Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
God, I know, so depressing that kids would dream about being someone who is rich and popular. The world would be a much better place if kids dreamed of growing up to be chronically unemployed and pathologically dishonest trannies, am I right, John?

career.jpg


career2.jpg
 
And this, my friends, is how you take your rabid dog of a "political campaign" out into the back yard and shoot it yourself.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
God, I know, so depressing that kids would dream about being someone who is rich and popular. The world would be a much better place if kids dreamed of growing up to be chronically unemployed and pathologically dishonest trannies, am I right, John?

View attachment 224604

View attachment 224605
Click to expand...

You'll note that all three of those are higher value professions than "mutilated con artist with a screaming Asian sugar daddy."
 
millais said:
Did Wu ever consider getting funding from Justice Democrats or WolfPAC or any of the other pro-progressive PACs that are trying to primary "corporate establishment" Democrats?
Click to expand...
John/Brianna tweeted at one of them "look at me, I'm a 'progressive'" and I think they had discussions but no word on if it went anywhere which means they rejected John. You know if he received their support he would have bragged about it.

One look at his FEC filing and you can tell this is a scam and his chances are going nowhere. John is lying about having a staff (unless you count Frank and the dogs), he's lying about meeting with voters (holding events in other states?), and he continues to stick his hoof in his mouth. John is not the candidate they're looking for and Lynch is not someone particularly awful.

Edit: It's bugging me that not a single journalist has looked at and reported on John/Brianna's FEC filing or refuted his claim of having a staff or going out to meet with voters of district 8. I know John is a nobody but he's still running for congress, was interviewed by several legitimate news organizations, and is taking donations from the public. It's a disservice to everyone to not investigate this scam and report on it. It's disgusting no one is challenging his lies or refuting them.
 
Sissy Galvez said:
John/Brianna tweeted at one of them "look at me, I'm a 'progressive'" and I think they had discussions but no word on if it went anywhere which means they rejected John. You know if he received their support he would have bragged about it.

One look at his FEC filing and you can tell this is a scam and his chances are going nowhere. John is lying about having a staff (unless you count Frank and the dogs), he's lying about meeting with voters (holding events in other states?), and he continues to stick his hoof in his mouth. John is not the candidate they're looking for and Lynch is not someone particularly awful.

Edit: It's bugging me that not a single journalist has looked at and reported on John/Brianna's FEC filing or refuted his claim of having a staff or going out to meet with voters of district 8. I know John is a nobody but he's still running for congress, was interviewed by several legitimate news organizations, and is taking donations from the public. It's a disservice to everyone to not investigate this scam and report on it. It's disgusting no one is challenging his lies or refuting them.
Click to expand...

You gotta realize that papers/magazines are already struggling to stay relevant, covering a Senate race 2 years from now isn't a hot topic. It's the only reason wu has lasted so long. Give it time.
 
You've got to wonder what John wanted to be while he was growing up. He enrolled at Ole Miss in engineering first, and clearly found that too hard so dropped out to do a business degree, dropped out again because apparently even business is too hard for Wu's tiny little brain and eventually tried journalism.

She's never really pursued any of these things as a career. It seems like any passion she once had for any sort of career has been eclipsed by her all-consuming ego that demands she be recognised as a big shot in some field or other.
 
Norvic said:
You've got to wonder what John wanted to be while he was growing up. He enrolled at Ole Miss in engineering first, and clearly found that too hard so dropped out to do a business degree, dropped out again because apparently even business is too hard for Wu's tiny little brain and eventually tried journalism.

She's never really pursued any of these things as a career. It seems like any passion she once had for any sort of career has been eclipsed by her all-consuming ego that demands she be recognised as a big shot in some field or other.
Click to expand...

Maybe she always wanted to be a grifter and she's living the dream?
 
If only Hillary Clinton had secured her votes with 64 character passwords...

secure.jpg


"Mathmatician" John Flynt will push the "Science" slider all the way to the right when elected to Congress, because being a junior representative is the same thing as playing Civilization.

science.jpg
 
Last edited:
Peace and Harmony said:
If only Hillary Clinton had secured her votes with 64 character passwords...

View attachment 224623

"Mathmatician" John Flynt will push the "Science" slider all the way to the right when elected to Congress, because being a junior representative is the same thing as playing Civilization.

View attachment 224655
Click to expand...

You just know every single one of John's passwords are something like "RIPCrash" or "IheartKylie."
 
Peace and Harmony said:
If only Hillary Clinton had secured her votes with 64 character passwords...

secure-jpg.224623
Click to expand...


Ugh. Again Wu doesn't understand. This chart shows how long it would take to reverse a salted and hashed password. The thing about that is, in the event that someone has your password hash to reverse, they've already compromised the site's security such that it doesn't actually matter if they have your password or not.

This is only a factor if you reuse passwords across multiple sites. If you don't, it doesn't matter in the slightest how long your password is as long as it resists any sort of online attack. An eight character password that isn't a dictionary word is absolutely fine for all practical purposes.
 
vertexwindi said:
It's "Fr@nkh@s@t1nypen1s".
Click to expand...

1 Quintilian years unless you have a quantum computer and a reliable internet connection on your base on the moon. Get hacking script kiddies.

Country was also founded on freedom of religion.

Respect remains to be earned, not handed out as a founding principle, John, you stupid fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom