Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
You're not a woman and you don't work, John, though it is true that you scam some money from Patreon so I guess that counts as getting paid.

View attachment 201254

What are you talking about you fucking mongoloid

View attachment 201256

My god, did some kiwi hack her account to post even more retarded shit?

Do you really expect "I pocket the money from charitable donations to do whatever I please" to go well with your goddamn constituents, who presumably would entrust their goddamn taxes to you?

Not enough :story: in the universe I swear.
 
Do you really expect "I pocket the money from charitable donations to do whatever I please" to go well with your goddamn constituents, who presumably would entrust their goddamn taxes to you?
Yes.

John thinks that everybody that isn't him is a rube to be taken advantage of and that he deserves to have money. He's never held a job in his life, never had to work for a living, never scrapped by. He's a selfish entitled prick that has never gotten his ass handed to him.

But if there's one good thing about all this, when the inevitable fall happens, and it will, he'll lose his shit hard.
 
Do you really expect "I pocket the money from charitable donations to do whatever I please" to go well with your goddamn constituents, who presumably would entrust their goddamn taxes to you?
I don't think he's pocketing charity money, he's just claiming to work with rich white-girl feminist outfits that "strongly suggest" you donate your speaking fees to charity. John never really worked with any such places, but I actually don't have a problem with it if he does take their money as a paycheck rather than using it to virtue signal.
 
You're not a woman and you don't work, John, though it is true that you scam some money from Patreon so I guess that counts as getting paid.

You can imagine the conversation that Wu had that triggered this rant.

"Hey Brianna, can you come to Feminist Con 20XX to talk about how evil men are, and how gamergate is literally satan?"

"Sure, I'll be paid a million bucks for this important keynote speech?"

"Um, Brianna, we're kind of putting this thing together on a shoestring, we don't have a lot of money to pay for speakers. Maybe we could reimburse you for travel expenses...."

"Fuck you, pay me!"

"Um, OK, I mean... like I said we don't have a lot of money for this kind of thing. Maybe we could arrange some kind of small honorarium to be donated to the charity of your choi...."

"FUCK YOU, PAY ME!"

"Never mind, we've decided to go with Lesbitrans McHatesMen instead."

"THIS IS SEXISM!"
 
You're not a woman and you don't work, John, though it is true that you scam some money from Patreon so I guess that counts as getting paid.

View attachment 201254

What are you talking about you fucking mongoloid

View attachment 201256

Considering he openly brags about the fact that he pays his "employees" literally one dollar, I don't think John has the right to complain about women's pay.
 
Reporting deadline for April(1st quarter) is due the 15th.

What a coincidence, my bills are due the same day every month.

Guess which one of us, between me and John, is more responsible.

I don't think he's pocketing charity money, he's just claiming to work with rich white-girl feminist outfits that "strongly suggest" you donate your speaking fees to charity. John never really worked with any such places, but I actually don't have a problem with it if he does take their money as a paycheck rather than using it to virtue signal.

Since our first reaction was "wait, pocketing charity money?", it will likely be the first reaction of a Mass. 8th District voter, and that doesn't bode well. People's perceptions don't need to align with the facts.
 
Guess which one of us, between me and John, is more responsible.
Technically Frank would be responsible for getting all the paperwork in on time as the campaigns treasurer, however maybe @AnOminous would know better as to which Wu would be on the hook legally if the books didn't pass muster.
 
h3h3 is alt right.png


h3h3 is/are alt-right now? *sigh*
 
Technically Frank would be responsible for getting all the paperwork in on time as the campaigns treasurer, however maybe @AnOminous would know better as to which Wu would be on the hook legally if the books didn't pass muster.

As a married couple, it wouldn't really matter. They'd both be on the hook for anything they did together. I'd assume they'd go after Frank because his name is actually on the paperwork and his retardation appears to be how he fucked it up. But if it came time to collect, they'd collect from the marital estate. Frank pays for everything anyway.
 
Wu was tweeting about the 'game industry' again but then deleted it. Could it be that Wu or someone nearby has figured out that sperging about this crap isn't helping the political campaign any? Probably not. But here's the tweet:
temp.jpg

The link goes to the following (which, tbh, points out a pretty cringy ad from awhile ago)

temp.jpg
 
Wu was tweeting about the 'game industry' again but then deleted it. Could it be that Wu or someone nearby has figured out that sperging about this crap isn't helping the political campaign any? Probably not. But here's the tweet:
View attachment 201385
The link goes to the following (which, tbh, points out a pretty cringy ad from awhile ago)

View attachment 201387
So, am I understanding correctly that, similar to his shitty piecemeal Murican Flag backdrop showing he's a true patriot, Johnny deleted this because he thinks his potential voters in district 8 are likely racist, and just like his faux Red Sox-ism, he's trying to play the part?

I mean, there's literally no other reason to delete this tweet; it's totally "safe" from the perspective of his usual milieu and the SJW types: whites bad, poor blacks, etc. (I actualy think it's kinda hysterical that Sony intentionally (accidentally?) pissed in peoples eyes with this "White Aryan Amazon PSP" ad, but that's another story!)

Wu is revealing just how patronising and condescending he is by how he's trying to "play the game" to finesse the votes.
 
Wu was tweeting about the 'game industry' again but then deleted it. Could it be that Wu or someone nearby has figured out that sperging about this crap isn't helping the political campaign any? Probably not. But here's the tweet:
View attachment 201385
The link goes to the following (which, tbh, points out a pretty cringy ad from awhile ago)

View attachment 201387
I'm going to guess he deleted it because that ad's old as fuck. Like more than a decade old.
 
So, am I understanding correctly that, similar to his shitty piecemeal Murican Flag backdrop showing he's a true patriot, Johnny deleted this because he thinks his potential voters in district 8 are likely racist, and just like his faux Red Sox-ism, he's trying to play the part?

I mean, there's literally no other reason to delete this tweet; it's totally "safe" from the perspective of his usual milieu and the SJW types: whites bad, poor blacks, etc. (I actualy think it's kinda hysterical that Sony intentionally (accidentally?) pissed in peoples eyes with this "White Aryan Amazon PSP" ad, but that's another story!)

Wu is revealing just how patronising and condescending he is by how he's trying to "play the game" to finesse the votes.
It doesn't matter how many times Wu purges her timeline. Not only will people remember that she talked shit, and then tried to sweep that under the rug, but Wu will continue tweeting bullshit the next day, because she has literally no self-restraint.
 
Back
Top Bottom