Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Professional journalist Flynt/Wu is, as usual, completely ignorant about the use of rape in news stories.

Reporters are supposed to be neutral and to avoid loaded words. I don't believe there is a single state in the U.S. with a statute that labels a crime as "rape." The crime is typically classified as some form of "sexual assault" or "sexual battery." Reporters are expected to use the proper legal terminology. What Flynt/Wu is claiming is that women reporters are less professional than men.
Click to expand...

Rape is in fact an actual offense in many states, and also consider statutory rape as well.

I would be more surprised if it wasn't an actual offense in every state; sexual assault is often non-penetrative or an additional charge in addition to rape. That is to say it can include a wide range of sexual misconduct, but rape is more severe and definitive.

However, John's idea of rape is what most people consider "verbal disagreement".
 
Last edited:
nice said:
I don't see any caps from this account. Surely there are people here who follow her personal twitter? If not, I might try my luck sending a request.
Click to expand...

Good luck. I imagine you'd need a twitter account that has been developed for infiltration- not new, good amount of followers (none of which are on blockchains), following all the SJW figures, etc. If you do get something from there, don't release it here right away, save some up... because you can bet if it starts dropping she'll purge new followers and probably go on a blanking spree.

Jan_Hus said:
That comment section is brutal. And really funny.
Click to expand...

Luckily for Wu there are always guys out there dumb enough to see something wearing a skirt next to a motorcycle and think it's automatically hawt.
temp.png
 
Peace and Harmony said:
Any examples that you'd like to provide and refute, John? No, of course not.

View attachment 188742
Click to expand...
>Washington Times
>conservative
pick one.
Kiras left nipple said:
View attachment 188257

lol. you talk to no one. senpai lynch wont acknowledge you....youre just the moon troon loon..
Click to expand...
I can't wait for John to be ripped apart by a professional, experienced politician.
Peace and Harmony said:
The man with a fictitious campaign staff is accusing his opponent of lack of integrity. Just incredible.

View attachment 186575
Click to expand...
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Teeter said:
You forgot when John dodecahedron downed and claimed Russians were hacking his campaign because he fell for a typical phishing email, going so far as to call LE about it.
Click to expand...
Fucking amoebas have more intelligence than this.
 
temp.png


"I come from the startup world"

And here I thought Wu came from the 'My parents gave me hundreds of thousands of dollars to blow through pretending to be a startup" world.
 
Last edited:
Unpleasant said:
Rape is in fact an actual offense in many states, and also consider statutory rape as well.

I would be more surprised if it wasn't an actual offense in every state; sexual assault is often non-penetrative or an additional charge in addition to rape.
Click to expand...

Your're right about rape. In the jurisdictions where I've worked, the statutes have always defined such crimes as sexual assault or variants on that phrase -- in Texas, for example, the word rape doesn't appear anywhere in the chapter of the penal code dealing with sex offenses [laws obviously written by men] -- but the use of the word rape can be found in the penal codes of other states, including in New York and California. Statutory rape, however, is nowhere to be found in a quick check of the statutes in California, Texas and New York. (It always struck me as odd that someone writing a statute would find it necessary define the statute's topic as statutory.)

California: sexual assault of a child

Texas: sexual assault of a child

New York: predatory sexual assault against a child

And, as you noted, Flynt/Wu's definition of rape doubtless starts with disagreeing with him and might include looking at him.
 
Sissy Galvez said:
"ME is about emotion" except the animation is so bad each character looks constipated and/or exceptional and the writing is god awful.

Thanks John Flynt, I'll take your word for it because your critically acclaimed magnum opus, Revolution 60, was such a smashing success with amazing art style, gameplay, and animation
Click to expand...

The emotion in ME:A is dialogue that sounds like it was wtitten by terrible fanfic writers and a main female character who looks autistic 95% of the time.

Also Flynt won't get an inch in this race. Picked the worst possible opponent, a local with 12+ years.
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Your're right about rape. In the jurisdictions where I've worked, the statutes have always defined such crimes as sexual assault or variants on that phrase -- in Texas, for example, the word rape doesn't appear anywhere in the chapter of the penal code dealing with sex offenses [laws obviously written by men] -- but the use of the word rape can be found in the penal codes of other states, including in New York and California. Statutory rape, however, is nowhere to be found in a quick check of the statutes in California, Texas and New York. (It always struck me as odd that someone writing a statute would find it necessary define the statute's topic as statutory.)
Click to expand...

Some places have in fact done away with the specific term "rape," although it is sometimes still used and often cases of precedential value get quoted that still use the term. I'm not sure if legislatures often specifically explain what exactly they meant by doing away with the term, but my opinion is that the word "rape" in legal terms carries a lot of baggage that was very correctly done away with by statute.

For instance, the old common law definition of rape only recognize penile-vaginal intercourse by a man upon a woman, excluded marital rape, could only be proven if the victim could prove they had physically resisted, and in some cases, wasn't rape if the victim simply weren't a virgin. Active resistance, rather than lack of consent, was often the defining feature, and this is obviously outdated and just not the law any more.

Fixing things like this is what feminism did when it actually did things, instead of whining that there aren't enough fat, ugly trannies in video games.

The newer statutes capture more abhorrent, violent sexual conduct than the earlier ones, whether they call it rape or sexual assault, and you'd think someone who plans on being a lawmaker and who is a "woman" would understand this.
 
I would love for someone to ask Wu to name one investment firm she secured funding from. Just one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom