- Joined
- Aug 21, 2024
from the other side he's doing us a favor and keeping the troons in their place by merely existing as himself and functioning as a walking example.
Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate
- Thread starter Jaimas
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
You will never have a real vagina...
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2021
He does have a pussy named Frank though
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
He is getting absolutely roasted in the comments. I looked at a few and not a single positive one.
I like when tides turn.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
DEBUNKED
Massachusetts has no statutory category called “legally female.” The state has never enacted a global definition of “female” that converts a biological male into a female for all purposes of law. What Massachusetts actually did was add “gender identity” as a protected characteristic in its anti-discrimination laws. That is a subjective identity claim, not a redefinition of biological sex and not a statewide civil status. The relevant definition is in G.L. c. 4, § 7, clause Fifty-ninth.
What Massachusetts allows are clerical amendments to documents:
- Vital records (birth certificates) can be amended under G.L. c. 46, § 13. The Department of Public Health issues a new certificate if the applicant submits the required affidavit and paperwork. This changes the record, not the underlying biological fact.
- Driver’s licenses and state IDs can use M, F, or X under G.L. c. 90, § 8N. That is a designation on a license card, not a legal conversion of sex.
Neither statute defines what “female” is. Neither statute declares that a male who completes paperwork or surgery becomes “legally female” for all purposes of Massachusetts law. They are record-keeping provisions—administrative procedures—not status-creating laws.
Civil rights protections in Massachusetts do not come from amended paperwork. They come from statutes that prohibit discrimination. The operative laws are G.L. c. 151B (employment, housing, credit) and G.L. c. 272, §§ 92A and 98 (public accommodations). Those laws apply because the legislature added “sex” and “gender identity” as protected grounds. Whether someone amended a birth certificate or driver’s license has no bearing on the scope of those rights.
The claim “I followed the law, therefore I am legally female” imagines a law that does not exist. There is no statute in Massachusetts that defines “female” in a way that includes male persons. There is no clause that says completing surgeries or paperwork transforms a biological male into a legal female. If the state were ever to create a category called “legal female,” it would have to define who qualifies. The legislature has never done that. The only cross-cutting definition is for “gender identity,” which is defined as an internal sense of identity, not biological sex, and not a conversion of legal sex.
Talking about “reverting” someone or “removing civil rights” is also incorrect. Changing or revisiting vital-records amendments is an administrative question governed by G.L. c. 46 and DPH regulations. Driver’s license markers are governed by G.L. c. 90, § 8N. None of that creates or removes civil rights. Civil rights are granted by statute, not by a clerical entry. The paperwork does not create rights, and changing paperwork does not take rights away.
FURTHER DEBUNKED
The claim that “many of us look and act like women” has no biological, legal, or logical force. Biological sex is defined by reproductive structure, gametes, chromosomes, and endocrine pathways. None of that changes because a male alters outward appearance. Makeup, surgery, clothing, voice training, or hormone use do not transform a male body into a female one. The skeletal structure, chromosomes, and every cell in the body remain male. Cosmetic change is not biological change.
Saying a male becomes a woman by “looking like one” is the same logic that would say a human in a dog costume becomes a dog, or a person with a tan becomes another race. Appearance is not essence. If appearance were enough, then there would be no boundary to the category. Any man with long hair and a dress could insist he is a woman. Definitions that rest on subjective impressions collapse entirely because they depend on individual sensation, not objective criteria. You do not get legal classification from a costume.
“Acting like a woman” is even weaker, because it rests on stereotypes. If a male could claim womanhood by imitating feminine behaviors, then womanhood would be reduced to mannerisms, clothing, and makeup—precisely the sexist caricatures gender activists claim to oppose. They cannot say sex stereotypes are harmful while simultaneously claiming those stereotypes define who is female.
There is also no field of science that recognizes “looking like” the opposite sex as a basis for sex classification. Medicine, endocrinology, genetics, and reproductive biology all maintain the same basic truth: males produce, or are structured around producing, sperm; females produce, or are structured around producing, ova. No surgery has ever reversed a male karyotype. No cosmetic procedure has ever made a male body capable of female reproductive function. Biology does not change because of outward imitation.
The argument that society should treat these men as women because it is “less disruptive” is not a legal principle. Law does not change definitional boundaries to protect someone from embarrassment. If convenience were a legal standard, anyone could demand recognition as anything they wanted. Legal categories are not based on feelings or social impressions.
This also destroys the basis for sex-based rights. Women’s sports, prisons, shelters, scholarships, locker rooms, and privacy laws exist because female bodies are physically different from male bodies, and those differences carry safety, dignity, and fairness implications. If any male who looks feminine gets access to those spaces, then the entire purpose of the category is gone. You cannot protect women as a class while erasing the definition of women.
The logic collapses into absurdity: if presentation determines reality, then there is no gatekeeping, no definition, and no way to distinguish genuine cases from opportunistic ones. A category with no boundary does not exist.
When a man insists that he — not women — gets to decide whether his intrusion into female spaces is “disruptive,” it’s hard to miss the arrogance behind it. It’s a classic bit of narcissism: he centers his feelings, his self-image, and his desired social role, while treating women as props who are obligated to tolerate him. The underlying message is, “I’ll tell you when my presence harms you, and you don’t get a vote.” That’s misogyny dressed up in therapeutic language. Women are expected to surrender boundaries, privacy, and basic biological reality, while the male intruder presents himself as the reasonable one. And when women object, he frames the objection as hate, bigotry, or ignorance — anything to avoid admitting the obvious: women have a right to exclude males from spaces designed for them.
Claiming that he “looks and acts like a woman” simply highlights the problem. Women do not owe safety, dignity, or deference based on a man’s costume, behavior, or self-assessment. Female spaces exist because women are female, not because someone “acts” like them. The final layer of narcissism is the idea that the comfort of a male is more important than the boundaries of countless women. That’s not compassion or dignity — it’s entitlement. The fact that it’s now treated as virtuous doesn’t make it any less chauvinistic. Women don’t need men to announce that their presence is “not disruptive.” The moment a man declares himself the judge of that, the disruption has already happened.
In short, a biological male remains male regardless of how he dresses, behaves, or presents himself to others. Appearance is not biology. Presentation is not legal status. A man claiming womanhood because he “looks and acts” the part is only asking society to treat costume and imitation as reality, and no serious legal or scientific system does that.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
I identify as Napoleon and the fact the medical system refuses to pay for my personal guard of 300 strong is an affront to human dignity. I am just trying to live my life in the least disruptive way possible while also ruling Elba.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
Pooner blog shits all over John:
Let’s Talk About Brianna Wu
"Maybe you follow me on Bluesky and already know that I got into a little cross-platform spat over the last 48 hours. Before I can talk about that, I’d better explain who Wu is, and why she’s relevant (read: being made fun of) right now.
Brianna Wu is, historically, a software engineer and establisher of tech start-ups, though she isn’t particularly well known for either thing. She says she was “adopted into a family of extremely right-wing republicans who were hyper-political,” and that she “grew up on a diet of Rush Limbaugh, Fox and others to a ridiculous degree.” In an introductory post on Susan’s Place (a legendarily toxic, evil place for trans women to congregate online in the 2000s), Brianna said she grew up religious and bigoted, but claimed her worldview had shifted to tolerant liberalism after a violent assault left her badly injured.
After some failed attempts at making webcomics and developing video games, Wu raised her profile by crowbarring herself into GamerGate. Perhaps as a result of her experience interning for former Republican Senator Trent Lott, who had to resign from his office in 2003 because he loved the idea of restoring racial segregation so much, Wu entered into politics in 2018 by challenging incumbent Democrat Stephen Lynch for his position as representative for Massachussetts’ 8th Congressional District, and lost spectacularly.
In 2020 and 2023, Wu was appointed to leadership positions in two different Political Action Committees, despite having no demonstrable experience in the field and a short-lived history of political failure. By August of 2024, Wu had flipped entirely from centrist liberalism (back) to conservatism, advocating for Israel during its genocide of Palestine and repeatedly describing herself as a Zionist. She also advocated for pseudoscientific ideas like Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (describing being trans as a “social contagion”) and autogynephilia, while discouraging people from medically transitioning unless they “really, really, really, really have to.”
Her conservative grifting arc in full swing, Brianna Wu shared a stage with anti-trans activist Leor Sapir at Middlebury College in Vermont last year. There, Sapir explained his (dangerously incorrect) belief that trans suicide statistics were exaggerated or entirely fictionalized, which he also does for free on Twitter, while Wu smiled and nodded.
Last month, a bright young trans woman from that college, who was 21 years old and who had her whole life ahead of her, took her own life.
On Saturday, seeking absolution for her sins, Brianna Wu posted a lengthy pseudo-apology to her “trans sisters” on Twitter. It wasn’t a particularly good attempt at making amends, since she insisted that trans women don’t belong in women’s sports, described herself as a “biological man,” and said she believes “many of our most extreme ideas are bad.” Given the content of a tweet she made later that day, I assume the “extreme ideas” she dislikes are acceptance of nonbinary trans people, easy access to lifesaving healthcare, and hostility towards people who want us eradicated from the face of the earth.
Katelyn Burns (long a target of harassment from Wu) said, of this half-assed apology, simply, “Go fuck yourself.” I quoted Burns’ post and said it was on sight, should I see Wu in public, and she’s decided that’s a credible threat of violence that might just necessitate a police report.
Here and now, let me be clear: I’m not going to hurt you, Brianna. I have no desire to put my own freedom at jeopardy by kicking your ass. Furthermore, I do not know where you live, and I don’t leave the house much because the political climate in America has made it so that every trip beyond my front door fills me with dread and terror. Maybe you already knew that, seeing as you contributed to that climate quite a lot over the last few years.
I know that Brianna Wu’s “apology” was fake, and any desire she may express to return to our community is a lie. Just yesterday, she made a tweet suggesting that trans women who come out while dating or married to cis women are “wrecking their lives,” and railed against Zohran Mamdani as a liar and a “goddamned communist.” Don’t worry, though, she does think he’s sexy.
Brianna and I come from very different worlds. I was raised in poverty and have spent my entire life poor, and expect to die without ever advancing a tax bracket. Brianna grew up wealthy, was once loaned nearly a quarter of a million dollars by her parents to fail to make a video game, and literally has a collection of Porsches. Silver spoon doesn’t even begin to describe the insufferable level of privilege Wu has experienced her entire life.
That isn’t why I despise Brianna Wu, though. I hate her with every fiber of my being because she and her monstrous buddies in the conservative anti-trans grifting sphere have driven countless trans people to suicide, and have actively made the world a more hostile place for us so that they could enrich themselves.
No apology will ever do the trick, Brianna. You can’t make amends for the blood on your hands, and I hope that keeps you awake at night for the rest of your life."
Let’s Talk About Brianna Wu
"Maybe you follow me on Bluesky and already know that I got into a little cross-platform spat over the last 48 hours. Before I can talk about that, I’d better explain who Wu is, and why she’s relevant (read: being made fun of) right now.
Brianna Wu is, historically, a software engineer and establisher of tech start-ups, though she isn’t particularly well known for either thing. She says she was “adopted into a family of extremely right-wing republicans who were hyper-political,” and that she “grew up on a diet of Rush Limbaugh, Fox and others to a ridiculous degree.” In an introductory post on Susan’s Place (a legendarily toxic, evil place for trans women to congregate online in the 2000s), Brianna said she grew up religious and bigoted, but claimed her worldview had shifted to tolerant liberalism after a violent assault left her badly injured.
After some failed attempts at making webcomics and developing video games, Wu raised her profile by crowbarring herself into GamerGate. Perhaps as a result of her experience interning for former Republican Senator Trent Lott, who had to resign from his office in 2003 because he loved the idea of restoring racial segregation so much, Wu entered into politics in 2018 by challenging incumbent Democrat Stephen Lynch for his position as representative for Massachussetts’ 8th Congressional District, and lost spectacularly.
In 2020 and 2023, Wu was appointed to leadership positions in two different Political Action Committees, despite having no demonstrable experience in the field and a short-lived history of political failure. By August of 2024, Wu had flipped entirely from centrist liberalism (back) to conservatism, advocating for Israel during its genocide of Palestine and repeatedly describing herself as a Zionist. She also advocated for pseudoscientific ideas like Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (describing being trans as a “social contagion”) and autogynephilia, while discouraging people from medically transitioning unless they “really, really, really, really have to.”
Her conservative grifting arc in full swing, Brianna Wu shared a stage with anti-trans activist Leor Sapir at Middlebury College in Vermont last year. There, Sapir explained his (dangerously incorrect) belief that trans suicide statistics were exaggerated or entirely fictionalized, which he also does for free on Twitter, while Wu smiled and nodded.
Last month, a bright young trans woman from that college, who was 21 years old and who had her whole life ahead of her, took her own life.
On Saturday, seeking absolution for her sins, Brianna Wu posted a lengthy pseudo-apology to her “trans sisters” on Twitter. It wasn’t a particularly good attempt at making amends, since she insisted that trans women don’t belong in women’s sports, described herself as a “biological man,” and said she believes “many of our most extreme ideas are bad.” Given the content of a tweet she made later that day, I assume the “extreme ideas” she dislikes are acceptance of nonbinary trans people, easy access to lifesaving healthcare, and hostility towards people who want us eradicated from the face of the earth.
Katelyn Burns (long a target of harassment from Wu) said, of this half-assed apology, simply, “Go fuck yourself.” I quoted Burns’ post and said it was on sight, should I see Wu in public, and she’s decided that’s a credible threat of violence that might just necessitate a police report.
Here and now, let me be clear: I’m not going to hurt you, Brianna. I have no desire to put my own freedom at jeopardy by kicking your ass. Furthermore, I do not know where you live, and I don’t leave the house much because the political climate in America has made it so that every trip beyond my front door fills me with dread and terror. Maybe you already knew that, seeing as you contributed to that climate quite a lot over the last few years.
I know that Brianna Wu’s “apology” was fake, and any desire she may express to return to our community is a lie. Just yesterday, she made a tweet suggesting that trans women who come out while dating or married to cis women are “wrecking their lives,” and railed against Zohran Mamdani as a liar and a “goddamned communist.” Don’t worry, though, she does think he’s sexy.
Brianna and I come from very different worlds. I was raised in poverty and have spent my entire life poor, and expect to die without ever advancing a tax bracket. Brianna grew up wealthy, was once loaned nearly a quarter of a million dollars by her parents to fail to make a video game, and literally has a collection of Porsches. Silver spoon doesn’t even begin to describe the insufferable level of privilege Wu has experienced her entire life.
That isn’t why I despise Brianna Wu, though. I hate her with every fiber of my being because she and her monstrous buddies in the conservative anti-trans grifting sphere have driven countless trans people to suicide, and have actively made the world a more hostile place for us so that they could enrich themselves.
No apology will ever do the trick, Brianna. You can’t make amends for the blood on your hands, and I hope that keeps you awake at night for the rest of your life."
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
> Tranny
> bright future
Pick one.
At least that Tranny won't rape any more women and children.
by "life saving healthcare" this pooner means surgical mutilation, non-required cosmetic procedures, and fucking with their body's internal chemistry such that they will be dependent on pills for the rest of their (hopefully short) lives. And because thye are all fat and worthless, expect the tax dollars of others to pay for it all.
I can't believe they are leaving out how they refuse to advocate for my own life saving procedures of being installed as the governor Elba. Health insurance won't even buy me a White Charger to ride, all because they refuse to take me at my word that I'm Napoleon. I can't believe that modern medicine has become so calloused and cares so little about my possible suicide becasue the rest of the world won't conform to my delusion.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
John has tons of Ambien and the like to make sure he can sleep whenever he feels like. He has no conscience, so none of what he's done will ever haunt him.
Yeah that's some definite shit. I personally self-identify as J. Edgar Hoover. Where is my personal program where they make me head of the FBI? They're literally GENOCIDING ME!
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
John's recent arguments are all about how he has had enough surgery to pass so he "earned" using the women's room. If I had done something so monumentally stupid and it looked like it was going to be for nothing I would be upset, too, but I wouldn't blame everyone else on earth either. The theme of every john post is that he did nothing wrong, nothing is his fault.
If anyone posts an old picture of him he laments that you had to "go back that far", but wasn't he like fifty when he had the jawbone surgery? I know he will never pass bc he is over six feet tall but its kind of ridiculous to keep leaning on that surgery result when he spent well over half his life looking like an ogre and he knows it. Was it okay to exclude him before they removed a bunch of bones from his head? He has very little time before he is a senior citizen and is going all-in on a "hot girl" image, its very weird.
I wish he would post details about all the stuff that went wrong w his SRS.
If anyone posts an old picture of him he laments that you had to "go back that far", but wasn't he like fifty when he had the jawbone surgery? I know he will never pass bc he is over six feet tall but its kind of ridiculous to keep leaning on that surgery result when he spent well over half his life looking like an ogre and he knows it. Was it okay to exclude him before they removed a bunch of bones from his head? He has very little time before he is a senior citizen and is going all-in on a "hot girl" image, its very weird.
I wish he would post details about all the stuff that went wrong w his SRS.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
Thanks brodoodking, I needed a laugh and I actually laughed out loud reading that.
Chickenpolar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2023
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
“Thank you, weird-looking tranny on the Internet, your tweeting has certainly prevented another Holocaust!”
Stinkyboy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2021
He's talking about zionazis though, not Jews.
Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
You apparently still have no idea what zionism actuallty is.
"Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel."
That's it. Full stop.
Stinkyboy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2021
israelis still arent jews, theyre slavs
their homeland is poland