Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Peace and Harmony said:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

View attachment 199414
Click to expand...
Seems the old house was pre-furnitured, why else would you need to buy stuff from IKEA, when you move from a bigger house into a garden shack?

Does anyone know why they had to change houses? It sounds like a rather interesting story could be behind that.
FatNero said:
One camera is not a studio it's a waste of time.

You can get a used BMD switcher for like 500 bucks. Stop being lazy.
Click to expand...
As expected Wu is throwing more money at toys she doesn't need. Why does a candidate need a 'video studio' herself, instead of hiring a guy with a studio to make the two or three campaign videos she's going to make during her campaign for her? Because she can buy that shit with donation money and/or deduct it from (Frank's) taxes.
 
Von Clausewitz said:
Seems the old house was pre-furnitured, why else would you need to buy stuff from IKEA, when you move from a bigger house into a garden shack?

Does anyone know why they had to change houses? It sounds like a rather interesting story could be behind that.
Click to expand...
The old house was owned by Frank's uncle, and they were allowed to stay there free of charge under the condition that they would clean up the house and renovate the interior. They left the house in shittier condition than it was when they moved in, so Frank's uncle kicked them out.
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
How long until John asks how to use an hex key? Or complains about them?
Click to expand...

"The 'hex' key may seem like an ordinary fastener on the surface, but it is actually an organ of the patriarchy, being officially called an 'Allen' key. This 'Allen' was a serial woman abuser and mansplainer who got his jollies by forcing women to shove his six sided phallus replacement into tight receptacles and turning- literally fetishizing the very process of attaching two objects together. By attaching his masculine name to the instrument and even using 'screws' in the process, this insidious man has once again attempted to exert his authority completely over what should be a sex-positive and woman friendly process of assembling Ikea furniture, and turning the very act of assembly into a form of institutionalized rape. As your congresswoman I will introduce a bill to ban rape and rename the 'Allen key' to the 'Brianna Key' to represent that women can indeed be engineers just like men, and that women should not fear the implicit sexism in Ikea furniture instructions."
 
If anyone is exceptional enough to donate to his campaign they deserve to have their money spent on cheap furniture n crap.
 
Okay, so at this point, I've not seen:

1. A positive policy idea. I will admit that Moon Rocks Lunacy is a serious policy idea, but it's not a positive one. Rote screed against harassment is perhaps positive, but there's no concrete policy here.
2. An appeal to everyone. Politics 101 would explain that in a democracy, you need more votes than the other guy to win. Wu is so stuck on identity politics that I've failed to see any mass appeal at all.
3. Any campaign staff, excluding Frank and Natalie O'Brien.
4. Wu switching into any kind of public posture. Let's face it, you need to be civil to someone who doesn't share your political views because they can still vote for you. Politics is rife with big donors with extreme views and trying to win their support for fundraising is a modern reality; instead Wu continues to use noxious tactics like twitter blocks, using the word "mansplain" (which is about as smart as using "White Power"). Wu lacks any kind of separation between his "campaign" account and his apolitical posts.

It's clearly a political farce, although some of the claims that this could be fraud seem plausible. Certainly, Wu will not be outgunning Stephen Lynch, but I wonder about the more obvious outcome:

Will Brianna Wu give up the campaign before election day? Can she keep clean with the FEC and manage being utterly hated by everyone for a year plus and be an outright hopeless candidate or will she be forced to shut down?
 
Hillary Clinton (Brianna's political idol) just popped back up giving a speech at Georgetown, and of course the entire thing was full of identity politics because Clinton didn't even remotely come close to learning her lesson about why she lost the election.

So it appears that Brianna is just following along in Hilldawg's footsteps.
 
smackpops said:
If anyone is exceptional enough to donate to his campaign they deserve to have their money spent on cheap furniture n crap.
Click to expand...

If they donate in excess of $200 they deserve to get doxed. Luckily, the law recognizes this and the FEC will do the doxing for us.
 
Mola Ram said:
Seems likely. Over/under on how long before he inevitably launches a terrible YouTube channel?

If he does, we'll be up to a dozen threads before the election.
Click to expand...

John knows he looks like shit on video. That's why he avoids it so much and why he has so many nervous tics when he knows he's being taped.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom