fuckidunno
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 24, 2019
That's the one I meant.
The one takes place (Well, first one does) in the deep ocean.
Oh, OK that's actually called the Rifter's trilogy
It's been about 20 years since I read it, but I enjoyed it -- I think he was in his over-extension phase that so many sci-fi authors (and others!) go through where the series degraded and lost focus somewhat.From that persepctive, I saw Blindsight as a tightening of focus along that line.
I though writing was a bit wooden at times (as I find with much of hard Scifi), but I didn't find the perversions to be meant erotic or titillating . He's addressed that criticism before.
I found it it, like so much of his work, stark...very very stark
the sexual component rung as a call back of the circular oscar wildism for me
IMO it wasn't the most (or very) sophisticated device,as is a tendency in sci-fi. and it was a brute force method. But I didn't find it pornographic in a prurient sense. I found the sexual component to be much like what Herbert said about the pain box " Pain’s merely the axis of the test."
The vampirism , Starfish was of its time and I found it a refreshing neuro-behavioral take on the "bloodborn disease" that rationalist fantasy/adventure was using at the time. and the vampire mythos is quite old a seeps into our language and societal sense of (figurative) cannibalistic predation "she's an emotional vampire" etc - so i think it warrants visitation especially as used.
but that brings us back to doe as his flogging horse, that authors are wont to have
(I think King is the, um, King of that. The Regulators and Despiration and DreamCatcher)
It's been about 20 years since I read it, but I enjoyed it -- I think he was in his over-extension phase that so many sci-fi authors (and others!) go through where the series degraded and lost focus somewhat.From that persepctive, I saw Blindsight as a tightening of focus along that line.
I though writing was a bit wooden at times (as I find with much of hard Scifi), but I didn't find the perversions to be meant erotic or titillating . He's addressed that criticism before.
I found it it, like so much of his work, stark...very very stark
the sexual component rung as a call back of the circular oscar wildism for me
“Everything in the world is about sex except sex. Sex is about power.”
as a device, I think it was a shock to the system to crack the habituation to the tropes...Silence of the lamb's Buffalo Bill, after all, was a gender serial killer who was so diluted (less so in the book, but still diluted) that he is sometimes seen as even comedic.IMO it wasn't the most (or very) sophisticated device,as is a tendency in sci-fi. and it was a brute force method. But I didn't find it pornographic in a prurient sense. I found the sexual component to be much like what Herbert said about the pain box " Pain’s merely the axis of the test."
The vampirism , Starfish was of its time and I found it a refreshing neuro-behavioral take on the "bloodborn disease" that rationalist fantasy/adventure was using at the time. and the vampire mythos is quite old a seeps into our language and societal sense of (figurative) cannibalistic predation "she's an emotional vampire" etc - so i think it warrants visitation especially as used.
but that brings us back to doe as his flogging horse, that authors are wont to have
(I think King is the, um, King of that. The Regulators and Despiration and DreamCatcher)
I suggest we continue this convo but move it off-thread
(though it is a great example to outside readers that KF isn't quite the monolith that certain factions want to pretend)