Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
lol, he's anorexic now, too?
I think he heard of girls starving themselves to disrupt their hormones into not developing female secondary features and is aping after that.

I mean, I'm sure he didn't lose weight the healthiest way (ie probably did drugs and does ozempic now), but I very much doubt he was anorexic. That takes a lot of discipline.
 
He can't even lie consistently.

Does he have great results?

View attachment 8187426

Or did the plastic surgery fuck him up really bad?

View attachment 8187428
View attachment 8187429

hmm
pass.png
vedddddyyyyyy interesting - John now says it took those 4 recent jaw surgeries "to pass"
That means even he admits he wasn't passing :
  • So he was using ladies' bathrooms as an obvious dude
  • when his fantards were acting all surprised like they didn't notice..John admits they were lying
  • all the "mansplainers" weren't telling some 'little lady' they were just having a man-to-man talk
  • when John talked about abortion, it was just another man talking for women
  • the whole "coming out" was just gratuitous grandstanding - like when the head of the HS drama club comes out as gay ...yeah everyone already knew
 
vedddddyyyyyy interesting - John now says it took those 4 recent jaw surgeries "to pass"
That means even he admits he wasn't passing :
  • So he was using ladies' bathrooms as an obvious dude
  • when his fantards were acting all surprised like they didn't notice..John admits they were lying
  • all the "mansplainers" weren't telling some 'little lady' they were just having a man-to-man talk
  • when John talked about abortion, it was just another man talking for women
  • the whole "coming out" was just gratuitous grandstanding - like when the head of the HS drama club comes out as gay ...yeah everyone already knew
I think it means he needs to get his faggot ass back in the ole body and fender shop, because its obviously not working.

Come on, lucky number 5!
 
I think this is the first time John has specifically said his name is John. Obviously he's confirmed the pictures but I think this is the first admission of the actual name John. Of course this comes while bragging about how hard he had it before he trooned out and gushing over his favorite pop starlet (a homosexual male activity).
1763553639500.png
 
I think this is the first time John has specifically said his name is John. Obviously he's confirmed the pictures but I think this is the first admission of the actual name John. Of course this comes while bragging about how hard he had it before he trooned out and gushing over his favorite pop starlet (a homosexual male activity).
View attachment 8188486
"John had to die", kek, you look at John every time the filter malfunctions or when you go to the bathroom.

My favorite thing about the tweet is how apparently quitting drugs was never an option.
 
lol, he's anorexic now, too?
I thought becoming a woman cured his anorexia! I thought curing his issues with body dysphoria was how he knows he’s definitely a woman and that’s unquestionably what was wrong with him! By his own logic, he can’t be a woman.

As for the suggestion that anorexia is “universal among trans girls,” (gestures vaguely at entire subforum full of trans fats).
He still looks like a man. Just a very weird one.
Oddly enough, I think he passed better before. Post him out of context and ideally not in video format and you could convince yourself that he was just a weird-looking woman. Now, he just looks uncanny. You can immediately tell he’s had work done. Look at his gawky body and listen to his off-sounding voice and it all clicks into place (unlike his jawbone lol).
I think it means he needs to get his faggot ass back in the ole body and fender shop, because it’s obviously not working.

Come on, lucky number 5!
Could he even have any more work done? Four surgeries and he looks like an alien.

I don’t think he realises how screwy his points sound. Like, “I went through all this pain and hardship,” well whose fault is that then? No one forced him to carve his skull up. He did it himself out of pure vanity, chasing this impossible goal of becoming a hot woman. Which serves no purpose, because he’s married and very openly trans.
 
Capture 1.PNG
Capture.PNG
Capture 3.PNG

1. Wu has no medical expertise whatsoever, no research training, no clinical background, and no experience evaluating scientific evidence.

Nothing in his background equips him to assess the methodology of the HHS report, peer-review processes, or clinical standards. His commentary is emotional, not analytical.

2. His core argument is circular.
His logic goes like this:

  • “They won’t use activist pronouns.”
  • “Therefore they want us eliminated.”
Using biologically accurate terminology in a medical review isn’t evidence of genocidal intent. It’s just clinical accuracy. He treats disagreement as hostility and then uses the perceived hostility as proof of his conclusion.

3. He defaults to motive-imputation instead of evidence.
“They want to eliminate us” isn’t an argument. It’s paranoia dressed up as moral urgency. He offers no facts, no citations, no analysis — just vibes and accusation.

4. Ryan keeps asking for specifics. Wu can’t provide any.
Ryan repeatedly asks:

“What specific statements show animus toward adults?”

Wu never answers because he doesn’t know. He’s not critiquing the report. He’s reacting to an imagined version of it built entirely out of activist talking points.

5. His “dignity” framing is just a rhetorical shield.
He argues that failing to adopt activist language automatically disqualifies a reviewer. But science doesn’t run on activist lexicon; it runs on definitions, data, and methodological rigor — none of which he engages with.

6. He ignores Ryan’s actual explanation.
Ryan explains that pronoun usage in pediatric reports can bias the issue.
Wu sidesteps every substantive point and retreats back into the same emotional claim:
“They want to eliminate us.”

That’s not analysis. It’s an online meltdown.

Capture 2.PNG

John's whole complaint is that the panel didn’t start by accepting his conclusion — that men who identify as women must be treated as “women,” full stop — and therefore anything they produce is illegitimate.

That’s circular reasoning in its purest form:
  1. Premise: “Affirmation is the only acceptable framework.”
  2. Therefore: Anyone who doesn’t affirm is biased.
  3. Therefore: Any evidence contradicting affirmation is invalid.
  4. Therefore: The only valid conclusion is the one he started with.
It’s airtight only if you never leave the bubble.

He can’t attack the actual findings — infertility, bone loss, loss of sexual function, surgical complications — because those are objective. So he retreats to the identity argument as a shield. When that shield isn’t adopted, he treats it as proof of hostility rather than proof that the reviewers aren’t trapped in his logic loop.

He’s frustrated because the panel didn’t play his game.
 
Last edited:
Uh oh. That paper is directly threatening John's life!
He'd better sit in the same chair he does every day and pretend to be on the run!
 
It's fun going into a bunch of trans threads and seeing them all use the exact same "anyone who disagrees with me is antitrans being antitrans makes you a hate group hate groups are wrong by default therefore everyone who disagrees with me is wrong by default" logic.

Even John, who's supposed to be the sane, reasonable one.
 
techbro.webp

The other funny thing about John calling people techbro (while sitting in 1st class no less) is that

Albeit fake, John self-styles as a major player in the entertainment software industry

but wayy worse

Frank worked for MoFo and now is inhouse at biotech startup...that's about as techbro as it gets
 
Uh oh. That paper is directly threatening John's life!
He'd better sit in the same chair he does every day and pretend to be on the run!

maybe he'll utter the magic incantation "credible"...as in "credible death threats" which makes it true in Wu-logic
View attachment 8197673

The other funny thing about John calling people techbro (while sitting in 1st class no less) is that

Albeit fake, John self-styles as a major player in the entertainment software industry

but wayy worse

Frank worked for MoFo and now is inhouse at biotech startup...that's about as techbro as it gets

John's salty (and got his sour grapes cut off a while ago) b/che tried to go techbro a decade ago, while he had plenty of bro energy, he didn't have the tech part.
He found out programming and tweeting weren't the same thing and now he's bitter about failing hard
 
John's salty (and got his sour grapes cut off a while ago) b/che tried to go techbro a decade ago, while he had plenty of bro energy, he didn't have the tech part.
He found out programming and tweeting weren't the same thing and now he's bitter about failing hard
John is basically Elon Musk - a wannabe techbro who doesn't actually do the work, just spends all day farting around playing video games and glazing himself on Twitter. The only difference is that John paid trannies to do his work him while Elmo uses jeets.
 
John is basically Elon Musk - a wannabe techbro who doesn't actually do the work, just spends all day farting around playing video games and glazing himself on Twitter. The only difference is that John paid trannies to do his work him while Elmo uses jeets.
To be fair to Elon, I get the impression he was involved and competent in the late 90s, early 00s. John just basically tried to take a short cut with Frank's money, just like with his political "career".
 
Back
Top Bottom