Sure thing John, once we take a look at the FEC filings we'll rest easy knowing movers-and-shakers are paying attention to your demands.
View attachment 3474312
Double penetration
View attachment 3474350
What rights are you referring to, John? Roe only applies to abortions, and as a man, you couldn't get one even if you wanted to because you can't get pregnant. Even if you actually were a woman, you're 45 years old, just about the time where a woman would be entering menopause, so abortions would continue to not be a concern.
The only other "rights" that were brought up in arguments by the Supreme Court were when Clarence Thomas made the point that other SC decisions made under similar "substantive due process" reasoning should be reexamined in the future, though he made clear that the
Dobbs decision did not immediately nullify the decisions made in those cases. Let's see, which cases did Thomas cite?
Griswold v. Connecticut? Neither Frank nor John have to worry about having kids, so they also don't need contraceptives.
Lawrence v. Texas? They live in a blue state, so I don't think they're likely to run afoul of anti-sodomy laws. I also have sincere doubts they actually fuck; I don't care how much of a tranny chaser Frank is, a face-melting ghoul is a certified boner killer.
Obergefell v. Hodges? Ah, there it is. John is terrified that he'll be unable to inherit Frank's wealth if gay marriage is overturned.
As always, it boils down to John being a greedy parasite.