Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Norvic said:
View attachment 3494693

Sounds like you were already on the path of Satan, because when you were 12 Lords of Acid didn't exist and albums weren't yet routinely being distributed on CD. I guess you got time travel powers from the devil.
Click to expand...
you can't be implying that True and Honest Woman 12-year-old-girl Brianna Wu didn't own an imported mini-single of "I Sit On Acid" (according to the Brianna Wu guide to electronic music, Lords of Acid are Groovie Mann, Al Jourgensen and Sasha Konietzko, with guest vocals by Rebecca Romijin-Stamos). that would be mansplaining!
 
CervixHammer said:
you can't be implying that True and Honest Woman 12-year-old-girl Brianna Wu didn't own an imported mini-single of "I Sit On Acid" (according to the Brianna Wu guide to electronic music, Lords of Acid are Groovie Mann, Al Jourgensen and Sasha Konietzko, with guest vocals by Rebecca Romijin-Stamos). that would be mansplaining!
Click to expand...
Speaking of Al Jourgensen, John's mom wasn't entirely wrong...John did wind up taking Revolting Cocks a little too seriously
 
CervixHammer said:
you can't be implying that True and Honest Woman 12-year-old-girl Brianna Wu didn't own an imported mini-single of "I Sit On Acid" (according to the Brianna Wu guide to electronic music, Lords of Acid are Groovie Mann, Al Jourgensen and Sasha Konietzko, with guest vocals by Rebecca Romijin-Stamos). that would be mansplaining!
Click to expand...

I'd lay odds that Wu's "EDM" obsession dates from no earlier than 2004 when she was introduced to clubbing by other members of the Ole Miss GSA. Wu's music tastes that she's been public about are extremely cheesy, as befits someone living in the back of nowhere who get all the trends a decade late and filtered through bedroom DJs who couldn't make it anywhere beyond Oxford, Mississippi. Lords of Acid have always been a joke band, and it's almost the only one she ever mentions.

Edit:

For evidence, I would submit Wu's top EDM playlist she made: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/2KJ9Moxc7nskgJGV3KpaDY
Music that isn't from a VERY specific point in time from 2003-2007 is from films or games. I contend Wu doesn't really so much like dance music as have nostalgia for the only time that she had a real social life.
 
Last edited:
Norvic said:
View attachment 3494693

Sounds like you were already on the path of Satan, because when you were 12 Lords of Acid didn't exist and albums weren't yet routinely being distributed on CD. I guess you got time travel powers from the devil.
Click to expand...
Time travel notwithstanding, I cant imagine why a parent would have a problem with a 12-year-old listening to LOA.

Some wholesome lyrical samples from Lust, LOA's first album, for which John straddled both time and space to aquire:
Screenshot_20220715-131201.png

Screenshot_20220715-131542.png

Screenshot_20220715-131718.png

Screenshots_2022-07-15-13-22-58.png
 
Norvic said:
View attachment 3494693

Sounds like you were already on the path of Satan, because when you were 12 Lords of Acid didn't exist and albums weren't yet routinely being distributed on CD. I guess you got time travel powers from the devil.
Click to expand...
I would love for someone on Twitter to point this out so we can see "ANGRY COCKLESS GOBLIN JOHN" come out again.

What 12 year old poor black girl in the South WASN'T listening to Lords of Acid?
 
Norvic said:
View attachment 3494693

Sounds like you were already on the path of Satan, because when you were 12 Lords of Acid didn't exist and albums weren't yet routinely being distributed on CD. I guess you got time travel powers from the devil.
Click to expand...
yes, in 1989 they'd only released one 12" single on a Belgian independent label (the first US release was their debut album, in 1991)
no doubt our John already had encyclopedic knowlege of the Belgian electronic music scene, and where to find obscure imported records
 
Smaug's Smokey Hole said:
John IS stupid and greedy, he just keeps stubbing his toe against all these obvious get-rich-quick schemes and that's what drives him mad. If he made money there would be no need for regulation.
Click to expand...
John is a small government conservative, there should only be one regulation: give John whatever he wants.
 
An Sionnach Seang said:
yes, in 1989 they'd only released one 12" single on a Belgian independent label (the first US release was their debut album, in 1991)
no doubt our John already had encyclopedic knowlege of the Belgian electronic music scene, and where to find obscure imported records
Click to expand...
John would flash his mission commander laminate and borrow one of the space amp vehicles to shuttle over to Belgium to get them.
In fact, the Belgians couldn't pronounce "John Walker". It came out sounding like "Brianna"...and the legend was born
 
Ghostse said:
I hate to be that guy but: You mean envious.

Jealousy means you are tight fisted on something you have. Envious means you want what others have.
Click to expand...

Not to be that other guy, but it's a bit more complicated than that. Because of John's maliciousness toward those who have what he wants, jealous is the correct word to describe his feelings.

Dictionary.com

“Jealousy” vs. “Envy”: Can You Feel The Difference?​

Published January 14, 2022
text: jealousy vs. envy

⚡ Quick summary​

Jealousy and envy both involve a feeling of desire for what another person has, but jealousy is usually thought to be more negative—it often involves resentment toward the other person. Envy is also a negative feeling—like a mix of admiration and discontent—but the word doesn’t usually imply hostility. Another difference is that envy can be used as both a noun and a verb.

What is jealousy?​

Jealousy is a feeling of resentment, bitterness, or hostility toward someone who has something that you don’t. This could be general success, an achievement, a trait, a social advantage, a material possession, or a relationship, among other things. What matters is that the other person has the thing, you want it, and this makes you resentful of them.
The adjective form of jealousy is jealous.
When used in the context of romantic relationships, jealousy more specifically refers to a feeling of suspicion or uneasiness that often comes from one’s partner giving or being given positive attention by others.

What is envy?​

Envy is a negative feeling of desire centered on someone who has something that you do not. Envy can also be a verb meaning to feel this way toward someone. Both the noun and the verb imply that you want to be in the other person’s position—to have what they have. Like jealousy, envy can be centered on any number of things, tangible or intangible.
Envy can be described as a mix of admiration and discontent. But it’s not necessarily malicious. It can even be used as part of a compliment, as in You’ve worked so hard to achieve your success—I really envy you.
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Not to be that other guy, but it's a bit more complicated than that. Because of John's maliciousness toward those who have what he wants, jealous is the correct word to describe his feelings.
Click to expand...
Nevertheless, the two words are generally listed as synonyms in a thesaurus, although this is why you should never just use a word you found in a thesaurus if you don't know its full meaning. Thesaurus-talk is one of the ways pseudo-intellectuals give themselves away.

You should generally use the more common word, unless the obscure word actually is the absolutely correct word. Don't make your readers run to a dictionary just to find out you pulled a thesaurus bait and switch on them.
 
CervixHammer said:
LISTEN HERE YOU SHIT
you get pink insulation foam, a hot wire cutter, mod podge, cheap acrylic craft paint and sand. and a hot glue gun, or just use the mod podge. you bitch about being mansplained to, but you are wrong because this is how you make rocks that look fucking awesome in any decade and any genre. is it Star Wars? is it Dungeons and Dragons? who gives a shit, it's got SOVL.

LOOK AT IT, JOHN. FUCKING LOOK AT IT.
View attachment 3492216
Click to expand...
It's better if John doesn't look at it, seeing that space marine which can only be male according to GW might cause another sperg out. On second thoughts, show him, we will get more milk out of the old cow.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
Nah John I think just stick to the highly ethical business of scamming re,tards of their cash.

View attachment 3496892
Click to expand...
John is amazed that it is actually Congress that is in charge of military expenditures, not unelected bureaucrats in the Pentagon. I guess Art. I § 8 cls. 12-14 confuses him: "The Congress shall have Power. . .To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces[.]"

Possibly the civilian leadership knows of reasons why this might be necessary. I don't know. Maybe there are agencies in charge of gathering information like that.
 
Mini cow crossover: Fatrick begging Wu to notice him. For the uninitiated, Patrick was duped into thinking a Rockstar employee was adding a fat stupid character based on him to GTA VI, then duped into giving 4 hours worth of interviews to someone posing as a HuffPost reporter in which he portrayed himself as the protagonist of "Gamergate 2.0"
1657998458453.png

Both are car guys too, Pat has farmed that blue checkmark engagement via Porche tweets in the past.

If Pat keeps mimicking John I fear for body parts he might chop off with his newly sharpened knives.
 
AnOminous said:
John is amazed that it is actually Congress that is in charge of military expenditures, not unelected bureaucrats in the Pentagon. I guess Art. I § 8 cls. 12-14 confuses him: "The Congress shall have Power. . .To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces[.]"

Possibly the civilian leadership knows of reasons why this might be necessary. I don't know. Maybe there are agencies in charge of gathering information like that.
Click to expand...
Can you imagine the level of stupid that would result in the pentagon having free reign over military expenditures like that. The cold war would have been an utter shitshow
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom