The first was left open simply because it was still relatively popular, but that had the problem of simply never being updated in its technology. I don't get what Wu is even whining about with the loss of DisneyQuest, because they outright explain why it needed to go: it was technologically backdated and mechanical breakdowns were common. Hell, the place allegedly was slated to be taken down since 2014 to make room for some NBA experience.

It should also be noted Wu doesn't make mention of the recent retro-fitting or even outright creation of rollercoasters to have VR capability, such as Dare Devil Dive in Six Flags over Georgia, or Galactica being a rethemed Air over in Alton Towers. DDD even has a target shooting game on the lift hill before aliens 'destroy' your ability to fire said guns during the actual ride.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if Wu is aware that to the average voter, it just seems creepy to see a middle-aged tranny always tweet about toys, video games, and Disney when he doesn't even have any kids.
 
She got on a plane on a whim for no better reason than to go to a shitty disney attraction.... And she's still claiming she's so busy with her campaign... I cannot believe people are still giving to her patreon every month. Does she have to use their money to erect a 15 foot neon sign reading "this is a scam" before they'll stop?
 
Ravana said:
So say Wu wins, how long until somehow all of Massachusetts becomes a Flint Michigan level mess?
Click to expand...
Massachusetts is traditionally ruled by its House Speaker, until they are inevitably arrested by the feds.

And, of course, any time a fruitloop is elected to Congress, they usually stay out of the Commonwealth so nobody realizes they've elected a retard.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
education-jpg.241743
Click to expand...

This all sounds great, but exactly who is going to fund multi-million dollar schools in every ghetto district? Are you going to tax the 1%?

Do they just say stuff they think sounds nice without the slightest thought of how they'll emulate the education an elite class comprised of less than 1% of the population, with wealth comparable to the rest of the population? You can't give 90 million children in the USA the same education that 50,000 children get (via their parents paying thousands of dollars a year).

They can't even hire enough teachers at the garbage wages they provide currently, where exactly are these elite teachers going to come from when there's only enough to teach 1% of the population?

CervixHammer said:
fraaaank-png.242018
Click to expand...

Western portrayals of White men:
Rarely let them have sex
Sidekick to the BBC bull
Never physically get the girl
qdFtqT7.jpg



I'm actually convinced this show is pushing the cuckoldry bullshit. The writer for it literally worked on a film titled Cuckold before this, and when the shows name was changed from Bella and the Bulls, they kept this bizzare scene where she's blindfolded and she "slaps" a bull for some team initiation, despite the show's name being changed long before, why would they include a scene with a white blonde girl and a bull in a room together when the team's mascot is a bulldog?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom