Science ‘Bombshell’ study finds natural immunity superior to vaccination - Kikes may have just turned Covid policy on it's head

‘Bombshell’ study finds natural immunity superior to vaccination

A major study conducted by Israeli researchers into natural immunity has found that immunity acquired via infection from Covid-19 is superior to immunity from the Pfizer vaccine. Researchers at Maccabi Healthcare and Tel Aviv University compared the outcomes of over 76,000 Israelis in three...

unherd.com

‘Bombshell’ study finds natural immunity superior to vaccination - Th…

archived 26 Aug 2021 16:29:49 UTC

archive.md

A major study conducted by Israeli researchers into natural immunity has found that immunity acquired via infection from Covid-19 is superior to immunity from the Pfizer vaccine.

Researchers at Maccabi Healthcare and Tel Aviv University compared the outcomes of over 76,000 Israelis in three groups: the doubly vaccinated (with the Pfizer vaccine), the previously infected but unvaccinated, and the previously infected with only a single vaccine dose.

They found that fully vaccinated but uninfected people were significantly more likely to have a “breakthrough” Covid infection than people who had previously been infected and recovered from the disease.



“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalisation caused by the Delta variant,” the authors conclude.

The study is only published as a preprint at this stage and has not been peer reviewed. Critics including British immunologist Andrew Croxford have pointed out potential limitations, but it has been described by infectious diseases expert Professor Francois Balloux as a “bombshell” development.

If the findings are confirmed, the implications for global Covid policy will be profound.

It would not undermine the importance of vaccination for more vulnerable groups in society. However it would weaken the case for vaccinating children, despite the programme being confirmed in the UK today, as they (and the people around them) would get superior future protection from contracting the disease. And it would pose a fundamental challenge to the singular emphasis on vaccine passports for travel and large events, if unvaccinated people who have already had Covid actually pose less of a risk.

 

[Alexander Thaut]

it's like they're trying to stoke the fires of conspiracy theorists with bait at this point.

 

[Penis Drager]

The study is only published as a preprint at this stage and has not been peer reviewed.

That aside, inoculation is underrated. It's well known that people with low viral loads tend to transmit a weaker infection to those exposed. This was the smallpox strategy up until an actual vaccine was invented. Hindsight's 20/20, but we might have had a better time with this shit if the social distance measures only applied to the visibly sick.

 

[SiccDicc]

I could have sworn there was an earlier study making the same claim a several months ago. Finding that immunization through infection was greater.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

we might have had a better time with this shit if the social distance measures only applied to the visibly sick.

Up until 2019 that is what happened.

The sick and at risk stayed in and away from the not stick until either a vaccine or flu season was done

 

[Kermit Jizz]

I've always suspected this sort of thing. I tend to avoid shit like the flu vaccine, allergy medicine, and other treatments for non-severe diseases. I never get the flu and my allergies have gotten much better over time. Meanwhile anyone I know who uses allergy meds regularly has horrible allergies every hay season, likewise people who get the flu vax tend to get hit harder when they do catch it.

I think medicine/vaccines should be saved for life debilitating things like polio. Trying to medicate us for every little thing just makes us dependent on drugs, although I'm sure big pharma would love that. If we keep down this road we'll probably end up like the Quarrians from Mass Effect.

That aside, inoculation is underrated. It's well known that people with low viral loads tend to transmit a weaker infection to those exposed. This was the smallpox strategy up until an actual vaccine was invented. Hindsight's 20/20, but we might have had a better time with this shit if the social distance measures only applied to the visibly sick.

I wouldn't even call it hindsight. I remember people calling for that very early on. But of course no one listened.

 

[ShortBusDriver]

That aside, inoculation is underrated. It's well known that people with low viral loads tend to transmit a weaker infection to those exposed. This was the smallpox strategy up until an actual vaccine was invented. Hindsight's 20/20, but we might have had a better time with this shit if the social distance measures only applied to the visibly sick.

We might have had a better time if Democratic dictators didn't use 'science' to claim that gun sales were too risky during the plandemic but vape shops are essential businesses.

 

[Sped Xing]

People who have already had a disease are more strongly immune to it than people who have merely been artificially immunized by vaccine.


. . . yeah, real fuckin' bombshell.

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

Related anecdote to activate your almonds: One of the local counties is giving people $100 to get the jab. Mom said she drove by a place where people were lined up to get it, and most of them looked like drug addicts. That means they were getting the jab solely so they could get the money and spend it on drugs.....some of the very same that Big Pharma got society addicted to (opiates and the like).

 

[Ero]

The same website tells me to "Never trust a scientist" so which one is it?

 

[Fentanyl Floyd]

The same website tells me to "Never trust a scientist" so which one is it?
View attachment 2482267

I know the site is retarded, but the study is real and the quotes they take from it are also real.

 

[Screw Danlon]

The same website tells me to "Never trust a scientist" so which one is it?
View attachment 2482267

Well, they’re trying to say psychology is a real science, so they’re clearly idiots anyway.

 

[Sped Xing]

The same website tells me to "Never trust a scientist" so which one is it?
View attachment 2482267

It really is impressively stupid.

"Here look, this study says that a person who already had covid is more immune than a person who never had covid and just got a vaccine, instead! That proves vaccines no work!1"

 

[L50LasPak]

I could have sworn there was an earlier study making the same claim a several months ago. Finding that immunization through infection was greater.

People who have already had a disease are more strongly immune to it than people who have merely been artificially immunized by vaccine.


. . . yeah, real fuckin' bombshell.

The basic premise of this article is essentially a given in medical science to be honest, they're just trying to be clickbaity with the title. We've known pretty much since the invention of vaccination that natural immunity is superior to vaccinated immunity.

 

[Bland Crumbs]

I could have sworn there was an earlier study making the same claim a several months ago. Finding that immunization through infection was greater.

That was a conspiracy theory.

 

[Sped Xing]

The basic premise of this article is essentially a given in medical science to be honest, they're just trying to be clickbaity with the title. We've known pretty much since the invention of vaccination that natural immunity is superior to vaccinated immunity.

Let's try an analogy.

Battle-hardened veterans who were once green are more effective soldiers than even the best-trained recruits.

ITT: Training is useless!

 

[Fomo Hoire]

One of the local counties is giving people $100 to get the jab.

$100 guaranteed, or conditional (raffle/first come first serve)? That desperation is going to stink so much more if they might not even get the money...

 

[Standardized Profile]

This is like the very definition of survivorship bias. Yeah, you get pretty effective immunity to COVID from having COVID, if you survive having COVID. The people who don't survive COVID don't get counted in studies like this.

And even survivors can have a pretty rough go for a few months, suffer debilitating after effects, lose their jobs, have to pay tens of thousands in medical bills, etc. That's really not worth the marginal gain in antibodies.

 

[Iuz]

The immune system dealing with live prey, rather than a spike protein has better results?

Well now, color me shoked.

 

[Toolbox]

Who could have guessed an experimental treatment that couldn't even actually be called "vaccination" without modifying the definition is over all weaker than letting the immune system actually deal with the problem? That's what actual vaccines do.