- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
Has Flynt decided yet whether having more twitter followers means she is better or whether more followers means she is a victim?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why decide, when you can vacillate between perpetual victim in the run, and public figure?Has Flynt decided yet whether having more twitter followers means she is better or whether more followers means she is a victim?
I think you may have hit on something here.
The number of likes and retweets that Flynt/Wu receives are vastly lower than you would expect for someone with more than 50,000 legitimate followers. Flynt/Wu has sent out 58,700 tweets, and has received only 70,600 likes. That's Frank and, from time to time, one other person liking each tweet. You'd expect Flynt/Wu to have millions of likes. In fact, if on average only 1 percent (505) of his followers liked each of his 58,700 tweets, he would be closing in on 30 million likes.
And look at the number of followers that @giantspaceket has -- 951.
I'd say the odds are pretty good that Flynt/Wu decided it would be a wise investment to buy about 50,000 followers with Frank's money. We need to find the day on which Flynt/Wu's Twitter following went from 137 to 50,137.
EDIT: Sorry for the double post.
Did she really just claim to be a public figure? That is monumentally stupid in mulitple ways.
I am fairly certain Ninja Economics some form of troll. She also follows a virped on Twitter and I'm sure she follows are insane individuals.
"Playtesters"? Who, Frank?No updates on SteamDb or the Kickstarter yet though.
Also now the engineer chick is the true villain somehow.
View attachment 86395
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/722530257862062080
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/722530929806286849
Natalie and the Ghost of Crash."Playtesters"? Who, Frank?
View attachment 86392
http://archive.is/JCQ8q
Please take note of the sublime shifting between "we" and "I", the masterfully disguised comparison between Wu and Lucas, the subtle hint at "new games" and the incredible amount of BULLSHIT permeating this series of tweets.
....so she's a villain because she says shit like "crazy pants?"No updates on SteamDb or the Kickstarter yet though.
Also now the engineer chick is the true villain somehow.
View attachment 86395
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/722530257862062080
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/722530929806286849
She's quite a number of years late on this. There are many games now with either entirely female casts or heavy screen-time for female chars and their interactions, so her game isn't unique in that and it's not "huge". Assault Android Cactus has an all-female non-sexualised cast, and actually good gameplay. Life is Strange, TWD2, Bloodborne, etc. all have a heavy emphasis on female characters with a diverse set of personalities. There are games doing far more interesting things with gender representation on top of actual solid gameplay (e.g. Rust). If female chars with different personalities are all that her game is bringing to the table in this day and age, it's not much of a Revolution.
I am fairly certain Ninja Economics some form of troll. She also follows a virped on Twitter and I'm sure she follows are insane individuals.
A real public figure would have a checkmark next to Twitter handle.
The vast majority of her tweets are economics-related infographics and links to her articles on @inc and the like.
She's quite a number of years late on this. There are many games now with either entirely female casts or heavy screen-time for female chars and their interactions, so her game isn't unique in that and it's not "huge". Assault Android Cactus has an all-female non-sexualised cast, and actually good gameplay. Life is Strange, TWD2, Bloodborne, etc. all have a heavy emphasis on female characters with a diverse set of personalities. There are games doing far more interesting things with gender representation on top of actual solid gameplay (e.g. Rust). If female chars with different personalities are all that her game is bringing to the table in this day and age, it's not much of a Revolution.
If they're not talking over natural-born women and taking over women's spaces (whether they be change-rooms or platforms to discuss issues facing women), they're often putting on the same fake, stereotypical female personality of what they think girls are like. It *is* pretty insulting to women.Trannies being more extreme feminists than woman is a trope at this stage and, imo, is kind of sexist.
No updates on SteamDb or the Kickstarter yet though.
Also now the engineer chick is the true villain somehow.
View attachment 86395
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/722530257862062080
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/722530929806286849
John would know all about being psychotic, wouldn't he...ARE YOU EVEN PREPARED Y'ALL?!
View attachment 86391
View attachment 86392
http://archive.is/JCQ8q
Please take note of the sublime shifting between "we" and "I", the masterfully disguised comparison between Wu and Lucas, the subtle hint at "new games" and the incredible amount of BULLSHIT permeating this series of tweets.
It's far easier to tweet about it and claim brownie points for thinking about something they didn't even do.