Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jackass RN said:
[MEDIA=twitter]642426266034024448[/MEDIA]Must hurt having blown deadlines for the last.....how long?
https://archive.is/oZ14u
Click to expand...
http://isrev60outonsteamyet.weebly.com/

zedkissed60 said:
[MEDIA=twitter]556172236600918017[/MEDIA]
Yeah, being mean and stupid on Twitter sucks, John. Especially people who are like that 100% of the time.
Click to expand...
It's ironic how Wu likes to to slag off GGers for doing nothing more than pissing on aGGers for their association with aGG, given how a literal storied history of slagging off people for being GGers.

People like Wu are why GamerGate as a whole is a clusterfuck. Trying to invalidate any claim based on a person's or group's given position in "GamerGate" is a shit argument and would be laughed out by anyone in any serious debate, not to mention making it nearly incoherent to people outside of GamerGate as a whole. This is like expecting to go into a political debate and seeing people trying to argue their points by saying "Well he's a Republican so his points must automatically suck."

It's arrogant to assume that one side is automatically correct and superior over the other. This isn't fucking murder, cannibalism, or pedophilia (hue) here. There is no immediate moral incentive to supporting one side of GG over the other if you aren't involved in the games industry. And any SJW that tries to spin aGG off as a movement for transexuals or feminists or whatever shit just comes off as blatantly obvious that they're coopting the movement to spread their own shitty ideology under the guise of something else, which some might argue is rather... unethical.

There really needs to be a neon sign for Ethics in Journalism. Every lolcow associated with this shite ends up having this line quoted ironically.
 
"Daily Kos founder and Vox cofounder Markos Moulitsas just tweeted: 'Breitbart writer arrested for terrorism, for trying to help terrorists build bomb.' He linked to an article that made no mention of Breitbart. But it did list the publications that this terrorist troll, Joshua Goldberg, wrote for, including… the Daily Kos....

Moulitsas thinks Joshua Goldberg is a contributor to Breitbart. Goldberg isn’t, and he never has been… although he did, before his arrest and under various names, contribute various liberal publications, such as Thought Catalog and Moulitsas’s own site.

Goldberg wasn’t a staff writer but his 'user journal,' in the name of Tanya Cohen, was published by the Daily Kos and attracted over 200 comments.

Goldberg was also a contributor to feminist blog Feministing.com under the name Tanya Cohen, where he outed transgender game developer Brianna Wu."​

There we go.

No wonder John calls him a "terrorist". He committed the unspeakable "crime" of pointing out John's racist, homophobic, misogynistic background.
 
Last edited:
Sanae Kochiya said:
http://isrev60outonsteamyet.weebly.com/


It's ironic how Wu likes to to slag off GGers for doing nothing more than pissing on aGGers for their association with aGG, given how a literal storied history of slagging off people for being GGers.

People like Wu are why GamerGate as a whole is a clusterfuck. Trying to invalidate any claim based on a person's or group's given position in "GamerGate" is a shit argument and would be laughed out by anyone in any serious debate, not to mention making it nearly incoherent to people outside of GamerGate as a whole. This is like expecting to go into a political debate and seeing people trying to argue their points by saying "Well he's a Republican so his points must automatically suck."

It's arrogant to assume that one side is automatically correct and superior over the other. This isn't fucking murder, cannibalism, or pedophilia (hue) here. There is no immediate moral incentive to supporting one side of GG over the other if you aren't involved in the games industry. And any SJW that tries to spin aGG off as a movement for transexuals or feminists or whatever shit just comes off as blatantly obvious that they're coopting the movement to spread their own shitty ideology under the guise of something else, which some might argue is rather... unethical.

There really needs to be a neon sign for Ethics in Journalism. Every lolcow associated with this shite ends up having this line quoted ironically.
Click to expand...

Pro-GG as fuck, and I'll agree heartily with that.
 
Just checked, people like Wu and his fellow liars are in furious damage control mode, hoping like hell this troll bullshit sticks to damage Milo's credibility. So far, it doesn't seem to be working.
 
Cynical said:
Just checked, people like Wu and his fellow liars are in furious damage control mode, hoping like hell this troll bullshit sticks to damage Milo's credibility. So far, it doesn't seem to be working.
Click to expand...

The thing is, Milo realizes he has nothing to fear. He's a gay moderate working for a Republican news site. What are they even going to do?!
 
Jaimas said:
The thing is, Milo realizes he has nothing to fear. He's a gay moderate working for a Republican news site. What are they even going to do?!
Click to expand...
I feel like that's at least one thing GG has over aGG. Wu and her group seem to be completely against admiring any sort of flaw or mistake they make. They're so dedicated to the idea of being "the good guys" that they will dig their heels in as hard as the can and deny, deny, deny anything that might show them as flawed.

GG, on the other hand, doesn't seem to care if people think they're wrong or flawed. They'll basically go "yeah, I'm an ass, but that doesn't mean I'm not right about this". Just look at how aGG handled Butts vs how GG handled the terrorist guy(before it was revealed he was trolling both sides). aGG is still trying to deny Butts is a pedo by falsifying proof, spreading rumors, making excuses....GG heard about the terrorist guy and basically went "Wait, he did what? Okay, fuck that guy.)
 
Corypheus said:
Stimmingis a repetative motion. She's just doing stupid shit.
Click to expand...
I think @HickoryDickory put it best when they described Brianna's unusual mannerisms as alien. It's like she knows how normal people act but doesn't quite get the why. It's just one of the many things that makes it difficult for me to watch her too long.
 
Jaimas said:
Wu, we know you hate Milo. It's more than the fact that he showed you up, too:

[MEDIA=twitter]642752499854745600[/MEDIA]
Click to expand...
Milo has the advantage in that he doesn't really give a fuck what Wu or her followers say. Wu, on the other hand, keeps trying to stir up stuff so she can accuse him of something.
 
Jaimas said:
Wu, we know you hate Milo. It's more than the fact that he showed you up, too:

[MEDIA=twitter]642752499854745600[/MEDIA]
Click to expand...
Plus the fact that, without even trying, Milo is a sexier and fiercer stone-cold bitch queen than all the surgery, expensive motorbikes, Hot Topic dye-jobs, and cuckolded Asian hubbies will ever make Wu into.

I know Wu wishes she was Tranmus Aran, but she's really more of a metroid: annoying as hell, she sticks to your head and won't get off. You freeze her with the truth and then blow her ass to kingdom come by quoting her own tweets back at her.
 
SteelPlatedHeart said:
Still at it.

[MEDIA=twitter]642725701716692992[/MEDIA]
But wait!

[MEDIA=twitter]642730295805001728[/MEDIA]
Click to expand...
zedkissed60 said:
1) At least he's employable, John. You are not.
2) All your whining merely strengthens his article about you. It doesn't diminish it.
3) This dovetails nicely with your rant the other day about attacking people and not ideas, and how you claim you avoid ad hominem.

[MEDIA=twitter]640668438571151360[/MEDIA][MEDIA=twitter]640666651562741760[/MEDIA]
Also fallacy.
Click to expand...
Wu, practice what you preach, you hack.
zedkissed60 said:
[MEDIA=twitter]642783712816570368[/MEDIA]
Click to expand...
Cynical said:
[MEDIA=twitter]642765872633917440[/MEDIA]
https://archive.is/vHid6

[MEDIA=twitter]642767092010360833[/MEDIA]
https://archive.is/xPNDP

[MEDIA=twitter]642767796867334144[/MEDIA]
https://archive.is/BdklV

[MEDIA=twitter]642772596371668993[/MEDIA]
https://archive.is/n87te

[MEDIA=twitter]642788310767783936[/MEDIA]
https://archive.is/Zyr4z
Click to expand...
Wu's surgery also removed his metaphorical balls, seeing as he had to contact another person to tell Milo that his story was shit.
 
"Youtuber asks for $22,000 to cover game. Depressing that it's the future of game journalism."

Johnslation: GamerGate is right, I am wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom