Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
All the handshake talk reminds me of her “parade” appearance last year where she was jogging in front of her Porsche, saw a poor unsuspecting person in a rascal and stomped over, giant bingo wing arm extended as she violently shook some fatty old woman’s hand. It was at the time on of the more cringey things she had done, before being surpassed by the constant snarling during her wuman in tech appearance.
 
Today in embarrassing, baleeted tweets.

View attachment 714016

This is the video:

amazon carrier has arrived.mp4
















She honestly seemed to believe that Amazon had developed a protoss carrier and had deployed it. Of course when people point it out...

View attachment 714022View attachment 714024

Uh huh, sure. that's why you deleted the tweets.
Man how is he so fucking stupid? Amazon can’t operate their drones for delivery today. This blimp/from delivery system if it existed would also be regulated by those same FAA regulations.

What additional regulations would you want, idiot? Do you really think Amazon wouldn’t accept liability if something happened to a person or house because of their drones failing?

Does he think Amazon would launch a drone similar to us war drones and drop packages like bombs? We’re taking 2 pound drones delivering small items, you idiot.
 
Regardless of whether it's fake, you have to admit that it's pretty funny that someone saw a video of mail delivery and thought "this is downright dystopian." And John, in his infinite wit, agreed.
 
"I am aware it's a render," he lied. "I was merely pretending to be 'about as sharp as a bag of wet mice'."

Regardless of whether it's fake, you have to admit that it's pretty funny that someone saw a video of mail delivery and thought "this is downright dystopian." And John, in his infinite wit, agreed.

Borderline dystopian is when you have only one Porch. No Porch whatsoever, is when it all turns Handmaid's Tale for Offrank.
 

I don't want to be that guy, but you do say it a lot.
This is a porch ->This is a Porsche ->
714215
714216
 
Forgot to link the cancerous "announcement": https://medium.com/@brianna_85629/b...abolishing-the-electoral-college-5d78878151b1 (archive)

DEDHAM, Massachusetts — Brianna Wu, candidate for U.S. Congress in Massachusetts District 8, today announced her support for abolishing the Electoral College.

“The Electoral College is archaic and unnecessary in the 21st Century,” said Wu. ‘One person, one vote should be the rule, and that can be instituted by the winner of the popular vote determining the winner of the election for the presidency and vice-presidency, as it does for every other elected office in the nation.”

Wu stated that one of the main reasons the Electoral College was written into the U.S. Constitution was to avoid a president being chosen by an uninformed and ignorant electorate due to a lack of information. “In the 1780’s, communication across the nation was slow to permeate. It was understandable then. This is the 21st Century. We can communicate across the world in seconds. This justification for the Electoral College is no longer valid.”

“The Electoral College enables presidential candidates to campaign in swing states, largely ignoring smaller states,” said Wu. “Presidential candidates should campaign in all fifty states, and a vote in Alabama should count as much as a vote in Ohio, Pennsylvania, or any of the other swing states. And if one candidate receives almost 3 million more votes over another candidate, then that person should be the President of the United States.”

Wu supports both a constitutional amendment and the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) as methods of negating the Electoral College. The NPVIC would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would take effect when states with a total of 270 electoral votes. So far, 13 states with 181 electoral votes, including Massachusetts, have signed the bill into law. A constitutional amendment would require passage by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and the Senate and approval by 38 states.

“We need to get rid of the Electoral College as quickly as possible,” said Wu. “Since 2000 alone, we have had two presidential candidates win the popular vote but lose the electoral college. That is not how a representative democracy should work. The NPVIC is gaining momentum, and hopefully now that the Electoral College is in the public discourse in this election, it will make some progress. A constitutional amendment is possible. We have done it twenty-seven times in our history. Since 1968, polling has shown that a majority of the American people have consistently said the popular vote should determine a presidential election. The will of the people is clear.”

Wu acknowledged the difficulty of passing a constitutional amendment with a Republican controlled White House and Senate. “The fact is the Republicans see the Electoral College as a pathway to the presidency. It has worked for them twice in the last five elections. They think that Donald Trump can be re-elected in 2020 with a repeat performance of 2016 — winning the Electoral College while losing the popular vote. For them, it’s not about a fair, representative democracy, it’s about winning elections any way they can. Although Democrats are fighting to repeal the Electoral College, I think we will need a large majority of Democrats in the House and the Senate to pass a constitutional amendment. When I get to Congress, it will be one of the many important items on my agenda,” said Wu.

For interview requests or follow-up comments, please contact the Press Representative listed below.
 
Forgot to link the cancerous "announcement": https://medium.com/@brianna_85629/b...abolishing-the-electoral-college-5d78878151b1 (archive)

DEDHAM, Massachusetts — Brianna Wu, candidate for U.S. Congress in Massachusetts District 8, today announced her support for abolishing the Electoral College.

“The Electoral College is archaic and unnecessary in the 21st Century,” said Wu. ‘One person, one vote should be the rule, and that can be instituted by the winner of the popular vote determining the winner of the election for the presidency and vice-presidency, as it does for every other elected office in the nation.”

Wu stated that one of the main reasons the Electoral College was written into the U.S. Constitution was to avoid a president being chosen by an uninformed and ignorant electorate due to a lack of information. “In the 1780’s, communication across the nation was slow to permeate. It was understandable then. This is the 21st Century. We can communicate across the world in seconds. This justification for the Electoral College is no longer valid.”

“The Electoral College enables presidential candidates to campaign in swing states, largely ignoring smaller states,” said Wu. “Presidential candidates should campaign in all fifty states, and a vote in Alabama should count as much as a vote in Ohio, Pennsylvania, or any of the other swing states. And if one candidate receives almost 3 million more votes over another candidate, then that person should be the President of the United States.”

Wu supports both a constitutional amendment and the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) as methods of negating the Electoral College. The NPVIC would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill would take effect when states with a total of 270 electoral votes. So far, 13 states with 181 electoral votes, including Massachusetts, have signed the bill into law. A constitutional amendment would require passage by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and the Senate and approval by 38 states.

“We need to get rid of the Electoral College as quickly as possible,” said Wu. “Since 2000 alone, we have had two presidential candidates win the popular vote but lose the electoral college. That is not how a representative democracy should work. The NPVIC is gaining momentum, and hopefully now that the Electoral College is in the public discourse in this election, it will make some progress. A constitutional amendment is possible. We have done it twenty-seven times in our history. Since 1968, polling has shown that a majority of the American people have consistently said the popular vote should determine a presidential election. The will of the people is clear.”

Wu acknowledged the difficulty of passing a constitutional amendment with a Republican controlled White House and Senate. “The fact is the Republicans see the Electoral College as a pathway to the presidency. It has worked for them twice in the last five elections. They think that Donald Trump can be re-elected in 2020 with a repeat performance of 2016 — winning the Electoral College while losing the popular vote. For them, it’s not about a fair, representative democracy, it’s about winning elections any way they can. Although Democrats are fighting to repeal the Electoral College, I think we will need a large majority of Democrats in the House and the Senate to pass a constitutional amendment. When I get to Congress, it will be one of the many important items on my agenda,” said Wu.

For interview requests or follow-up comments, please contact the Press Representative listed below.

What an ignorant moron.

The Electoral College was done to prevent the larger states from having the whip hand over smaller states, not because of the communication issues. The Founders were rightly terrified popular voting would lead to mob rule, which exactly what this idiot wants.

And we are in representative democracy, as Wu stated, and the electors are REPRESENTATIVES of the electoral process, meaning this idiot just argued against a very system they also justified with that confession.

Finally, this is sour fucking grapes because a slight popular vote edge would have given the Democrats the presidency in 2016, how dare this liar try to pretend otherwise.
 
Yes, John, let's go to a mob rule system for our government. We can put it to a vote across the country as to whether or not to allow troons in womens' bathrooms, or whether gay marriage should exist. You know, instead of having these issues tested at the Supreme Court to see whether or not those issues are protected by the Constitution of our republic, regardless of votes.

I guarantee you would not like the results if minority rights were subject to the will of the majority. That's the whole point of a republic, you dumb fuck: preventing the disenfranchisement of minority citizens.
 
Abolishing the electoral college is no guarantee that the Dems would win the White House either. I know a bunch of my family who is hardcore Republican don't vote in Presidential elections because it's pointless for them to because their state is going Blue. If the college was gone, they would most definitely vote, and who knows how many are in that same boat.

Food for thought, eh John?
 
I’ll type this in caps for you. BRIANNA WU IS A MAN NAMED JOHN FLYNT.

Show me an equivalent Elizabeth Warren tweet where she berates someone for differing with her opinion. John is a megalomaniac with anger management issues.

That’s what you want in a leader! Also, the EC isn’t going anywhere because you need a constitutional amendment and 38 states need to approve it which would never ducking happen. This is another liberal distraction where they talk about an issue but not the impossible uphill battle just to string idiots like John Flynt along.
 
The hubris in believing you have the majority in the country. Only 58.1% of the country voted in 2016, don’t expect the remainder are all democrats or left leaning.

Part of me wants them to end the EC just to see how 70-80% of the electorate would vote. It would bite the Democrats in the ass.
 
Fucking weird. I assumed that Megan Amram was some kind of particularly hideous troon but actually looks normal and for some reason possibly ironic picked the most hideous picture of herself she could create making some ugly ass mug.

She thinks it's funny. It's not uncommon for comedians to put up intentionally unflattering photos of themselves as profile pics.

You're assuming he has muscle tone just because he's tall, where as the bingo wings and general flabbyness suggest he'd have one of those greasy, weak handshakes.

John is, guaranteed, one of those people who did a Dale Carnegie-style course and so makes sure to 'project strength and confidence' with a firm handshake. Add in his lack of perspective and, yes, I can imagine him crushing hands because he regards it as proving his worth.
 
His “one person, one vote” mantra is asinine. The EC corrects for the population imbalance.

I’d be more supportive of getting rid of states for the most part or at least federalizing infrastructure spending like roads and public schools. These things shouldn’t be left up to the states and should be high quality and standard across the country.

We shouldn’t have separate taxes and systems across state, disparate taxes for car registration, state licenses etc. fuck all that shit and make one goddamn system so people aren’t penalized for moving around,
 
Back
Top Bottom