Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wake up, John, the jews are bombing shitskins again!
When brown people get killed, John isn't far behind.
Had to upload a lower quality archive of the video than I would like due to errors every time I tried uploading something larger, likely Tor related.

Israel's top guy:
1772280108493.png
John's very male use of knife hands on full display in the video.
knife hands.png
Brianna "the only way to achieve peace is through bombing infinity brown people" Wu:
1772280179128.png
 
Another day, another hideous selfie + Frank soyface:
1772289046588.png
Supreme Tranny Leader apologizes to Jews for the behavior of antisemitic troons:
1772289143907.png
If John still had his penis it would be erect:
1772289089372.png
 
AI/ML was involved in the creation of this post.
Why aren't your boots on the ground to steal land in Iran with your heroes, John?
This is all airstrikes dummy.

This is a hgihlight of just some of the many errors and falsehood in John's twithcy Tiktok video.

1. Mischaracterization of the IRGC (Factually Inaccurate) John claims the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) lives entirely outside population centers because the Iranian public would kill them if they had access to weapons. This is factually false. The IRGC is deeply entrenched within Iran's urban centers. It controls a vast portion of the Iranian economy (including telecommunications, construction, and infrastructure) and maintains heavily guarded headquarters, bases, and operational centers directly within major cities like Tehran. Treating them as an isolated insurgent force hiding in tunnels fundamentally misunderstands their structural integration into the Iranian state.

2. The "Modern Paradise" Fallacy (Historical Oversimplification / Cherry-picking) Describing pre-1979 Iran as a "modern paradise" ignores the severe socioeconomic realities that led to the Iranian Revolution. While the Shah’s regime pushed westernization and modernization that benefited urban elites, it was also characterized by extreme wealth inequality, widespread rural poverty, and brutal political repression carried out by the SAVAK secret police. Ignoring these factors creates a historically skewed narrative of why the current regime came to power.

3. State-Sanctioned Gender Reassignment (Missing Context) John mentions the government forcing gay men to undergo vaginoplasty. This touches on a documented human rights issue but lacks precise context. Iran legally recognizes transgender individuals (following a 1987 fatwa) and subsidizes gender reassignment surgeries, but it simultaneously criminalizes homosexuality with penalties up to death. Consequently, human rights organizations have documented that gay individuals are often heavily pressured or coerced into undergoing sex reassignment surgery by state authorities and families to fit into a legally permissible category and avoid execution.

4. Regime Collapse Leading to Immediate Stability (Non Sequitur / Causal Reductionism) The argument posits that if the IRGC falls, Saudi Arabia will step in, proxy groups will be neutralized, and the Middle East will stabilize. This is a massive non sequitur that ignores decades of historical precedent. As seen in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, removing a central security apparatus creates vast power vacuums that invite protracted civil wars, sectarian violence, and the rise of new militant factions. Furthermore, assuming Saudi Arabia would seamlessly stabilize the region ignores its own controversial and destabilizing military involvements, such as the protracted conflict in Yemen.

5. The Evaporation of Proxy Groups (Oversimplification) The claim that Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis would immediately lose their operational capabilities without Iran is an oversimplification. While losing Iranian funding, training, and ballistic missiles would severely degrade their strategic threat level, these organizations have deeply entrenched local political bases, their own domestic governance structures, and independent illicit funding networks. They would remain significant localized threats even without Tehran's patronage.

6. War as a Path to the "Pivot to Asia" (Contradictory Premise) The most significant logical flaw is the assertion that engaging in a war with Iran is the necessary step to allow the U.S. to finally pivot to Asia and focus on China and Russia. Iran is significantly larger, more populous, and possesses a much more advanced military and geographic advantage than either Iraq or Afghanistan. A war with Iran would almost certainly trigger a regional conflict, disrupt global energy markets via the Strait of Hormuz, and require a massive, multi-decade commitment of U.S. military and economic resources. Initiating such a conflict would fundamentally tether the United States to the Middle East, entirely preventing the strategic pivot John advocates for.
 
Last edited:
Nah, its still land theft.
Mossad were the ones killing Iranians in the first place.
John's celebrating terrorists.
 
Why aren't your boots on the ground to steal land in Iran with your heroes, John?
John is more of the commander-in-chief type, he gives the orders around here. When he tells Frank to buy him a new pinball machine, Frank's only reply is "which one?"
This is a hgihlight of just some of the many errors and falsehood in John's twithcy Tiktok video.
Yeah man we all love it when you post gigantic AI-generated paragraphs that don't mean a thing and turn the thread into a joyless slog.

There is no one more patriotic than Brianna Wu when brown people are getting bombed:
1772365388182.png
 
What is even going on in the second tweet here? Since when does Ancestry "work" with people to identify their family? I thought you send in your DNA and then you get matches, I assume with various percentages of match (ie your parents should match you 50%, your grandparents 25% and so on). Also, if he's identified his grandfather, then he'd also have identified the children and certainly would be able to point out one of his parents pretty quickly. But also, since John is born in 77, I'd assume his grandparents would be likely to be born in the 1920s/30s, so his grandfather allegedly sent in his DNA to Ancestry??

Why is John dreadful at lying?
IIRC, one of the genetic testing companies, i THINK its 23andMe, had a check box for "I want to know if there are undisclosed relatives who also use your service and tryin to find families" or something similar. Basically you could opt in and adoptees could try to find biological family members.
 
How is not mutilating living children the same as an abortion of a clump of cells?
That's got to be one of the most legitimately psychopathic things he's said.
 
"Exactly like abortion"

View attachment 8642722

"Since before I was born."

View attachment 8642727
Again, what rights did Troons have in the presumably 1960s and early 1970s which they don’t have now?

I suppose, being men they had more rights to get away with marital rape and other abuses of women that were tolerated far more then.

John fucking hates women, so that’s the most likely explanation.
 
Again, what rights did Troons have in the presumably 1960s and early 1970s which they don’t have now?
Absolutely none.

The only "rights" are those which were introduced by stealth by TRAs and Stonewall and have become described as "trans rights". in order to make out that they have some sort of validity.

They were nothing more than subterfuge and lies backing up the smoke and mirrors used to portray them.
 
The right to steal trophies from girls and rape women in prison and make everyone play pretend, of course.
 
Back
Top Bottom