Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow. . . just wow.

Bitch, it's fucking Twitter not the New York Times! The only "editorial decision" to be made is asking whether or not your statement is too inane or stupid to be shared with the world. Considering the frequency and quality of your tweets, I wouldn't be going on about anything that might demonstrate you having any self-control when it comes to social media.
The Podcast is alternately the 3 or 4 "hosts" trying to outnerd each other, ("haberdasher" cuz I's smart you guys!) while Wu brags constantly.

To whit, from just this episode:

-"a professional gets it done," Wu says non-ironically about herselfa

-brags about being in a documentary, 3 separate times

-brags about speech @ MIT

-brags about "photo shoot" on motorcycle

-brags about applewatch so many times I actually lost count

-brags about listener sending her "his nintendo and all his games" but when asked which games were sent, clearly has difficulty naming any but most obvious titles. Smells like BS

Final Analysis: So inside-jokey and self-aggrandizing. Who listens to this for entertainment?
 
Do you think Flynt will ever come back to check up on this thread from time to time? I'm thinking he only came here because it was a slow day for him in terms of drama and he needed to stir up some shit to get asspats on twitter
 
Do you think Flynt will ever come back to check up on this thread from time to time? I'm thinking he only came here because it was a slow day for him in terms of drama and he needed to stir up some shit to get asspats on twitter

Wu's a coward who only looks at mean shit about him long enough to cry about it to his goon squad to shame and condemn, then moves right back into being an egotistical cuntbag.
 
Top kek, even RationalWiki, a shithole that white knights Wu, had this shit to say about Solyent:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Soylent

I will never, for the life of me, understand the marketing decisions behind that product:

"We've created a flavorless pablum that can serve as a meal replacement! Jet-setters and go-getters all across the US will be interested in it! But it needs a name...."

"Boss, this sounds like a pretty bad idea. People like eating food."

"What hogwash, Minion #23! That fancy food-eating is totally in the past. Sucking down glasses of chalky material that looks and tastes like the contrast dyes used for digestive MRI testing is what all the cool kids are doing. It just needs a snazzy name, is all."

"Boss, you're not going to win anyone over with this shit. People are going to be making jokes about it resembling liquid shit. They'll start making jokes about it being the Protein Slurry from Paranoia or that crap from Soylent Green."

"SOYLENT! THAT'S PERFECT!!"

"...You're going to name a disgusting-looking, even-worse tasting drink that claims to be nutritionally complete with a name that specifically references a movie in which the product in the title is made from people?"

"I know, it's bulletproof, right?"

"Fuck this, I resign."


Wu reporting basically anyone who says anything he doesn't like again

[MEDIA=twitter]626629754716844033[/MEDIA]

Vx22qY7.png


I've been watching Wu for a while. Those report numbers? None of them match her previous ones.

I just realized what this means. You know how we mock Wu's Twitter addiction? It's worse than that - she literally spends all day when she's not posting reporting people who insufficiently kiss her ass or call her to task about absolutely everything. That guy who asked Wu when she was ever funny? Reported already. And Twitter Support is getting worse with it - one dude was recently banhammered for RTing a publicly available photo of Brianna Wu:

CKiS33dUcAETmGV.png


The moral of the story is clear: Brianna Wu has rights, you have none, so shut the fuck up and let her oppress you, shitlord.

 
I've been watching Wu for a while. Those report numbers? None of them match her previous ones.

I just realized what this means. You know how we mock Wu's Twitter addiction? It's worse than that - she literally spends all day when she's not posting reporting people who insufficiently kiss her ass or call her to task about absolutely everything. That guy who asked Wu when she was ever funny? Reported already. And Twitter Support is getting worse with it - one dude was recently banhammered for RTing a publicly available photo of Brianna Wu:

CKiS33dUcAETmGV.png


The moral of the story is clear: Brianna Wu has rights, you have none, so shut the fuck up and let her oppress you, shitlord.

More shit Milo needs for an article exposing how Twitter enables this asshole.
 
Is Twitter staffed by sympathetic sjws or do they just humor her to get her to stop screeching and spamming them with reports?
 
I will never, for the life of me, understand the marketing decisions behind that product:

It isn't really a marketed product some company decided to make to make money. It was designed by a single obsessed nerd with a hard-on for the subject, for whatever reason. He was creating something he wanted, and it took off and got crowdsourced.

I think the general concept has a certain appeal, but only to a niche market.

If you wanted to market it more broadly, it would be better marketed toward casual users who just wanted to replace a meal from time to time.

I don't think food is going out of style any time soon.
 
Is Twitter staffed by sympathetic sjws or do they just humor her to get her to stop screeching and spamming them with reports?
My guess? Definitely some corruption. Brianna frequently sucks the e-dick of anyone who has even the slightest bit of power on social media. I think we've even got some tweets where she's talked with Twitter staff. I wouldn't be surprised to learn if money is involved somewhere along the way (yet another reason Patreon is horseshit and needs real oversight).

My other thought is that Wu (and her cohorts) win by spamming Twitter's report system so much that the staff just says "fuck it" and go with it.
 
My guess? Definitely some corruption. Brianna frequently sucks the e-dick of anyone who has even the slightest bit of power on social media. I think we've even got some tweets where she's talked with Twitter staff. I wouldn't be surprised to learn if money is involved somewhere along the way (yet another reason Patreon is horseshit and needs real oversight).

My other thought is that Wu (and her cohorts) win by spamming Twitter's report system so much that the staff just says "fuck it" and go with it.

I think we just found Wu's weakpoint. If direct evidence of deliberate collusion with Twitter staff to turn Twitter into another Wu-controlled Ghazi can be proven, the results would be devastating for Wu and Twitter, the former for obvious reasons, the latter because it will embarrass Twitter, especially if other SJWs are in bed with Twitter and Twitter is deliberately helping them.
 
I'd say they're obviously sided with Wu. It's like, really, really easy to see but not to prove. if that makes sense.

As nice as it'd be to see them get their comeuppance in some form or another, it'd be a shame for legitimate users and stuff like show staff that just want to keep people updated if Twitter actually gets tanked ala Gawker.

That and Wu would go into withdrawal symptoms and pull an Elliot Rogers except trying to shoot up a Fraternity for being full of proto-gamergators.
 
The report system is probably largely automated. If you get reported enough and aren't important enough, you get a ban. Individual users simply don't matter to an organization with as much of a userbase as Twitter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom