#BPGoonerGate

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Finger Pistols said:
That's wrong. He voiced his dislike of the reaction system multiple times and the drop that broke the damn was @Mankirk commenting on how some users hide in DM chains out of fear of being negrated. He destroyed both the react system and broke dm chains. I don't see how that would have been specifically done for these users.
Click to expand...
There's no point talking to these morons. They are the perma-victims who deliberately lie to themselves and to everyone who will listen to try and make every single thing they don't like a personal tragedy inflicted directly upon them to the benefit of like 10 users in Beauty Parlor I don't talk to, I don't think about, and I don't interact with.

I am very over the community infighting. If you're going to provoke huge retarded slapfights, you're banned. I don't have a reason to tolerate you. I tried very hard to give everyone their own space and the consequence of this is bizarre factions of people who are obsessed with pretending daddy's favorites are somewhere else and they aren't loved and it's all just soooooooooo unfair!!!!
 
LurkTrawl said:
Weird because I've been told that an account being a sock isn't that big a deal, and that known sock accounts are allowed to operate as long as they don't cause trouble.

Which brings me right back around to wondering why this particular DM leak has gotten the OP banned for it, and unlike people here throwing shade at Null implying shit, I think it's a problem of clarity. If "community infighting" includes "posting embarassing DM chains for people to laugh at" now, then I think it should be made clear in the rules of the site as it's a very new idea to me that a thread like this would get you so much as insulted by a member let alone personally banned by the owner.

Hell I wouldn't have advertised it the way I have if I knew it was against Null's ToS.
Click to expand...
because this leak embarrassed josh's parasocial harem of slampigs, DUH
 
Null said:
  • @Android raptor - Following a very rare all-hands-on request for comment from staff, nobody could say anything credible in her defense and the consesus among staff was that I would have banned her years ago if she wasn't someone who had registered on CWCki Forums before I did.
Click to expand...
Android Raptor added absolutely nothing to the forum and I'm shocked she wasn't banned sooner. She repeatedly derailed threads simply by posting in them because she was such an awful poster. She out of nowhere would bring up priests molesting kids in a really disturbing fashion like she was totally obsessed with that topic. All she did was drag down the quality of A&H which I can't believe is even possible to begin with. I always had assumed like the staff did that you kept her around because she was an oldfag. She also had a really sick demented hatred of babies and pregnancy she'd refer to the fetus as a "crotch maggot" or something like that. Fucking freak.
 
Last edited:
How do you fucking people have enough spare time to get involved in this kind of secret online faggotry? Doesn't anybody have a job or other responsibilities more pressing than sexting and planning gayops?
 
LurkTrawl said:
Weird because I've been told that an account being a sock isn't that big a deal, and that known sock accounts are allowed to operate as long as they don't cause trouble.

Which brings me right back around to wondering why this particular DM leak has gotten the OP banned for it, and unlike people here throwing shade at Null implying shit, I think it's a problem of clarity. If "community infighting" includes "posting embarassing DM chains for people to laugh at" now, then I think it should be made clear in the rules of the site as it's a very new idea to me that a thread like this would get you so much as insulted by a member let alone personally banned by the owner.

Hell I wouldn't have advertised it the way I have if I knew it was against Null's ToS.
Click to expand...
It's not a big deal to the point where I go out and actively spend time hunting down socks because the issue is behavior. I don't need to hunt down socks because they come to me. They are obvious, they immediately go back to the same threads, they have the same talking points, they hate the same people, and they do the same things. Over, and over, and over again.

If someone gets banned for X and comes back and never does X again I don't fucking ban them. How could I? How would I know they're a sock? What would bring them to my attention if they never repeated the same mistakes? How is this difficult to understand? Do you have theory of mind, or are you some sort of subsaharan nigger with a 60 IQ?
 
Null said:
It's not a big deal to the point where I go out and actively spend time hunting down socks because the issue is behavior. I don't need to hunt down socks because they come to me. They are obvious, they immediately go back to the same threads, they have the same talking points, they hate the same people, and they do the same things. Over, and over, and over again.
Click to expand...
Didn't you just recently talk about this on MATI? Some people must think you act like a reddit janny and browse IPs to ban socks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom