Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Who the fuck would harass John as a true and honest woman??? I'd rather commit seppuku than stalk John's kind for sexual purposes. My hand would bear a lot more of sexual attraction than you or your kind John, deal with it.
 
Who the fuck would harass John as a true and honest woman??? I'd rather commit seppuku than stalk John's kind for sexual purposes. My hand would bear a lot more of sexual attraction than you or your kind John, deal with it.
We all know John gets cat called at least 500 times per day.
 
Robert, we have been friends for a very long time (remember the time that I liked your tweet once?), so with the greatest respect, I hope you fucking DIE you piece of shit sexist PIG

rob1.jpg


rob2.jpg
Maybe these men should ask for a womans opinion.
 
Listen n,igger, if you dare to get a game that John Walker Flynt doesn't enjoy, he will personally snarl at you over the Internet. Make the right choice.

View attachment 3081849
I like all the steps taken in the OP to connect the game to something unrelated that's not actually happening so they can whine about it. Sony maliciously choosing this week of all weeks to promote a game that has nothing to do with genocidal legislation (that doesn't exist) being supposedly prompted by Rowling's "anti-trans" views (which have no connection to each other and neither of which happened this week anyway) is supposed to be some kind of incredible faux-paus because things just don't coincidentally happen. As if Crystal and Brianna would ever allow there to be a time to promote such a game when [THING IS HAPPENING] even though they hate it no matter what just because it shares an IP with other things created/written by someone they hate for not being a woman who is not pro-trans enough.

Plus throw in that it's "racist" because why not, it's not like anyone in this bubble is going to dare to disagree.
 
I like all the steps taken in the OP to connect the game to something unrelated that's not actually happening so they can whine about it. Sony maliciously choosing this week of all weeks to promote a game that has nothing to do with genocidal legislation (that doesn't exist) being supposedly prompted by Rowling's "anti-trans" views (which have no connection to each other and neither of which happened this week anyway) is supposed to be some kind of incredible faux-paus because things just don't coincidentally happen. As if Crystal and Brianna would ever allow there to be a time to promote such a game when [THING IS HAPPENING] even though they hate it no matter what just because it shares an IP with other things created/written by someone they hate for not being a woman who is not pro-trans enough.

Plus throw in that it's "racist" because why not, it's not like anyone in this bubble is going to dare to disagree.

You don't understand. Assaulting women, inserting themselves into women's spaces (hiyo!) and grooming children are intergral and vital to Trannies. If they are not allowed to watch young girls undress and shower, you are killing them. If they are not able to dominate women out of sports, you have murdered over 100 trannies every day that they aren't able to destroy record times and scores.
 
Why are they making such a fuss over a videogame? Do they think boycotting it will help their cause? I really don't understand those people.
It's all preformative. It's to show they are indeed in support of the victims and stand with them, because buying a sony game would cause JK Rowling to gather power and all trans lives would end.
 
"Big pharma is actually really good" says the guy whose entire well-being is supported by big pharma.
"On a completely unrelated note, here is the latest in a long list of porches I plan to buy"
 
How we know John doesn't actually know any women: he believes women aren't as vicious as men. (Perhaps explained by John's strange feminine tendency to stick to chasing position in male dominated fields: gaming, tech, sports cars, electoral politics, etc.)
John has obviously not watched Heathers or Mean Girls, and seen how a woman's worst enemy is OTHER WOMEN.
 
Why are they making such a fuss over a videogame? Do they think boycotting it will help their cause? I really don't understand those people.
Because it's a low-effort way to virtue signal for easy NPC points. Rowling is desirable target because they can yell at her with no repercussions, so they can act brave and scream about how they want to bash her teeth out with a baseball bat, and they know she isn't going to retaliate because JKR knows it's useless bluster and has better things to do that give trannies the attention from her they crave. The other reason they do it is because they hope that REEEEEEing at her enough is going to shame her into groveling for forgiveness and then showering them with free gibs from her vast fortune.

Boycotting the game is just more pointless virtue signaling because 1) they were never going to buy it or they will pirate it and 2) JKR already has so much money they she downgraded from billionaire to millionaire because she gives so much of it away to good cause. So she could give 0 fucks if trannies buy it or not. She's set for life
 
John has obviously not watched Heathers or Mean Girls, and seen how a woman's worst enemy is OTHER WOMEN.
What a surprise, self-professed "expert" on online harassment is oblivious to the many, many instances of women doing it:





But sure, maybe it's dudebros that are pissed at every girl that dates Justin Bieber.
 
Can't call it a 28 hour work day without John picking a slapfight on Twatter.

View attachment 3063847
View attachment 3063848
I love how a misandrist can just write "the source of all evil is men" and the only point of contention from the woke crowd is muh trannies. Like yeah, the problem is not the author writing that half the population needs to die for the world to become a better place, no the problem is that muh trannies are womxn. Who's genocidal again?
I could go on a tangeant about how funny it is that the left who's supposed to be all about muh historical materialism suddenly starts believing in the existence of the soul when it comes to trannies:
"There is no world but this one, there is no life but this one and nothing exists but the material conditions steming from the interactions between my body and the world but, somehow, I am trapped in the wrong body" is hysterical when you put it into words.
Ironically, thinking that there is such thing as an essential part of yourself existing outside of your material conditions is exactly what religious people believe and socialists mock them relentlessly about that. Of course when trannies say the same shit, you can hear a pin drop.

A woman is a woman and also a man. Which one is you, John?

View attachment 3066122

Mississipi John at it again with th 89 IQ answer. It's not like the accepted woke answer is not being repeated ad nauseam everywhere; i.e. woman is the gender role and not the sex, anyone can be a woman by taking on the gender role.
Which of course makes no fucking sense as an integral part of the gender role is the biological function it serves for the family and society but whatever. I remember a talk from an old feminist who was appalled that contemporary gender studies degrees didn't have even 1 credit of biology in them, as if to say hormones and reproduction didn't matter in women's experiences. You really have to never have been with a woman (let alone being one) to believe that being incapacitated for a week every month for three decades and having the ability to create life inside of you doesn't change the way you see the world. Of course trannies, being fetishists who think that woman= skirts + bathrooms, have no idea about how dumb this is. However, I'd really like to point out that, as idiotic as the woke gospel is on the issue, John is such a retard that he can't even articulate it competently, litterally :"woman is woman + woman derp". He's below NPC levels of IQ.

Robert, we have been friends for a very long time (remember the time that I liked your tweet once?), so with the greatest respect, I hope you fucking DIE you piece of shit sexist PIG

View attachment 3080425

View attachment 3080426

DAY ONE PURCHASE for a high-poverty elementary school where the kids can barely afford books or stationery! Their faces will light up with joy!

View attachment 3080424
I mean, I know at least one true and honest woman who bullied and underpaid her staff so much that they had to quit their game company so I wouldn't say it's a specifically male issue... or was it actually a man all along? The plot thickens...
On another note, you'd really have to never have interacted with women to think they can't be shitty people. Just ask any guy who doesn't measure up to societal standards (short/ugly/poor) and ask them about their rejection stories and you'll lose any such illusion.
Long story short, if John weren't a tranny he'd be an incel.
 
Back
Top Bottom