Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
But I'll give ole' John credit here, he does have taste in men. Too bad that even if this dude was gay, there's no way he'd ever go for John.

I expect Wu picked his name out of the hat to be her supposed high school crush because he was captain of the basketball force or whatever.
Also, from the year book photos he's basically the only white male who doesn't look like a future serial killer.
 
Yes, you are Kermit.

Screenshot 2024-12-29 082149.png

No, Kermit.
Identifies as a woman.png
The Washington Post begs to disagree
She identifies as a woman.jpg
 
John can't defend his own "moderate" position.

Interesting that John speaks authoritatively on the gay male expereince while simultaneously denying his true identity as a gay man.

Screenshot 2024-12-29 145227.png
Screenshot 2024-12-29 145203.png
 
Last edited:
"Womanhood is something you learn by watching online tutorials." - John Walker Flynt.
I can only assume that none of these tutorials cover washing and combing your damn hair.

But I'll give ole' John credit here, he does have taste in men.
How does one explain Frank then? Presumably desperation and dollars won out.
 
John sperging on fellow troon Nick Contino without even the slightest sense of self awareness.

Screenshot 2024-12-29 182413.png
Screenshot 2024-12-29 182444.png

John is still refusing to answer questions about his "moderate" views.

Screenshot 2024-12-29 193127.png
Screenshot 2024-12-29 200631.png
Screenshot 2024-12-29 200650.png
 
Last edited:

You can tell just from his tweets that John has no clue what Pascal's Wager even is but thinks he does and is impressing others by referencing it so casually. So standard John on most topics.

But I do want to say that this is actually a great usage of it, even if wrong, because the flaw in Pascal's Wager is that it doesn't work if you just don't accept that there is a Hell or even just that the Church is correct about how to avoid it. (Pascal was essentially writing to an audience that claimed to accept this.) Similarly, Leor is rejecting the premise that a gay child must be trans because they're gay and all John can do is assert that gay child is going to Hell if they don't transition while denying that this is his argument.

Pascal's Wager is logically tight because of the probabilities assigned in it, but nothing says you have to accept other people's probabilities especially for things about which they can't show or that can't be measured. This obviously eludes John for multiple reasons, such as that he doesn't grasp that infallibility doesn't exist.

edit: I will add another objection to Pascal's Wager, and why the concept might appeal to John as supposedly irrefutable, is that you suspect God might not look favorably on someone who believes purely out of personal gain. It assumes no personal agency in God, that you'll get to rules lawyer to St. Peter about TECHNICALLY following the rules. Which would suggest that you are personally superior to He who created everything.
 
Last edited:
Brianna: Don't judge women on their looks!
View attachment 6802625

Also Brianna: Haha, look at this woman!
View attachment 6802629

I feel like you should leave more than a week's gap between those two tweets.
Nobody’s “melting down” except Wu. The only reason he’s complaining is because he wants everyone to think he’s the hot, passing tranny, not the result of a fortune in plastic surgery and enough filters for half of Instagram. Same reason he keeps posting about how men totally hit on him all the time.

And the only reason people keep doing it is because it gets under his artificially-tightened skin. You’d think a man who’s been on the Internet since dial-up and claims to be the number one victim of online harassment would understand that.
 
This sort of book is the product of about three years of dedicated research. Wu can't even edit a video in a day without getting distracted by twitter. It would take many months of research, and I suspect at the end of it any intellectually honest person would come to the conclusion that their initial premise was false, which puts a bit of a dampener on writing the book.
John is an imbecile. He's a low quality mind, who couldn't even get a journalism degree in ten years of failing, because he's too stupid even to be a journalist.

Contemplate that for a second. How stupid do you have to be to be too stupid to be a journalist? And that's being funded by his parents for ten years. He was too dumb to get enough credits, in ten years, to qualify for the major with the second lowest IQ other than education (the dumbest college graduates of all time).

And this lying faggot continually pulls "i'm a engineer" "i'm a scientist" "i am doktur an i am gojira of tech feminism even though i is man" and other similar bullshit.
Interesting that John speaks authoritatively on the gay male expereince while simultaneously denying his true identity as a gay man.
Surprisingly, John is always the absolute expert on every single subject upon which he opines, despite the fact that HE knows literally nothing about the subject at all.
 
Sure Bri Bri, before Grindr banned having such statements it was common to see, 'no fats, no femmes, no Asians white guys' on profiles.

Oh and gay men hate men with athletic builds, they want chubby or fatter.

Oh and wait to see how quickly people block you if you advertise you're a total top with a big dick.

It's one thing for Brianna to prefer Asian men, but for him to imagine it's anything other than his own preference but is some kind of objective fact shows his grip on reality is lost.
 
Maybe late but I decided to listen to the "dollcast" that John talks about like it's the second coming of Jesus in tranny podcast form. A couple of episodes have been taken down, but there's an interesting clip up on Youtube where they discuss whether AGP is real. I'm putting it here for archival purposes:


TLDR: four "based HSTS not like the other trannies", including John, all admit to jerking off in the mirror or whatever the term "AGP experiences" is supposed to mean, claim that jerking off in the mirror is normal female sexuality.

It's honestly scary how many troons will present themselves as "the good ones" until they're talking to each other, at which point they will go mask off about being sex pests.

The way AGPs claim that their paraphilia isn't only about sex but has a romantic/companionship component makes it more disturbing because that's what extreme paraphiliacs do. Many pedophiles/zoophiles use the same excuse and say that they truly love children/animals, which is why they should be allowed to rape them. When a fetish is so deeply ingrained that it affects a person's sense of romance and companionship, it's a very bad sign.

The troons in the clip keep mixing up "autosexuality" (a tiny amount of which could be seen as normal) with "autogynephilia" (a fetish that destroys people's lives). If a 15 year old girl has a romantic/sexual fantasy, in which she is herself, that's normal. If a 50 year old man has a sexual fantasy in which he is a 15 year old girl, he should see a psychiatrist. If a man likes fuck in front of a mirror, that's autosexuality and only slightly weird. If a man puts on women's clothes and jerks off in front of a mirror, that's AGP. The difference is that in the former case, the arousal is directed at the act of oneself having sex with another person, and in the latter it's directed at the idea of being a woman. One of the troons also claims that women having sex for validation is AGP. In reality it's unhealthy and a sign of low self-esteem and grooming (which can make people base their self-worth on how attractive they are), but not AGP.

In a way they're living proof that the classic HSTS/AGP typology is wrong though, since they're four classic early transition "HSTS" trannies who nevertheless have elements of AGP. IMO it's impossible to put trannies into boxes like this in 2024 2025, because early porn exposure, trauma and grooming complicate things.
 
TLDR: four "based HSTS not like the other trannies", including John, all admit to jerking off in the mirror or whatever the term "AGP experiences" is supposed to mean, claim that jerking off in the mirror is normal female sexuality.
Would you fuck me? I'd fuck me. I'd fuck me HARD.

BRB skinning a woman to make my skin coat. #justgirlythings
 
Back
Top Bottom